Jump to content

Grumpy Owl

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Grumpy Owl

  1. I've never been any kind of fan of Piers Morgan, and I don't regularly watch any of his shows. But I watched the following clip the other evening, and I found myself enraged by his inability to have any kind of civil discussion with anyone who dares to have any different to opinion to him.


    I get that Morgan is an 'establishment tool', but if anyone thinks he is some kind of 'free speech champion' then they are sadly mistaken.


    David Kurten, leader of the Heritage Party and former UKIP London Assembly member, was on Morgan's TalkTV show to apparently 'discuss' the UK Government's commitment to blow millions of pounds on military aid to Ukraine.


    Morgan comes across as an enforcer of the Establishment Narrative, and when Mr Kurten tries to make any kind of counterpoint, Morgan just starts shouting and talking over him, like a spoilt bully having a tantrum. So much for "Piers Morgan Uncensored"


    Watch the clip here:


    Sorry but Piers Morgan always has been and always will be an obnoxious wanker.


    But this is nothing new, it has always been the case that whenever people appear on such media shows who don't "go with the flow", they just get talked over or interrupted, unable to put across any contrary opinion or explanation, without having the usual 'narrative' points thrown back at them. (I used to see this all the time whenever representatives from UKIP used to appear on shows such as BBC Question TIme and the like)


    I know some people here think that David Kurten is just another Zionist shill, and I don't know for sure myself, but fair play to him for remaining as calm and composed as he did here.


    As for Richard Tice, well he clearly comes across as another Establishment Shill, repeating the same 'current thing' soundbites.

    • Like 1
  2. 9 hours ago, Truthblast said:

    Conspiracy... Conspiracy...


    Does MUSK still CONTROL Paypal???


    9 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

    It has been happening for years. Telegraph are only piping up because anyone can criticize woke culture. I doubt they cared about other folks further to the Right of them that dared to commit bigger thought crimes.


    And no, Musk doesn't still control Paypal, and I don't think he ever did. He was just a co-founder to my knowledge.


    John Donahoe and Dan Schulman control it now. Paypal is also partnered with the ADL.


    Correct, while Elon Musk was a 'founder' of PayPal, I don't believe he's had any involvement with them for years now.


    Don't forget, for several years PayPal was 'owned' by eBay, until they offloaded it a few years ago.

    • Like 1
  3. On 9/18/2022 at 9:13 AM, Itsa said:

    Police appeal for calm after 'serious disorder' in Leicester as hundreds take to streets









    1 hour ago, Dustpanandbrush said:

    Unrest in Leicester, UK, not sure if it’s being downplayed or exaggerated by the media. 

    Protests starting in Iran and spreading to Turkey and other nearby states regarding the woman who died after being arrested for not wearing a head scarf. 


    1 hour ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    According to our friendly BBC, it's all "misinformation" and nasty slurs.


    Of course it is.


    I believe the media are downplaying this. There have always been 'tensions' between the Hindu (Indian) and Muslim (Pakistani) 'communities'. And it would appear that things are starting to simmer to a head.


    You'd probably be surprised how 'racist' some Indian Hindus can be towards Pakistani Muslims, and vice-versa. (Makes us white folk look extremely tolerant!)


    But this goes against the 'narrative', after all it is supposed to be the case that all minorities are 'victims' being oppressed by a racist majority. While the truth is that much of the aggravation and tension is between the different minority groups themselves.

    • Like 1
  4. On 9/18/2022 at 11:44 PM, Mikhail Liebestein said:

    My DD is £380 a month, but it is quite a big house.


    I fully appreciate that different people have different situations, and some households use more energy than others.


    For context, I live by myself in a 1 bed 'apartment' in a low-rise block. I have gas-fired central heating and hot water using a 10 year old combi boiler, and the heating is controlled by a programmable room thermostat, so turns on and off only when needed. The only other gas appliance is a fairly modern cooker. All the electrical devices I have are fairly energy-efficient. So all in all I'm not a great consumer of energy as it is, I can't really 'cut back' much more!


    But on the other hand, I also earn a fairly modest salary while living relatively frugally; put it this way my energy bill could double and it would still be affordable to me.


    A refund of £66 pound a month would benefit you more than it does me. But then again, there are some people for whom that kind of amount would still be considered affordable. That's the point I'm trying to make.

    • Like 1
  5. 39 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

    And as I am on fixed rate tariff until September 2024, I am not concerned by energy price cap increases either!


    It would seem that those of us who had the foresight to sign up for long-term fixed-rate tariffs last August/September will prove to be the fortunate ones.


    I also don't expect the likes of EDF to suddenly 'collapse into administration'.




    Rather unsurprisingly, EDF are not offering any long-term fixed-rate tariffs now, and I expect it is the same for other energy suppliers.

    Just out of curiosity I had a look to see what their 'standard variable rate' tariff will be from 1st October.



    What sticks out the most for me is the increase in the daily standing charge for electricity. So even if you don't use any electricity at all, you still pay nearly 50p a day. Strangely the gas standing charge hasn't really increased that much.


    OK, so maybe I will enjoy this for the next two years, and it may well be the case that come September 2024, when my tariff expires, that I will get a bit of a shock.


    But who knows what will happen in the next two years - maybe I'll get another pay rise, maybe I'll win the lottery, maybe I won't even be living in this country any more. Or maybe this whole ridiculous situation will have been 'sorted', and energy prices will have reverted back to what they realistically should be.

  6. From an email I received from EDF Energy today:

    The UK Government’s Energy Bills Support Scheme starts in October. Every household in Great Britain with a domestic electricity supply will get a £400 discount to help with energy bills. This is a government discount which you don't pay back. You don't need to apply for the scheme.


    The £400 discount is in addition to the Government Energy Price Guarantee. If you’re on a variable tariff, we’ll write to you again before the end of September and explain what this means for you.


    How will I get the discount?

    ·     It will be paid in six instalments, starting from October 2022 and ending in March 2023

    ·     Payment will be made each month

    ·     The first two payments will be for £66, followed by four payments of £67

    How you'll receive the discount depends on how you pay for your energy

    Your payment method

    How you'll receive the discount

    Budget Direct Debit (Monthly)

    An automatic refund each month to the bank account your Direct Debit payments are taken from

    Cash/Cheque or Direct Debit Whole Amount

    An automatic credit to your energy account in the first week of each month

    Pay As You Go

    An automatic credit to your smart Pay As You Go meter within the first two weeks of each month


    A voucher from the Post Office® within the first two weeks of each month to redeem when you top-up


    So as things stand, as I pay by 'budget direct debit' monthly, I still pay my usual monthly amount, but then I get a 'refund' back into my bank account.

    Now this £400 amount is the same for EVERY household with an electricity supply, and so are the monthly refund amounts.

    I mentioned elsewhere that my direct debit increased from £57 to £74 earlier this year, because my energy usage had increased during the winter, I assumed this was because I had been using more gas than usual, during the relatively cool spring (my central heating was still coming on at the begining of June!).

    However while submitting meter readings today, it transpires that I must have incorrectly read the electricity meter back in June, as todays reading was lower than the last one by about 400 units! After contacting EDF, the previous bill has been cancelled and new one is to be generated with correct readings, so I'm hopeful that my direct debit should decrease back to £57.

    Which basically means that for the next six months, the refund I receive will be for more than I am paying,. Who said there was no such thing as 'free energy'? 😅

    And as I am on fixed rate tariff until September 2024, I am not concerned by energy price cap increases either!

    • Haha 1
  7. 6 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

    My lady and I were talking about big events occurring earlier today She argued that if you could probably find a big event every day of the year if you look for it.

    She argued that it didn't have to be a big headlines event but could be a law passed underneath the radar that would have enormous repercussions. Regardless of which country the law was made in.

    I'm not saying she's right, but I agreed with her because I don't want to sleep with one eye open.😂


    I remember the massive fuss that was made about the 'millenium bug', and how planes would fall out of the sky, and nuclear reactors would go into meltdown, and computers would just stop working.


    Guess what, it never happened.


    I'm fascinated by numerology, but the danger is that some 'massive event' could potentially happen every nine days, if one was to over analyse any sequence of dates or numbers.


    Plus, does anyone actually really know what the date is? With tinkering and changing of calendars over the centuries, who knows what the actual date is?



    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  8. On 9/14/2022 at 3:09 PM, sickofallthebollocks said:



    I'm sorry, but this is the kind of childish meme that is intended to make 'flat earthers' look 'silly', and adds nothing to the debate, other than to provoke 'reactions' .

    • Like 1
  9. 23 hours ago, jois said:

     The issues isn't the sea ice.its the ice on land that would increase sea levels.


    Greenland however will rise several metre's when the ice goes we can all go and live there

    Seriously if in the unlikely event that happened all though we would loose land. The habitable land in the world would increase as long as you don't mind living in Siberia


    Regarding the ice/snow on the land, this would only cause an issue if there was a sudden and immense increase in temperature that caused all this ice and snow to melt instantaneously and turn into water. Yes, instant flood, and sea levels rise as the formerly frozen water rushes down into the seas.


    But if you look at glaciers, consider them as 'frozen rivers'. And don't forget that water expands as it freezes, so the volume of water actually carried in these glaciers will be less than it looks.


    Also consider that as glaciers slowly melt, a lot of the meltwater will naturally just soak down into the ground too.


    Think about the number of times you may have had a huge amount of snowfall in your garden, yet your garden doesn't get flooded when the snow melts away.

    • Like 1
  10. On 9/15/2022 at 6:00 PM, sickofallthebollocks said:

    If this is possibly true, are we looking at something beyond imagination happening on 22nd, 23rd or 24th September?  I hope not, please forgive me for dooming, that is definately not my thing, I remember in October 2020 people here in the UK shitting themselves over an asteroid hitting and a load of people I knew literally took to the hills.  I thought, fuck it, if it's true then take me away, bollocks to all this.  Obviously it turned out not to be true.
    But this one?  I find it highly strange that this has been spoke about so long ago even by those that work to enslave us.  I hope I'm wrong.
    Either way - I'm getting my own backpack full of stuff ready just in case?  I knew I should have built an Ark?


    I have certainly seen references recently to something 'big' to occur between September 23rd and 25th, there's another thread here where it was claimed that a Carrington-style coronal mass ejection (CME) will strike the Earth on the 23rd, though I do find those sorts of claims quite doubtful.


    However I am simply taking the opinion that nothing of note will actually happen on these dates, and that there are 'certain people' trying to social engineer people into 'believing' that 'something bad will happen'.


    As David Icke himself says, if we do indeed manifest our own reality based on our own beliefs and perceptions, be mindful of those trying to alter your beliefs and perceptions.


    The old saying of course is "be careful what you wish for".

    • Like 8
  11. 8 hours ago, allymisfit said:

    I have an app called Nextdoor and it's a way of speaking to those who live around you. Good for reporting lost pets etc. I don't use Facebook, so it's quite handy for me. 


    NextDoor is a 'local social network'. I joined my local neighbourhood there a couple of years ago now, I quit after it became infiltrated with people pushing agenda/propaganda talking points. It's just as bad as Facebook in my opinion, 77th Brigade agents everywhere it seems!

    • Like 2
  12. On 9/12/2022 at 8:55 PM, oddsnsods said:

    They are running out of lithium for the battle against climate bollocks.🤤 Greta is not amused.


    'We don’t have enough' lithium globally to meet EV targets, mining CEO says https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lithium-supply-ev-targets-miner-181513161.html



    Maybe this is a cue to 'discover' a vast source of lithium somewhere "off-world"? Perhaps on the moon, or in one of the asteroids beyond Mars.


    Thus then begins a new race for investors to funnel billions into 'projects' to 'get that damned lithium here'.


    7 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

    So the plebs can't drive cars as there aren't enough to go round. Where's the problem? All part of the plan


    And in the meantime, you end up with a classic supply/demand problem, if such electric vehicles cannot be mass-produced, then they will never become as 'affordable' as petrol/diesel vehicles, thus they remain expensive and only affordable to the wealthy.

    • Like 1
  13. On 9/10/2022 at 6:00 AM, masonfreeparty2 said:


    I started to have some doubts about that Electroverse site some time back now.


    The headline claims that this CME 'will' hit Earth on the specified date, yet if you actually read the article and the paper quoted, it does say "This short paper forecasts the next Solar Storm".


    A forecast is just that, a prediction, and not a statement of fact.


    You get the same tedious shit parrotted by the mainstream media whenever the Met Office puts out a warning about a bit of wind/rain/snow/sunshine. "Exact time snow will fall..." etc, and in most cases it never happens.


    In my opinion, its pretty difficult to know if such a 'Carrington-style CME' is going to happen, not until it does.

  14. 5 hours ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

    Tell us something new - we know sunscreen is well dodgy?  I don't know about you - but I always felt headachey after putting any of this stuff - especially over the face?
    There is some better organic stuff around, but - as alot of you here are aware - this stuff is probably a mjor factor in alot of skin cancer cases:



    This really needs a thread of its own, if there already isn't one. David Icke once claimed in one of his books (forget which one) that it was the suntan lotion that caused the skin cancer, not the sun.


    I stopped using sunscreen a few years ago, though to be fair I was never a regular user of the stuff anyway, apart from maybe when I was on holiday in 'hot sunny countries'.

    Even after liberally plastering myself with sunscreen, I'd still somehow end up burned somewhere.


    What I learned that the sun lotions were also doing, is that they act as a filter for UV rays - the UV rays your skin needs so that the melanin can produce vitamin D.


    So people are literally plastering themselves in "anti-vitamin D shield", which contains numerous other chemcials that get absorbed into the skin, yet it is the sun that causes the skin cancer!


    • Like 3
  15. 2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:


    I'm not sure that I agree. There are plenty of articles criticizing her role in things like colonialism. Nobody is forced to support the royals like they're some supreme leaders like Kim Jong-un either.


    But that is itself just another aspect of the 'narrative/agenda pushing'.


    4 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

    I agree. And we wondered why so many fell for the jab BS - there's little doubt now that it's because many are fooking bonkers!


    It's all social engineering / behavioural 'messaging'.


    Especially on social media, people really are just 'sheep', and will do whatever they are told, no matter how insignificant. For example, Facebook did its usual trick of "why not add this frame to your profile picture" and many people I know just went along with it. Then you have of course all the big companies and brand-names "going black" with their cover photos, or posting up RIP images of the Queen.


    "Everybody else is doing it, so should we" - seriously I had to stop myself for a moment as even I was considering a short RIP post on our work's social media account. It did feel briefly like I was being hypnotised, but luckily I managed to snap out of it.


    Social engineering, behavioural messaging, the 'nudge effect', psychological manipulation, call it what you will. This is what we're all up against.

    • Like 5
  16. 1 hour ago, Steven Tansell said:

    Do we actually know, beyond a shadow of doubt, that he really is dead? He had money, and heavy political clout, plus a fair amount of blackmail footage I'd imagine! Maybe some poor sap took the drop for him, and now he's on some pedo island somewhere alongside McAlpine, Max Clifford, Grevile Janner etc. It seems funny how 'dying suddenly' seems to be a popular get out of gaol card these days!🤨


    • Thanks 1
  17. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

    yup...see its the perfect precursor to the event 201 covid scamdemic


    hit the public with flu jabs and then call the adverse reactions 'covid'

    Last weekend, I started suffering with cold-like symptoms, which I attributed to hay-fever, and most of this week I've had a nasty chesty cough which I presume is some kind of chest infection.


    I've never been 'jabbed', and I know this isn't 'Covid' because... I've had this before in the past, several times, going back to my childhood. In fact, last time I had this was in December 2019, just before Christmas...

  18. It's true, so many websites being disappeared down the memory hole, mainly because either:


    1 - Google doesn't think the content is 'relevant' or 'appropriate' (ie it doesn't suit the narrative/agenda)

    2 - you haven't paid enough to get your keywords 'boosted' in search results.


    Basically, search results are just another 'advertising platform' where results are sold off to the highest bidders.






  19. 30 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

    i'm in david's camp that we shouldn't have a monarchy, i'm just a little wary about what we replace it with and feel we should be looking to build up to that problem from the ground up to guard against the wrong outcome


    I agree, I'm always mindful of the saying "be careful what you wish for".


    I've always envisaged replacing the monarchy with a 'true peoples' republic' - the United Kingdom becoming the British Union or 'Republic Of Great Britain'. Led by an elected President of course. But the downside is that unless proper mechanisms were put in place, you'd end up like the USA, where it is the same 'chosen ones' from the Royal bloodlines that would end up as 'British President', so in which case nothing much would really change.

    • Like 2
  20. 1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

    There are two reasons why i don't feel jubilant about liz dying


    firstly is from a completely practical perspective that what has actually changed in terms of us gaining greater freedom? All that has happened is that the baton has been passed from one old reptilian consciousness person who at least we never heard a peep out of except once a year when she gave a speech at christmas, which i never listened to anyway, to her younger son who is much more vocal and who we know is fully onboard with the whole great reset agenda? Nothing has actually changed for the better here. Charles is a meddling so and so who has written lots of letters to people in positions of influence seeking to influence them.


    Charles has been waiting years for this opportunity. Despite what he said in his recent speech, I expect his reign as King will see him taking on a more 'hands-on' approach, with him becoming more 'involved' and continuing his 'influencing'.


    41 minutes ago, numnuts said:

    It's Prince William we want to worry about. Regardless of whether he is actually a freemason, or just a fellatioer of, matters not. He is their man. Charles won't abdicate the throne, which will be William's role. I wouldn't be surprised, if Charles gets bumped off somehow, in the next few years. This would be because it's hard to complete the denationalisation of the U.K., in the mass consciousness of the general public, with a monarchy still in place.


    I can't find the article now as the Birmingham Mail are spamming their own news homepage with incessant stories about the Queen, Charles, the state funeral etc. But there was some short piece where someone was predicting that King Charles III could be one of the shortest-lived monarchs the UK has known. Which I found a bit strange - given the timing, as Charlie had only just been officially announced as King - how would they know or even begin to predict?


    I also can't find the story from today about someone being arrested by police for jumping over a barrier in front of Charles.


    I think Charles will be allowed a few years as King, to push his masters' green agenda, and then maybe 'ill health' or some assassination attempt will see King William crowned.


    Or maybe it will be the case that Charles will be the last monarch of this country.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  21. 32 minutes ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

    The symbolism at the funeral is going to be off the scale.


    Good job I won't be watching then! 😆


    I see the date is now confirmed as Monday 19th September. I'll likely either work from home, or go and hang out with the geese down the park. 🦆

  • Create New...