mishy

The Naudet clip is enough to prove the first plane wasn't real. No wing scar at the point of impact. https://fakeotube.com/video/48/september-clues---911-amateur-part2

I'm sure I read somewhere that soaps etc have a thing where the camera angle changes every 4 seconds. I can't confirm as I don't have a telly and can't be arsed to look on YT. Something to do with keeping the person focused on it apparently.

https://fakeotube.com/v/31 All within the first couple of minutes

Can't see it as it apparently broke Twatter rules.

That's up to you if you want to believe that. But lets not forget Winston is next to the building looking at the size of the hole as the second plane hits. But he doesn't mention a plane, his microphone doesn't pick up the noise from a screaming commercial jet or the resulting explosions of it crashing into the building he's standing next to.

The M Slip is right at the start of September Clues, literally 1 minute in. The reporter is asking Winston https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/

Why wouldn't you watch it? Why take my word for it? Why not just watch it? I'm guessing you've watched other 911 docs? SC just points out how fake the footage is. If just one piece of footage is fake, then you can't trust any of it, even more so if it was on LIVE tv. SC is well over an hour long and is FULL of fake footage. We're not just talking about fake plane crashes, if you'd watched it you'd see that buildings actually move in the LIVE news broadcasts.

You're just being awkward. None of the footage can be trusted. September Clues has been mentioned several times in this thread, you sound like you still haven't watched it. It's not just about fake planes. https://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/

No, they were demolished on 911.

I have to agree with this. None of the footage from that day can be trusted.

Looking forward to it. Hoping to beat my 4 hour personal best, but I usually get bored and change the channel.

https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_documents_lost.html

It's exactly the same footage. No wing scar at the moment of impact.

Here's a youtube link for the official Naudet documentary. The footage is exactly the the same. The 'buffoon' as you put it is just pointing out that there is no plane crashing. So with proof that no plane crashed. It would be a fair assumption to say there were no hijackers, no Islamic bogeymen and just a load of lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iw-1bOQNIA Go to the 19:51 mark.

It's on the original Naudet DVD. Probably still available on Amazon. I'm not buying it, you buy it and have a look. It's been discussed to death, years ago. They or someone else added the plane. The news then used that exact same footage later on 911.