Jump to content

numnuts

Members
  • Content Count

    754
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

337 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just LOL at the fake smiles in this clip. Vaccine heroes went astray.
  2. I wondered whether Beverley Allitt might have been set up a few years ago. I think that the PTB making society much more selfish, in recent decades, will also help. I definitely can't see any cokeheads taking it. A good article and Hancock does have to be the worst liar going. Too right, along with the mass media shills. Protection from legal action in relation to something we are told shouldn't need protection from legal action. A good oxymoron right there. They are the conspiracy theorists.
  3. Best news I have ever had. Exactly! And they are ALREADY talking about booster jabs being needed in the coming years, as we all well predicted. The nastier shots will follow the initial double dose in due course. Not that I would touch the initial double dose with a barge pole anyway. I haven't got the time to try and analyse whether every individual M.P. is a shill or not. God just doesn't send enough hours in the day. Without judging this guy, I will only say that I am sure some of them do the odd bit of grandstanding, after the fact, to protect th
  4. All of those, who were already living right on the edge, would have sadly perished in April. This is the spike in deaths that the PTB wanted and are still, in terms of directly connecting them with Coronavirus, clinging on to. Now, with Lockdown 2, it won't have been so bad. This is why they recently plugged the 'Lockdown worked this time around' spiel. Funny how it worked better in winter, when fewer people were adhering to the rules as well. I am not saying that the PTB wouldn't do anything they thought they could get away with. They did 9/11 for God's sake. I just don'
  5. You are wise not to go along, as lashing out on the street will never help. And yes, even if you pile through four of them, there will always be more coming for you. The sheeple need to only act as one, then that will be that. No use worrying about it. Just hope for mass non-compliance. Yes, a process which would yield a decade's worth of data on potential side effects. Sigh. In the run-up to the Scottish 'Independence' referendum, Andy Murray pretty much stated that he was 'going to talk to other people', before deciding whethe
  6. If only Molly Russell's dad hadn't allowed his daughter's demise to be used by the evil scum. I don't blame him at all, as he was blinded by anger. We all called it out from Day One though. Problem - Young girl killed herself, due to viewing self-harm images online. Reaction - How terrible! Solution - Remove self-harm images from the internet? NO, censor the entire internet for anything the government doesn't like! Anyone who disagrees is very horrid. I believe that they are aiming for a global population of 2 to 3 billion. Some folks
  7. It is true that the PTB will always seek to tell renegade sheeple, by way of their TV screen, just who 'their new man' is. 'Sheeple, THIS is your new man.' A while back they kept on plugging Jacob Rees-Mogg and Bill Cash as 'our new men' I would run a mile from that duo. Ha ha ha. P.S. Not to say that literally everyone we get a glimpse of on TV is a shill. George Galloway is very legitimate in my eyes. Nigel Farage at least 'was' legitimate I think. It's just the way in which such folks are presented to us that must be scrutinised. For example, Richard Tice is largely left alone b
  8. Yes, as well predicted, they are going to be running economic Armageddon stories literally every day now, until at least the end of this month. I personally see it as a 'Remain In The E.U.' Advent calendar. For me, it is circumstances like this that destroy the narrative of the vaccine pushers. They are literally shooting themselves down in flames. They say 'Oh, it's safe. Oh, some of these new vaccines are based on tried and tested vaccine technology. Oh, you must have it.' And yet, they then seek to change vaccine indemnity protocols. Um, why? We all know the answer.
  9. She is well fukking creepy. I saw her on TV, just the other day, and had a 'The Demon Headmaster' (1996) 'Look into my eyes' moment. The BBC is totally gone now. Not that it was ever a bastion of truth, but I would say that even 20 years ago it had 'some' positive role to play. I am convinced that his hubby is a spook. Bob Geldof. For sure, this is why the House Of Lords was scrapped, as the final arbiter of U.K. justice, and replaced with a U.S. style Supreme Court. Unpalatable as it was, we were better
  10. I still don't understand what the fukk he is trying to prove here? Why are folks, who are primarily concerned with the potential medium and long term side effects of the vaccine, going to be at all impressed by this dunderhead taking it live on air?! Is his trampy sidekick supposed to be taking it too? In short, he turned to the dark side. I am wondering whether a Youtube video, which only said 'Side effects data, for any new vaccine, can only go back as far as the creation of any new vaccine', would get removed in the current climate? Airtight logic
  11. Maybe someone has him on film bumming up a goat? None other than the dodgy outfit that conjures up loads of dodgy polls. It seems he is very well qualified to be a Vaccine Tsar then. The Israeli sheeple are the dumbest sheeple going. They will swallow any old bullshit. I have always thought handing out flyers is a very good idea. I have consistently said so too, ever since first joining the old forum over 10 years ago now. We are getting there, but, as one of the resistance guys in 'They Live' (1988) said,
  12. I couldn't trust anyone, still in the same employment at the BBC, who won a journalism award last year. If the poll is real, then I am still a bit worried that 20% of folks would accept a 'freedom pass'. It sounds like a special access deal you would get for a day out at Butlins. Um, nefarious as they sound, how are they ever going to know whether someone is having unsafe sex or not? It makes no sense to me. I agree, but not the best tactic for U.K. residents to use in the middle of winter. Good on her. It
  13. Personally, I would take some good, honest chaos, non-PTB chaos, over kettling any day of the week. I had another thought. If peaceful protesters do decide to initially gather at one location in the future, so as to subsequently move on to another location, then they can just keep on moving between the two locations non-stop. The copidiots will be following the protesters, thinking they are trying to throw them off the scent, but in reality the non-stop moving between the two locations will actually be the march. Everyone will then go home and the copidiots will be left at the scene, while scr
  14. Footnote as follows: 'If you ever happen to bump in to someone called Numnuts, then just run. He munches on our sort for breakfast.' For sure. If he was in any way genuine, then why did he prorogue parliament last year? It was a completely pointless act that only played in to the hands of the PTB. I am yet to hear one credible explanation, as to why anyone legitimate would have done that. Maybe, when the true horror of what he was fronting dawned on him, he did got cold feet. I definitely don't buy him being seriously ill in hospital thou
  15. If that was done, then don't make a decision as to where you will next head off to, until you are actually at King's Cross. Foreknowledge, in terms of unfriendly parties, would then be a logical impossibility. As a general concept relating to peaceful protests, I am not just talking about mainline London train stations here, I think that should be the rule of thumb. Always meet up somewhere and only then decide where you are going to move on to.
×
×
  • Create New...