neonbelly

Completely agree with this and also with Macnamara's point in terms of the 'rubber meeting the road' at the point of enforceability/willingness to enforce on the part of those who have the power to - this is where I have constantly hit a brick wall with the 'common law' types in my local freedom movement: why does it help us to understand their particular version of 'common law' if the authorities will simply ignore it and carry on anyway? Also re: Mark Windows, I might have unintentionally misrepresented his position a bit as I agree he is an advocate for the useful 'core' of (real) common law but also warns that there are many charlatans around using the name 'common law' to push totally unrelated and often extremely risky ideologies (for instance I know one person who got the impression that they could dispense with car insurance because they were a 'traveller' not a 'driver' or something and then ended up having to pay a substantial fine when this didn't hold up in court - the 'common law' truthers response to this essentially being to ostracise/smear the person involved, who had been one of their biggest supporters and claim that they simply weren't 'doing it right' whilst also shutting down any discussion of exactly WHY their approach didn't work in this case or any others they have tried). I think the historical common law IS an important thing for us to defend/uphold but I believe the whole 'common law' movement simply reveals the general confusion about how power works amongst the truth movement as a whole - which is something we urgently need to correct before TPTB try and pull another 'covid' style coup and we find ourselves unable to respond effectively again!

Just realised that I didn't add the link to Mark Window's site in the original post so here it is: https://windowsontheworld.net - highly recommend to those in this movement who are a bit more skeptical or who have seen strange behaviour and ideas start to creep in and derail the activities of otherwise effective local freedom groups.

Hi everyone, this is my first post here and I just wanted to share some blog posts I wrote a while ago to see if they might be of interest to any of you as I read a number of interesting posts here while I was researching them that influenced how they ultimately turned out. I saw that there were a number of posters on here who were beginning to question the validity of much of the 'common law' ideology which is being presented to people as a solution to the problems we are currently facing. Recently(ish) I wrote a couple of blogs looking into this ideology a bit further as I had grown increasingly frustrated with how 'common law' had come to dominate the local, let's say, 'freedom' movement in which I had become somewhat involved as a result of the lockdown situation and had made it increasingly less effective and increasingly more cultish and cliquish to the point where myself and others basically stepped back entirely. What I found, when I tried to find a clear explanation of what 'common law' adherents actually believe was a tangled mess in which certain indisputably true things (historical common law) were mixed together with bizarre interpretations of existing laws (e.g the lost at sea stuff) and a lot of interesting but impossible to prove esoteric wordplay. I strongly suspect that many, if not most, of those pushing this ideology as figureheads and speakers are either grifters or are deliberately pushing a psyop that is designed to siphon people's energy into paths that don't fundamentally challenge the regime or expose its real mechanisms of power (most of which couldn't give a damn about 'sovereign beings' and special legal formulas as witnessed by the illegal wars they wage, the treatment of political enemies like Assange and countless other things) and ultimately lead to financial ruin for those who pursue them to their logical conclusions. This suspicion was only heightened when I discovered that many 'common law' gurus first popped up at the precise moment when the system was expediting its last major crisis (the 2008 financial disaster) and many were becoming aware of the fraudulent nature of its fractional reserve banking system and were demanding real change. For those who already have similar suspicions/ideas I would highly recommend checking out Mark Window's work which I also discovered while writing the blogs (his site is ...and he does an excellent podcast every Sunday which can be found on there along with archives of all of his shows). Unlike myself, he has a deep knowledge of real common law and I believe has actually been involved in trying to win cases with it for years and so understands where it is and isn't applicable/effective. There is a link to both of my blog posts below and I would appreciate any feedback that people have as I'm still trying to get tot he bottom of whether there is anything in this 'common law' stuff or whether its all just a big con/psyop! The Common Law Cult Part One The Common Law Cult Part Two