Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

234 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Gareth, you must surely realise that some of the negativity directed towards you is not coming from genuine forum members. I see the baddies and some of them are on this thread. Your mind has been disturbed and you need to take stock and think clearly again. Don't do exactly what the PTB would want you to do. We aren't going to win this without taking some serious shit. How could it be otherwise? Please stick around and don't remove yourself from running this forum or the new forum. We need you. It doesn't matter how long it takes. We can work it all out. Peace.
  2. When I first saw this video, then I just knew he must have died in action not too long after. I thought I was fukking nuts as well. Ha ha. RIP Bruno.
  3. https://novakdjokovicfoundation.org/press-center/news-and-info/novak-and-jelena-djokovic-opened-the-first-kindergarten-in-the-village-near-sabac/
  4. Novak Djokovic has certainly served the PTB agenda in the past, but when he first came out against the idea of vaccines a few months ago, then I think he was being genuine. So, he either fell into line on this or his tennis tour got ambushed.
  5. numnuts

    Elton John

    I wasn't suggesting that Freddie or Elton were. I was merely stipulating why Freddie and George weren't doing anything untoward in the said time frame. As already stated, Freddie died in 1991 and was ill for quite a while beforehand. As for George, he was very unpopular with the PTB. If there was even a whiff of impropriety with children, from any time in his life, then we would have surely heard of it. And I do mean even a whiff, let alone anything concrete. I am always 'suspicious' of such threads, as it is certainly one tactic the PTB would use to try and make this forum look bad. For example, take a national icon, preferably gay or sexually ambiguous; then have someone cast some vague aspersions at them; then have someone else come along and casts more vague aspersions at them, plus others too, which are even more heinous; then someone else reading the forum says 'Oh, how dreadful!'; then the masonic mass media, who really do cover for some of the sickest paedophiles on planet Earth, also get wind of it and say 'Yes, how dreadful! Something must be done about this!'; and on it goes. Yawn... As for Chris Spivey, I have checked him out in the past and I am certainly no supporter of his. I don't know if he is a shill or not and I don't really care. What I do know is that he isn't going to bring about much change, given the way he goes about things. Isn't real change supposed to be what he wants? Or is this all just a hobby for him? I say just leave him to it. I have seen purported 'truthers' having ego battles in the past, at least some of them must be shills, and it seems like a total waste of good energy to me. P.S. Going back to my mass media comments, just take Guy Verhofstadt as an example. He was prime minister of Belgium from 1999 to 2008, in the heart of the E.U., when the bulk of the Dutroux Affair went down. He then became a prominent E.U. figure. And yes, he went along with it all and the mass media said nothing. I must be living in an alternative dimension somewhere then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaf7q9RKjgo
  6. numnuts

    Elton John

    Never google what someone tells you to google on this forum. Not very likely, as Freddie was dying and George wasn't a paedophile.
  7. Christmas is just around the corner now.
  8. No introductions needed here...
  9. I have been speaking my mind since 2006 and I was on the old 2006 forum from 2009. I think that most folks who know of me will appreciate that I usually use quite considered language. For example, if am 10%, 30%, 50% or 70% etc. sure of something, then I will try to make that very clear. Now, on the late Anthony Lawson's (RIP) Youtube channel, there can be found his quite popular 'WTC7 - This is an Orange' video. I have viewed it numerous times, over the years, and also posted it both on the old forum and on this forum on a few occasions. My concern is that this video has now literally been 'added to' or 'segment switched', within the past fortnight or so, and I am 100% sure of it. God knows what Anthony would have said, if he had lived to see it. I am talking about the footage that I can now see between 1.03-1.07. It shows a more top to bottom view, from one angle of the building, and I believe it has been added to make the building look more susceptible to a total collapse. In reality it doesn't, as all of the separate steel columns will still have to have failed at exactly the same time, but I can see why someone would have done it. It was already quite farcical having a link to the official narrative on Wikipedia forced under this video, when this video in itself wholly disproved the official narrative, but whatever. Sigh.
  10. Indeed. However, I would like to add that, fake or real or something in between, all of these 'events' will have been manipulated by the PTB. Some shootings in Manchester have also recently occurred, according to the mass media. Our streets are no longer safe!
  • Create New...