Phil26

Makes you wonder why Tesco and other stores don't really care about shoplifting or product loss. It's all about control and tracking what you eat and use. Truth is the food costs nothing to produce (and vast quantities are thrown away by supermarkets) as the corporations who own those companies are organised in a pyramid hierarchy. They "print money" aka numbers on a screen. Governments own those supermarkets through the corporate structure that owns governments, look at how quickly they organised them at the start of lockdown. As money isn't real anyway and there is way more food than the world needs (false scarcity) people need to start asking why all these new ways to pay in shops are only happening now, and it's nothing to do with profits.

What has been your experience of the simulation and perceptual dominance? As you're asking others to share their experiences the least you can do is explain why you even think it is possible for this world to be a simulation and what experience you have that makes you believe it could be. Otherwise why would you ask?

Given that you would demand evidence for anything said how would you know if what you were told was true or not? Should people even strive for perceptual dominance? For how long? Should they just leave instead? The problem in this world is that the dominant 'mind' is manipulating others to make their perception match the people trying to control them. At the same time they force everyone into the same world to experience this. When Icke refers to perceptual dominance he is saying that divine sparks already 'override' the simulation, to an extent anyway. There is good in this world, within the simulation, but all the time something or someone is trying to destroy it. The goodness is caused by divine sparks who want to experience goodness. The world would be a lot worse, and more controlled, if all the free divine sparks left, with only those who have sacrificed themselves to full control by the system (brain mesh, chips, VR etc.) who would remain. By then the world would be all transhumanism based and love, family, joy and goodness would be absent. You are seeing this in the way they are destroying cultures and people today. The simulation is created by the minds within it. Think of it like a computer, the world has hardware but the minds run like software on it. The 'people' who own the computer can't fully create the software, but the minds can affect this. So it influences the minds to create the software/world it wants. This creates a world in constant conflict, which is related to what you said about divide and conquer. It really doesn't matter if people disagree, left, right, religion and everything else, what matters is being forced into a limited artificial space to fight it out. They want us to fight each other. They pitch endless things for us to fight about, and they churn out more news to provoke every minute of everyday. The simulation forces you to experience that. We fight for perceptual dominance because we are beings who naturally create reality with our perception. So throwing us into an artificial limited space is bound to cause us to have to fight to survive.

As you admit you haven't read the books you are referring to how would you know either way? I was referring to your many comments criticising Icke. You have difficulty with opinions that differ from yours. And you always try and make it personal with snide remarks like your comment quoted here. It is completely unnecessary and counterproductive to debate. You keep telling people they should "do" something, but what are you doing? And what are you suggesting the people you criticise should do? You're always either really angry (when the comment is a different opinion to yours) or you are hyper 'nice' when someone agrees with you. Interestingly you were 'nice towards me for a few days (apparently you had no problem with the way I posted comments then) but as soon as I disagreed with one thing you said you have become angry at all my comments since. You really should try to realise that difference of opinion is a good thing.

While it is fair to say women have been treated badly as a group for some time (the system set it up that way), it is a system construction to pit groups against each other. It's why the elite are demonising women now and blaming them for all the men's problems, while at the same time demonising men. It's a mindf**k. They are using the narcissistic tactic of triangulation. As you say, the elite have no interest in whether you're male, female etc., they are psychopathic narcissists, they only care about themselves.

That is one level of the system.

The recent New Age spiritual movement is just another step along in the plan of the elites to control beliefs. Most of that spiritual material is rehashed from older religion and practices. The 'patriarchal' control is just another lie to pit men and women against each other. You're also using a metaphor that makes no sense. There is no pendulum of Patriarchy, in fact what most people perceive as the 'Patriarchy' has a lot of elite women in it. The truth is it's not about men and women finding 'balance'(whatever you mean by that because you didn't explain what that you mean by "balance"- balance of what?) it is about us all realising how we're all being manipulated by race, gender, sexual orientation and class. Until people see past all those aspects of the system they will be controlled by it.

The system invented religion to steer people, now they are using it to destabilise social groups. What we need is to find community in ways that the system didn't invent or control. The system has corrupted what family really is. They just want to isolate people, make them fearful of each other and cause depression. That's why there are increasing numbers of narcissists in the population.

That is exactly what they do. A lot of narcissists use rage as a substitute (or precursor) for sex, especially when they have isolated themselves. They also are more likely to be addicted to porn. It is a shame that pornography and sexualisation has become normalised for young people and it is damaging them psychologically, which of course is the intention by the system. Children see pornography as young as seven, new report finds Interestingly far more LGBTQ teens and children actively sought out to watch online porn - at least two thirds say they do. This is particularly disturbing as a lot of LGBTQ online porn involves the normalisation of BDSM. Why aren't people questioning the assumption that it is normal for pornography to exist? Why is it so 'unpopular' to question the psychological harm it inflicts on those involved in it (not to mention the connection to organised crime, sex trafficking, drugs and other crime) and on those watching it, even though the evidence of that harm is overwhelming. Brain damage from porn addiction - research findings It is also concerning that trans youth are being encouraged to have a 'career' in 'sex work' (reframed language as prostitution doesn't sound as appealing to most people). It's not surprising when trans youth are growing up building their entire identity and sense of self around their sexuality! Louis Theroux has done documentaries on porn actors and his latest was on 'sex workers'. The three women in it were all admitting to disassociation during ALL sex. One said she ran away from home at 14 (due to abuse) then met a man of 25 who abused her and then she went into 'sex work'. See the review here. Louis Theroux documentary review. A problem with Theroux is he is in deep with the BBC and the system but sometimes his approach reveals more than he probably intends. Suicide rates, drug use and self harming are common in 'sex workers'. When people promote 'sex work' as an independent rational choice I always ask them - "if you were a billionaire would you sell your body for sex?". Obviously the answer is always no. While society.is busy reframing prostitution and pedophilia as 'sex work' and 'minor attracted person' there is a generation of young people in poverty being pulled into it as 'easy money'. The system creates the poverty and the normalises pornography, Onlyfans, 'sex work' etc. You can be sure no kids of the wealthy will have to get f**ked to feed their families or themselves.

I disagree. Most people do not "love the 'system'". They hate the system, they hate the oppression and poverty, they just can't see a way out ...yet. They are forced by the system into a constant fight or flight mentality, just to 'survive'. You're wrong to say they "don't really want to let go of it". They are suffering from Stockholm syndrome at best, and a hatred of the system in their being. By your 'logic' a prisoner in jail "loves the guards" and "REALLY doesn't want to leave". You have no understanding of the psychology involved. Wherever there are people discussing getting out of the system there are always a few nay sayers floating around shilling for the system. They always tell people there is no hope, and gaslight them saying they "really want(ed) it" (the abuse and suffering). People in this world do not want to be imprisoned or forced to suffer, they simply haven't seen the way out yet, but they will. You're talking like Agent Smith in the 'Matrix' - "... I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery.". You're selling that trope and it's nothing but propaganda and gaslighting, which is why Agent Smith tries to use it to break the human spirit. It's interesting that you and others with a similar mindset do nothing, but then criticise those who are doing something, but you accuse them of doing nothing. You're blaming everyone else for your predicament but you should be saving yourself. You can't stay in your victim mentality and expect your situation to improve. That mentality always says people don't "do" enough but they never say what they expect people to "do". What do you expect people to "do"? David Icke leads by example. So it's unclear why you criticise him for not "doing" anything. What do you expect him to do? If you read through the comments you'll see it's those who are prepared to do things for themselves who are not criticising of others suggestions and discussion, regardless of their opinions.

Why do you think it is a great plan then?

Exactly. It is our perception, our questioning and refusing to accept the dominance that matters.

And that's why people need to question EVERY ASSUMPTION they have about this world, their lives and everything around them.

If you were in the scientific community for long you'd see how it is a lot of 'politics' with heavy military and corporate funding. It was the scientists who backed up governments over the COVID scam. Very few are prepared to do the right thing as they care more about being successful and getting funding. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/07/report-says-cokes-research-funding-gives-it-right-to-kill-studies.html Abuse of research funding widespread https://jacobin.com/2018/07/capitalism-science-research-academia-funding-publishing Non scientists have a very romantic view of science and scientists (TV and movies too) when in fact it's nothing like they imagine. I wasn't arguing against 'science' per se, I am arguing that it is all conjecture. So none of it can be stated as fact, which is in fact what a lot of people do unfortunately. I have advanced degrees in science myself so I am certainly not dismissing science per se. You just have to see how it has become corrupt and used to manipulate the population. Rupert Sheldrake speaks on the subject and he is a scientist... so. I think that even scientists have to raise questions about the practice of science or silence is exactly what encourages corruption. In its purest form science can be useful, but in practice it rarely is now. Strictly speaking, especially from a scientific point of view, you should doubt everything you have not observed yourself. It's not a recipe for paranoia or craziness unless you - 1. Don't trust your own gut/intuition. 2. Keep waiting for absolute proof - that is not going to happen in this world. 3. You don't go and seek the experiential and empirical 'evidence' for yourself. 4. You stay locked into your five senses. The conditioning of this world, and ironically science promotes that conditioning, is that you give your trust and judgement to 'authority', that is the first mistake. Then you start to wait for the proof to be shown to you, another mistake. David Icke is a good example of someone who was deep into the conditioning of the mainstream, professional football, BBC etc. but he trusted his gut and left it behind. Every step of the way he has trusted himself and sought the experiences necessary for him to discover what is going on. He also has developed excellent research and writing abilities. There are people with so called higher education who don't come close to his level of communication ability. He also has common sense. He doesn't put people on a pedestal. He is balanced and questions everything. Always trusting his gut, experience and knowledge. So if David can do that (and go through all that he has) without becoming paranoid or crazy why should you think you would go crazy just by thinking about the simulation? Fear of 'going crazy' is a tactic the system uses to keep you in line. And that is something most people aren't talking about but it is a big part of what is going on 'behind the scenes'.

Well, as it affects other mammals why not humans? Brain parasite may strip away rodents' fear of predators—not just of cats Predators and parasites can work together and they often do. They also share many characteristics and behaviours. Predators and parasites are prevalent in this world and other dimensions.

Your posting of a list of copy and paste entries from online dictionaries is not an argument for anything you have said. Also everyone here already knows what those words mean. So what is the point of that? It proves nothing. People who get stuck on semantics like that usually do so because they have no argument or a weak argument. There are predators and parasites. You seem very determined to convince people they don't exist, which of course is where the phrase "it's the best trick the devil ever pulled" comes from. The power of a predator or parasite is HIDING. A predator will do anything to mask themselves or their intentions to keep you feeling 'safe' while they plan your fate. Of course that gives them the advantage because you don't do anything to escape the situation and you are completely unprepared for the horrific outcome that awaits you. Parasites are similar and will hide as long as they can while they consume you and your resources. They both win by convincing you they don't exist. Also, and interestingly as you are trying to say people are "causing their own suffering", predators and parasitic entities in any form will gaslight the victim that they are responsible for their own suffering. Everything you are promoting gives advantage to predators and parasites. Even in this world people are finally seeing the extent of 'human' predators and narcissists, psychopaths and those whom in human form are doing everything to hide their true intentions just so they can cause harm, use, abuse and destroy others. Those people are only a manifestation of predators and parasites of beings in consciousness. All 'physical' beings have a consciousness 'counterpart' and therefore as they manifest as predators and parasites, narcissists and psychopaths etc. that is what and who they are in their consciousness state. Ergo these beings can exist in different dimensions, not just in physical form, just like the rest of us in fact. What you are suggesting is that good empathetic people create evil to torment themselves. But you fail to explain why they would do this. You also fail to explain why a consciousness that is fundamentally at 'one' with everything would want to create child serial abusers, sadistic murderers and the elite who rape, steal and abuse whatever they can get away with. There are predators and parasites and they have their own consciousness separate to those who are empathetic beings.

But is it? Everything you can perceived with your five senses is within the simulation. In fact what you, I and others perceive within the simulation also has a personal element to, which is why personal experience can vary. We overlap with other people when it is necessary, that takes energy (and why lockdown saved the simulation huge amounts of energy). For example the 'mandela effect', and even if you don't believe in that look at the unreliable testimony from witnesses for the same event. That is even in people who have been been tested for having normal cognitive functioning. Then there are the 'glitches', items disappearing and reappearing and other so called paranormal experience. Some people see things that others don't. The simulation is always seeking efficiency, it avoids wasting energy. When a 'tree falls in the wood'... it didn't because nothing happens when there is no one experiencing it. The system is 'pruning' right now. For an analogy look at brain consolidation, memory and energy usage and upscale it to a 'world'. Think of this 'world' as a 'hologram' of your brain. As the simulation makes your brain more efficient the 'world' needs less energy to run it - which leaves more to be harvested to the beings running the simulation. The pandemic was a massive experiment on brain structure and interfacing to produce your perception of the 'world'. Why do you think they keep trying to put messages into your thinking about "energy efficient devices" - because you are one! It's a reflection of the foundation of this simulation. It's like farming. It has become more 'efficient', at the expense of the animals and quality of food. Pesticides, nanotechnologies, GMO, battery farming and now they seek to make it more efficient with lab grown meat and veganism. They are encouraging people to live on protein drinks and artificial supplements. It's more efficient, and that is all it cares about. One thing rarely discussed about the pandemic was the real reason everything was shut down. All entertainment venues, sports and live events, schools, universities, work, doctor offices, and the fact that people say even places like hospitals were mostly empty. Now that meant people were at home, all day, every day, the same Perceptual Environment. The same few people around them or no one if they lived alone. And no travel or holidays or visits for parties or events. Of course the elite could still use as much as they liked because they serve the simulation. They are the 'farmers' keeping the 'cattle' under control. Now look at this analogy. Do you think it is easier to keep Truman in his limited 'town', which was a TV studio, or do you think it would take more resources to build him an entire planet to roam while keeping him in 'The Truman Show'? Even before the pandemic the average person, and majority of the population, hardly left their town, except for holidays or careers, but most had the same routine, which once established is easy to maintain with less energy in the simulation. Economics, poverty keeps that under control. While the elite globe trot all they want. The pandemic was a test run of efficiency for the simulation. It needs to reduce output and increase energy input. Not having to produce all those other places, activities and environments (and 'people'), while just maintaining the same small home or local experience for people takes a lot less energy. While at the same time people were giving away more energy than ever before. Even scientists are looking to use humans at 'batteries'. Also the time of "14 billion" years is not real. Were you there to see it? Have you been to those other planets in this 'physical' world? You base all of that on what you are told by the simulation, mostly through science and scientists who act like gatekeepers for the system. Even if you believe in traditional science you have to admit it is constantly saying it was wrong before and now 'here's a new theory'... For a start there is no science to prove the age of the universe, it's all theory and changes all the time. Age of universe... Not to mention that EVERY scientific theory is opposed by an opposite scientific theory - both of which had to produce experimental data for those theories. So how do YOU decide what to believe? Cambridge University how reliable are scientific studies? Science is only interpretation of data, based on rules invented by scientists themselves! Science is a closed system of rules using those rules to explain unexplained data.

There are infinite worlds possible in infinite consciousness. Why try and rule this one? Especially as this world has been created to cause suffering for the enjoyment of beings who are sadistic psychopathic narcissists. A cross between Westworld and The Hunger Games! But I do agree that while in this world it is vital not to be passive or sit back and do nothing about it.

That's true. It's like organised crime, corporations just have the power to make the laws to make the crimes they commit 'legal', but yeah, they are the same thugs as all gangs. In this world conflict is constantly provoked by three things, false scarcity, a disconnection from our ability to create and psychopathic narcissists. This world is just a corruption of what it is possible for us to create. When you speak of community and cooperation that is the true way to freedom and a better existence for everyone in that agreement for that reality. Outside of this corrupt world are infinite possibilities and those with the same creative intentions gather together in agreement. We chose who we will build our world with, our community with. Those who want peace, cooperation and respect for others live together and create together. Those who seek something else will do that with others of a like mind. The problem is this world is a world designed to trap people and abuse them for the 'enjoyment' of the elites and their controllers. They created a false scarcity environment while blocking our true creative abilities, like blocking a signal. Because of this you have a mixture of evil vicious gangs, thugs and narcissist psychopaths thrown into the same world as good loving caring people who have good empathy. Then you see what you would expect to see if that happens. We're not meant to be here. We're thrown into this world and made to forget who we are. When we realise our true selves and leave this place we can create the world the way it should be for those who gather together to create it. A world based on integrity, good ethics, cooperation, community, mutual support and respect and a deep sense of our natural self in empathy and real love for our creation.

That's because this world IS a simulation. At the same time any simulation will have rules, so a train running someone over in the simulation is because they agreed to the rules that it could run them over and they could die. A simulation doesn't mean no rules.

All excellent points, and my personal experience has been similar to yours in that respect. Let's not forget that it is psychologists who ran MKULTRA. Australia has seen that. In the UK they were still running those psychological 'projects' on kids through schools and military bases into the 1980s and beyond that. A friend of mine, who was a psychologist during the 1990s has had personal experience of knowing psychologists 'researching' on young people at military bases in the UK. Some were from the care system, some their parents were paid for their children's participation in the research and some were born and brought up on the bases. The military are recruiting a lot of psychologists in increasing numbers. The UK government is spending £16.8 billion this year on mental health services and it is increasing every year. That's not good. It simply means they are pushing more people into 'needing' mental health treatment. It is disturbing. They are encouraging everyone to think they have a mental illness. They are conditioning more and more children in accepting a lifetime of mental illness. This for example, "Children’s mental health A 2023 survey of children and young people’s mental health found that 20% of children aged 8 to 16 had a probable mental disorder in 2023, up from 12% in 2017. Among those aged 17 to 19, 10% had a probable mental disorder in 2017, rising to 23% in 2023.". https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06988/ They are hiding the real cause behind those statistics. They try and say it's just modern life causing it, but look at the tough lives people have lived in the last 150 years, but only in the last 20 we see this trend towards the normalisation of mental illness in young adults and children.

That's what they overtly say, but if you look at what they actually do when in government it's not that black and white. In the UK the conservatives say they are the party of low taxes and hands off government, but they have raised taxes and look at what happened with lockdown. The Labour party tend to be worse, which is saying something when the conservatives are a bunch of elitist psychopaths. Of course so are the labour party, but they just hide it more. In fact being a psychopath is a requirement for any political position. It's all a soap opera anyway as they are all a one world government run by people you never see. Trump is interesting... but not for the reasons most people think.

The only real currency that matters is energy, everything else is just a symbol for that. Sure, fiat currency is just manipulation of power, but it's still just another layer of the manifestation from the astral. Everything in this world ultimately revolves around sex. Sexual energy is simply nervous system energy. They created a sexualised race to keep generating it, especially in unhealthy, perverse and addictive ways. It's why they are making everything about sex and why they are sexualising younger and younger people. They understand the value of the different values of sexual energy from different sources with different situations.

It's true that no one is in charge of EVERYTHING. Even this world is constantly fought over, even in the astral etc. All beings want the world they want. The problem is when what those beings want is to hurt and control others. Then the conflict begins.

When you consider the unique qualities of water, its electrical conductivity and how this increases with salinity, and this world is mostly ocean, it makes you think about the simulation and how it uses this.