Certified Green of Heart

Hi Eagle Eye, Makes me smile this your funny humor there, and just as well to ponder for it's sobering reality, is another saying (by whom I don't remember) but that in particular if our minds in each of us have a photographic memory too, those of us must watch out by being careful what we put in, as we may never get it out..... This is very wise, to be cautious in life I think especially in such as way as visual images which imprint on the mind more than anything else, apart from smells of a certain kind, good or bad smells, whatever. The interesting thing about smells btw, is I heard on radio, they are processed in memory recall in a way different from normal data or visual memory, and so have a different more immediate impact on us and so brings back to life the memory more quickly too. Anyway, not suggest anything bad in the above video by your account, so back on topic there... These are the basic observations I was looking for without needing to look myself and at least gives some impression for when I might watch later myself...It's funny you too feel tired half way through videos too. As for me, my head is just out of the loop right now by in some ways not being as open as I normally would be to spoken videos in particular, so it's nice you have taken some of your time to explain some of what you made of it to me and others.... Thankyou, Cheers... Ps, Naturally, I stopped reading at last paragraph, just because I see you considerately warned of a spoiler for "The Life of Pi" film.

https://davidicke.com/2024/02/19/the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples-was-established-in-2007-as-a-way-to-use-the-idea-of-giving-restitutions-to-the-natives-as-a-means-of-taking-over-th/

Maybe a good offer to try cheap access to E-books... (found advertised on Pinterest.com) http://www.bookbub.com/hero-books-discounted-ebooks/2?source=pinterest_uk_2024-keywords&pp=0

Lessons & Advice seen in one place by all, that teaches one, teaches all here on DIF, exchanging ideas with everyone suggesting something? Is that correct?.... I am in debt a bit atm. Try Martin Lewis money saving expert, especially if you live in the UK like I do.

Here, have a chew on this somebody... I don't have time currently, and haven't even heard of T h e E x p a n s e series until today. Sure seems interesting... anyway, came up to my attention, truly random as I was listening to unrelated music at the same time, so that's how I know... I'm like not even 3 minutes into the video, and already, it's something that looks fascinating... How real is it potentially?... or could it be real... I don't know assuming this Tv Series is based on a SciFi, to concede the obvious. but here is someone's comment on this video.. and more specificly about the ProtoMolecule!

Those people on that website even have a look at examining Vaccine awareness by [*strong*] caution of them *as I can easily imagine*... https://greenmedinfo.com/keyword/vaccine-research

Yeah no worries mate, take your time.... Good basic explanation for it in all what you said there, so at the start there already, especially how the way some people (understandably) might have an idea of AI which might well be outdated if I am on the right track here, and which if what you are pointing to, is it a thing that although it might complete the picture to some satisfaction, that old idea of AI (if this is what you mean) was not anywhere near the reality of today's AI??... if public perception & understanding is limited for the true nature of today's AI capability, or modern AI was not known enough about or where this was all going in other words??.... However, what then if my assessment has any basis, presumably then we are talking an older form of, but basicly non-comparable in terms of competing with modern AI.... Therefore connected or not and even if all this reveals is I may just be a little confused by my own assumptions?? .. buuuut the sensible question in any case is--> was there even a definable or discernable predecessor to modern AI, and so sparking an evolution of AI, somehow resulting ultimately as we now know at the cutting edge stages in how it is applied.....etc? it is quite an interesting thought, even if "fake by its' function at the former early stage" and despite the lack of what I can provide as a comparator to differentiate or marry the two?? Apart from we all know modern AI aims to rule by mastery of confusion and manipulation, but as by design the depth (or sophistication) of it is still ultimately very about fake forging realities by how this technology is used to create the Matrix whole system of things. Well I wish to know in any case for "way back when" sakes of understanding please (in simple answer or whatever you like), so was the 'fake' (or half-baked even) counterpart of it pivotal in any way considered the forerunner (no matter how rudimentary or fatuous or hinged on some prototype in conceptual aspect in humble beginnings the whole idea may have been).... Did this predecessor thing - pertaining to AI - **even as an idea** WAY BACK WHEN does anyone know, even indirectly contribute to anything related to modern AI??.....A cheap version of AI?? that's one possible. I am going with the notion anyway you could mean with that a lessor or loosely symbolic sort of predecessor AI... or as one would suppose by this whatever being part of the gradual evolution of AI (directly related or not) ....purported I guess to exist in various strains of interpretation depending on the person (or the herd believing what they see & hear).... Though this means even if I am right in my reckoning as per its' introduction, it might still depend on the viewer within the realms of how indeed their own perception came to be through whatever lens projected onto the masses, and how they the masses believe "AI" in general, began life in speculative fashion compared with today where its amalgamating to appear everywhere, but back whenever it would of course be speculative compared to today just what was in store for us.... ----- Quick Example of Progressive Shift or Change in Impression or Advancement Observation (usually in approach of some New & Strange thing or on-Coming) -> Similarly although SPACE ALIENS haven't probably morphed quite so much I suppose in most peoples imagination as AI secretively has, but let's say they (SA's) have the for hell of it -have created new impressions from ALL SORTS OF ALIENS & equally have evolved in the minds' eye we could believe, even if fabled or rumored to be etc.....That too would be an incremental shift of any keenly observed changes as perception and awareness meets in the middle, and people begin to see and even perceive more clearly the true nature of patterns or anything changing and evolving or re-embedding new or altered ideas... ----- Anyhow back onto AI odds n sods, even as I say that trying to bring distinction of one sort or another, I can't absolutely be sure what you mean in principle as fully as I look forward to hearing (or seeing) so for how to imagine the old AI... or put another way this "cheap imitation AI" or "lessor perhaps more casual form of AI" or even AKA "more general & nostalgic AI" like I dunno, but like something somebody might has seen in a movie, and therefore don't necessarily rush to correlate it to reality first hand unless they were futurists before their time had truly arrived, and could only speculate the future. Thus~ As if something so futuristic could ever be brought upon humans as AI so to say would have been the mindset in the general population once upon a time before the year 2000..... But anyway without digressing too much before I get the thread of what you mean maybe it might be easier to point at a common representation (a picture/ a portrait of an idea if that's enough?) of this "lessor AI" at what you point to as the "human experience level" for whatever audience reading this thread if we can show that in some key element of recognizable format or analogy... or indeed how it contributed to an evolutionary pattern thereof where technology including of its' inceptions all fell into line as they took aim at the future if that's what happened....and it were dangled in front of us on Big Screens, enough to be believed in our own reality as we know it to be?.... Rendering an image of this in anyone's head then, if it were even recognizable to the eye, what you might refer to, would it be to expect something in terms of being a bit more relatable to humans somehow despite the half alien concept AI already is, even fake AI? and were that for example almost down to earth was it but not all at the same time? I could imagine so especially if coming at people direct from the movies as the main source of it's inception of conception onto the general public, and where producers did not want to make "too alien" how AI in whatever form would come across.... Perhaps in order to not freak out the audience new to this idea etc? Anyway whatever this "old hat idea of AI" (whether caring on were it ever a real AI of any kind at the birth of it or not) this in any case could be the launch of what you are refering to as my guess (on the one side)... However for all my guesswork you might still have to name this with more precision I'm afraid, although I think you are half-way there already.... but in its underlying essence or most common thematic resemblance, what would it appear like this"Old Hat AI" ?? especially when compared to the much more advanced AI of today.....? Lol, I don't know is my answer. but it's kinda fun to guess. Ps, I don't watch Sci Fi or a great deal of anything on the film screen, so cannot bring to mind really any possible influential examples of AI being introduced to us on any level. Sorry if that was all a bit of a mouthful for anyone as clueless as I am, but I like to flesh things out sometimes.

To think all this which is most traumatic for a child/baby BEFORE EVEN 3 YEARS OLD, is startling enough, but anyway to start calm on this issue, without myself crying can I just confirm the irregulated subconsciousness of a baby or infant is what we are most talking about here, in terms of memory in bold when you say that? Well see, because I put the bit of your last line in bold I had here better focus (at least for the moment) mostly on this (skipping the bit of the end as I feel a bit uncomfortable on the possibilities or not? there), so yeah to focus more what will happen to any child person AND WHY (the system killing all joy & expectation yeah that in large part, but maybe we can get more specific than just calling it "the System"....we'll see anyway) .... but "hootie hoo" I guess from a child's POV perhaps only getting to form substantial thought patterns upward of 3 years old, [-I mean I don't really know- this is part conjecture when hoping this to be close to the truth where particulars might come about or be seen most noticeable at a certain age than any other time] ..... but I suppose Phil you might in what you say imply or propose maybe there is a certain tipping point IS IT to suggest for a baby but before whatever time that is the baby will have virtually NO MEMORY it is so much freaking out like is the norm in one way I guess?? (me I don't know for sure as I am only 2 years old right now).... But by the sounds of words you make to offer, it would seem especially true at this approximated time anyway as in to say in some regard EXTREMEMLY PIVOTAL, that this innate traumatization thing of being born onto this planet that BY ITSELF is painful enough, BUT THEN as will become apparent to them in due course GETS RETRAUMATIZED BY THE TRANSITION PAST THE PIVOTAL MARK??, but before that happens their subconsciousness reigns supreme up until the age of 3 is it for SURE as I would imagine true or don't we really know, and mothers of any kids out there?? Subconsciousness is a fascinating subject at any age, but me I don't want to lay bold claims to what really does happen when for a baby..... I haven't got much of a clue as I don't have direct experience with kids, but it would seem as if this by general certitude is what we might assume as the tipping point (roughly speaking) at a MEAGRE THREE y/o (if to take your word as any kind of gospel whereby you may well have done research there whereas I just use my own mind to assist me, sometimes that is) ....anyway ,, is where by various sources of stuff bombarding a baby's mind is utterly to it - like a mish mash of data-sets becomes implanted in them that WE AS ADULTS know is likely to be more trauma (*for anyone awake*) even when doing the best to care and protect the natural state of innocence of a child by their parents if they are lucky...... Though not forever pure &/or free by birth, as they get conditioned obviously by too much information trying to hack its way into them and worst of all using their subconsciousness to do that, the very thing which SHOULD BE MOST HELPFUL & SACRED IN A PERSON OF ANY AGE =THE SUBCONSCIOUS POWERHOUSE.... But yeah as if planned (coz it kind of is by outside influences of not so friendly nature) meaning babies making their first steps in the world will stumble and fumble around a lot more than they should have to, unless they have best switched on parents with some smarts, but I suppose almost inevitable can leave in some situations their offspring prone to brain washing stuff out there (*not completely unattended, but you know what I mean, like in public places, sounds at large etc*) Soooooo FOR A WHILE, (*as if temporary but not*) their young minds get only marginally stuck or intermittently where subject to mad stuff accumulating (I GUESS) and once amassed like some mental up-rising, can ultimately deregulate or interfere with what should else comeby them more naturally by information processing LESS THE BARBARISM BASICLY.... then subsequently sooner or later however (ie, pen-ultimately or whatever) the matter where were it to OVERWHELM could have the baby's brain retort in dismay and throw up (subconsciously) in vaguely drawing on these mesmerizing NEW FIRST TIME experiences.....either simply allotting as a whole what it all means, OR broadly allocating BASIC meaning ---NOT QUITE LITERALLY a blow by blow account necessarily, of course, but in taking stock--- and amalgamating everything the child is exposed to by also not devoid of detail either I should imagine-- And so with that in mind, in among that data to process at some level, well all of it in a sense, but of what evaluated subconsciously let's say might only SOME things about 25-50% of stuff I GUESS of which could frighten baby??.... (WHO KNOWS) but POTENTIALLY carrying long term these interpretations by the many inputs of raw and often scrambled data storing (if at all memorized in baby- by you guessed it possible trauma or big discomfort experiences) and that which (initially at least) probably get taken on and decode (sts) as 'unattached' or 'unwitting' perceptions by baby's mind (which at this age I mean to say must be like conundrums that don't all have to be solved or even identified or concerned about because that's life as a baby, but which could proove harmful, whether memorized or not it is possible to conceive as a lot of that RAW ONCOMING RELENTLESS DATA once gets as a child is so sporadic and random - that it only gets remembered in fractal like portions or as distorted vague recollections, like that of a jigsaw- but that if traumatic in any sense I can well imagine can become most perturbing or troublesome if how the unattached thing at the start or inception of information gathering and how that was presented out in the world, or by interpretation, the key fault in how they gets memorized *or more likely only part memorized* if it starts to embed in the memory in a harmful and/or just simply non helpful way for growth and memory as a whole - whether for baby or adult frankly, these things have to be taken care over, depending on how fastidious or cautious one naturally is at the start) BUT YEAH THEN ULTIMATELY, as the days and months pass,, the mind boggles enough to get bounced too much around in an innately confusing way PLUUUUUUUS having to deal with the onslaught from a sticky web of disinformation in various formats ---- So both of natural manifestation or outcome as NATURE is a sort of matrix too, (a much more innocent/ benign one though, at least for a baby) but as we know in making "best assumptions" what are ALSO the meaner / more unforgiving aspects that MUST BE so damn distracting also by the constructs from THE PROGRAMMABLE WORLD IN GENERAL ....whereby any impressions formed of the world are stealing the babies prime time of perception by imprinting on them something not supposed to be, yet still in the baby's abilities probably at least in terms of open mindedness, that will to some degree go on unaffected on the one hand --> because subconsciousness is POWERFUL in overcoming just as it is A FORCE FOR GOOD TOO, when used well by *naturally subtle intelligence forming* gathering by living baby growing up in a sea of information (which are often LOUD sources belching out this information), but despite all this babies still obviously need to be protected from over-breach of infection of any subconscious mis-notion or deception etc,, put there from outside where it is clear the thing is not of natural origin....This of course in the better outcome to embrace the natural world by what is most important, just like any child needs to know it is BIO-LOGICAL, and should expect to be that, supported by what should be (realistically or not) an open & honest society taking care of its' young and future generations.... So as for subconsciousness again, theirs at their tender age, because it has so few actual regimens IF ANY to follow other than from mother, the baby's open-minded ability I wouldn't be surprised even exceeds some adults in terms of their inner awareness/ subconsciously at least, but that which they don't discern of course at the youngest tender age of especially below 3 years old is --who knows what exactly sometimes-- and therein lyes the devil in the detail foks!!... Yet all this does still not mean of course what they go through is not traumatizing by being born and despite being clothed and fed, doubt and unknowing must to a large degree still beckon to reign supreme in baby's perception of trying make that abundantly obvious by crying, just as much as innate trust must serve to correlate with that by the mother, so crying in the MOST OBVIOUS sense is just natures way to remind mother to go on doing her job in maternal aspects and so sustaining a relationship where the confidence in mother & child is at least a basis for stability, even when the world we live in is anything but stable... I might have side-tracked a bit......Blame my subconsciousness guys!

My attention span is dropping so excuse me (stuff on my mind like what I will PM briefly just to mention and point to why that is privately) but yeah great wisdom for helping gage these matters (not that I have read everything quite yet but give me time, however long that happens to be for myself., which could be a good while of a PAUSE, by how I can't be online heap loads atm.. So thanks for that above anyway, or for whomever found that useful or worthy!... even where stuff is tough to explain like in the subconscious mind... Anyways~ as for the quoted~ I just got stuck with that only really and wanted to ask is the word "NOT" supposed to be in the sentence, as wouldn't it make more sense without the "NOT" ?? I suppose depending on where the vantage point is and where the HERE is in that last paragraph- in relation to our reality now compared to one we remember or vice verse if the inverse or whatever, that it could make sense either way depending on which way around that sentence gets read, huh.

Thanks for this, I am sure IT CAN DO BRAIN DAMAGE, when I was younger I am sure being over angry at unsettled upbringing and taunts from kids/ young adults my age, made me lose it (more inwardly than out but this is still a problem) and so anyway did more loud venting more than was good for me a hell of a lot in aftermath of any stress just gone before it (yep by myself sulking/ feeling sad/ resentful). This you could say was made worse by not seeing an easy remedy to feel better, as you would expect in what seems a hot bed of coals etc..., And so when on this path leading to anger, if one loses it, screams, lashes out, bounces off the wall or whatever, it will almost certainly include the frustration of knowingly or not and avoidable or not what this is all about going on inside us>> (well firstly owing to stress or conflicts of right or wrong etc, probably not so easily avoidable if a younger person like I was - or we all were once a bit like this.... Being not mentally well equipped enough at dealing with complex challenges of the mind and life events etc)... CONTINUED>> will include thus being ill adept and even if aware of the realization of what is happening to us or not, when no OUTSIDE HELP, would come along at any great speed, it hardly makes the matter of GROWING PAINS a walk in the park now does it. (And btw as for "Outside Help" ==WE LOOK MORE OUTSIDE AS 'KIDULTS' IN GENERAL, so that's what would be natural at the time in the younger years!).... In any case of how stuff turns out, those shady feelings (if left unchecked or inadequately addressed) just build and build, if all we know is to bottle things up, especially when lonely in our plight which is one of the main contributors to an temperamental angry episode, the feeling that isolation does to amplify whatever grief or tumult is being experienced...and by some characterization is a lot like spontaneous combustion as is well documented, when too many things just aren't going right. And all we can seem to do is make bad or wrong choices, when at the past younger age. Though that be of Long Past for me now, but it doesn't mean I don't still struggle or in-fight with inner demons now and again, if things are looking threatening in the mental barometer or forecast of what overshadows, etc. Even when I do have the skills to gain purchase on that sucker to overcome it, I mean the mind is just like that.... It gets better though if we consistently practice to overcome, by being MINDFUL, forbearing with ourselves, and work on ourselves for whatever conducive reasoning of remedy to assist in *either* a teenager OR AN ADULT (since life always poses challenges of some sort no matter the age).... But I mean the reality is you go through this process of healing OR TRY TO, all whilst still a bit too young to get a grasp on everything, and yet what bugs the most is that antagonistic yet quite true knowing of how others SURE DID had a hand in how we feel or felt, well, soooo okaaaaay, finally comes the day which becomes asking ourself~ like how quick can we let go of that wrong doing before it completely destroys us from within how we have placed blame and rightly so to a degree but of course inevitably if we see the light we have to take back all responsibility at some point, and just move on, and learn from anything of undue displeasure etc.... Also.... When on this road to psychological recovery or re-structuring in the case whereby we might be procrastinating or agonizing too long, the demons MAY have won, if we cannot forgive at least some aspects of what we have pain-stakingly psycho-analyzed in asking why stuff happened to us as it did. (in anyone's life, not just mine)... Interventions (incl. Self Help) and Coping Mechanisms are really important on that journey as well self aware responsibility and reflection upon what really matters..... Such as for self growth in adversity as well as for allowing the way for making better choices, the next time bad news or bad actors come our way...

"How to Never be Angry again"....[Book of Self Help for anyone into giving some thing like this a go] https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/431008626853718903/

Fair enough Phil26. I admire your discipline, I like some discipline too, but I think also we have to be realistic and that jerks really trying it on, are always ultimately aiming to ridicule (poke fun etc) or be intimidating if they also have a streak of vindictiveness, and so it's always a hard thing to pull back or resolve a way out from those types, when tensions rise especially by such people as really unruly ones playing us up.... I just avoid people most of my life by going off into nature. Eta, in situations of being outnumbered, it is better to be a shrinking violet, (than a dead combative intent on violence violet), if that gets a person out of the line of violent surge, and to have it consider stopping any repercussion for the onset of further provocation into a fight with a foe and any mean person (and perhaps mentally unstable person) out there, and so yeah without a little pluck to verbally defend at least in preference over physical violence, we have to consider the shrinking violet approach sometimes, which is only a form of being humble in one way and to show the ability to rise above situations..... Doing such is not necessarily cowardice at all......What would we all prefer (depending on what is at stake I suppose which is anyones guess in this day & age).... but one truth remains absolute which is Violence begets Violence, (reinforces the obligation to meet action with reaction) always has always will, at least for some... Sometimes it is best to be humble and walk or even run away if outnumbered by some thug types taking this to the extreme... etc... Live to 'fight' *& make Peace* another day!

Talking about being angry has often been known to make me angry!

Meanwhile in jail tonight, Gary Glitter was refused a marmite sandwich, or did the marmite sandwich refuse him? The verdict is out....

For whom in <any> situation, I would say "vindictive provocation" is a serious offence, it should be taken more seriously by the emotionless police, if they were anything like human of course. It's hard to say what they are, the police, apart from cold and calculating and trained to be impartial, thus encouraged to not have emotions. Pity the world of Law Enforcement has to be used as an example in such a way, but hopefully not all are like that even in todays' technocratic society, just saying to be provocateur as per the subject. Anyway, fair is fair for this arguement on either side as we don't automatically know a newbie in town except to say Phil26 you handle your words very well, so I guess your emotions too, which sets you up as someone in good control over yourself which is good. For whatever by whom else with outside thinking perhaps where they are tempted (not really saying rightly or wrongly) to say something in pointing out a seemingly wonton hypothetical or denominational assumption (ie, at first from unspoken thought but then decided to allocate by making spoken - perhaps in devils advocate style, then seeming to accuse but proven wrong, or tempered in some way on both sides) ....well the thought and temptation to assume or fill any vacuum of the unknown is always there of course, and then we say what we could be thinking just by how logic tends to push us on expressing everything that comes to mind and logic assertions etc in wanting to substantiate and ask questions is natural enough, for me too in fact.... So in one way this is great to (ask questions) and to find balance of truth, once we know a person a bit better (but which usually means asking questions or prodding with a monkey stick a little bit, if being naughty or a bit forward etc) , but meanwhile swinging back to my slightly more serious point we other members of longer standing here should perhaps like I suggest~ try maybe to be a little more reserved about making assumptions sometimes me thinks unless provoking like a monkey with a stick finding that irresistable, haha, however provocative by the end of not, to be fair with you too GG, you came back with a measured response which is to say showing to us a common enough yet totally standard understanding about what could be acceptable as a measured response IN A REAL SCENARIO for curtailing trouble, as to see fit even as reaction to somebody (rebuttal &/or outburst), then all is a possible if must be applied, depending on the severity of the stupidity or maleficence of the person, then sure self defence has its' place... Has someone pre-meditated, been a persistent jerk, shown ill consideration over a long length of time, made mindless mistakes again and again, (been disturbed themselves but wrongfully take it out on others) ~ these are just some examples where from anyone meddling or off-balance themselves, all these things can sway someone who is NORMALLY well balanced off balance, when normally you or I might be quite emotionally stable otherwise until people with the above behaviours come along to mess with us and cause disturbances. Anyway~ despite contingency situations where needs must to do something other, I still agree the more better, in particular when around lots of other humans (more triggers to test our resolve) it's overall best to maintain control as best we can... and to cipher safely away any bad energy that comes our way (best by disengaging from the crowd when this is possible) and of course by dis-owning what is patently not ours to store up as our own in the first place when it did not come from us how certain crooked energies got unleashed and mis-directedly so when others cannot control themselves sufficiently.

A system -part built- by narcissists such as that would certainly fit this SELF AWARE PROGNOSIS of NARCISSISTIC GILE etc etc = but not limited to them as the culprits for laying siege on our consciousness *not respecting any person of more natural or integral spirit*, but that contend by any means necessary to them...... Such as to put contextually from their mindset, by socially and in other ways engineering to suit narcissistic taste does of course make perfect sense, to make that apparent as they might also on other aspects of their apparatus of theirs for control... self glory, etc etc, and may feature if not already-> multitudes of copious surveillance cameras, tracking, checks, multi-level leveraging by hierarchy of the rich - and err by the rich mostly, fake virtue signalling to condition us, class wars, stoking up woke, division, death rays by radiation, *and most notably for all technology expansion/ using insidious AI*.).. Also where hijacking is also the name of the game=> a possible other thing if not already apparent to assume in some ways (as I know you Mac have thought about but perhaps different from me) New Age regurgitation possibly, and definitely skewing/warping our perception of anything thought of as GOOD or TRUE or FACTUAL, but whilst we're on this subject of NEW, just to remind anyone out there, nothing is really so new about the New World Order though and don't we know it, and so what is so new also about the Matrix, (other than it is more in our faces these days, and more advanced) ... anyway, such as this based on some of my understandings forms the infrastructure for the Matrix or Simulation by which it is built or seg-wayed into conceptual reality to therefore appear real even when it is not, (or large chunks of it not real and not beneficial to OUR LIKING or BEST INTERESTS), And so anyway~ as I began by commenting, it would (have to> I SUPPOSE) **for them the controllers** be desirable to include the notion or option to be "self aware" (semi- humorous but rather more sinister than even the sickest joke)... even if that is purely a data exercise mainly, and to collect all the entire worlds PERSONAL portfolios of the supposedly sovereign individual included... (all gathered & orchestrated in 'central control room' sort of thing - but up in the TECH CLOUD probably mostly fair to say...... as per the internet as far as that goes, until then of course we saw (but most the general public did not see exactly what's UNDER THE BONNET of this tech and what exactly is it being used for more widely!!?!?!?!?!) in UBER CARS the use of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTER-COMMUNICATING ROBOT PROGRAMMABLE SELF DRIVE CARS).... So for anyone still ruminating around what makes the system what it is, well it's right there written & *wired* into that in Master Plan... which permeates (as technology does) also by becoming the vastness it expands to become for DEEP BRAINWASHING of the masses... but within which or at the start of which is also primarily known as the "HIVE MIND" APPARATUS (my word to make more apparent= apparatus) .... It's level of sophistication using modes of devisiveness, and codes for use (as is my guess) designed to work like in an inter-feudal control system, centrally operated on the one hand, but self reliance TOO embedded into the system of the Matrix more as a whole on the other hand, as AI would mostly take care of itself like in 'a trickle down secondering effect for sphere of influence' or according to whatever limitations or presets AI has been programmed to do, or to self delegate.. (not least through self replication of codes and AI programming etc).... Yet foremost I suppose most will know (if anything like my idea of it) that the Matrix/ and/or Simulation (dominion over reality), is the main tech "God-Father" (sts) wherever to believe that is found in operation using core centrality having dominion over all domains.... Anyway my original point was that since you mention narcissism **of theirs* that seems in keeping with fitting their perverted needs rather well by having certain abilities to be self aware, in the vain sense, and becoming at one with the Matrix Fusion with Human/Cyborg, and well in among having been imposed on us in no small part by narcissists, who also adore smoke & mirrors to go along with that suits them nicely.. haha.

Hi, I have landed in this thread before not long ago, but never said a word, now I am doing... with a little favor to ask.... So.... If anybody is watching this aside from yet also including obviously~ 78ast78dgyad,, please let us know those of us who don't have the time to view just now, what it contains, what is the interest or inspiration or indeed secret, etc... thanks tremendously, honestly, if a mouthpiece of sorts with a certain amount of delectable observation powers to convey the message in words could oblige, so much the sweeter... ie, if any other member (including OP) can assist in this to bring those with less time currently to the mantle for revealing the content, to propose to us what ideas or sources of information it contains to pleasure or horrify my brain... (I am guessing this is a generally more optimistic video than most though can we expect??) If help comes... That would be Great. nice one. Viewing myself will in my state of mind more likely send me to sleep, but I don't have time for sleep so much nor viewing, so this is why the ask....

Not just with the above but in all your replies, you put some great levellers or whatever your answers are feeding into the conversation Phil26 (that yes will take a while in me at least to digest better at some later date), but in the meanwhile are quite apt I suppose based on my quick read, I just don't know what to say about it all just now exactly, precisely and above all as I have other matters on my mind "in the life of whatever need calls or demands attention from me".... but before my own next post I first want to ascertain what is "Ergo" that I have highlighted, that presumably is not EGO you mean is it, but something else? (only I haven't seen Ergo before if that is a thing).

I see this on that link you post... Aside from reading, DAMN CONFUSING TITLE BTW OF WEB ARTICLE... GRR. (implying there is such a thing as a great or good reset....hmm....in whose favor though? Davos Magicians and Bankers?) Anyway, I decided to hear this Tucker / Brand video... Here's what Tom Luongo, at one part of his writing had to say about the two guys having the meet... Good Watch by my opinion ^^^ Tom Luongo also ends on this note, quote:- " Carlson, like Brand, Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Jerome Powell, Jamie Dimon, or any of the others I give credit to in this blog, aren’t perfect men. We killed that guy over two thousand years ago. We don’t need them to be perfect men. If you need that, I suggest you seek professional help. What we need is for them lead where they can when they can. " Ps, As a simple Disclaimer of Common Sense by me:- I didn't know of Tom Luongo, before Mac posted link to him... but seems interesting enough.

Extraordinary and irrational behaviours, good you kept calm, you can't let Yah-hoo's or emotionally disturbed people rush you off the rails or grease and crease you up by them trying to inculcate you in their baffling shouting fits, but somehow predetermined rage as it seems. So horrible, especially when your family seems also to be influenced by whatever this coincidence generator is, and I guess in much the same way, they react all weird... Especially weird to know that they go on after like nothing happened. Try to stay like the look of this smiley, unperturbed...

hmmm, I read it once and well, wait for it, I got it like a no-brainer, perhaps thanks to the warning of perhaps needing to read it more than once, hehe. So, unless a guy is an escape artist and suicidal self assassin, chopper upper, then its a murder... and hence he wasn't alone. ------ Ps, as an aside, just on the DI I read, don't know what DI &/or Co. has got interest in the ***DailyMail*** so consistently for though??? why is that then btw? Maybe its just take the devil you know (best?) in terms of newspapers.

What is that? Papal? is the spelling correct?

A well put together understanding you will see below, and most importantly "you hear" by the narrator in this video... Let me first just say, if you're skipping straight to the video, it is NOT compelled by ego the way this video tells about the Shaolin (despite the tough element in title of it)... OK, you're good to go!... WATCH,,, or read me first,,, whatever you have the stamina for...haha. Rest Assured I think I know enough to say it is set with the right intent... There is hardly any hype in this video... I can believe much that is said is true in one way or another. It is well grounded enough, and has my approval therefore. Combined with a few of my thoughts also here (although I repeat some of what is in the video *and learnings from my elsewhere observations of knowledge* etc), .....So now the vid speaks of how it all comes together for the most utilitarian mobility of the training with many aspects (holistic in approach as I like and espouse also myself, in any category of health or fitness for overall wellness)....and about adaptive strategy, well concerning this it is conceivable indeed, that because of the variability of the moves in Kung Fu, that makes the Kung Fu hard to lock onto or penetrate for any foolish opponent... Their whole package for anyone unfamiliar makes them not at all easy for anyone to decode by their numeracy in terms of varied arsenal of skills, making he or she difficult & unpredictable if chosen to be..... Anyway back to basics or otherwise ... (which btw it looks to me when required even advanced students will use basics over n over as much to advance and build upon that)... And likewise passed basics can also welcome in by repetition of advanced progressing so that when up to a certain point in his or her training, one can begin to realize & see their work on self pay off, with their mind & physicality accomplishment taken to a new level of mastery & expertise.... Also bearing in mind the Buddhist philosophy to help others, so it is not only about 'self consolidation' or whatever you might call it. How do we know for sure when comes the time to assess how one is doing??..... Well.... I don't know everything beware, but as a way to gage or test ability, a good sure way is for instance to see how easy a student or practitioner can do a switch between offence & defence, once you are well trained enough to be versatile enough to be so quickly mobilized or adept in changing style etc or combative mode (-or- why not else tactical training by itself by yourself, should that be sufficient for you and enjoyed as much for the learning you get similar to if you did actually have an actual adversary -or RATHER a spa or training partner - but still as can never be over-emphasized~> whether a sparring partner is wanted or needed or not, the only real opponent is basicly us ourselves and remains that way life-long), but as a Shaolin is built to fight *if necessary* that is okay to be exposed to that too and training sees to it your response is second nature, but that you do not fall into fights easily or look for that sort of thing because the art of discipline and wisdom is more important for a more peaceful attitude to life... (& aided certainly if also a person has chosen to be Buddhist or by alternative wisdom perhaps only part borrowed from Buddhist as well, each is fine) ....as then you continue on your path hopefully spiritually rewarded just the same (give or take) aided by more peaceful thoughts to enpower meditative practice, and also perseverance & resilience in keeping with challenging your own potential (whether mental or physical), nevermind what others have to say about it, unless they are a wiseman or a Sifu (teacher) with more experience than you, but even then, they can as they say sometimes as standard~} they postulate, perhaps correctly that they "can only point the way" (in whatever situations that actually works in activating self to grow or be self reliant etc, and learn through themself, including our own mistakes--- well argue that one if you wish, but I still think a *Good* teacher has a lot to teach us too).... and in the interim, I can assert similar now just as I am pointing you to this video now (and point myself at the same time, keeping my goals in sight and with some degree of focus that might measure up or whatever, but the most important thing is to try try & try) ....and soooo encouraging you to be inspired and for those if for the first time, encouraging you too to explore Kung Fu and martial arts more widely even outside of the Shaolin perspective if you want, ultimately inspired someway by your OWN ability and potential to be creative with your Kung Fu training based on whatever learnings, and bettering your relationship with life (and any available teacher), as a whole, and all that connects you to a deeper sense of being and if you like belonging as you wish too..... So, don't mind me too much, I am just speaking my mind based on my moderate understandings, but that have deep reasons as to why I like Shaolin (and most all Kung Fu types which each I suppose has something new to explore and have to compare or compliment what we may already know or have still to learn) and makes appreciating what they the Shaolin do all the more special even though I learn from some other video, the sources of Kung Fu teachings for Shaolin came not just from them and not just from Bodhidharma Indian yoga/spiritual guy but also the Shaolin themselves part got it introduced to them originally in a styles melting pot where styles may have been pre-existing in surrounding China, or at very least where similar Kung Fu simultaneously was emerging being practised from other parts of China at roughly the time when Shaolin were still establishing their pick of the old methods to carry through to today of which anyone was basicly a contributor at some stage, before it all became more roundedly known as Shaolin Kung Fu and honed and perfected by them *as one could argue*, and so eitherway a good number of those styles we still see (I think??) being maintained today whether Shaolin born at the seat of their navel or not entirely ... but hey this is not a video about history so much. So, a half an hour well spent, for something along these lines...For encouraging and learning why fluidity of flow and of often seen end to end motion or dynamism is necessary & desirable to practice in such a way of course... but so too tempered by good control of form & energy meridians & by nerve control etc, and the structure semi-naturally born within each style or application or combination of styles too, depending simply on regimen or need for a mixture of ways to express the human!.... So such things as made much aware in the Shaolin Tradition and equally other martial arts, especially Kung Fu types of styles etc, the clear fundamental is learning properly how CHI works . . . (*helping nurture & further generate your energy for more energy when required, and thus harnessing it ready for use on command of your will and your practice of ensuring you have sustenance of spirit, the motivation & the skill mentally and bodily to do this until it becomes not just instinct, but an enhanced version of your instinct complimented by various stances & forms and elevation in terms of say accuracy and of bodily agility through the mind's application transformed into the physicality manifestation*) . . . and now finally to when working with CHI in all this, which s brought to mind consistently throughout training cycles (guided by mindfulness & self belief & enthusiasm & a sense of calmness even when energetic) for when & whether harder or softer Qi Gung is used, where the functions of both spiritual (in some way) mind and body awareness and application of how the body works, have to ideally all work in unison or correlations with balance, speed, strength (resulting in optimum agility & increased focus).... Whereto find useful is even the ability to make "minute shifts" in muscle tension for better weight distribution for the particular practice you are doing, or such as fluid body realignment, etc... Balance is particularly useful here, like you go try and stand on one leg for as long as you can, and then lift (when advanced) other leg into the air literally reaching for sky behind you and bend down your upper body which will definitely help, whilst still being stood on the other ONE leg!... Fun to do as well for serious... All great stuff to test yourself and test your stamina too! =)) So on we go... it, the video, tells it well, using artful language which is capable in delivery to explain how any KF practitioner showing an interest can be inspired by this video, whether looking to get started or to improve-- or for general insight is good too-- and I think the latter really is what it's main aim is, but is quite detailed & fairly well descriptive all told nonetheless...

I am VERY laughing at how true that probably is!!.... As in, its so true it hurts kinda thing. (excuse my emotion, I am calm again now and this was just my initial first reaction to this thread, along with quite genuine horror, obviously, but fair play for the expose on where they basicly farm kids....) Nice to know we do however (Seem?) to LIKE how we have a Philosophical King in that aspect.... Yep, sure, what's not to like... I like Philosophy until it gets too complicated.