Jump to content

Mitochondrial Eve

Members
  • Posts

    1,603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by Mitochondrial Eve

  1. I can't take credit for this but have seen this posted on social media and couldn't resist sharing.
  2. Germany demands Telegram provide law enforcement access to user data over concerns about extremist groups, and threatens a multi-million euro fine (up to 55 million). Germany threatens Telegram app with fines, demands access for law enforcement – media https://www.rt.com/news/526412-germany-telegram-app-fine/?tg_rhash=8b7b9f9e18d765
  3. Regarding your point about images of the virus, the electron microscope images allegedly of SARS-CoV-2 show particles which vary greatly in size (ranging from 60 nm to 140 nm). But, according to the authors of 'Virus Mania', a virus with such extreme size variation "cannot exist by definition" (page 392 of the 3rd edition). In fact, of the images presented, none have been obtained from completely purified virus. This has been confirmed by the authors of 5 pivotal papers to Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter who authored the Off Guardian piece 'Covid-19 PCR Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless'. https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
  4. I find this a very odd attitude. This is a forum that has specifically been created for the exchange of information, evidence and opinions. Whilst you may construe this as bickering, it is, in my view, an important part of the process of discerning truth. Does this not require hypotheses and testing of theories (from both sides)? Suggesting that this should be shut down smacks of censorship to me, especially when it comes to a key foundation of this so-called pandemic - whether of not the alleged pathogen said to cause the so-called disease has really been proven as fact. What do you suggest that we do instead to prevent the population from "being screwed over"?
  5. The site looks great - very well presented. I have put something together regarding isolation of the virus which needs a home (after perhaps a little more tweaking). Maybe it could go on the site as long as you don't have a word limit lol!?
  6. In terms of chronology, the Corman-Drosten protocol slightly pre-dates the first supposed case of asymptomatic transmission. The PCR protocol was published online by Eurosurveillance on 23rd Jan 2020. But even before that, it was published on the WHO website on 13th Jan 2020. The asymptomatic "case" which set the stage for widespread use of testing in healthy people came from a case report in the New England Journal on 5th March 2020 with some reports of this case made as early as 30th Jan 2020. A Chinese businesswoman from Shanghai travelled to Munich to meet with four employees on 20th to 21st Jan 2020 of which one of them later fell ill. It was initially reported that the businesswoman had no symptoms of illness but then became ill on her return trip to China. Fauci then declared that this was definitive proof of asymptomatic transmission. However, it was untrue that she had no symptoms. In a later interview with the Robert Koch Institute over the phone (some time before 3rd Feb), the businesswoman revealed that she had had symptoms whilst in Germany - having had contact with her elderly parents who had the disease - but had been suppressing them with paracetamol. But the case report of 5th March 2020 (of which Christian Drosten was one of the authors) still went ahead without mentioning that the woman had in fact had symptoms - it should have been immediately retracted and, because it was not, scientific fraud had taken place. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong Both things - the PCR testing protocol and the first asymptomatic "case" - are pretty contemporaneous of each other. In fact, I think both things may need to be covered together as they are so closely intertwined. I think that the evidence of pre-planning should have its own video - it could be quite simple to do as a stand alone I think. I have quite a few clips and other forms of evidence which could be included for that. For me, the best time to work on the script(s) would be the last week of June and the first week of July as I have a couple of weeks off work for no particular reason other than needing a break.
  7. It could be done in one video but it would certainly be considerably longer than 2-3 minutes. I totally get the point about not putting isolation of the virus first. It may actually be that asymptomatic transmission should come first as it was this alleged phenomenon that then set the stage for the PCR protocol which was needed because the virus is apparently so insidious that it can be transmitted even without symptoms and therefore needs to be identified via testing. I think that masks don't quite fit in with the other aspects. Pre-planning and behavioural manipulation would be far better fits in my view but perhaps touching on masks in amongst that as a coercive tool with no scientific basis? As for writing the script, I will need to be clear on what videos / websites / documents / memes etc are being included first (and in what order) before I can know what to write so may need to liaise direct with those with such content to include.
  8. I can try and put a "script" together. If it is going to be a series of various aspects of the pandemic, please let me know if there is any particular aspect that should be done first? Is there a preferred order?
  9. Do you mean in terms of a script for narration? I could try and keep dialogue simple but sometimes can't help but get a bit... long-winded and analytical (especially when it comes to complex topics)... I could give it a go though.
  10. I have read around this subject as extensively as time permits for me, and I do not believe that SARS-CoV has been proven to exist and cause disease. SARS-CoV was thought to be a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome during an outbreak in 2003. Scientists in Hong Kong studied 50 patients afflicted with symptoms including fever, chills, myalgia and coughs1. Samples were taken from two of these patients and developed into 30 cloned cultures in fetal monkey liver cells. In one of the 30 cloned samples, genetic material of "unknown origin" was found. This unknown material was analysed and found to match bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitus virus by 57% after which it was concluded that it must belong to the family Coronaviridae and was registered with GenBank under Accession No. AY2741192. Primers were then designed for detecting SARS-CoV, and 44 nasopharangeal samples were taken from the 50 patients. Only 22 tested positive and it has not been explained why the other half were not found to be infected with the alleged micro-organism, going against orthodox virus theories that the pathogen should be present in all cases of disease and also not found in healthy individuals. It is claimed that a further two studies in May and July 2003 provided definitive proof of SARS-CoV as a pathogenic virus fulfilling Koch's postulates.34 436 patients diagnosed with the condition were tested for SARS-CoV but the coronavirus was only found in 329 of the cases. The supposed virus was injected into four macaque monkeys which, rather than becoming gravely ill, developed light symptoms including lethargy, temporary rashes, breathing difficulty and altered pulmonary tissue and only died when they were euthanised. Closer reading of the technique reveals that the virus was administered through the monkeys' throats, noses and under their eyelids. And blood was taken from veins in their groins and smears from the nose, mouth, throat and anus. Furthermore, the monkeys were subjected to doses of ketamine to anaesthetise them, of which its side effects in humans can include pulmonary disturbances and even respiratory arrest in too high doses. Only one of the monkeys developed breathing difficulties, despite SARS-CoV being characterised as a serious pulmonary disease, and three experienced non-advancing alveolar damage to both pulmonary lobes. There was no control group of monkeys exposed to the same conditions without the alleged virus so it could be that the conditions themselves were traumatic enough for the monkeys to develop the symptoms that appeared. The case for SARS-CoV relies on some unknown genetic material being discovered in only one of 30 cloned samples which only matched a suspected betacoronavirus by 57% leaving 43% unaccounted for. And, after supposedly isolating the virus, only half of the patients even tested positive for SARS-CoV with no answer as to why the other half didn't. And further, closer examination of the monkey studies held up as definitive proof that SARS-CoV is a pathogenic virus, reveals that the test subjects were exposed to traumatic conditions and anaesthetic which could equally have caused their illnesses, whilst control experiments were lacking. 1Peiris, JSM et al. Coronavirus as a Possible Cause of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)13077-2/fulltext 2Marra, Marco A. et al. The Genome Sequence of the SARS-Associated Coronavirus. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/300/5624/1399.full.pdf 3Foucher, Ron et al. Koch's Postulates Fulfilled for SARS Virus. https://www.nature.com/articles/423240a/ 4Kuiken, Thijs et al. Newly Discovered Coronavirus as the Primary Cause of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12892955/ Dr Sam Bailey has also made an excellent video on the dubious science behind the "discovery" of SARS-CoV which she presents beautifully. And perhaps you may wish to review the chapter in 'Virus Mania' about SARS-CoV - https://archive.org/details/virus-mania-how-the-medical-industry-continually-invents-epidemics/page/11/mode/2up
  11. This is the athlete's foot section of my aromatherapy book - maybe it will be of some help to you.
  12. I am curious to understand why you think the symptoms you had were Covid-19 over flu? Here are the list of symptoms of Covid-19 according to the CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html People with COVID-19 have had a wide range of symptoms reported – ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness. Symptoms may appear 2-14 days after exposure to the virus. Anyone can have mild to severe symptoms. People with these symptoms may have COVID-19: Fever or chills Cough Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing Fatigue Muscle or body aches Headache New loss of taste or smell Sore throat Congestion or runny nose Nausea or vomiting Diarrhea This list does not include all possible symptoms. CDC will continue to update this list as we learn more about COVID-19. Older adults and people who have severe underlying medical conditions like heart or lung disease or diabetes seem to be at higher risk for developing more serious complications from COVID-19 illness. And here is the CDC's list of symptoms for flu including longer term complications: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/symptoms.htm Influenza (flu) can cause mild to severe illness, and at times can lead to death. Flu is different from a cold. Flu usually comes on suddenly. People who have flu often feel some or all of these symptoms: fever* or feeling feverish/chills cough sore throat runny or stuffy nose muscle or body aches headaches fatigue (tiredness) some people may have vomiting and diarrhea, though this is more common in children than adults. *It’s important to note that not everyone with flu will have a fever. Flu Complications Most people who get flu will recover in a few days to less than two weeks, but some people will develop complications (such as pneumonia) as a result of flu, some of which can be life-threatening and result in death. Sinus and ear infections are examples of moderate complications from flu, while pneumonia is a serious flu complication that can result from either influenza virus infection alone or from co-infection of flu virus and bacteria. Other possible serious complications triggered by flu can include inflammation of the heart (myocarditis), brain (encephalitis) or muscle (myositis, rhabdomyolysis) tissues, and multi-organ failure (for example, respiratory and kidney failure). Flu virus infection of the respiratory tract can trigger an extreme inflammatory response in the body and can lead to sepsis, the body’s life-threatening response to infection. Flu also can make chronic medical problems worse. For example, people with asthma may experience asthma attacks while they have flu, and people with chronic heart disease may experience a worsening of this condition triggered by flu. Are the lists of symptoms not the same? Indeed, the CDC specifically state on the first link above that "because some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, it may be hard to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone, and testing may be needed to help confirm a diagnosis." And complications of flu can include inflammation of the heart which may explain your angina symptoms. If your reason for thinking it was Covid-19 over flu is because you (or others) tested positive to "back it up", are you not aware that there are huge issues with the tests which should not be used for diagnosing an infection? Indeed the PCR testing protocol, which has been calibrated based on the Corman-Drosten paper, has been heavily criticised by a group of 22 experts who conducted an external peer review of it and found 10 major scientific flaws calling therefore for the paper's retraction - https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/. The flaws include problems with primer design to omission of cycle threshold recommendations, conflicts of interest and the likelihood that the paper was not peer reviewed. I could go on into how this relates back to concerns over how SARS-CoV-2 and its predecessor SARS-CoV have not been isolated in pure form, lack of control experiments and issues with sequence-based microbial identification. But there are threads on this already which you may wish to take a look at.
  13. The UK Government may of course ignore these findings, but the House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee has reported on Covid-status certification which has been published today and highlighted by Big Brother Watch on Twitter. https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/6264/documents/69158/default/ The report is incredibly damning and calls for domestic Covid-status certificates to be abandoned due to concerns around the lack of any scientific basis, the discriminatory nature of the concept, the lack of any cost-benefit analysis and full financial costings, the impact the scheme would have on businesses especially within the hospitality, arts and sports industries, and concerns over data protection. The Committee has further found that, by implementing Covid passports for international travel without notifying and consulting Parliament, the UK Government has acted in contempt of Parliament and the Committee. The summary of the report states the following:
  14. I see it a different way. Firstly your post suggests that you view the pandemic as an accident by comparing it to a kid kicking over a vase which then had to be superglued back together. I think this overlooks all of the evidence of pre-planning including Event 201, the 2012 Olympics, the Rockefeller Lockstep document, the SPARS document, the EU roadmap to vaccine passports and the various government advertising deals and contracts agreed before the extent of the pandemic was supposedly known. Do you not think that all of these pieces of evidence combined suggest premeditation? I have previously posted in an older thread as to why the no virus theory is the best fit to this situation and the basis for DI's rationale in this respect. DI believes that SARS-CoV-2 is fictitious because this gives the powers that (should not) be complete control over the narrative. This is not to say that people aren't getting ill and dying, just that the deaths aren't being caused by a "virus" that hasn't been proven to exist. Releasing a real bio-weapon comes with the risk that it could get out of control. What if it mutates (if such a phenomenon even exists)? Why take the risk if there are other safer options for the controllers? Having a faked pandemic means that any story can be made up at any point to suit the cabal. They can dial the PCR test cycles up and down at a whim to generate more or less positive cases as they wish - either to prove the efficacy of vaccines or restrictive measures, or to create more panic over rising case numbers and new Variants of Concern™. It provides the flexibility to change the narrative as the controllers wish in response to public opinion, and to keep further gauging how the masses may respond so as to continue steering things towards the end goals of depopulation, global reset, transhumanism, all encompassing control over all aspects of our lives including bodily autonomy, and spiritual death. There is no need to have a real disease causing organism to provide the illusion of a pandemic. Numbers of deaths can be manipulated by killing off the elderly and vulnerable at choice moments during peak seasons for deaths (often due to respiratory illnesses). This was achieved during the first lockdown by kicking elderly patients out of hospitals into care homes and placing DNRs on them whilst deterring people from attending hospitals and making access to other forms of healthcare extremely difficult. Added to this, there are now concerns about the (over)use of midazolam to send the poor victims to an early grave. It has been the restrictive measures which have created the excess deaths, of which a huge number have occurred in people's homes. Meanwhile, Covid-19 is recorded on death certificates for everyone who has tested positive within 28 (or possibly 60) days prior to their death, and these are included in the official death stats associated with Covid-19 even if other causes of death were obvious. The media keep pumping out the fear daily so that the general populace lose all critical thinking faculties - indeed, it seems that fear can be addictive and people become attached to it. Current mainstream scientific consensus on proving the existence of a virus is via use of "sequence-based microbial identification" rather than from properly isolated and purified "virus" from an infected patient. This is wide open to fraud and can be used to pluck out genetic material that we all have in our bodies depending on the PCR cycle threshold. This allows for viruses - none of which have, in my view, definitively been proven to exist - to be the perfect cover story for any so-called pandemic. The more I read about prior pandemics allegedly caused by viruses - such as HIV, avian flu, the Spanish flu, swine flu etc - the more I see the same narrative being repeated over and over again. Hysteria is whipped up when clusters of individuals are supposedly identified presenting with symptoms of a new deadly disease allegedly caused by a virus (or prions). Although the alleged disease can be explained through other causes such as pharmaceuticals, drugs, pesticides, vaccines and other poisons, a virus is always "found" to be the cause generating a race to produce a vaccine or pharmaceuticals to treat the disease. This is very lucrative for Big Pharma particularly as vaccines come with no concern to the manufacturers of being sued for causing injury or death. And the injections being produced are faster becoming more and more sinister and can be described as "experimental gene therapy" or "operating systems" rather than vaccines which ties in with the transhumanist agenda. In light of the above, I don't think that there is any way that the controllers will let go of the dogma of germ theory as this would entirely remove any justiciation for Big Pharma to peddle their wares and/or for experimental therapies to be unleashed on an unsuspecting public. This is why I feel, out of all of DI's views on the pandemic, the "no virus" part attracts the most dissent and criticism because it is the biggest threat to the narrative. This forum has now seen so many new members come along and post an apparent genuine concern about his "no virus" view very rarely to return again, and never to engage in debate as to why his views are scientifically incorrect. This is why I think the lab-leak theory is a total red herring. In my view, it is a desperate attempt to keep the threat of "viruses" alive and within our consciousness so that we do not lose the fear that keeps us within our cells (pun intended). Should germ theory and the field of virology be demolished, their favourite pandemic playbook narrative could never be played again!
  15. The FDA has, in an update on 10th June 2021, warned the public to stop using lateral flow tests manufactured by Innova. This is because the tests come with a high risk of producing false positive rates. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/stop-using-innova-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-qualitative-test-fda-safety-communication The lateral flow tests used in the UK are also from Innova... Indeed, TCW have been featuring Sonia Elijah's three part investigative report on the Innova tests exposing how they are highly inaccurate with debate ranging over their reliability. Furthermore, Innova is a start up company (based in California which is the state with the most personal liability protection for its directors) which was only set up in March 2020 yet was given pre-orders for their tests in huge numbers as early as September 2020. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-innova-lateral-flow-tests-another-scandal-in-the-making-part-1/ https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-innova-tests-another-covid-scandal-in-the-making-part-2/ Only the first two parts of the investigation have been published so far but it appears to be thorough and well researched.
  16. You couldn't be more wrong...
  17. There is this video by Norman Fenton which I posted at some point in the megathread and that I have listed in my references under "asymptomatic transmission". I haven't watched it recently so cannot remember the entire premise of the video (and don't have time right now to watch it again) but will post it in case it is what you are looking for. It debunks the claims by government that 1 in 3 people with Covid have no symptoms. And here is the link to the paper upon which the video is based. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350755197_What_proportion_of_people_with_COVID-19_do_not_get_symptoms
  18. In terms of what I can contribute, I am not as techie as some here but I could perhaps give some ideas as to what sort of clips and other material to include once the concept has been decided upon. I think trying to squeeze it into 2-3 minutes may be a bit tough though. I agree with ink that it perhaps needs a member in charge to make executive decisions. As this is Mac's brainchild, I think it would make sense that he took that role as long as he is willing. I recently attended some meetings about a new publication which was interesting, but trying to come up with the name was pretty painful! And what I learned from the experience too is that the concept needs to be absolutely clear and perhaps that part needs to be a less democratic process. Once an idea of the framework is in place, perhaps then further suggestions could be gathered. Who is the intended audience? What aspects of the pandemic should be included? The video could potentially attack the key foundations of the coronavirus narrative which have provided the so-called justification for the restrictive measures. In my view the key foundations are: Isolation of the virus - there is a video clip of the Chinese Chief Epidemiologist stating that the virus hasn't been isolated. Contributions from others could include doctors Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey and Claus Kohnlein. PCR and other Covid tests - the obvious clip would be of Kary Mullis saying how PCR cannot tell if you are sick. And there are the various tests on fruit etc too. Asymptomatic transmission - Sam Bailey has covered this a little in her videos. The infamous Chinese study of 10 million people in Wuhan could be covered too - perhaps a screenshot of the study overview. The deadliness of the disease - this was debunked very early on when the UK government downgraded the status of Covid-19 whereby it was no longer classed as a high consequence infectious disease. There are plenty of graphs and other proof showing that it is old people and those with underlying health conditions who are affected by the "virus". Evidence of pre-planning could also be included such as: Event 201. 2012 Olympics. The Rockefeller Lockstep document (recently exposed by Thierry Baudet in the Dutch parliament). The various advertising deals and other government contracts awarded in advance. The EU document setting out the plan to vaccine passports. WEF videos - "you'll own nothing and be happy". However, it may be that it is decided the focus should be, like ink has suggested, on likely vaccine damage to children and other harms caused. This includes some of the heart-wrenching videos of the elderly in care homes, children speaking out about wearing masks and adverse reactions to vaccines. However, a concern I have of focusing on the damage of restrictive measures is that it could potentially be used as a weapon against the unvaccinated and turned around that we are prolonging the harms by refusing to be injected. This is why I lean more towards exposing the heart of the issue which is the lack of a scientific basis for lockdowns combined with pre-planning and/or vaccine injuries and/or possible solutions. Time can be an issue for me but I do keep my own offline list of references regarding various aspects of the pandemic. So I could help bring sources of info to the table if that helps.
  19. It is openly admitted on Jim Davidson's Wikipedia page that he is a Freemason. Davidson has been reported in the Sun today as saying that paedophile Gary Glitter is "remorseful" and "ready to start a new life". Supposedly he also described Glitter as a "great guy" in 2012. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15223002/jim-davidson-paedo-gary-glitter-remorseful-free-in-weeks/
  20. Just a quick reply for now as I am at work and posting from my painfully slow phone, but @Macnamara is already running a thread on Covid conflicts of interest. Here it is. Some of the posts cover Susan Michie's connections to Communism. Also, regarding Dr Devi Sridhar (who is not a medical doctor), she has apparently (on Twitter) denied having connections with Big Pharma. But that is untrue as she is connected to the Welcome Trust which receives huge amounts on funding from pharmaceutical companies. Both Hugo Talks and Vernon Coleman have discussed her in their videos over the last 2-3 days and pointed this out. Coleman's latest video was especially powerful and full of righteous anger towards her, so certainly makes for recommended viewing. https://hugotalks.com/2021/06/08/cbbc-evil-newsround-vaccine-propaganda-hugo-talks-lockdown/ https://brandnewtube.com/v/GO3DU2
  21. In today's broadcast, UK Column covered the BITE model which is a blueprint of how to establish authoritarian control using "undue influence, thought reform, brainwashing and mind control". This is how cults operate by suppressing any real sense of self and replacing it with a new identity alongside dependency and obedience on the group. UK Column cover this topic from 58:37 into their video linked below. https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-9th-june-2021 And this is the link to the original document of reference which is a dissertation submitted to Fielding Graduate University in 2020 by Steven Alan Hassan. https://web.archive.org/web/20210206143635/https://freedomofmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Dr-Hassan-Dissertation-Published.pdf Pages 52 to 56 contain the content featured by UK Column today namely the methods of behaviour control, information control, thought control and emotional control which make up the BITE model. UK Column have highlighted, in the screenshots below, the tactics relevant to the mass psychological attack being perpetrated on the public in order to create the Covid cult.
  22. The World Freedom Alliance have compiled a list and summaries of Covid-19 court decisions from around the world. The decisions are listed in reverse chronological order and cover issues including mask mandates, curfews, testing, quarantines and business closures. The overwhelming majority of decisions have been against restrictive measures. https://worldfreedomalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/International_court_decisions_covid-19_5_June_2021_ver_02.pdf A summary of the "core of the decision" is given in each case along with a link to the decision. Examples include: Germany - 13th April 2021 Iceland - 5th April 2021 Czech Republic - 19th February 2021 Peru - 21st December 2020
×
×
  • Create New...