Sportsfan28

What's all this about? Reports of multiple bodies found, and then changing their story saying only one body was found? Multiple bodies found in woods during hunt for missing man in Cornwall | The Standard Devon and Cornwall crime commissioner sorry for multiple bodies claim | Police and crime commissioners | The Guardian

What are the chances of two children killed by falling objects within a week? Young girl dies and another is 'very seriously' ill after tree collapses in Southend | UK News | Sky News Boy, four, dies after gravestone falls on him at Rawtenstall Cemetery in Lancashire, police say | UK News | Sky News

Using the excuse of criminals to justify 'Smell detectors' could be used to catch drug abuse - both inside and outside of prison | UK News | Sky News

Regarding the statement made by Ebeneezer Anjorin, note how he says "we followed in a police car" and also that "an ambulance arrived" and "he was placed in an ambulance". This shows that Daniel was taken by road ambulance and not an air ambulance, as you can't follow, in a police car, a helicopter which is going to get to the Royal Free Hospital in a matter of minutes, and not once does Ebeneezer even mention an air ambulance.

An impact statement was read out today in court by Ebeneezer Anjorin, the father of Hainault attack victim Daniel Anjorin. Ebeneezer claims in his statement that Daniel Anjorin was taken to the Royal Free Hospital in London. Why would Daniel, who it is claimed was "virtually decapitated", be taken all the way from Laing Close in Hainault, to the Royal Free Hospital in the borough of Camden, which is over an hours drive away? His injuries were so bad that surely you would take him to the nearest hospital and also via air ambulance which would be the quickest? We heard last week during the trial of Marcus Monzo from Tom Little KC, who claimed that Daniel Anjorin's life was "snuffed out in an instant". Even in Ebeneezer Anjorin's impact statement, he claims that he was told by a paramedic at the scene that Daniel was not likely to survive his injuries. An air ambulance was deployed to the scene, so why wasn't Daniel Anjorin taken to hospital by air ambulance, which would be so much quicker than by road ambulance, and also why on earth wasn't Daniel taken to a nearer hospital? There are so many hospitals around / near the Hainault area, so why was Daniel taken so far away, by road, to the Royal Free Hospital in Camden? The distance from Laing Close in Hainault (the scene of the attack) to the Royal Free Hospital is approximately 18.3 miles, and an hour and ten minute drive. The distance from Laing Close in Hainault to the King George Hospital in Ilford is approximately 3.4 miles and a 13 minute drive. The King George hospital is one of many hospitals that is close to the Hainault area. And don't forget that the time of the attacks was early morning, as Marcus was arrested at roughly 7:22am. So can you imagine trying to drive Daniel Anjorin all that way to the Royal Free Hospital in rush hour morning London traffic? Why was Daniel taken to a hospital so far away? Why was Daniel not taken to a nearer hospital or by air ambulance?

An example of the TV foreknowledge, I remember watching this episode and clocking it straight away Coronation Street's Geoff makes chilling coronavirus death prediction while abusing Yasmeen - The Mirror

While researching the Hainault case and the attacker Marcus Monzo, I kept coming across articles about two banks called Marcus and Monzo. While I believe it is probably a coincidence, as the banks were around before the attacks happened, I do find it a bit strange in general how they have the same names. Also as well, M is the 13th letter of the alphabet and used in huge brands such as McDonalds, Microsoft, M&M's, even down to other names such as Madeleine McCann (a case which anybody with a brain knows is one of the dodgiest ever). McDonalds' logo is even a 13 when turned sideways (picture attached). So maybe there is more to the name / banks / M lettering of Marcus and Monzo? https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/saving/article-7002555/Marcus-Monzo-savings-pots-come-Yolt-app.html Monzo and Marcus: American challengers or just noise? - Chris Skinner's blog

Don't worry it's for their own good Every baby in the UK to receive DNA testing | UK News | Sky News

I know this is a bit late, but what is this, Unlucky Alf? Manchester Arena survivor among injured after being hit by car in Liverpool parade crash - Manchester Evening News

I wonder if all this plane business is to maybe frighten people into not wanting to fly Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner turns around mid-flight after technical issue | World News | Sky News Two EasyJet Flights Make Emergency Landings in Just Two Days – What Happened? - Travel And Tour World

More strange happenings around India, the billionaire friend of Prince William swallowing a bee only hours after paying tribute to the Air India victims being the strangest yet Air India flight forced into emergency landing after bomb threat | The Standard Prince William's billionaire pal dies after swallowing bee while playing polo - The Mirror Helicopter carrying Hindu pilgrims crashes in India, killing seven people | World News | Sky News

There's also confusion over the age of the survivor on articles like this one British crash survivor told family 'I don't know how I'm alive' seconds after plane came down | UK News | Sky News "According to the Hindustan Times report, Mr Ramesh is 40 - but official flight documents list his age as 38."

Here is the link to the original news article with witnesses claiming Marcus was arrested the day before the Hainault attack. Police deny claims Hainault sword rampage suspect was released 24 hours earlier | UK | News | Express.co.uk

The following is a post that I made previously when the Hainault attacks had first happened. It was posted to a different topic, so while it may be an older post it is extremely relevant as it includes information that I had myself forgotten. Right, the day before the Hainault attacks, a 23 year old man, named only as Jefferson, claims that he witnessed the attacker, Marcos, outside of his house (Jefferson's house) in Copperfield, "wielding two knives" and screaming "help me". He claims that 30 minutes later Marcos was arrested. The wording that Jefferson uses in his account is that "he came out screaming "guys help me" (he means Marcos is screaming this). So when he says he (Marcos) "came out screaming", what does he mean by this? Does he mean that Marcos came out of a house? Because the story being reporting in the news is that Marcos lives in Newham, which is 10 miles away from Copperfield. We then have James Fernando, 39 years old, who is a military coordinator and says that he witnessed the Hainault attacks. He also claims that he heard the attacker, Marcos, had been arrested the day before the attacks, on the Broadmead estate. James claims that he heard about this from residents who live on Broadmead, who were looking out of their windows, watching Marcos with "two knives" being arrested. Met police have said in a press conference that there was no trace whatsoever of a prior incident with the attacker Marcos. So we have two people saying that the day before the attacks, in different locations, that Marcos was arrested with knives but the police are saying these are false claims? And regarding James Fernando, he claims he witnessed the Hainault attacks unfolding from the start, and that when police arrived on the scene, the attacker was still "looking for victims" before finally being tasered around 10 minutes later. If James Fernando had witnessed the attacks from the start, up until even after the police arrived on scene, why wasn't he himself attacked? Where was he watching the attacks from? A house window? A car? He hasn't said. James has also given numerous video interviews and statements on news websites already, and each time he is saying something different or contradicting what he previously said. Just one example of a contradiction: James Fernando claims in one interview for ITV news that he saw the attacker Marcos approach a woman and talk to her. He claims that Marcos was on a phone, asked the woman to talk on the phone he was holding and for the woman to give the location of where they were to the person on the other end of the phone. He then states that the woman knew something wasn't right with Marcos and decided to warn another neighbour. James Fernando then claims that Marcos "pulled a sword from his trousers". But Sky News on the other hand (along with so many different news sites and witness statements) are giving a different version. Sky News has a report that claims Marcos exited his van "with a samurai sword" and attacked a man he had just run over. So if Marcos exited his van with a samurai sword to attack the man he has just run over, why is James Fernando saying that after this, that Marcos only had a phone in his hand and produced a sword "from his trousers"? In another video, James Fernando claims that Marcos approached the woman with the sword already in his hand, stood on her foot to stop her from moving, and apparently asked the woman to speak to the fire brigade and give their location! How does James Fernando know it was the fire brigade on the phone? Why did he say Marcos pulled the sword from his trousers, but then claim Marcos had the sword already in his hand? This is just one of the many inconsistencies with this Hainault attack story

Day two of the Hainaut trial and very early on we have the opinions of Marcus being brought up in court. I believe that his views on the pandemic and his conspiracy theories will be used to further make out that anyone having these beliefs is dangerous or a potential "nutter", and will be used to further silence and stop anyone having an alternative opinion. For example, Richard D Hall who was dragged through the courts and destroyed for having an alternative opinion (and one that could also be backed up and proven).

The first day of the trial of Marcus Monzo is now over. Today in the news, we are told that the trial heard how Marcus skinned a cat at home before driving to Hainault to carry out his attack. I would like to make a few points regarding the apparent skinning of the cat, and even if it may sound like I'm reading too much into things, I feel it is always worth discussing as we never know in life what is true or genuine and also what links there could be potentially to something else, and I appreciate anyone taking the time to read my thoughts. For anyone who followed this particular topic when all this began, you might remember the discussion about the attacker's sword and how there was no blood whatsoever on the sword, even after the multiple stabbings and, apparently, the virtual decapitation of Daniel Anjorin. Well today at the trial, it was brought up that there was blood on Marcus' sword, but that the blood was not human. The blood was apparently from the cat that he had skinned that morning. In all of the pictures and footage that we had from the time of the attack, most of which can be found on the earlier pages of this topic, there was not one sight of any blood on the sword, or even on the attacker. The trial also heard how when the police searched the attackers van, there was a brown handled knife found that had traces of non human blood on it. This was assumed to be the blood from the cat that Marcus apparently skinned in the morning, shortly before the attack. So did Marcus use the sword, which had no blood on it as previously shown and discussed, to skin the cat, or did he use the brown handled knife in the van? Even though it is claimed the sword had cat blood on it, the brown handled knife seems more likely as the sword had no blood visible on it at any time. Details have also emerged of how, when questioned by police about the attack, Marcus claimed that his personality had switched, he felt like he was in a game, and how one of his personalities is a professional assassin. Now while it may be quick to assume that he is mentally ill and, if to be believed, under the influence of cannabis at the time of the attacks, could the talk about how he felt and his personality switching be linked to some sort of mind control? For example, when a mind controlled person has "alters", different personality's that can be brought forward and put back again? There has been so much evidence and information documented about this in books, such as David Icke and his research into mind control, and I believe there is a possibility that Marcus was mind controlled to play a role in the events that day while something else was going on (regarding the no blood on the sword). Now, going back to the apparent skinning of the cat, after reading about it this morning, I remembered a lyric from a song called "I Could Care Less", by a metal band called DevilDriver. In the song, there is a lyric of "I had to skin the cat for curiosity". I have always wondered why those particular words were used in the song but have never found a proper meaning or reason. But while reading about the Hainault attack this morning, I came across a website in which the singer of the band DevilDriver was interviewed when the band was newly formed. The singer talks about quoting Aleister Crowley in one the bands songs, and how he was brought up around Italian witchcraft, which is how the band got its name of DevilDriver, in reference to bells that Italian witches would ring to drive devils away. So in regards to the witchcraft / Aleister Crowley influence on the band, could the skinning the cat lyric be in reference to some sort of sacrifice or satanic ritual? And if so, could this be why Marcus is said to have skinned a cat? Did Marcus skin a cat as some sort of ritual sacrifice? I know the lyric part of this post may sound completely far fetched, but I believe it is always worth thinking about and questioning everything. Hainault sword attacker 'killed and skinned own cat' before rampage, court hears - The Mirror Hainault trial opens - as it happened: Marcus Arduini Monzo appears in court accused of killing 14-year-old Daniel Anjorin in sword attack | UK News | Sky News Swordsman accused of murdering schoolboy ‘became psychotic after taking cannabis’ metalupdate.com - Features

We now have the heatwave in Britain, which is being blamed on global warming, apparently affecting pregnant women and their babies. How many people live and are born in hot countries around the world? Another excuse for more future weather control. 'I felt I couldn't keep my baby safe': Warning of heat impact on pregnant women and newborns | Science, Climate & Tech News | Sky News

We've had two prison officer attacks in the last couple of weeks that have made the news, one attack by Hashem Abedi, the brother of the Manchester Arena bomber, and the other by Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer. The main response has been possible "supermax" prisons for apparently the most violent offenders and "calls for US-style prison controls". Considering that both the Manchester and Southport attacks were dodgy as, could they have been fake prison attacks to justify potentially bringing in so called "supermax" prisons? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/supermax-style-prisons-could-built-35214604

I think we knew this was coming when the bus crash story came about a few weeks ago. Yet another dodgy death linked to that disgusting royal family. https://news.sky.com/story/virginia-giuffre-who-accused-prince-andrew-of-sexual-assault-has-died-her-family-says-13355731

Thanks, well spotted, I hadn't seen those BBC articles. So you've got the young being targeted in the 50 mile radius rubbish and now the elderly in the BBC articles. And notice the coroner in the BBC articles saying there needs to be a change in the eyesight rule is Dr James Adeley. He was the coroner who ruled that Nicola Bulley's death was accidental drowning, so we can safely say he can not be trusted whatsoever lol

More control disguised as safety it seems Britons support new driving licence rules that restrict motorists to '50 mile radius' from home

I thought that about the diagnosis, very specific. I also can't find any news article regarding the crash, apart from obviously Virginia saying she's been in a crash. Even so it's yet again another suspicious event / death linked to the dirty royals.

I didn't know about Bernini, thanks for that, very interesting. The bee symbolism was also with Artemis, the goddess known as the queen bee who was also Diana. And don't forget the honeymoon, the mixture of menstrual blood and honey that would be drunk before the wedding. With Southport you've got bee symbolism and the trinity of victims, just like the trinity of victims in the Nottingham attacks which were also very dubious. (The Barberini family coat of arms = three bees, more trinity symbolism?)

Leanne Lucas seems to have a link to a children's yoga company called YogaBeez. I just find this strange, regarding the bee symbolism. We had all the bee stuff with the fake Manchester attack and the children at YogaBeez are described as "honey beez". Maybe I'm reading to much into it but the bee symbolism in my opinion could be significant in some way. And yes, I thought she looked very different in the interview as well! Enlightened YogaBeez Success Story - Children's Yoga Teacher Training | Teach yoga to Children | YogaBeez

Why are the news now saying they can't legally name Bebe King's parents due to legal reasons? They have been named previously since the beginning of the Southport attack and their picture with Bebe and her sister Genie was used throughout the media. Every other parent is still being named, so I don't understand why Bebe King's parents suddenly can't be named anymore? Maybe I've missed the reason so if anyone knows I would appreciate it.