-
Posts
821 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Certified Green of Heart
-
That's SORT OF good to know, as I long ago got tired of humans meddling in stuff.... It's for the same reason that any possession you own at home cannot be left unlocked on the driveway or on the porch or it will get nicked. No respect, but if you lived in Japan, there is more respect for that type of thing. People there AFAIK don't steal what is lost, and therefore can be reclaimed by the rightful owner. But if your or ET's idea of having no idea is the idea, that's why I've led off already featuring another *more down to Earth* narrative as I just explained, which is still more explaining than I've ever seen written on something the size of a match box from you.
-
Origin, how long if applicable have you followed the Orb Whisperer guy? I watched the one called "Electric Light Being" you posted on this page.... but he seems to have much more material in videos when you go looking for more. What happens in his longer videos, is he doing a vigil in the form of a stakeout or a combination of vis a vis a vigil is basicly a stakeout, hehe. (serious-ish question)
-
Dreams and visions
Certified Green of Heart replied to vernon nielsen's topic in Mysteries / The Paranormal / The Unexplained
For real was that?... Do we know more, which one was it if so? -
Like Mac, I don't know hardly anything about Rich Hall either... but my very initial opinion just after having seen that video, you have to consider that is just a normal person protecting his family, and even climbed Kilimanjaro half disabled whilst having to endure God knows what trauma after having been paralysed, so is it any wonder anyone going through that reacts in what is a normal way and well I don't know outside of this what to say but ya know, it is normal no?... Hate to use the word "normal", but you know what I mean, as far as a face value 2 cents, that's what I'd assume without knowing Rich Hall's side ~ so yeah Regardless of what government is alleged to have done to use the event of Manchester Bombing et all for whatever end. That's my impression.
-
Oops, yeah you're right..... Easily done when fixated on a light bulb, transcending moment by moment into a glowing testimony of history and as it were rediscovered 'lost textbooks' pointing to the fact & out of it the growing lust for the illuminative* wisdom to yield a betterway for us all, with less expense and less profiteering too. (each a good thing for broader common sense of all life on Earth) (not to be confused with the Illuminati adverse cult*)
-
Wow, stuck for words pi3141, thanks very much for the breakdown in science, I enjoyed reading that from your knowledge as far it tells of common sense (at least to submit for further analysis by someone), and although you stopped watching the video to post having been roused by the inexplicable, but still providing what you know of the 'glow conundrum' (glad to see you then go on to continue watching after which is great)... and in the pause of you doing so you try to explain or at least illustrate as best you know, so that's good as you at the same time offer up to say its still hard to explain fully and so remains as a "problem uncovered" by most people or anybody, and so is very interesting topic indeed. For why electrons or photons in either case can be questioned why don't they just deplete & run out? and so off with the light you'd think after a certain life expectancy. But as per one example, the Tungsten filament btw, was for certain supposed to be one of the most longer life materials used wasn't it back at whatever time, just to add that insight materially and yet we can't explain precisely the science behind even that material with longer life given what you say I guess?
-
Yeah by overall impression, I agree (and I still haven't seen enough of his material put out, so this is as much my instinct as anything)... But alongside what else people will say here about his awareness, well it works both ways as now consider he is also ahead of us in much of his knowledge too (as far as his own interests and general knowledge but as a celeb then shares with the masses by like writing books and making informed TV if is still on TV making informed programs about history or whatever, I don't know). So maybe it's we ALSO that need to be a bit humble sometimes in some ways too. Not just him and others still on a voyage trying to bring salvation but whom are still on a learning curve, I mean WE ALL ARE.
-
With that in mind you might like (and lament) over seeing this video..... Conspiracies by businesses by design intended in a certain way, hardly a surprise... Me, I have seen this video before and only just gave it another quick view thinking of your comment there. And because the title drew me in again.... Anyway screw eye-catching cat-&-mouse... All I mean to say is this Veritasium guy has so many well figured videos for keeping our minds working... He's the epitome of a sensible interviewer and probing what doesn't make sense and questions in the hope of more reasonable answers in all things, especially where there is not a commonly enough understood way of thinking as a means I guess to make viewable some decent alternatives or so called popularizing a staging-post (remarking the territory) for 'alternatives' to propogate solutions to problems in more honest and efficient ways, perhaps-still-to-garner-support in the midst of a public rethink or rallying to attention in pursuit of better integrity in the way things are made and the ethics that ought be a part of that, etc... Yet hopefully still not all is lost once various factors all sink into their brain upon realizing how duped or manipulated big business has subjected them to become financially impotent as public become largely or explicitly (through their own fault in some part for ordinary people also have greed ..and also tack on an extraordinary dose of gullibility) quickly making them dependent on the manufacturing moguls of the predominant market forces motivated by greed etc... Always hatching new plans (or time tested tactics) to attract consumers to buy and buy again in never-ending commodity addiction but all by design, nothing by accident.... This all comes as no surprise of course given the depth of brain washing out there, that has already / has long harvested the minds of people (obviously just take one look at the mass populus who continue to get cajoled and directed in a certain way, by nudge protocols and also less subtle aggressive marketing across the board, and btw, the nudge protocols can be considered aggressive action too).... Of those effected and who be slave / the many who subconsciously or otherwise cling onto and carry messages planted by advertising etc, etc...... and so contrarily this video looks a bit when there were things still worth their manufacture being made to (pre-)compete (Sts) with all which came after, which before or originally were more positively well made by design and longer lasting and of a more simple intention, that's probably what we call the "hey day" or "Halcion days"- like when taking us back to the older ideas & models, but well, it all gets jettisoned where products serve too well our pocket or our well being but that are or were just not well known enough by comparison since they were eclipsed and killed off by deliberate capitalist bigger payoff flaky designs etc.. so where business is concerned the public get groomed into believing progress is being sold to them at the price of having the latest whatever and falling for that guile and spin etc etc as is all too familiar, but it's all a con & a swindle obviously..
-
Why spend all that money on making sure they are 'safe' (as in safely delivered as in satisfying the ill deeds of the manufacturers and genocide-ists) when they (the vaccines) are patently not safe, nor designed to be safe. This is a good starter question for any newbie on the forum.
-
That was interesting about doubting hydrogen use proposals Aka- suspected anti-proposals for it's use to individual homes , I wonder how that is going 16 months later?
-
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
https://www.newscientist.com/sign-up/lost-in-space-time/ -
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
Yeah, interesting to get your take on that, which is that^... I neither am a flat earther. As an aside: I get the intention behind your moot and how most people use it to mean indifference or similar, like a void result... but interesting is (and I am not the first to realize) when we say "moot" btw, I always try to read "neutered but not necessarily castrated" as a little mind trick to remind myself it doesn't mean what most people think does it, moot? I won't tax my mind TOO MUCH on trying to explain what it does actually point to though as my head is not craving detail today. But I'm sure a dictionary will tell it has certain nuances depending on how used maybe? (anyway, just saying in case you did not know)... ie, moot can be something possibly relevant OR MOOT-ISH but likely to NOT be well defined or resolvable or even plausible then I suppose?? So we could just say MOOT means TOO LOOSE TO HANDLE AND TAKE SERIOUSLY <- In GENERAL... But were it pursued, could open up new points of interest... Such as we see in the extrapolation on Grammarly.com (the YT advert site coming to haunt me but thankfully in a helpful way here, haha) https://www.grammarly.com/blog/moot-point/ Here's a funny from history: https://www.oed.com/dictionary/moot_adj?tl=true [1932] P. G. Wodehouse, Louder & Funnier 77 -
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
Some people may find this interesting... Helpful too hopefully, if taking into account your healh in this thread as much as you are concentrated on whatever else (perhaps to your expense)... https://themindsjournal.com/how-cognitive-distortions-harm-us/ -
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
I enjoyed that even if my mind is already partially warped, therefore this did no extra harm, lol. -
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
We had a guy on here once in the Flat Earther thread or the other opposite Round Earth thread, that eitherway was really confident about NASA, noone that I recall could seem to challenge him or give come back on what he said, this is a little sad, as I really as well don't want to believe in NASA given what comes out the woodwork about them,, and to always be wary in so far as having a BIG PINCH OF SALT where goes big bodies of leverage in the world that automatically ought not be trusted....(though I don't know specificly what that is which is the main grievance people have with NASA, as I haven't deep dived it, apart from faking things on a big scale using cheap studio-sets, lol) ps, This by Bombadil might surely provide a link to whoever that was in this post of Bombadil's... but no it was not Bombadil himself who I am talking about... I just don't remember the username of who I mean... -
Changing the past to create the future
Certified Green of Heart replied to Mr H's topic in Nature Of Reality
I noticed the weird eye ball cover of this video, on YT recently too, how bizarre or sensationalist is this video for anyone that has watched it? And further more what SPECIFICLY makes this planet horrible? Thanks..... Waiting. -
would win out... *as long as we are not obsessed with winning every single damn time** ----------------- This^^ has always been fair in my mind anyway (so as to remain reasonable- fairly consistently), and should exist in everyday philosophy no matter whether numbers are perceived to be involved, but as it turns out this form of math by common engagement seems to work well enough, even when seeing such a simple basis by how it's played, always resorts to simple truths, am I right? Simple wrong / simple right,,, simple raise, simple fall.... etc. Yet the more people that interact, the better the odds can congregate and co-operate and see good in the world..
-
Edit for this paragraph beginning:- The test desired to see was put together by math scientists comprising 15 sets of data each with its' own programmable attributes unique to its' particular strategy of input to partake into the FIRST TOURNAMENT (Later they tried the whole 'GAME' with 62 data sets ((and probably more)) as behavioural input, but you can watchout for that in the video), so in any case~ to see what the winning attribute OR VARIED ATTRIBUTES OF STRATEGY TYPE (whether good or bad politics so to say) would win out... ------------------ Expanding the Concept: IS EASIER than we might have supposed yes!?... coz actually most human beings will anyway have already acted in ways true or false or as co-operation by which to say can draw (or AKA live in Peace). See, 19:27 for seeing about does this theory apply suitably to the real world until the end of the vid.. (and actually few minutes just prior to 19:27 helps this realization also). More advanced strategies like payoffs, & mutations were added, and even the most winning strategy of all was played against itself... Niceness or Nastiness, The Environment holds all the keys? Or the Player holds all the keys? Maybe it's a bit of both... as the test done repeatedly does appear liable to suggest as proof-positive, in how you should be confident in being nice, but at the same time doesn't have to leave you vulnerable by making you a pushover, as we uncover by this experiment. and BTW, it depends on many interactions. . . .Not just one solitary or a handful of games or encounter but rather by which all ways meet with all ways and even one off negative encounters can be over-ruled by forward thinking ... And so what we do so see in finality of the greater picture and of the long run along with multiple interactions, is actually quite encouraging come the end results, so long as people ARE MINDFUL OF THEIR OUTPUT (attitude) AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT they aspire to dwell and prosper in despite hostilities & deception & general game players... So nevermind is it just game play** where it could be seen as just trivial, REALLY IT IS NOT "trivial" BY & LARGE, (this as the scientist says is just math label**) but in reality as in the game, shows mostly always a mode of deliverance for you and others is by acting for the good, (as long as we generate the will to co-operate) this can be shown or emulated how to co-operate, and be that using "Tit for Tat" (one of the behaviour modules), this is only a strategy in order to keep the bad guys from out-performing the OVERAALL GOOD in among the MANY, so "Tit for Tat", although used commonly both in the game -and- in the real world, should as a general rule only get used only when really necessary. And even with this yin-yang style of interaction, in the end traits that encourage Co-Operation are things like Forgiveness & Generosity ARE THE GREATEST TO COME OUT ON TOP, despite the bad actors at play in there that use con tactics such as in the "Tester" Behavioural Module or "Always Defect" Behavioural Module.
-
Interesting to say the least.... Mirrors a lot of how we see real people (politicians mainly) so if be they people with grudges, biases, sneaky behaviour, etc etc, (Or all of this first & foremost to be treated as Math Ratio or INTER-ACTION? Problem -so to say- of some kind,, depending on how you want to view it).... Anyway, pertaining to the above, each set AKA strategy input which each a gameplay strategy represented so (as per applicable to each).... most of which with a certain tactic.... but also ONE of the 15 was put forth to combine as a random 'placebo' model to contribute in the overall test, that is to say included in the end experiment one of the data-sets went 50/50 in whether to co-operate or defect (Aka counter-offensive= Aka non-cooperation).... Now be that what it may, the whole FIRST TOURNAMENT (I'm talking about here) experiment was repeated with all data-sets, of each programmable input particular to how it behaves when put head to head against all other competitors (or simply "data-sets" using pure at heart math language) ... and so yeah, vital to the overall exercise ~ was this, the following, what they did as a key insurance elemental to success, where understandably for veracity of veritable proof, the whole thing like many experiments in the world was run 5 times over to ensure confidence in the result stayed true... (fast forwarding a little bit there) Before we come to the actual experiment, let me explain a bit.... So we are taking all these attributes (of characters/ attributes/ strategies, call it what you will) into account for game play exchange to demonstrate either co-operation and/or counter-offensive= Aka non-cooperation.... The test desired to see was put together by math scientists comprising 15 sets of data each with its' own programmable attributes unique to its' particular strategy of input to partake into the final event/experiment, to see what the winning attribute (whether good or bad politics so to say) would win out as per the construct of whatever logic and then combined logic of all the data-sets for each character and their programmable individual strategy for each.....So these 15 sets of attributes are effectively (in the spirit of the word defining GAME) represented by personality (playfully called a CHARACTER)... Anyway--- For good or for evil, (or MATH if you prefer to say MATH) in knowing by the result whatever else may manifest too.... So on with it, "they" (==these character nuances => each their own program or set of rules in playing the game) then ALL TOGETHER got combined these total number of 15 programs/data-sets of game-play attributes fed into a computer, so that ALL played out collectively ... Then you see what the result was by watching the video...
-
-
Saw this book round and about my town (something where sold much like in a charity shop I noticed it, but someone took home anyway as it soon became apparent shortly after my spotting it, sold/ gone!).... Anyway, just in case this is of interest... Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures.. by Karina Reiss Ph.D. and Sucharit Bhakdi MD | Oct 2, 2020 https://www.amazon.com/Corona-False-Alarm-Facts-Figures/dp/1645020576/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1TIB6MP3B1I84&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.VIFIDEjesm7rIe4XEYP9PQ.cxaqd-O8_NIdjS2YbDv-7DIHct5zERvcdlt4EBRLFJw&dib_tag=se&keywords=Covid+K.Reiss&qid=1708723635&sprefix=covid+k.reiss%2Caps%2C298&sr=8-1 Geez Haven't they got Shorter URLs on Amazon for us to use....
-
A bit like a poltergeist then, it could sound like that in a way? Do we have any choice in what the poltergeist or ghost is sharing? Just as a fun question ... Why do we think (or as I suppose) a poltergeist is not so fussy about location at which to prey on people? Whereas a ghost (traditionally anyway) has rathermore tasteful hangouts in castles, old ruins, mansions, and abandoned / semi abandoned places?
