Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by oneantisworthtenofyou

  1. 14 hours ago, sambaking7 said:

    I see it all the time with those who claim to be 'awake' LOL. No discernment. No research. No critical thought.





    I notice that most people seem to want to follow someone granting them "guru" like status perhaps its because they don't have to think for themselves and make decisions that could be wrong if they just follow a leader 


    i notice that people following the alternative media with the same level of trust & lack of critical thinking as vaccine enthusiasts follow MSM propaganda 


    MSM & alternative media are selling "fear" rather than solutions and the plandemic has been financially profitable for many of them


    what was surprising to me is that those following alternative media throw their toys out of the pram with more force than those following MSM

    if i suggest the latest video they posted of someone being arrested in a supermarket for not wearing a mask was nothing more than a staged event with crisis actors they often get hostile and accuse me of being a vaccine enthusiast


    rather than working through the evidence they think in black & white they have been divided and conquered

    "you are either with us or against us"  George bush 


    do you remember the video of the boy in Australia in a video game arcade who was strangled unconscious and thrown to the ground for not wearing a mask? his limp mannequin like body and dangling limbs?

    the majority of "awake" followers of alternative media believed this video to be true

    with emotional cries of  "if that fat security guard tried that on me i would've knocked him out"


    many truthers get upset when i suggest that some of the alternative heros are actually controlled opposition

    this includes the really obvious ones too


    so this has left me with the working conclusion to keep my friends close and my non thinking enemies even closer

    ALL alternative media is controlled opposition until proven otherwise




    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

    No I don't stand under you! 😉


    I see what you're saying though, but it's not what I'm aiming at, I'm just pointing at the mandatory aspect and it's reliance on a censuses between each party.


    No consent by the living being cannot therefore be enforced by a corporate entity which the government is. I see what you're saying about council tax and I suppose this is the legal/lawful argument again. Is it legal, yes, is it lawful? No. A bit like taxing your wages. Is it legal? Yes. But is it lawful, no. 


    The video I posted, forgetting the subtext, is about standing and jurisdiction. As the video states, it's challenging the jurisdiction before even answering a charge. I thought it was interesting, but I see what you're getting at. 


    i think these ideas are "morally" right and i agree with them

    i have also witnessed so many people fail when going down this road because the system doesn't allow many of these arguments to even be herd in their courts although it can delay things and lead to cries of abandoned ship! if the judge runs away 

    i agree that we all have natural rights we were all born with and no fucker should be able to take them away

    but unfortunately the corrupt do take them away from those who don't have the numbers to fight back and enforce their beliefs 


    whoever controls the most numbers controls what is right and what is wrong rather than using the correct words in court 

    its kind of like a catch 22 enough people are required to make up the numbers to ENFORCE whatever they believe to be true the common law chaps say the can arrest people once 100 people have signed a document and the barons

    can send for the arrest of judges 

    when the judges start getting arrested by the common law knights and barons ill have more faith in the movement  


    governments do not believe in natural rights they believe in statute and privileges they hand down as rights

    im sorry if i am coming across negative or defeatist about this that's not my intention

    i'm very cautious where i place my trust 🙂





    • Like 1
  3. 19 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Sorry, but what's council tax got to do with this? I've never mentioned council tax and I'm really referring to mandates and people's fears of being forced to do something they don't want to do. I've provided the definition of a mandate and person according to Black's law dictionary but somehow you're turning my posts into not paying council tax which I've never mentioned. 


    As I say, believe what you want, but we have unalienable rights that neither they nor any mother fucker can take away from us, no matter what bull shit they pass. So, what are you in conflict with on my posts, bearing in mind I've never mentioned council tax once? 👍


    council tax is what i am talking about connected with freeman on the land and common law vs statute

    its based on the exact same concept you are talking about but surly you know this?

    do you "understand"?




  4. 1 hour ago, RobSS said:


    Judging by the comments that looks like it applies to stores in Australia.





    from the letterhead ABN 90 196 565 019 23



    Current details for ABN 90 196 565 019 23


    ABN status:Active from 04 May 2000

    Entity type:Limited Partnership

    Goods & Services Tax (GST):Registered from 01 Jul 2000


    Main business location: NSW 2770

    State: New South Wales (capital: Sydney


  5. 2 hours ago, Morpheus said:

    Ah, but one has to understand what standing is, please see this excellent presentation to call out a judge over jurisdiction over you:



    This is what they don't want you to know, of this is done right, I'm confident this is a thing. To those that are scoffing, I think the more people understand what the unalienable rights are the better. This is not horse shit, it's legitimate law when used in the correct manner. 


    Anyone is free to give it a try stop paying all tax, including road tax take a camera to court and film it "lawfully" and post the results here "lawfully" should be entertaining 


    common law Malcolm on the markwindows show is very true to life from my experience of it all 












  6. 16 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Just to elaborate on the post above, my understanding is there is a difference between what is legal and what is lawful. Legal, is corporate/statute law. Lawful is common law. Three principles of common law, do no harm, cause no injury and cause no death. Therefore, legality is not the same as lawful. Therefore if a statute or law infringes on your common law rights, then in fact it is not applicable to a human being as it infringes on those rights. I.e. coronavirus act 2020 as it restricts your God given rights to freedom of movement, freedom of living. That's why there has been little success from the CPS to prosecute people as it's unlawful. 👍


    This is the mantra of the freemen on the land folk who also use this to attempt not to pay council tax etc

    while i agree with the sentiment of not causing harm or loss and remaining honorable with any contracts you have

    agreed to

    to enforce this freeman stuff seems extremely difficult

    the courts dismiss it they won't even hear the arguments when folk start quoting magna carta 1215


    one of the founder members of this movement Winston shrout is currently in jail

    unfortunately so many of these freeman gurus end up in jail or dead like "John the carpenter Harris" 



  7. 21 minutes ago, Mr H said:

    And what about the ruling the EU passed earlier this year .............




    these other two may also be of use along with The Nuremberg Code (1947)

    they cover informed consent


    World Medical Association’s (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki of 1964

    Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 


    • Thanks 1
  8. 9 minutes ago, Martin1234 said:


    Mandatory is not law?


    Can you elaborate on this for me?


    So if they do mandate it, we still don't have to get it, is that what you are saying?  Not trying to challenge you, just interested and keen to understand.


    possibly a reference to common law and or policing by consent

    and the difference between statute and common law

  9. On 11/15/2021 at 6:07 AM, zArk said:

    so it wasnt the jab going into the vein ? 


    cant they get the story straight just for once


    injection into vein causes bloodclot

    its the manufacturing process



    I don't think "the jab" implying it's all the same concoction in each dose is correct 

    I think there are different jabs for different people/reasons/tests/objectives 

    Some jabs maybe very harmful some harmless (saline)

    I also think the main target for the jab is the children but they couldn't go for the children straight away they softened the adults into accepting it by giving it to them first

    If children become sterile In the future when they become adults i would not be surprised







    • Like 1
  10. 1 hour ago, Bullion said:

    Protests are getting bigger every weekend here in Melbs... the pollies are definitely getting the picture....


    They can pick their fate.... get strung up or pushed under a tram, makes no difference to us as long as they’re out.😀




    • Like 3
  11. 1 hour ago, Frankieboy said:




    initially i didn't realise the video was age restricted because i use Newpipe on android which doesn't require age verification for any age restricted videos 



    • Thanks 1
  • Create New...