cosmicinaudio

The more I read on "social media", I think the makings of a civil war are brewing, if you can call it a "civil war". It's apparent that the vast majority of people of foreign-descent in the UK have absolutely no sympathy or empathy for us. They see this as THEIR country now and I think most of them would be prepared to fight us over it. In fact, not only do they consider us to have no right to our own country, they believe we personally owe them financially because of the empire.

I'm surprised they went for a name as on the nose as "Jihad", looking it up it doesn't even seem to be a very common Arab name. The majority of the few people with the name "Jihad" seem to be obvious Western intelligence plants like Hezbollah and Palestinian-resistance commanders and people associated with the Syrian government.

Makes you wonder if the agenda is to allow the Jewish "Shomrim" police units to carry guns themselves and organise their own security, as the regular British police are incompetent and can't be trusted. Maybe they plan to turn Jewish areas into effectively closed enclaves that operate outside of UK law and authorities?

Problem with conspiracy subreddits is 90% of it is Yanks talking about Yank politics and issues. Any attempt to discuss UK topics hardly gets any replies, the Yanks aren't interested in anything outside their country and most of the time I'm not really very interested in their politics either. At least here you can discuss things that are happening in the UK and most posters will know what you're talking about.

I've noticed Jews almost never criticise mass immigration into this country as the direct cause of these attacks. They turn it round that it's a problem with "British society" at large and imply that native British people are equally culpable and should bear the brunt of the repercussions.

Stabbing outside a synagogue in Manchester, so they claim any way. Wonder what narrative they'll be pushing with this, pro-Palestine muslim jihadi or white nationalist, anti-semitic incel? Also surprised how quickly they say the attacker was shot dead, within a few minutes. Are the Jewish police units that patrol their areas allowed to carry guns?

Something I find irritating is how the sort of people flying English flags, English patriots, are also the sort of people who are the biggest supporters of the royal family. The same royal family who doesn't give a shit about English patriotism. Every year Prince William and Kate, or other royals, publicly acknowledge St. Andrew's day, St. Patrick's day and St. David's day but they don't even mention St. George's day, they totally ignore it. Speaks volumes about what they think of the English working classes, their biggest supporters I would argue. I find it strange how many people believe that the royals, especially QEII, are very patriotic and defend this country, despite the fact she approved every anti-British law that parliament as ever put before her, and then they and their supporters hide behind absolute bullshit like "they can't do anything, they have no power". Then what's the point in spending vast sums of money maintaining a royal family that have no power to do anything?

The public are being polarised on mass immigration. Increasingly you either want it stopped entirely or you actively support open borders and consider anyone who disagrees a racist. I also think there's more than an undertone of class warfare at play, working class people are largely against mass immigration and many middle class, especially upper middle are for open borders and look down on those who oppose it as racist chavs and Wetherspoons customers who shouldn't be entitled to an opinion in their view. If there's ever a civil war in this country, and that looks more likely with every passing year, I believe it will be fought over the issue of open borders. Most middle class English people with nice jobs and company cars with little green plates are lackeys of the establishment and big corporations, they gladly throw the working class English under the bus in support of their masters.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly they can shift the public's focus. The last few weeks it was illegal immigration and St. George's crosses, now it's ID cards with immigration and flags all but forgotten for the time being. They still control the narrative 100%, there's no doubt about that in my mind.

It won't happen in this country, ID cards are dead in the water. The UK is the international centre of money laundering and dodgy dealing, they're not going to interfere with that by bringing in a nuisance like biometric ID cards. They're just using it as an empty threat, pushing the narrative that open borders mass immigration is the price we have to pay for no ID cards.

The vast majority of abduction victims seem to be female, up to 80% in some studies. That would imply to me the main purpose is some sort of hybridisation programme. Or maybe it's simply they see females as an easier target? Maybe more likely to put themselves in a position where they get abducted in the first place, less likely to cause problems for the abductors?

I have the feeling that the cabal are actively working towards banning the St. George's cross from being flown privately, to proscribing it like a Nazi swastika. They already have left wing "academics" on TV saying the English flag is "racist" and should be replaced, laying the groundwork for a ban. I can see it ending up like the swastika, only being permitted in very limited circumstances. I believe the real reason the cabal want it banned is because the St. George's cross is originally a Templar symbol, it's a very ancient cabal symbol and they hate the fact that working class English oiks have adopted their symbol. We're supposed to be the slaves of the people that flag represents, we're not supposed to fly it proudly as if it represented US.

They'll be fine, all Kremlin Col..., sorry UK Column broadcast is tankie propaganda about how wonderful Putin is and how evil Ukraine is for having the temerity to defend itself. The other day Gerrish said something like "the Russian and Chinese governments have done so much for humanity and could do more still if it wasn't for the sanctions the evil West has imposed". I don't know if he says things like that often as I don't listen to UK Column much because I can't stomach it, I find the brown-nosing of Putin and Xi absolutely nauseating. The UK government won't touch them because their tankie world view aligns perfectly with many in the Labour establishment. The other day I read that the union leader of the tube strikes in London, Eddie Dempsey, is also another pro-Russian tankie who was photographed with Russian thugs in Donbas and calls them heroes fighting against "evil fascist capitalist NATO".

I bet you wouldn't call people flying any other national flag a "knucke dragger", and people have been attacked, verbally and physically, for flying the English flag from their own properties, by both the government and individuals. Also, it's quite common around the world to see national flags flying from "street furniture", only in England do bed wetters like you consider that "offensive and wacist". Funny how a so called "conspiracy theorist", and a mod on a conspiracy forum no less, suddenly becomes a big defender of the state's laws surrounding "street furniture" when it involves flying English flags.

I find typical American bible-bashing and Israel worshipping really quite nauseating.

I think most of them oppose Russia using its military to subjugate a sovereign nation, even using Chechen, African and Korean thugs to murder Ukrainians in their own land, and don't specifically support Zelensky. I know people of your ilk would never support Britain using its military to defend British people in Northern Ireland, you would probably advocate the Russian military attacking us on the side of Irish republicans, so you aren't going to pull the wool over my eyes.

I've always felt England in particular is an easy target for race replacement. Many English people dislike and look down on their own people and actually prefer foreigners, they have a low opinion of most English. This is especially true of the middle and upper classes. It's actually quite common to hear company owners say things like "English people are good for nothing wasters and we actively prefer to employ the hard working, superior foreigners". How many other countries would you hear that sort of thing in? The English are also particularly susceptible to guilt tripping over the "evils" of the British Empire. Other countries had empires too but most of them seem less ashamed of their history and attempts at guilt tripping usually don't work so well.

I agree Zelensky is dodgy in many ways, sometimes I wonder if he's actually working with Putin to destroy Ukraine and ultimately NATO. There are so many things about his background that are circumstantially dodgy that it almost seems too good to be true from a Russian propaganda perspective, like he has been installed as a deliberately dubious character to make Russia look good. I feel that public opinion in the West is shifting in favour of Russia. It's getting to the point where to openly argue against Russia's actions is considered a more "controversial" opinion than to support or be indifferent to what Russia is doing. To support Ukraine is certainly not the path of least resistance any more. As for being indifferent about it and not support either side? Why should I be indifferent? The Russians and Chinese are not indifferent about their hegemony and "geopolitical" power. Why should I be? Am I supposed to be ashamed to be British? I know a lot of people would like me to be. The Russians and Chinese are not ashamed of their history, why should I be? If we just give in, roll over and say our own British/Anglo-Saxon history and culture is shit and worthless, then we will just end up being dominated by the Russian and Chinese/Eurasian system which I guarantee will be worse.

We are being manipulated to see only illegal immigration as a problem. It has become taboo to criticise the presence of vast numbers of immigrants if they're here "legally". If the government legalised the boat people and started flying them in, removing the spectacle of dinghies across the channel, then I suspect the problem would go away in the minds of most people.

Men get totally contradictory narratives on violence these days, on one hand many on the "right" tell us that white Europeans are innocent, non-confrontational wallflowers who wouldn't hurt a fly and that violence is the domain of the Muslim and black invaders. On the other hand, on "social media" sites like Twitter/X, you get fed a constant feed of men being brutally assaulted and beating the shit out of each other, and captions like "FAFO", ie "Fuck around and Find out", and violence essentially being glorified and the idea being presented that a "real man" solves his issues and "beefs" with violence. There is a strange duality going on in my opinion, we are at once told that violence is totally alien to our pacifistic and altruistic European/white nature, but also that violence and instant retribution is the highest expression of masculinity and masculine honour. No wonder most men, especially white men, are totally confused these days. I don't think all men are by nature violent, it depends on the individual man in question. Some men are extremely violent and have a hard time controlling it, and some men have no inclination to violence whatsoever and would be less likely to strike you than even most women would be. I think the former group is more likely to be working class, and the latter more likely to be middle class and work in a non-manual profession like office work or academia.

I wonder if some of the animosity towards English patriotism comes from them resenting the fact that the English plebs use their symbols to mark their own identity. It would explain why there is an agenda to eventually ban the St. George's cross being flown privately, they want complete control over the use of their own symbols.

Talking about UFOs and "supernatural" topics seems to be more culturally acceptable in America, they're more open about it. In Britain it is basically a taboo subject and if you mention it you will be considered a nutter, possibly a dangerous nutter and ostracised by most people. I also think the mainstream media in Britain is even more aggressive and organised in stamping on coverage of UFO topics than the American media is. It's like the crop circle phenomena in the Wiltshire area should be a huge topic of discussion in Britain, that area has the most elaborate crop circles anywhere in the world that appear consistently every year, yet no one mentions it, many don't even know about it and the media for decades has completely covered it up other than to occasionally publish nonsense about "men with planks on their feet" doing it overnight. If crop circles like you get in Wiltshire appeared in America on a regular basis it would be a cultural phenomena over there, in this country it's totally ignored and taboo to mention.

An anti-immigration movement that is focused solely on stopping Muslim immigration is doomed to failure because banning people from one particular religion or race is just not happening. Either you stop all unskilled mass immigration into Britain or you allow all of it. A system where we still welcome hundreds of thousands non-Muslim Indian, African and Chinese economic migrants each year but completely ban Muslims is a fantasy. If you want the world to come and live and work in Britain, then you have to accept that Muslims are part of that world. Either you have open borders for everyone or you become isolationist and have very little immigration from anywhere. Picking and choosing based on religion and race in our current political and cultural system is unworkable. Trump tried it in America by banning immigrants from certain Muslim countries and the courts overturned it as unconstitutional, he had to give up on it.

I've noticed many British "patriots" support Indian mass immigration, god knows why because most of them don't support us. The typical Indian view is that England is an evil colonialist country that deserves what it's getting and should be obliged to have open borders, that we owe them ten-fold. Case in point the books written by Hindu nationalist and supremacist Shashi Tharoor that are just anti-British polemics about how evil Britain is and how we owe them reparations. Many British people naively believe Indians are their friends, they don't know what they really think. Indians are more than happy to team up with their Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic kin when it involves their collective South Asian interests against the native English.

Good point, in most countries people are allowed to build a house to live in on their own land and no one interferes. Over here if you have the audacity to do as much as put a shed or a fence on your own land the council and local NIMBYs go mental. It's not just the government that's the problem, the UK is infested with people who see it as their life's work to interfere with and obstruct people applying for planning permission and trying to utilise their own land. It's a real cultural problem I think.