Jump to content

numnuts

Members
  • Posts

    2,357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by numnuts

  1. As anyone with one or more brain cells has now realised, Brexit was never accepted by the PTB. The Brexit agreement itself was a massive fudge; no one in power, invariably fake Brexiteers such as Michael Gove, has tried to make it work; and then the 'Covid' crisis, followed by the Ukraine crisis, followed by the cost of living crisis etc., have all been orchestrated and used as covers to further make Brexit look like a failure. Despite 'Brexit' being passed by a Tory government, fudged Brexit or not, the PTB do probably have enough political sway to get it reversed in parliament right now.

     

    The problem for the PTB, is that they can't openly do that. A Tory government that delivered Brexit, on the back of an emphatic general election win with a Brexit promise at its core, can't be seen to play any meaningful part in reversing it. Not even dumbed down sheeple would swallow that pill. Therefore, it is critical, absolutely critical, for the PTB to get Starmer elected to do their dirty work. A lot of 'other things' have also been going on in the background, so as to help enable a Starmer victory. Furthermore, I believe that there is a clause that allows for Brexit to be 'renegotiated' in 2024. How convenient. So, what are these 'other things' that have been going on in the background?

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-68284594

     

    'Simon Harris: Council admits 'lack of controls' over payments.'

     

    'Council leader Mr Bentley told the chamber: "Some of the contracts were not signed and that processes were not always followed around declarations of interest." Referring to Mr Harris, the Conservative leader said money was paid to an individual "to pass onto others. That was not good practice either." Mr Bentley also disclosed how the council's "central services" team had not been made aware of the payments, and had they been informed "it would not have been allowed to happen in this way". Poor record keeping by the staff who had made these decisions was also highlighted in his statement and there was a lack of information around why the payments had been made.'

  3. 10 hours ago, SimonTV said:

     

    Just a tad... 🙂

     

    P.S. Cheers 'GB News', aka the 'MI5/Masonic Front', which is even less convincing than Arch-Dork Elon Muck. How about a Grand Tour of all the things that Konstipated Keir said during 'Covid' as well? You know, like longer and tougher lockdowns. Like more vaccines. No, I thought not... 🤥

     

     

     

    On 2/10/2024 at 6:44 PM, Macnamara said:

    yeah as someone else said recently in an article i read, it's not always what the media says but what it doesn't say. By what it chooses to focus on it gets to dictate what 'the news' is. if they were impartial they would of course have decided by now that the excess deaths following the jab roll outs is in fact news and in the public interest to explore. Clearly the media is being steered away from key topics and key areas of information or to put it another way: CONSPIRACY

     

    They did cover the excess deaths and mile long ambulance queues for a while, say in mid to late 2022 and early 2023, but almost nothing since then. Orders were clearly given for continual coverage to stop.  

     

     

     

    On 2/10/2024 at 6:48 PM, Macnamara said:

    what a wild interview that was! Thought David really skewered the agenda from about half an hour in where he explains how the takeover of twitter by musk and his rebranding as some sort of free speech advocate has lulled people into a false sense of security re musk so that now they believe that what they see on X is legit when in fact the algorithms can now control the content seen on X thereby allowing the cabal to create a new more controlled alternative-lite to kettle peoples perceptions so that they don't go any further down the rabbit hole.

     

    In reality musk is up to his neck in agenda stuff whether it is firing satellites up to help build 'the cloud' or trying to interface humans with AI or advocating for the merger of humanity and AI. Musk is a total bond-style villain but now people think he's some sort of hero battling the elites....

     

    It is amazing that more folks haven't seen through him yet.

  4. On 2/6/2024 at 9:07 AM, Useyournous said:

    To think I used to tell my children if they lost me outside they must go to a lady with a pram or a police man. How times have changed or how bloody thick I was!

     

    Times have definitely changed. To say society has really sunk; doesn't mean you are saying all used to be fine and dandy. Society has really sunk. This is the DIF and one can't really afford to get emotional, over this that or story. Otherwise, one probably won't last long. It is also good to try and play devil's advocate, as things aren't usually very black and white. However, what I will say is that the more I have had time to dwell on this story, then the more sickened I have become. Especially about what did and didn't happen, after the whistleblower came forward.

     

    P.S. Berkshire Plod. Keeping women and girls safe, on the mean streets of Newbury! 🤥 

  5. On 2/8/2024 at 10:32 AM, Macnamara said:

    So if i'm right about all of this then tucker carlson, despite often saying a lot of good stuff, is in fact just reinforcing the outer grand delusion that there really is a genuine struggle between the BRICS and the davos elite which would then require us to ask: is carlson simply misled or is he part of the grand deception?

     

    In my opinion, Carlson is just another pied piper. At the very least, if not literally taking orders, he has lasted an awful long time in the spotlight, for someone who is supposed to be anti-PTB. Suspicious, in itself. As for BRICS, perhaps there isn't a genuine struggle going on, between them and the Western PTB. However, you can't look at all of the BRICS members in the same light. I don't think anyone would argue that Russia doesn't have some Western PTB tentacles reaching over its borders. It's just a case of how many and where they are. It obviously stinks that Russia invaded Ukraine, right at the time when the 'Covid' narrative was starting to collapse.          

    • Like 1
  6. 18 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    Those of us who were here at the time won't forget the absolute shit-show that TPV became. Mainly because hundreds (maybe thousands) of us were banned from the forum.

     

    The main issue with TPV was that not enough consideration was given to the fact that the PTB would try to derail it. Divide and conquer tactics were used to help knock it off air. Then, after it had been knocked off air, divide and conquer tactics were also used to sow discord on the forum. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  7. No end in sight. I reiterate, these are 'supposed' to be the elderly folks we went into lockdown for, we took vaccines for and we trashed the economy for. And, these elderly folks never asked for any of it. When they ring up and ask for help though, then they are just left to die, if it comes to it. Just how bad does the next 'pandemic' have to theoretically be, given the NHS horrors of the past two years or so, for anyone in government to have the temerity to claim that 'Something must be done!'? We are already way beyond 'Covid'.  

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-68211110

     

    'NHS Wales: Day-long ambulance wait after care home fall.' 

     

    "They were told not to give her any food or pain relief." (Again, this is a protocol devised without any inkling of the NHS ever getting in to this dire situation. At what point do you just say 'Bugger protocol'?)

    • Thanks 2
  8. 7 hours ago, SimonTV said:

    Thailand Issues Warning About COVID Jabs: ‘They Cause Cancer and Brain Tumours’

     

    https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/thailand-issues-warning-about-covid-jabs-they-cause-cancer-and-brain-tumours/

     

    That translates as 'They were designed to cause cancer and brain tumours (and much more)'.

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

    If they turbo jabbed the king with boosters. That should be a national security risk. Good job we don't live in the real world.

     

    If it was targeted, then the whole reason they did it was as part of the 'Destroy the U.K.' package.

     

     

     

    12 minutes ago, Freaky Dragonfly said:

    "I'm vaccinated. Why aren't you, you stupid fucking fuck."

     

    Because I don't believe what my TV screen tells me.

  9. On 9/28/2022 at 8:14 PM, numnuts said:

    I wouldn't be surprised, if Charles gets bumped off somehow, in the next few years.

     

    The way they are talking, this is quite serious. The PTB were never going to let Charles trundle on, for another 10 years or more. I said on another thread that it would probably be CIAncer that gets him. From what I can gather, after one is diagnosed with CIAncer, death invariably occurs within 2 years and usually within a year. On occasion, even within months. Assuming this is CIAncer. We will see...

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68208157

     

    'King Charles III diagnosed with cancer, Buckingham Palace says.'

  10. I don't think it is possible for Starmer to dodge some key questions, about our relationship with the E.U., irrespective of how slippery his handlers try to be. And, if they try to not even mention the topic in the manifesto, then it will be even more obvious what their plans are.

     

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/feb/03/labour-ditches-radical-reforms-as-it-prepares-bombproof-election-manifesto?s=04

     

    'Labour ditches radical reforms as it prepares ‘bombproof’ election manifesto.'

  11. 13 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

    Seems to be endemic in the police. They recently reviewed background check offences and had to fire a load of officers with criminal records, so definitely some bad eggs in the mix.

     

    I don't know about endemic, but it is very concerning. If this is the sort of environment that Wayne Couzens existed in, then I think that it probably would have affected his outlook and behaviour. On occasion, someone can do something wrong or say something inappropriate. They can get pulled up on it, realise it was poor behaviour, say sorry and move on. With the officers in this case, it seems to be more about ingrained defects in their character; rather than an isolated incident of poor behaviour. You can't just say 'Sorry' and brush it under the carpet. The officers involved should have been suspended and faced a serious misconduct hearing. To keep their jobs, they should have shown a clear understanding of why what they did was wrong and shown genuine remorse. And that's only if what they did wasn't deemed criminal. Personally, I think it was criminal. Who would want folks like this turning up, after dialling 999? Probably more interested in seeing minge, than busting crims.     

     

    The journalists pursuing this case have done well. However, I think there are two things that they shouldn't let up on. Firstly, the excuse that the whistleblower's departure from the police had nothing to do with his whistleblowing needs to be scrutinised much harder. Sounds like a load of bullshit to me. Secondly, the Sergeant who is said to have shown the whistleblower job adverts outside of the police and heckled him needs to feel some heat. A journalist needs to ask him some very hard and searching questions. He can't just be allowed to waltz off.        

     

     

     

    11 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

    employ a crook to catch a crook

     

    You mean, that we need to recruit some career criminals to keep an eye on the cops?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  12. It's easy to judge from the sidelines, but I found this quite sickening. I can accept that some people might make inappropriate comments in private and that it might all get overblown, if it comes to light. However, cops watching video footage that they no longer had any need to watch and asking to 'see her minge' is way over the line. It's a form of sexual assault.

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67958136

     

    'Police officers mock body-worn video of semi-naked woman.'

     

    'Later that shift, the female officer began viewing body-worn video of the woman's journey inside the van while at her desk in Newbury Police Station. Three male colleagues, including the tutor, gathered around her laptop and watched the footage while making "sickening" comments about her - according to Faisal, who was also in the room. His witness statement, which we have seen, records the types of comments made by colleagues. He reports his tutor saying the woman had "crusty" or "manky" breasts, while another officer asked to see her "minge". A fourth male colleague also joined a discussion about how much money officers would need to be paid to have sex with her. One suggested £500,000, another said £250. Faisal says officers referred to the woman by name and were clearly aware of her identity - and watched the footage despite the female PC's decision that charges would not be brought.'

    • Thanks 1
  13. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-68142578

     

    'Edenfield Centre: Vulnerable patients denied human rights - review.'

     

    'The report outlines a series of recommendations for the trust, which include ensuring patient, family and staff voices are heard "at every level" and creating a culture where quality of care is the "utmost priority". Other recommendations include a call to adapt to problems caused by staff shortages, to address the poor state of some building, and for a review into oversight to "prevent tragedies like those seen at Edenfield from reoccurring".' (It will keep on occurring, unless society changes.)

  14. The 'Islamic Resistance In Iraq', eh? At this rate, they will soon be the most feared terrorists in the Middle East.

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68159900

     

    'White House blames Iran-backed umbrella group for deadly drone strike.'

     

    'National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said US intelligence believed the Islamic Resistance in Iraq was behind Sunday's drone strike.' (Yeah, i'm sure they were.)

×
×
  • Create New...