cosmicinaudio

It seems to me that real criminals, such as armed robbers, burglars, muggers, phone snatchers, gang members, etc, pretty much act with impunity because most police are scared of anyone likely to fight back.

I feel that the cabal is using English nationalism as a tool to accelerate civil war and ultimately world war. There's a hell of a lot of people around the world, as well as in England itself, who hate England and the English, I mean absolutely despise this country. Flying the St. George's cross and being openly proud to be English is like red rag to a bull to many of these people. They're not encouraging people to fly English flags and be patriotic because they think it's a nice thing to do, I feel it's absolutely about pushing peoples' buttons and stirring up violent confrontation.

I remember last time there was an anti-illegal immigration demo in London, I think just after the first lockdowns, all the black gang members came out with knuckle dusters and other illegal weapons and beat many of the protesters to a pulp, and the police stood by and let it happen. The media loved it, they gloated over it for weeks and how the "racists" deserved it in their view. I can't help but think that those going to the protest on 13th September are being led into another similar trap, but on an even bigger scale this time. All I can say is I hope they've somehow organised adequate security this time because evidence shows time and time again that the police absolutely will not protect you if you are deemed "right wing". A lot of patriotic protesters naively believe that most police are basically honourable and fair and will protect them against violence when the reality is most of them are corrupt, nasty bastards with an axe to grind and will take great pleasure in allowing you to get beaten to a pulp.

After what the Russians did to German civilians, especially women and children, at the end of WW2 and the way Putin says that "Nazis" need to be snuffed out, it always amazes me how far-right/white nationalists regard Putin and Russia as heroes. They and their ilk will be the first to be lined up against the wall and shot in the Russian and Chinese NWO.

I don't see what difference a list like that makes, I have no doubt that you would claim Britain is an "evil colonialist nation" just because Northern Ireland and Scotland are part of the UK, despite the fact you almost certainly have no problem with Russia's colonisation vast amounts of non-Russian people and lands, the majority of land mass of the country is not natively Russian. I also think that list is playing fast and loose with its definition of "invasion", but thanks for confirming my suspicion that people like you are primarily motivated by a rabid anti-British sentiment and are not interested in justice in general, but in fact are an active supporter of injustice just so long as it's not British. I also find it amusing how many "truthers" praise technocratic policies and digital mass surveillance of the population when countries like Russia and China do it. They are up in arms when Britain or America implement such policies, but when Russia and China does it they praise them for being so "modern and forward thinking", not like the backward West and they have no problem with those countries banning VPNs either, they say "if you've nothing to hide then you've nothing to fear from Russia and China". From what I've seen most so called "truthers" would gladly sell us down the river to China and Russia's technocratic new world order, in fact most of them would gladly be guards in the gulags.

I feel like people, especially young men in particular, are being brainwashed to be very aggressive and see violence as a good thing. I notice that every other video on Twitter/X is of someone being beaten to a pulp, usually people of two different races, and it is usually presented in a positive way like extreme violence makes you a "real man". I remember a few weeks ago a video was doing the rounds of an English "patriot" kicking a lefty/Muslim agitator who got in his face in the side of the head with a sudden high kick, accompanied with the usual violence glorifying rhetoric such as he "FAFO'd" and "got humbled". Of course, there are plenty of videos of the reverse scenario, of white people being beaten by non-whites. When you combine this current trend of openly celebrating violence with a patriotic/flag-waving protest movement (not necessarily a bad thing in itself) it isn't difficult to see this turning nasty and into serious civil unrest between different races.

A lot of people seem to be basing her innocence on the fact she looks like a normal, nice middle class young woman, but that means nothing in itself. From what I've seen 90% of murderers and nonces are outwardly totally normal looking and acting people, often outgoing, charming and respected people with lots of friends. Most of the time people who knew them are shocked when they get convicted of such crimes. People like to believe that these deviants are readily recognisible as "creepy weirdos", but in reality this does not seem to be the case the vast majority of the time. I'm not saying she's definitely guilty, just that experience has taught me that her appearance of being a totally normal and pleasant person absolutely does not preclude her from being guilty of such crimes. If anything, she's more likely to be that than a stereotypical "creepy weirdo".

A lot of so called "truthers" are just running dogs of Russian and Chinese imperialism. They only ever attack Britain and America, they say that Britain must be split up, that Scotland, Wales and NI are "colonies", yet at the same time they say that Russia is sacred and must never be broken up, that their borders must be expanded despite the fact that the country is built on the subjugation and mass murder of non-Russians. They practically see Russian wars as righteous Holy wars. They attack Britain and America for Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East wars, justifiably, but never attack Russia for their invasion of Afghanistan that left 2 million+ dead. Many "truthers" are intellectually dishonest and are primarily motivated by portraying Britain and America as evil rather than by calling out evil actions by all parties.

Don't police in Brazil shoot people all the time for various reasons? Not saying what happened to him was right, just I find it strange why this country is held to different standards than most other countries. If he'd been shot in Brazil or frankly most other countries I seriously doubt anyone would be talking about it 20 years later.

I have a feeling the Pakistanis who attacked the female police officers at Manchester airport will be found not guilty and walk free. The cabal want riots/race war and a travesty of justice like that would certainly see it happen I think.

I think the IRA is a rare exception, reflecting how weak and/or treacherous the British establishment are rather than how effective that sort of terrorism is overall. Groups that have attempted the same thing in other countries usually end up being bombed into submission themselves by the country's military, such as ETA in Spain, Uyghur separatists in China, Chechens in Russia, Kurds in Turkey, Rohingyas in Burma, Tamils in Sri Lanka, etc. This country is unusual in that the elites and "chattering classes" are full of people who look down on the native English working class as scum of the earth and would throw their support behind groups like the IRA and third world mass immigration rather than support their own people and country. Other countries don't have this class warfare to this degree it seems to me.

As I've said before, this case reeks of psyop to me. I notice the latest article on the Mail is reporting she gets £33 a week to spend on chocolate and sweets. What a random thing to report, anything to shoehorn the number 33 in there it seems to me. I'm not sure what the endgame of this psyop is, but I am almost certain that eventually it will turn into the next big "scandal" like the Fujitsu Horizon post office scandal, complete with "Mr. Bates vs the Post Office"-style TV drama to seal the deal in the "public consciousness". My guess is the agenda is to further cement the victim-status of NHS staff and make their judgement absolutely beyond question or reproach. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14851169/What-life-REALLY-like-Lucy-Letby-bars-33-week-spend-sweets-chocolate-time-outside-cell-TWICE-visits-prisoners.html

I find it almost amusing (if it wasn't so deadly) how in one breath Russia and Eurasianists claim to be "Nazi killers extraordinaire" and in the next claim to be the legitimate successors of Nazi ideology with the Wagner group, etc. They will literally claim to be anything to anyone if it advances their position, absolutely shameless.

Do you think Argentina has the right to seize the Falkland Islands? I see you ignored that example.

On the Greenland subject, it does strike me as a double standard that the UK has to give up the Chagos Islands, and many people demand this country gives up the Falkland Islands and Gibraltar too, but most of the same people are up in arms about Denmark being expected to do the same thing with Greenland. Most people seem to forget or are for some reason unaware that Denmark is a former colonial power too, and has done nasty things to Greenlanders in the past like sterilising the women to stop the native Greenlandic population growing. A lot of people seem to be under the illusion that colonialism is a uniquely British thing, believe me it isn't. A lot of people seem to get very upset when you point out other countries besides Britain being involved with colonialism.

If Britain invaded the Irish Republic to protect British territorial integrity, protect British citizens from terrorism and to stop EU encroachment and erosion of British territorial sovereignty, you and your ilk would be the first to be screaming for total war against this country.

Apparently there were Russian drone attacks targeted at civilian blocks of flats in Kiev last night, with no strategic purpose other than to instill pure terror and demoralisation. I only saw this mentioned on Twitter, not a thing about it in any of the mainstream media outlets. I find the British media actively ignore the worst of Russian atrocities.

I really don't get this so called "ceasefire". It seems to me that the only condition is that Ukraine stop bombing Russia's gas and oil infrastructure, the only way Ukraine has of harming Russia, and in return Ukraine gets nothing, Russia is free to continue its invasion and slaughter of Ukrainians unhindered. The fact no mainstream media outlet is picking this so called "ceasefire" apart just shows how much the pro-Russian and pro-Eurasianist agenda pervades in media circles in the West. These days it's considered more "controversial" to be pro-Ukrainian than it is to be pro-Russian.

I find it curious how the Irish are among the most vocal supporters of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but scream "Brits out of Ireland" at any opportunity.

A lot of people claim the West has deliberately stirred up Ukraine and Russia to provoke WW3. If the cabal really want to start WW3, they should have Britain start invading other countries, maybe launch a "special military operation" against the ROI to stop EU encroachment on British sovereign territory. That would really set the cat among the pigeons. No one gives a monkeys about Russia and China murdering hundreds of millions of people, those countries have done that quite openly throughout their histories and no one has ever really cared. However, Britain doing it today would be a whole different kettle of fish. Few would be prepared to fight a war over Russia or China, but Britain doing the same thing would very rapidly send the world to nuclear armageddon. Britain is the most hated country in the world, opposing this country is a hill many around the world would be prepared to die on. The perfect vehicle for WW3 if that's what the cabal want.

There's a commonly held belief around the world that only Anglo (ie British and American) history is evil and immoral, and that only the British Empire was objectively a bad thing. Judging Russian history by the same standards, the Russian empire and Soviet Union has murdered hundreds of millions of people throughout its history, yet you almost never hear anyone criticise Russian history in the same way, or any other empire. I find it laughable how most of the same people who shit on British history and consider the British Empire to be the pinnacle of evil believe that the Russian Empire is their saviour, in reality it's a case of the proverbial out of the frying pan and into the fire. I've concluded that most people are just stupid, I only watch and laugh at this point.

It seems to me that the West has well and truly lost the propaganda war, maybe deliberately. The "man in the street" in the UK supports Putin and Russia, that's been my experience and I think even more so in the US especially with Trump supporters.

If it was a male nurse I doubt anyone would be entertaining the idea he was innocent or demanding a re-trial. I think there is a significant element of society not wanting to believe that a woman, a white middle class one at that, could be responsible for such heinous crimes. I've noticed a lot of middle class women essentially have this view, that she's an innocent sister being victimised by the evil patriarchy.

I wonder what the cabal's end game is with this case. It seems very obvious to me that the mainstream media want us to sympathise with her and believe that she is not guilty and the victim of a severe miscarriage of justice. The Daily Mail even has the headline today of "There were no murders", how much more blatant a narrative can you get? I also find it interesting that the sort of people who think there's a big conspiracy against Lucy Letby are typically the sort of middle class women who enthusiastically went along with the Covid scam and in any other context would support the establishment line fully. What I want to know is where the cabal are going with this, what change do they want to bring about as a result of this "gross miscarriage of justice"? Maybe the agenda is to do away with jury trials and make decisions AI based? Maybe the agenda is to fully sanctify NHS workers and allow them to operate with zero oversight, to make questioning them absolutely taboo? Just a couple of suggestions off the top of my head.

I find it interesting how lefties, among others, usually say that Britain is an evil colonialist nation that should give up the Falkland Islands and other overseas territories, yet the same people seem to be up in arms about Denmark being asked to do the same thing. Double standards surely?