Occulus5

That's what I was thinking. I don't think people in these social groups will be truther type people who think terrorist attacks are fabricated or other things we discuss on here, plus there's bound to be one person in the group who will mention Covid and lockdown and people they know dying from the supposed virus, so it's probably best not to mention your views, at least to begin with.

You're right, it wouldn't kill me to give it a go, looks like a good thing to get involved in. I do appreciate it. I know some people seem to think joining social groups makes you conformist, but if you want to meet people and hate having no friends or not meeting a partner then it's either be part of a group or be on your own.

A few years ago I got into the whoe PID thing mainly from Mark Devlin. I don't know what his view on Paul having been replaced and murdered is now as I haven't listened to him for awhile now (mainly because I just got tired of him), but I did hear him say that he changed his view somewhat. Mike Williams (who I just think is a big head and think he's some Beatles know-it-all) is sure that Paul was bumped off in Sept 66 and replaced by a Scottish bloke named William Campbell/Bill Shephard (aka Bill Shears) and the Memoirs of Billy Shears is written by him under the Uharriet name. Tina Foster also believes Paul died and was replaced but she believes the Beatles were originally an organic group. Nick Kollerstrom also talked about PID and he has said the same that Paul was replaced. Mark Devlin has talked about the idea of Paul having been a twin, this wasn't his own theory but from Miles Mathis. Early pre Beatle photos of Paul in Hamburg by Astrid Kerscherr do appear to show Paul with a narrower face and nose like the present day Sir Paul McCartney and unlike the pre-66 Beatle Mania Paul with the rounded face. Eyebrows seem to change alot at varying times, not just from 67 onwards but before when original Paul was supposedly still around. As many will have noticed, Paul's personality changed.

No you're right, I know you are trying to help. That group sounds a good idea, though looking at their site most members seem to be pensioners or over 50s, and I'm 44 so aint looking for anyone who is over 50. Yes I'm in the UK and in the Liverpool area (well more Knowsley really). Pity there isn't a group in Liverpool.

Everyone in Monaco seems to drive the same looking Ferrari or some other modern supercar. Yeah these people probably expoilt poor countries.

Can it really be that straight forward attaining welath via asssets?.

Yes I do have a defeatist attitude, but this is down to having alot of bad experiences and no outcome. The only place I go at the moment are dating sites, and we all know they are a waste of time. I don't know of any social groups the ones you mentioned. I don't have much in the way of a hobby, I'm not interested in sports, I doubt I will bump into anyone joining a gym.

No I agree. Yeah the skinny blonde types just want a footballer. I know I have no chance with those anyway, but I do have standards. Yes social groups are a good way to get to know someone, but it's unlikely any woman in such a a group (especially in their 40s) will be single.

IMO I think hair colour matters, that's just my opinion. My friend tells me it doesn't matter. I don't really know what is considered attractive. When I go on a night out with my friend (though not often) I dress casually, jeans, nice shirt and a nice jacket, but I don't stand out in anyway. As for type, well I tend to atrract ugly/average or overweight women, or women who have a disability. Last date I went on about a month ago I met up with this 40 year old who has this neuroligical brain condition where it causes her to sometimes have seizures. She was quite overweight and was about 4ft 11 and not very attractive looking. She was nice to talk to and we seemed to have things in common as she was talking about her Irish roots and wanting to go to Belfast to see the Titanic museum. I said that I interested in the Titanic disaster (yes I did mention the switch theory but she seemed OK with it even though she had never about it). She seemed to want to meet again but I couldn't meet her again when she wanted to due to being very busy with a house move. After that we just chatted on/off on Whatsapp but all she talked about was her ex being on bail and her wanting to move. Last week or so I've talked messaging her but she has given me the silent treatment, and her Facebook dating profile has been updated with a new photo. One minute they are interested and then next they ignore you. I have no idea why I seem to be getting replies from women who have issues or disabilities.

I've ever only had one relationship since being single, and that was when I was in my late 20s and I'm now in my 40s. To have never met anyone before that I think is very odd, especially when I am not ugly looking, none of my family even cared that I had met anyone. I don't consider myself attractive though, and I do tend to think my hair colour is a put off as I have reddish hair. If you look around at blokes with their partners/girlfriends, one thing I tend to notice is that they are always with men who have dark hair. I know dark hair the most common colour, but even if it was a level playing fieldthere were the same number of different hair colours in men, the women would still go for someone who has dark hair. Blonde haired women especially are always with men who have either dark brown or black hair. If you're a ginger he may as well forget trying to meet someone, especially someone who is very attractive because. Another thing I've noticed about these dating sites which makes me think some profiles are fake, is the unusual spelling for supposedly English names. I see alot of women named Rachael instead of Rachel or "Rachelle", Stacy instead of "Stacey" and other odd names. Either the person can't spell their own name or it's someone from a non english speaking country and doesn't the correct spelling for those names. Quite often they put where they work (as in the company they supposedly work for) and when I look up the company the company either doesn't exist or is located on the other side of the country, sometimes when there are photos on the company's website of the staff, there is no mention of that person working there under the name given on the profile and the job title. Red flag that it's a bogus profile. Why any real woman (unless they are really looking for attention) would want to state on a dating profile the company they work at I don't know, you don't know who's going to be waiting outside and stalking them, so to me anyone who mentions where they work is probably a fake profile/scammer/bot.

My friend is far more chatty to women in public than I am, and he will sometimes (depends on the person really I suppose) approch them and talk to them, but most of the time after chatting and exhanging numbers they give him the silent treatment the next day, probably because they were so drunk they don't remember talking to him and giving her number. In pubs and bars you will get women like that or players who are just there looking for attention nothing else.

Went to Iain Davies' website earlier and noticed he's done an interview about Manchester with Gareth Icke. It's about bloody time the Icke's talked about this and fabricated terrorist attacks.

Yeah I need to meet someone the old fashioned way, join a group or club, but I'm not a group type of person. Back onto dating sites, but I think any profile that mentions that if you have taken the Covid vaccine is most likely, IMO, a fake profile, BOT or a scammer, either that are the person is incredibly stuck up and prejudiced. I saw this profile just: "Kind, creative, non conformist. We probably wouldn't get good together if you: Smoke Don't drive Are rubbish at DIY Took the Covid vaccines Are obsessed with football Believe everything you tv tells you Have very young children Can't take a joke" I notice the anti smoking and anti vaccine thing quite abit on dating sites. Note: this profile had an Instagram link, so it's likely a fake profile. Alot of women do prefer men who drive, which is abit unfair and discriminitive. My friend often tells me if I drove it would make a difference in meeting someone. I think the above, if a real person, is an example of a spoilt brat with an entitled attitutde, yet the person is in her 40s she acts like a teenager. There's alot of them on dating sites, yet I don't know anyone in person who talks like that. Take note of odd/bad spellings and bad grammar in many profiles which hint at being fake.

Yeah that's what I thought about the scammers, they would reply, but the amount of messages I have sent in the last few years of using those sites I have only ever had two people ask me for money, and I can't say for certain if they were scammers, neither of them looked like supermodels that you would normally expect. You'd think I would've had alot more, yet most of the complaints about these sites are about there being full of scammers. I have had some really strange replies where it seemed like I was messaging a robot. Yeah alot of them just want some handsome millionaire or someone who is reasonable well off and has a nice car, house etc. I think the not waning to meet someone and the ego boost is more likely the reason. In 4 years on those sites I've only had 3 dates, spoken to maybe less than 20 women either via the site or on Whatsapp, and only one still bothers to message me on Whatsapp, the rest have either ghosted me or blocked me, in most cases for no apparent reason. I've had women say "Bye" when all I've asked was how their day was and what do they like doing in their spare time, just a normal thing to ask, yet they react like I have asked a personal question or been dirty.

So many complaints on Trustpilot about these so called dating sites and some comments about wanting to sue them. Why haven't the owners of these sites been investigated or prosecuted?. Makes me wonder if they are being allowed to do what they are doing. Are they unaccountable and untraceable?. 15 years ago I used to go on Udating, datingdirect and Plenty of Fish. The times I was using those sites (Plenty of Fish was free and the others were paid but where very cheap where you could pay so much for a few days, no need for a subscription) I managed to chat to quite a few people who where genuine. They werent fantastic by any means but they were far better than what they are now. If I ever get a reply now the person only says "I'm ok" and rarely asks me anything back, it's just a one way conversation, and asking them if they would like to chat on Whatsapp (which I don't see a problem with as they could just block me afterwards) just get "I don't use Whatsapp" or "I don't like giving my number out" which probably means the person doesn't live in the UK. I have messaged women who have no pic, are overweight, ugly, slim, attractive, disabled etc and it's very rare I get one reply out of 50 messages in the space of a few days. Hard to imagine most are fakes or scammers.

Yeah charity shops are a nice place to look for old stuff, you can find lots of DVDs in there for next to nothing. But charity shops annoy me when you want to give them an old good sofa or couch, if it doesn't have a fire safety label on it they won't take it. If they don't take it and someone on Gumtree or ebay doesn't want it (for free) then it just ends up at the local tip, which means more waste. And having someone take the thing away (which they will just break up anyway or fly tip it because they can't be arsed going to the local tip) will charge you for taking it.

I agree there. I think Richard is right to question Manchester, and IMO he is right that there was no bomb. I have watched his investigation thoroughly and I came to the same conclusion that it was staged, the amount of inconsistencies were everywhere. Not to mention that the event had the number 22 all over it. I think it's also possible the Southport murders may've been staged, but I've yet to see anyone investigate that event. There was a video I saw on Bitchute a while back where the person noticed on the Wayback Machine site that the website of the centre the stabbings took place had been updated on the same day just a few hours later and had changed the events calandar. Also, one of the supposed injured who was said to be in critical condition was interviewed at his home a few days later by Sky News. These people seem to recovery very quickly.

These dating sites can be damaging to your self esteem and confidence. I think a pyschologist/pyschiatrist would have a field day on these dating sites looking throigh all of the weird and wacky profiles and the strange attitudes that many women on there seem to have, they would spot all of the personality disorders. Having spent alot of time on those sites I see alot in photos of what I would describe as the "looking through you" look, where the person has a starry eyed gaze like they are out of it or in a trance or under mind control, when I see those it gives me the creeps. It's like the lights are on but nobody's home. These people (whether they are AI/fake or real people) seem to have no soul, personality or warmth to them, and there are ALOT of people like that on those sites. The mirror selfies (why do so many women take selfies in a public toilet mirror for?) is another one I find disturbing, just feels like these people have mental issues.

There's no specific things I heard, pretty much everything he mentioned I agree with, the Nick Bickerstaff video, Ruth Murrel walking casually across the room with a "fake" bloody stain, the victims families showing no real emotion, lack of CCTV footage of the explosion, no evidence that the glass roof and doors had been shattered, and so on. And no I don't think Richard is mad.

Why? because it was as per Richard's research which I believe he is right in his view that it was staged.

It doesn't matter if Richard was allowed to show his evidence because the public will never believe that the arena attack (and others) were staged where members of the public were either paid or threatend to take part in it, that there was no explosion, that noone died, that certain NHS, medical/ambulance personnel, security and police were involved it. They just will not believe it because it is so hard for them to accept that they could do such a thing, especially when children were allegedly killed. Even if you showed them the reasons why they carry out these staged events they still wouldn't believe you. IMO I doubt anything wil change even if it was shown to be staged, are the news laws that have come about as a result of these hoaxes going to stop? I doubt it. I mention the area attack to my friend and he just thinks I'm a mental case, when I try and explain about it he just says to me "don't start". He looked really pissed off that I think it was a hoax. I said to him that this bloke called Richard D Hall tried to show his evience and they wouldn't allow it, but he just looked at me as to say "so what?". He has never done any research, and even if I sent him Richard's video he probably wouldn't watch it.

That's alot of money in a month, it's no wonder they don't give up doing what they do if they are getting paid that kind of money. I bet they don't do the businesses they visit any good when it comes to their reputation though if they have reacted in a bad way. Youtube seems to have become an easy way of making money, where anyone can make a video, women doing vlogs where it's supposed to be about a camping trip, yet then next they are stripping off their clothes in a bikini and thong and going swimming in a river, and the video gets thousands of views in days or even hours, and I doubt the high views are because of the camping, it will be by men wanting a perv at the woman. How shallow can some people get, all for likes, views and money?. There's alot of that stuff now on youtube. I wonder how much Billy Moore is getting from his channel, must be alot.

Came across this video of someone who claims he knows Richard (why is he hiding his face behind that stupid fake beard and those 3D glasses?, just makes a mockery of the whole thing, Bitchute is just full of strange people and content, it's no wonder these alternative video sites aren't watched by most people they are a joke imo). He claims that the reason Richard was taken to court was because he sold his book on Manchester and made money from it. Anyone think this is true?. https://www.bitchute.com/video/JL0VDerjeQLy

Yeah it seems to be that way. I don't know anyone I know who would go around doing that kind of thing, even if they were being paid, to me it just isn't normal behavour. What about filming in a "public" place that these adutors seem to think they are in when they are filming?. Sometimes these conflicts happen when they are clearly filming from a public road. I couldn't imagine anyone I know who works at the places they go to reacting in the way by being aggressive. I've seen these auditors going to police stations and even prisons where they have been stopped by armed police with patrol dogs. I'm surprised noone has been shot or tasered. Those videos just highlight how bad tempered and arrogant police have become, it's no wonder noone likes them anymore.

I don't think the recent news hitpiece on him has made him well known, not to the extent where everyone knows who he is. I don't think the media have made that much of a deal about it as far as reporting, yes there was the odd news story about it but it wasn't a major news story. Most people will have forgotten they heard or read about it. Not sure about the speaking venues. I don't think it's made him famous as such.