cosmicinaudio

The problem with anti-immigration protests in England especially is that it's basically just a proxy for class warfare. In my experience most people who consider themselves middle class and "upper class" don't really give a shit about mass immigration, and often look down on those who oppose it as the knuckle-dragging underclass who make up most of 'Spoons regular customers. Many of them would actually say they prefer foreigners to working class English people. The tension over English flags is representative of this class divide. You have working class English people putting them up, and largely middle class "educated" types making a point of removing them. I don't think the anti-immigration movement will become truly effective until it actually becomes a national movement and not just another expression of class warfare. For things to actually change at a political level you need the middle classes on board, and at the moment I don't see much evidence that they are.

Israeli football ultras are known as being violent. I remember they banned English fans from some matches in Germany during the Euros last year for the same reasons, and I don't recall anyone complaining about that or saying that it was anti-English racism. It was just accepted as a fact that there was the risk of trouble from English fans at certain games.

I've noticed the BBC and Sky News give Israeli and Jewish guests free reign to shout, rant and talk over the presenter and at least 90% of the people they interview are Israelis/Jews. Usually all the coverage Palestinians/Arabs get is one carefully selected sentence out of everything they said, they never give them free reign to speak like they do with Jews.

I find it odd how a lot of British people celebrate all young Israeli men being "commandos", yet most would repel at the idea of all young British men being trained as "commandos" and learning to handle guns.

I feel a lot of English people misguidedly use Israel-support as a proxy for their own nationalism. Being pro-English, pro-British military, etc, is considered highly "controversial", it's much easier to be pro-Israel and pro-IDF, than defend the British army in Northern Ireland say. Just look at how the band "Kneecap" frequently make highly anti-British and anti-British military comments, and no one cares and certainly no one demands they be prosecuted for it. Being pro-Israel allows you to virtue signal most right wing nationalistic talking points without getting yourself into trouble. Being pro-English and pro-British military, etc, can easily get you into A LOT of trouble, legal or otherwise.

One of the methods they use to subtly promote ID cards in the UK and US is using Youtubers to post videos about how amazing and futuristic all the payment apps and facial recognition tech is in China, like Alipay and WeChat. They portray it as trendy and exciting, like something out of a sci-fi movie. They also know that many Westerners are less likely to resist if they see it as coming from China as opposed to their own elite, China is seen by many as more benign and less threatening.

I'll never understand why Western white nationalists support Russia. Literally all Putin supporters ever go on about is "Kill Naaaaazis. Must kill Naaaaaazis". Western white nationalists would be the first to be lined up against a wall and shot in Russia and China's NWO. They are digging their own graves.

That Israeli spokeswoman they keep wheeling out makes my skin crawl, can't listen to her.

The technocratic NWO will be lead by Russia and China and you'll love it. There'll be no English or Muslim nationalism, if you don't conform with the Eurasian NWO you'll be sent to a "re-education" camp or maybe just become an organ donor, and as it happens most of your jailers will be people who called themselves "truthers" in the Old World Order. You'll have a biometric ID card and a social credit app with facial recognition and you'll thank Russia and China for their forward thinking technological superiority that makes your life so easy and gives you so much freedom.

Religion in general seems to be a magnet for some pretty rum characters. Born again Christians (or any religion) who like to shout about it always put on my guard as to what their deal is. It's been my experience, at least in the UK, that normal, law abiding, productive people have no interest in religion.

I suspect after Hamas has returned the hostages Israel will renege on the ceasefire and bomb them to smithereens.

As another poster pointed out, I've never heard anyone in the mainstream media or politics argue that people removing English and British flags from street furniture are committing a racist hate attack against British people, yet that's precisely what they argue when it happens to anyone else, especially to Jews. Also, as bad as the knife attack on the synagogue was, there have been many cases where non-whites in Britain have gone around randomly attacking or stabbing native British people, such as the case in Nottingham in 2023, where three people, all white British, were stabbed to death at random by a black immigrant. I've never heard anyone in the mainstream media or politics suggest that all white British people are persecuted and under threat because of cases like this.

The woman in the video appears to be Jewish herself, which contradicts the mainstream narrative that all Jewish people support the actions of the Israeli government and aggressive Zionism, and therefore to criticise it is always anti-Semitic. The Mail are ignoring the fact she's Jewish and trying to pretend it's a "vicious anti-Semitic attack" by a non-Jew to further the perception that they're victims. If anything the fact you have two Jewish women arguing in public over Israel's actions proves there is a split in the Jewish population and Jews are not as united in their support of Bibi as we are led to believe by the mainstream media. We are told it is racist to criticise Israel because aggressive Zionism and Jewishness are apparently inseparable, yet clearly that's not always the case.

I notice for the past couple of days the Daily Mail has been making a big thing about an "anti-Semitic" woman filmed cutting down October 7th ribbons with a pair of scissors and accusing the Israelis of genocide. The woman who did it has been identified as "Nadia Yahlom", Yahlom is funnily enough a JEWISH name and the woman looks Jewish. The Mail are trying to portray this as indicative of anti-Semitism being rife in the UK, yet it seems to me that it's either a put up job by the Jewish community or an example of infighting within the Jewish community, and nothing to do with wider British society as a whole. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-15171947/I-felt-rage-shock-confronted-woman-cutting-yellow-ribbons-tied-railings-support-Israeli-hostages.html

They drop the charges against anti-British pro-IRA "Kneecap" singer, but it seems to me they'd throw the book at an English person arrested for the same thing. The law isn't applied equally to everyone. It's alright for him to be anti-Zionist because he's Irish it would appear.

It's funny how Nigel and "Tommy" bleat on about freedom of speech and the right to protest until it involves calling out Israeli atrocities, then they become big supporters of the government curtailing free speech and police aggressively cracking down on protests. I used to actually like them somewhat, but now I think that pair are wolves in sheep's clothing. Same goes for Trump, they all claim to be for freedom but very quickly call for a police state.

I've seen lefties try to blame homophobic laws in former British colonies on Britain, and say that homophobia is a British invention. I've seen them claim that homophobia didn't exist in places like India and Uganda until the British arrived and that their anti-gay laws and attitudes are due to British influence. Most lefties will never acknowledge that many non-white countries have barbaric attitudes and policies towards gays, they just turn it round that it's our fault.

The most far-fetched thing I find is the idea that the ECHR is against the cabal and will protect us. The European courts and the British courts seem like two sides of the same bent coin to me. I know there's a lot of people who subscribe to the belief that anything "British" is worst of the worst so anything foreign is always preferable.

Tommy, so called, only seems to promote the idea that Muslim immigrants are a problem and a threat. Mass immigration of everyone else from everywhere is just fine as long as they're not Muslims.

They'll only ban anti-mass immigration and pro-Palestinian protests. The usual lefty, anti-British, Zionist-approved protests such as by "Hope Not Soap" will be allowed to continue as normal.

Another poster on here has a thread claiming the UK unduly accuses Russia and China of espionage and persecutes them for political purposes, but I feel the opposite is the reality. Despite so called "sanctions", that seem to amount to very little in reality, there are no limits or restrictions of Russians and Chinese entering this country. A miniscule number of Russians have been sanctioned by this country. The vast majority are still free to launder their dirty money here. The UK courts dropping an espionage case against a Chinese citizen seems par for the course for this country, mustn't upset the Chinese and Russians. The weakness of Britain after the Novichok attack is so typical of this country too. Can you imagine Russia or China putting up with a similar attack by Britain in their country? Not on your nelly. I read recently that the Chinese have cut off the water supply to the British embassy in Beijing to try and press the British government into approving China's plans for a huge embassy in London. This is what we are up against, a country that plays dirty and for whom there are no rules. Can you imagine Britain cutting off water to an embassy as a tactic to try and pressure their government? There would be international outrage. The Russians and Chinese laugh at how weak and naive we are, I am certain of it.

Nationalism in white countries has been completely taken over by Jews, especially Zionist ones. Old school nationalism that was openly skeptical of Zionism and the behaviour of anti-white Jews in government is now dead as a doornail. They've really done a number of nationalists/patriots in Britain, most of them won't hear a word of criticism said about Jews and would gladly fight for Zionism if Tommy told them to.

I've noticed Sky News and BBC News only ever seem to interview Israelis and Jews. Can't recall ever seeing anyone Palestinian or Arab interviewed by them about Gaza. I suppose they can't control what they might say so they just don't let them on. It's also odd that Al Jazeera was removed from Freeview in the UK not long after the war started.

You won't find me supporting the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, but Russia's conduct in Afghanistan and Chechnya were hardly any different. You Russian sympathisers specialise in whataboutery.

I think the reality is they're incredibly lenient with allowing Russians to enter this country, despite the so called "sanctions" and Russia's frequent violations of NATO airspace, and also the novichok stuff a few years ago. I don't detect any real agenda against Russian people from the government, if anything we're told that we must separate the actions of Putin and the Russian state from ordinary Russians, and that it would be racist to hate all Russians because of it or want them banned from the country. They talk about sanctions, yet it seems to me the number of Russians who have actually been sanctioned by the UK government is infinitesimally small. The vast majority of Russians with UK assets still have full control of those assets and are free to come and go as they please. I take the opposite view to OP, that the odd media report of a Russian or Chinese spy being arrested is an attempt by the government and media to pretend they've got their finger on the pulse in regards to espionage, when in reality they've got their finger up their arse. They have no idea who's entering this country and what their intentions are and are too interested in "global trade" and "the markets" to do anything about it.