Jump to content

numnuts

Members
  • Posts

    2,166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by numnuts

  1. 8 hours ago, pete675 said:

    Something that is now termed a 'bizarre rant' is what used to be called the truth.

     

    I am now just waiting for the likes of Gary Lineker to rally in support of McGiffin's right to free speech. Per chance, Ian 'Baby Man' Wright and Alan 'Don't care who owns my club' Shearer won't be far behind either. The dam is about to burst!

    • Like 2
  2. 8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    the flood gates are creaking under the pressure....they just need a good shove and truth can wash the world clean

    Loose Women star Carol McGiffin is forced to quit the show in row over Covid conspiracy views after bizarre radio rant

    By Katie Hind, Consultant Editor Showbusiness, For The Mail On Sunday

    Published: 22:29 BST, 6 May 2023 | Updated: 00:02 BST, 7 May 2023

    Loose Women ITV star Carol McGiffin was forced to quit after a bizarre radio rant, including claiming the Covid pandemic was a World Health Organisation plot to take over every government. Ms McGiffin, 63, revealed last week that she had left the lunchtime show, protesting that ITV insisted she sign a contract with clauses that were 'totally unjust and unworkable'. Now The Mail on Sunday can disclose that a free speech row was at the centre of her departure, after a backlash over her tirade in an interview on TNT talk radio. In it, original Loose Women panelist Ms McGiffin also accused reputable mainstream news organisations of conspiring to brainwash the public, causing a mass mental health breakdown, after being 'bought off by the Government'. She added she thought the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock tried to bring in Covid patients from France to fill 'empty hospital beds' in Britain at the height of the pandemic.

     

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/usshowbiz/article-12055015/Loose-Women-star-Carol-McGiffin-forced-quit-Covid-conspiracy-views-row.html

     

    All in the aftermath of Lineker's free speech battle with the BBC being headline news. And McGiffin doesn't even work for the BBC, which was the main reason why Lineker got scrutinised in the first place. As in, over the impartiality contract clause. Ridiculous. As for the article itself, we have the usual lingo reserved for anyone in the public eye who gets their hymn sheets mixed up. For example, the likes of 'bizarre', 'rant', 'tirade', 'plot' (vague usage) and 'Government' (vague usage), but nothing on Elvis as of yet. I haven't heard that Hancock/French patients story before, which does sound silly. However, I couldn't find the audio of McGiffin's radio interview on Youtube, so I can't know what she said or where she might have got it from.         

    • Like 3
  3. 2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    Same reason the WHO has since declared the pandemic over. It was over before it began.

     

    Indeed, if everyone had refused to go in to lockdown and just tossed their TV's from their homes, then no one would have noticed the slightest difference in their lives. I think it is now very safe to assume, a certainty even, that the next 'pandemic' will not be 'Covid'-related in any way, shape or form. The PTB need a new brand name to work with.  

    • Like 4
  4. On 4/28/2023 at 9:23 AM, webtrekker said:

    Screenshot_20230428-081709_Telegram.jpg.624d6e6528aed38c788587e5fd25b895.jpg

     

    You're not wrong there, Christine!

     

    Christine Anderson - 'There's a lot of people that think...'

     

    The whole problem is that a lot of people don't think. Not any more.

     

     

     

    On 4/29/2023 at 3:28 PM, Campion said:

    People have switched off from COVID imo, we're taught to have such a short attention span. In any case they won't want to spoil the photo opportunities of the coronation so perhaps they'll crank it up after that. 

     

    I still like the way that the 'pandemic' had to officially be declared over. Cheers, Tedros.

     

     

     

    On 4/30/2023 at 12:54 AM, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

    GB News: Andrew Bridgen is a legend.

     

    A PTB pawn who was placed on the board, when it became obvious that one non-PTB M.P. or another, was soon going to enter the vaccine concerns fray. These non-PTB M.P.'s now know, by entering the said fray, that they will be cast as in league with unruly 'Holocaust Mentioners' and kicked out of their parties. Whereas, if one non-PTB M.P. had entered the fray prior to Bridgen, then the 'Holocaust' would never have been mentioned at all and neither should it have been. Then, the rather silly scene at PM's Questions, where vaccine concerns were somehow conflated with 'anti-semitism', could not have taken place.  

     

     

     

    On 5/1/2023 at 7:07 PM, Macnamara said:

    JABBED?

     

    If this lady has died due to vulnerabilities caused by the jabs then that would mean that even the aristos and high up freemasons were not warned off the jabs:

    Duchess of Buccleuch dies aged 68 after 'short illness' following operation, her family reveal - just days before her husband was due to attend King Charles' coronation

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12033971/Duchess-Buccleuch-dies-aged-68-short-illness-following-operation.html

     

    If one thinks about it, even briefly, then it is quite obvious that only a very small minority really 'knew' what was going on. All bound by oaths, no doubt. They would have each been personally responsible for what their own did or didn't get. It still makes me laugh that some were expressing surprise, at the likes of Justin Bieber getting vaxxed. Like he would have been Inner Sanctum or something. 🙂    

  5. 7 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    Shady shenanigans, do we think?

     

    I don't know. However, he managed to lose 11 frames in a row, on the biggest stage and in front of the whole world. And, this was not long after a load of Chinese players got collared for match fixing. So, if he was cheating, then he is the Moriarty of the green baize. 

     

     

     

    2 hours ago, Shake said:

    Early days but Selby has to up his game instead of doing boring safety shots all the time

     

    Hard to see Brecel choking for me.

     

     

     

    12 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

    sing along

     

    Woke pioneers. Lot's of 'thems' and other assorted pronouns in there.

    • Like 1
  6. On 4/28/2023 at 8:42 PM, Ethel said:

    I'm finding this year a bit of a let down. I'm usually a Ronnie supporter, but there are others I enjoy too, i.e. Neil Robertson, Judd Trump etc. The prospect of a final with Selby in it doesn't really excite me, although I do like this new Chinese player 'Si'. He is sensational. 

     

    Imagine how those who punted on Si felt, after watching his 14-5 lead slip away. So sick... 😀

    • Haha 2
  7. 4 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    I'd like to see Brecel win as he's always been a stylish player, but the way Ronnie let him win the QF would take the gloss off it a bit (for me anyway).

     

    If I was a player, then I would hate to win like that. Wondering whether someone had thrown a match against me.

    • Like 1
  8. I would like to see Si Jiahui winning it. I guess that most of the general public will also be rooting for him now. I don't greatly dislike Selby, but I would rather he didn't win it again. I don't really mind if Allen or Brecel win it. Allen looks like a leprechaun, so maybe luck will be on his side this year. 🙂

  9. I am not casting any hard aspersions here, but I was wondering the same thing as this chap on the BBC comments, after watching the conclusion of the O'Sullivan V Brecel match. Even allowing for all of Ronnie's weirdness etc..

     

     

    Reply posted by R M, today at 13:46

     

    'Anyone but Ronnie, this would have gone for fixing.'

     

     

  10. This move is part of wider judicial reforms. Most alarming, is the news about a pilot scheme that will allow just one judge, with no jury at all, to decide whether someone is guilty of rape or only attempted rape. Nothing undemocratic to worry about here then. 

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65397235

     

    'Not proven verdict to be scrapped in Scottish courts.'

     

    'A new specialist sexual offences court will be created and a pilot project will see rape and attempted rape cases being held without a jury, with a single judge deciding whether or not the accused is guilty.'

    • Like 1
  11. On 4/11/2023 at 4:13 PM, Nemo said:

    BBC presenter’s widower says only option is to sue AstraZeneca after her death


    Lisa Shaw, who worked for BBC Radio Newcastle, died a week after her first Covid jab in May 2021. The widower of a BBC presenter who died due to complications from the Covid-19 vaccination said he’s been left with “no alternative” but to take legal action against AstraZeneca.

     

    Telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/10/bbc-presenter-husband-suing-astrazeneca/

     

    This is positive news, but how long could it take to go through the motions? Years, probably.

     

     

     

    On 4/12/2023 at 8:50 AM, Nemo said:

    Covid probe looks at nurse's claims after she accused Scots Government of corporate manslaughter


    A former nurse who reported the Scottish Government to the police for corporate manslaughter has been asked for more in-depth information. The Covid-19 National Death Inquiry Team are now looking at Lesley Roberts’ evidence as part of Operation Koper after she accused the government of corporate manslaughter. She has been asked for a fuller statement ahead of a formal police interview. Lesley, along with other NHS campaigners, handed in a coronavirus dossier to police last month blaming the Scottish Government for around 10,000 deaths since the pandemic struck.

     

    dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/whistleblowing-scots-nurse-who-reported-29677178

     

    Sadly, I am guessing that 'corporate manslaughter' equates to none of the guilty ever eating any porridge.

     

     

     

    On 4/18/2023 at 4:03 AM, Kelli said:

    Anyway, one of the most popular topics for articles - and by that I mean most likely to be approved by the so-called 'peer-review' process - were articles targeting 'conspiracy theorists' and those who believed that covid was a hoax. I wanted to post this link for those who are interested in reading about how THEY were attempting to combat those of us who knew what was really going on and were attempting to spread the word. I think this article is a bit old but I came across this yesterday while doing a search for something else. 

     

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356

     

    A long while back, there was some idiot on here bragging that they had written an article debunking our assertions. Probably died when gardening by now.

    .

     

     

    On 4/18/2023 at 3:54 PM, Talorgan said:

    So aim of these characters is population reduction but whilst topping up the decline with immigration? Then what? Does this "parallel government" and all the think tanks etc know what they want?

     

    For now, in the countries where it is occurring, mass immigration is running alongside depopulation. No reason why it shouldn't do. 

    • Like 1
  12. On 3/22/2023 at 11:53 PM, numnuts said:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/iga-swiatek-injury-miami-open-b2305987.html

     

    'Miami Open: Defending champion Iga Swiatek pulls out with injury.'

     

    The Stuttgart tournament starts a month after she last played. I will be interested to see whether she does play and how she performs. It must have been some coughing fit. Probably her body trying to expel something that couldn't be expelled.   

     

     

    https://tennis-infinity.com/wta/swiatek-hints-comeback-from-injury-in-stuttgart

     

    'Swiatek Hints Comeback From Injury In Stuttgart.'

  13. 12 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    Anything but you-know-what.

     

    It's almost like you can hear some little cogs going round in Jurgen's pea-sized brain. However, when you've been one of those heavily promoting the shit juice, albeit innocently, then the bar to self-realisation must be a lot higher, than it would be for your average Joe. 

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65215883

     

    'Liverpool v Arsenal: Gunners boss Mikel Arteta expects atmosphere like a jungle.'

     

    The Reds are 29 points behind leaders Arsenal having lost nine times in 28 matches. They have not lost more league games in any of Klopp's six full seasons in charge. "It is one of these moments where it is really not good," Klopp said. "You get in this whirlwind and it sucks you in that direction and all of a sudden it's like 'Wow, where are we?'. But I am not a worse manager than last year, definitely not. It doesn't mean the outcome is good enough, not at all. But I'm not worse. And the players are not worse players. They've just played worse. That's definitely the case." (Why?)

    • Like 2
  14. 5 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    I'd say that german word beginning with Schaden, if I could pronounce it. Yep, what comes around, Herr Klopp.....what would be interesting to know is, how many of this suddenly-amazing Arsenal squad were jabbed? Because they've been shite for the last decade and suddenly they're runaway leaders in a bang average league.

     

    I would love to see the official stats relating to the vaccination status of all Premier League squads. How many vaccines has each player had, if any, from what manufacturer and when. I certainly wasn't suggesting that a vaccine-hammered Liverpool squad solely accounts for the 30 points or so gap between them and Arsenal, but there is no doubt in my mind that it has cost Liverpool points. If enough players are not performing 100% physically, which the vaccines clearly do affect, then it's a given.

     

    P.S. It seems that at least some of the Liverpool squad did manage to achieve the quadruple last season.   

    • Like 1
  15. 2 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

     

    If someone walked out of a vaccination centre, had a cardiac arrest and expired 100 metres down the road, then I reckon that they would still try and pass it off as unsuspicious. Even if it happened to 333 people in one day. They would probably say that the vaccine gave them an extra 50 metres or some tripe like that. RIP.

     

    P.S. If he 'died peacefully', then it must be ok. All sudden, unexpected deaths of those in their 30's, 40's and 50's, which are subsequently deemed 'peaceful', should not be questioned.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...