Jump to content

mishy

Members
  • Content Count

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

107 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

333 profile views
  1. My eysight is fine. My understanding of Newtonian Physics is sound. I don't see real plane crashes in any of the 9/11 footage. That's the most important FACT for me. Anything that happens after is irrrelevant. If there is ever a new investigation and that investigation doesn't study the footage then it's not worth a wank. https://911planeshoax.com/ Surely if you're trying to prove that the WTC was demolished. Then showing the planes were fake would prove you right? Or would that put the wrong people in the frame? Oh ffs I mentioned planes. Is that toys out the pram and on your block list?
  2. https://videopress.com/v/tyb4tbsm http://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/ I've just sat here and started watching SC again. In the first 2 minutes there's a reporter at the WTC as the second plane hits. But no plane sound in his mic, nobody mentions a plane etc. Those who dismiss this documentary are either just in complete denial or still shillin' like the best of them well over 10 years after it came out.
  3. As I've already said - I was just pointing out the bullshit about military planes. You call it drivel yet provide no evidence, just insults. It's simple really. The TV and amateur footage from that day IS THE BEST evidence that the OS is nonsense. Once you understand that there were no planes, it becomes obvious that the towers were demolished, and the how they were demolished becomes secondary. To say those who point this out are posting drivel is ignorant at best, and basically asking people to disbelieve their own eyesight.
  4. 1/10 Poor effort. I've posted both a video and a link to an entire forum and this is the best reply you can come up with? Rupert? I'm fully aware of the thread title - I was just pulling you up on the military plane bollocks.
  5. And that proves what? They can add a blip or two to radar? We have both TV and amateur footage of the plane crashes. They just don't stand up to scrutiny., and many contradict each other. There's absolutely nothing you can post that will prove the existence of planes that day. It's been done to death. Just watch September Clues. It wasn't just the planes that were fake. http://cluesforum.info/
  6. You clearly haven't watched the vid in the link I posted. No planes. Empty towers and few, if any victims. http://cluesforum.info/
  7. There were no planes and none of the footage from that day can be tusted. None of it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF0-nslm3j0
  8. What does everyone think the current situation would be had Trump not won? Or are you of the belief that he was going to win anyway as it's all part of the agenda?
  9. Biden is odds on?! https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2020/winner
  10. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-53751678 No pictures of the train......yet.
  11. I think it's fake now tbh. Although it looks more realistic than the crashes on 9/11!
  12. What have we got here then? Real or fake?
  13. Apparently there were two explosions? I can only find footage of the huge second one, which I guess loads of people would be filming after the first. There is one with an almost 9/11 money shot zoom in just before it goes bang though.
×
×
  • Create New...