Jump to content

2020member

Members
  • Posts

    204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 2020member

  1. 1 hour ago, No.6 said:

    That's a great video by Graham Hancock , thanks for posting Messenger . Also what you said about the commercials reminded me of something that happened to me while living in Northern California about 6 years ago . When watching tv I would often hit the mute button when the commercials came on because I found them so annoying . One day when I did this a message popped up on screen that said ....... Mute button = danger . It was only on for about a second but long enough for me to read it .

     

    That's crazy about the mute button. I hate adverts too. You just feel like you're getting the most undesirable things rammed down your throat. 

  2. On 7/24/2020 at 9:17 PM, motleyhoo said:

     

    I don't have proof as yet, but I am really convinced that, beginning with the NDAA in the US, the US, the UK, Australia and the EU have all very quietly implemented a new highly technological form of subliminal messaging within TV news media.  For months I was wondering how so many people had fallen for this hoax even though it is so freaking obvious to the rest of us.  And they haven't just fallen for it, they believe in it like it's their new religion.  It's like they have been in a brain-washing program for years.  How could this have happened in as little as a couple of weeks back in early February? 

     

    Then, I heard about a US Intelligence program, part of Project Mockingbird, that was using the TV news media in the US to broadcast subliminal messages, particularly during broadcasts of the national anthem.   Fast forward to 1975 and the Frank Church Commission that uncovered this sinister shit and made it illegal to ever happen again.  Fast forward again to the Obama presidency and the passing of the National Defence Authorization Act, which had a law added to it nullifying the laws passed by the Church Commission.  They didn't have a dozen lawyers writing these new laws if they were not intending on using them.

     

    Now, with that information in hand, and surmising that the subliminal messaging technology must be 1,000 times more advanced than it was 50 years ago, it's not hard to see why the people who have stayed glued to TV news are now acting like programmed robots.   I am convinced this insidious shit is happening once again, and I think the behavior of the pandemic believers is living proof of it.

     

     

    I totally feel like something like this is happening too. They've ramped it up to unbelievable levels. 

  3. I think the ‘powers that be’ will fall flat on their face when they try and introduce Wave 2. 
     

    As they seem to have forgotten all the sheep were sold down the river and promised there would only be one wave if they behaved themselves. 
     

    Even a sheep has a biting point...

    • Like 1
  4. @HAARPING_On i even managed to get an admission out of my mum that it was a ‘dystopian’. Yet the buck stopped there and that’s all she would agree on. 
     

    Sorry to hear your dad is a ‘lost cause’ in that sense. But remember to take solace in the fact that we are all One. And even though he has individually succumbed to the trance. The great work you are putting into your soul will eventually help balance it all out. 
     

     

    @Dulanjala yes I feel the same. My emotions are very up and down on a daily basis (asking those searching questions of humanity). 

    • Like 1
  5. @Edgecrusher i’ve had multiple people (including myself) report that they can no longer plan into the future at any length. It’s as though their minds simply won’t let that part of the brain work. 
     

    This is no coincidence. In my opinion, the creator has put blinkers on us for a reason. To stop us endlessly trying to escape the present. This is all coming to a head now, and those of us that walk in the light, we are sat bolt upright now partaking in this great transformation. 
     

    So to answer your question. Time as a construct is quickly loosing a lot of value. 

    • Thanks 1
  6. @HAARPING_On my mum who is a staunch believer in COVID went into the town centre yesterday. She absolutely hated it and said it scared her / was sinister and everyone looked frightening. 
     

    I explained (again) that it’s all by design and it isn’t a coincidence you had those feelings. She still rebutted any and all of my theories. 
     

    Unfortunately this will all be ‘one big coincidence’ till the bitter end for a lot of people. As much as it breaks my heart...

  7. 17 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

    WW3 is an information War and there's no civilian / soldier divide....we're all in it, like it or not.


    100% agree. They’ve diluted races and cultures too much to have swathes of people being conscripted into the military for ‘X’ country Vs ‘Y’ country.

     

    This is a war on perception and information like you say.

  8. Isn't it funny how history repeats itself. In World War II it was mandatory for everyone to carry masks in fear of a gas attack from Hitler. Funnily enough if memory serves me right, there never were any recorded gas attacks in the U.K. 

     

    Fast forward 70 years, we now must carry masks for yet another invisible killer with a 99% survival rate! 

     

    My personal opinion is a 'nuclear war' and all the predictive programming we see in films of an armageddon style World War 3 is merely there to muddy the waters. We are living through World War 3 right now, as an invisible enemy is dividing and conquering humanity world over! 

     

    It's up to us to learn from history and pick a side. Either the masked zombies or the side that bring a new righteous world into existence. World War 3 is a war on our minds. 

  9. @AndyJ Yeah she seemed to be on the ball with the McCann stuff. I know what you mean about the 'fully awakened' aspect as she seems to have that kinda glass ceiling above her when she talks. But I find that really odd to say she has been around so much alternative stuff for so long. Maybe she just doesn't want to embrace it all, as she simply wouldn't be able to cast a slightly 'alternative' opinion on MSM. Scared she'd end up like David and not be able to hold a fake conversation on 'good morning britain' for fear of telling them the truth. 

    • Like 1
  10. Sonia has made several appearances on Shaun Attwood's podcast covering some pretty 'out there' topics (as has david icke). 

     

    She seems to stick her nose into some pretty controversial stuff, but manages to keep her foot in the door of mainstream t.v (strange). 

     

    Around the time the wheels came off TPV she came across as extremely narcissistic and played a big part in destroying that venture from what I can gather. Would people who know more on this forum suggest giving her insights into alternative news a wide berth or would some consider her to be credible? 

  11. He seems very humble and only offers up an opinion he doesn't shout at you like Mark Steele does. 

     

    Anyone however who is ex security services and becomes a whistleblower I always leave a bit of leeway or rope for them to hang themselves on. As to get that deep into something and then start to speak out, you'd have thought they'd have silenced him by now. 

  12. I notice 12 hours ago this was being reported as “terrorism” (which means MI5/MOSSAD funded). And today its turned into knifeman (which means spontaneous nutter). 
     

    Did they make a faux par? Why did the government claim ownership so early on and then back out? Maybe they had second thoughts and realised if they add terrorism into the mix they will well and truly cause a civil war right now. 
     

    Many people on the comments sections of MSM youtube channels are reporting all videos have been re-uploaded removing any notion of terrorism. 
     

    We now well and truly live in a day and age of news which can be edited on the spot to fit the agenda/narrative. 

  13. Pick one: 

     

    Exemptions - people who do not have to wear a face covering

     

    The requirement to wear a face covering does not apply to:

    • a child under the age of 11
    • an employee of the transport operator, when they are acting in the course of their employment
    • any other person providing services to the transport operator, under arrangements made with the transport operator, who is providing those services
    • a constable or police community support officer acting in the course of their duty
    • an emergency responder such as a paramedic or fire officer acting in the course of their duty
    • an official, for example a border force officer, acting in the course of their duties
    • if you are allocated a cabin, berth or other similar accommodation, at any time when you are in that accommodation, either alone, or only with members of your own household or a linked household
    • if you are on board public transport but remain in your private vehicle, for example on a car ferry

     

    The requirement to wear a face covering also does not apply if you have a reasonable excuse not to. Reasonable excuses include:

     

    • if you have a physical or mental illness or impairment, or a disability that means you cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering
    • if putting on, wearing or removing a face covering would cause you severe distress
    • if you are travelling with, or providing assistance to, someone who relies on lip reading to communicate
    • if you are travelling to avoid injury or escape the risk of harm, and you do not have a face covering with you
    • if you need to remove it during your journey to avoid harm or injury or the risk of harm or injury to yourself or others
    • if you need to eat, drink, or take medication you can remove your face covering
    • if you are asked to remove your face covering by a police officer or other official, for example to check your railcard
×
×
  • Create New...