numnuts

I don't think anyone on here will consent to taking the vaccine. I don't even reckon a shill would try pushing that angle either. Well, not on this forum anyway. Grumpy Owl was purely debating whether some of the vaccines distributed to the general public might, somehow, be placebo vaccines. I don't think that is practical at all. Moreover, even if it was hypothetically practical, no one would want to play Russian roulette regardless. So, from my point of view, we are left with the 'same old vaccine shit' versus 'worse new vaccine shit' argument. I don't think that the majority of the new vaccines in production are going to be any worse than the existing vaccines doing the rounds, but that's not a strong selling point is it. I truly believe myself to be a vaccine autism victim. Furthermore, I have the same negative attitude towards the potential, side effects of vaccines, in general, as do the vast majority of members on this forum. I am not going to take it. We are now left with the concept of the RNA vaccine. Hypothetically, if someone literally felt like they had to take a vaccine, for whatever reason, then I would be avoiding the RNA vaccine. Call it the lesser of two evils. However, what folks need to realise is that the PTB will be coming back to their arms, in due course, even if they do take two non-RNA vaccine shots now. This will be to tackle a claimed Coronavirus mutation or to tackle a claimed new virus threat, which has emerged somewhere in the world. By then, they might well have decided that RNA vaccines are the best thing since sliced bread, so you don't even get to choose the old vaccine shit. The new vaccine cycle, which we will all have to take, will never end. No doubt, the end result of any vaccine consumption will, at the least, be an increase in ill health, an increase in sterility and a decrease in life expectancy. And these are only the medical implications. I know you already know all of this oddsnsods, I was just quoting you in light of your remarks on consent. When the 'time comes' for Boris to go, then they will be directed to turn on him, along with an unwavering outburst of mass media support. Any genuine political opposition that emerges will always be labelled as 'extremist'. Yes, it is. I don't think they can backtrack now either, even if they wanted to. And as I have told folks all year, they are rushing and being sloppy, as they had to also use this Coronavirus bullshit as a cover to stop Brexit. This is one thing in our favour. I will remain positive to either the new beginning or the bitter end.

Some times, when I do the odd google for the latest bit of Brexit Con news, I look at the Tweets that show up in a Tweet box on the search results page. There are 3 or 4 Tweets visible in the Tweet box, then you can scroll right to read a few more, if you wish to. You can just tell that they usually all come from the same Remainiac source. The latest lot I bothered to read, just for a laugh, related to Constipated Keir being cast as a Godlike figure, due to his telling us we should have locked down a few weeks earlier than we did do. For example: 'If only Boris had listened to Keir, then we wouldn't be in this big mess now. Keir predicted all of this!' Yawn.

For sure, on this forum too, but the mods can't police and analyse every post, even if all suspicious posts were reported. Anyhow, personally, I find the notion of masonic desperadoes both quite amusing and quite encouraging. *pop goes the weasels*

Is it even possible to get the virus from fish?

The grandfather of 'The Sturgeon' would be feeling quite proud now no doubt.

Some serious shills on there. I believe that they the use the logic of 'the more people who take the vaccine, then the more effective it is'. For example, a vaccinated person is supposedly at a greater risk of infection from a greater number of unvaccinated people. We would still literally be killing them. Sterilised sheeple sounds good to me. They would probably stamp your vaccination form for a few Big Macs. Mmm. I feel that they are soon going to be getting it right up their stinky pooper chuters.

Any excess deaths, I am only referring to this year here, literally occurred during a period of full lockdown. I thought that the idea of a full lockdown was for the death rate to not shoot up. Some nobhead was just on BBC News, while talking about the full lockdown high death toll, but he seemed strangely unable to connect any of the said deaths to anything other than the Coronavirus. Even other parts of the masonic mass media have now acknowledged all of that. Same daft bint dong the presenting, as yesterday morning, who seems to happily go along with everything put to her. I smell the smell of desperadoes. P.S. I think that they 'may' have now shifted to defining Coronavirus deaths as 'deaths where Coronavirus gets a mention on the death certificate'. That is what I heard today anyway.

A lot of implicit agenda and programming here. Some of the fake faces the interviewer pulled are priceless.

Wow, Deep State Dickhead, Peter Hitchens, is proving himself by joining the staged, mass media attack on BoJo The Clown, which now won't stop until he leaves prime ministerial office. Piers Morgan, no doubt, will also soon bravely jump on to the anti-government bandwagon of the day. Just to prove to us that he really is independent, working for the people and happy to take on anyone in high office. Yeah, right! Cue the next group of cardboard cutout PTB front men and the little weasel will pipe down again. I thought that the Swedish approach was all quite genuine. The PTB have probably been working very hard, since April, to get more of their own in to positions of power. Something like that. There is more than enough good information out there, which they can't dispute as 'fact'. I still can't quite believe the mass media are 'claiming' there is overwhelming support for actual prosecution of anti-vaccine folks, not just that there is a general affinity to the vaccine in the population, while at the same time making out that there is a big problem that needs handling. It's like they are shooting themselves down with their own stupidity. It's ridiculous isn't it. If 'they' really are so convinced that all is well, then the thought wouldn't ever enter their heads in the first place, would it.

I have been thinking. I know that a load of sheep are called a 'flock of sheep'. I know that a load of wolves are called a 'pack of wolves'. I know that a load of numnuts are called a 'brilliance of numnuts'. All of that is set in stone. So, what is the collective term for a load of freemasons then? I have heard them called a gang on occasion, but that term makes them sound a little bit tough, which is quite misleading given the fact that they still all play with their Sindy dolls every night. How does an 'embezzlement of freemasons' fit the bill?

Is this the chap?

This is incredible to read. I started a thread on the old forum, about 5 years ago now, having a big bash at all of the bad grammar and spelling that was slowly beginning to appear in mass media news articles! Everyone should, of course, freely post their personal views to the best of their ability, but the mass media are surely supposed to be setting a high standard.

I used to be the biggest sheepon going. Difference now being that they are rushing and being sloppy, as Brexit has to be stopped. Bonehead China. Going by the narrative we have all been fed this year, then I would say you make a good point. Like when some of the government stooges all miraculously claimed to have the virus, right at the beginning of this saga. They wanted to pretend to self-isolate for two weeks, then just do as they pleased. This was before the 'you can get it more than once' and 'it can mutate' stories emerged, but them doing as they pleased post-infection still went against all of the lockdown orders they were giving the general public. As in 'Stay indoors because you might spread it about outside, even if you don't get infected'. My opinion is that this is a good move for us. An awful lot of people aren't going to be happy about that.

Sounds like a good plan to me.

A BBC News lass just interviewed some vaccine pusher. 'What have you got to say to those people concerned about possible medium and long term side effects' she asked him? 'Most of the Coronavirus vaccines are based on the same technology already used to develop other vaccines for other ailments' he replies. Good enough for her and case closed then. The very next news piece was about how playing video games can actually be good for you. Sigh.

The script is already written for the next election, assuming it even takes place.

BoJo The Clown set to announce 'Christmas Number One' quest, with a cover single for charity, as his 'last hurrah' before soon leaving office.

I was typing 'Beirut explosion' into the google search box, on the day I heard about it, so as to have a look for myself. The number one search suggestion that came up in the dropdown box, before I hit 'Enter', was 'Beirut explosion Israel'. Therefore, a lot of folks had been making that specific search and do know the score. P.S. I also think that act was a thinly veiled anti-Brexit threat against us here in the U.K.. Probably not just ritualistic. A clarion call, to all of their willing members and supporters, as well? P.S. SimonTV, I reckon that the masonic mass media are the spiky bits on the end of the virus, which are said to hook on to you. Just don't let them reach your brain.

But not in the highest places, in my opinion.

I know what you mean. The masonic mass media will always be looking for a childish 'Gotcha' moment, which will be both contrived and totally unconvincing, but still. Furthermore, a lot of genuine medical experts seem to be doing a good job at debunking the Coronavirus bullshit, as it is, so we don't even need to don our white coats do we.

The PTB have also had their agents posting on run-of-the-mill internet forums, from as far back as the early 2000's. Maybe he is a born Zionist, like Michael Gove, and simply hasn't realised it yet. Watch this video, from just last year, and you can clearly see what super shills Morgan and his trampy sidekick are. Galloway clearly and repeatedly states 'It's a trick they play'. He then says 'An Israeli cabinet minister even told me this in person!'. Any honest journalist would have said 'Right, let's get this name down and ask the person concerned ourselves', then duly followed up on it. Some Israelis do say it how it is. However, no, they both try their utmost to ignore him and you can see Morgan desperately trying to change the subject. Meanwhile, trampy sidekick presses on hard, with lines that have very evidently been well rehearsed. U.K. 'democracy' in action! P.S. And just LOL at the vile, horrible, racist Sugar Daddy Monster lurking in the background. Ha ha ha ha ha. This is the 'official' beginning of the 'End Of Brexit' and the transition of prime ministerial office, which we heavily outed at the beginning of this year. He is right in a sense though. It will be 'something' that stops what is clearly now on the horizon. I have said all along that I think they hit China, Iran too, with something. Whether that was 'THE virus' or not, I don't know. In any event, I have also never outright claimed that no virus exists. What I have said is that if it does, then it is man made. Furthermore, they could have pulled off everything they have just pulled off, in the West, with only a handful of real cases at the root of it all. Bottom line, it's clearly a big fraud either way. A bit like the 'Planes v No Planes' 9/11 debate. It doesn't really interest me much. Common sense, alone, is all one needs.

If you think that comments sections of local media outlets are also not 'policed', then you are wrong.

Thinking back to that 'Decade Of Health' advert, which has recently been doing the rounds on TV and was linked to on this thread just recently, one other thing did come to my mind. Notice how the nanotech cancer cure was only due to come in right at the end of the decade, after we had already gone along with everything else. Like a great prize at the end of the rainbow, which, in reality, they will never release to the masses. Any cure I mean, whether that be nanotech or whatever, which they certainly already have. Not, 'you can't'. You can, but it is difficult. I am surprised that they haven't yet recruited 'The Farm' to continually perform 'All Together Now' live at their largest testing centre. Then again, to be fair, Peter Hooton would have none of it. I hope so, anyway. Wrong, eventually they would come for you too. You would be existing as an alternative concept to their mono-version of reality. Give it a few years and they will be forcing eskimos to install smart meters in their igloos. Ah, yes, the masonic mass media. Truth is the very last thing on their minds. When the Tower Of London Hotel is soon reopened, then we are going to need a dedicated, high security mass media wing I reckon. The very worst offenders should be forced to dungeon share with Piers Morgan, in the inverted penthouse suite.

Right, so 80% of Joe Public, supposedly, think anyone 'off message' should be prosecuted. Surely, a significant proportion of the remaining 20% must still trust the vaccine, while not thinking anyone 'off message' should be prosecuted. I mean, aren't we looking at 90% plus trust in the vaccine, from those numbers? What's the problem then? Unless, the survey is even worse bullshit than a masonic fairy tale... P.S. This does all seem to suggest that they are shying away from attempting forced vaccinations, at least for the moment.