Jump to content

itsnotallrightjack

Members
  • Posts

    1,752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by itsnotallrightjack

  1. Yes. It's a very personalised approach. Three people are suffering from one complaint will likely have different causes for their illness. In addition, they will be different people with different experiences and homeopathy will take all of that into account, which means that there will be several remedies for a particular complaint. Each homeopathic remedy may be also taken for a number of various complaints. Very different to the "one pill fits all "pharmaceutical approach.
  2. Where do you buy it from? I used to get very bad hay fever in my 20s and found Nelson's Pollena worked well. I don't really get hay fever now, but I have developed loads of new allergies and am looking into homeopathy as a treatment. I've got an online consultation booked in January with a homeopathic clinic, but in the meantime I'd like to try histaminium.
  3. Yes. I had 2 and they make a big difference in air quality, but when the filters were full I found that both models had been discontinued and so I have had to send them back for refunds. I am looking at big name models now that won't discontinue the filters after a few months.
  4. Nadine Dorries was extremely naive if she thought the Old Boys Etonian Club would view a state school educated Liverpudlian woman as one of their own. No surprise to us of course.
  5. That would certainly get them annoyed.
  6. Sides. Sides. Both murdering each other, and innocent babies included in that. Human beings just love waging war on each other. Bring on the robots.
  7. The simplest way to "understand" it is the fact that human beings are seemingly incapable of living in peace with each other, and still arguing over imaginary gods, squabbling over land and ruled by cowards sitting in big mansions who keep transporting weapons to incite "sides" to keep on murdering each other. Many animals understand how to live in peace better than these despicable bipeds.
  8. Laurence Fox is quite unstable and an embarrassment to the Fox family.
  9. Revolting behaviour. I'm beginning to think humans deserve A.I and robots to take over.
  10. Indeed. It is utterly despicable. Why can't people live in peace with each other. On the whole, animals behave better.
  11. It is disheartening to find that so many women lack good taste, that they would be attracted to such a vulgar man who also looks like an unwashed vagrant.
  12. Don't forget though that the super rich in their mansions on private estates will be exempt because they need to keep their jacuzzis, tennis courts, swimming pools and 30+ rooms heated 24/7.
  13. I am in agreement. They would hardly be bothering to travel millions of light years to bring us yet another bill.
  14. That is a logical conclusion due to electric cars not having liquid fuels.
  15. I've got this robot model in my little robot collection! Nerdy I know, but I love robots.
  16. Ha ha ha very true. In fact one would have to be very dense not to know who he was.
  17. How bizarre! I cannot believe Huw's wife said this; for one, she gives no mention of the allegations being untrue (which one would expect) or alternatively them being true and that he is sorry, only that the allegations have been made and he has severe mental health issues and will be in hospital for a long time.
  18. Ditto me. Haven't listened to the radio in years, and that was Classic FM. Again ditto: seems very odd timing re Schofield and the BBC.
  19. Tate is a lesson in absolutes. The good guy v the bad guy. Bad people can have some good aspects to them, or speak some sense on some things, yet be despicable in many others. Tate is known to be violent to women (bad) but may raise other points worthy to consider. Chairman Mao starved his people yet got rid of footbinding for women.
  20. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12189041/Twelve-year-olds-taught-anal-sex-school-nine-year-olds-told-masturbate.html?ico=related-replace#comments Not sure how true this is, given most teachers in the comments have said they have never seen it. But some have indicated they are seeing some teaching topics like it. Absolutely mind boggling and disgusting. To any parents reading this: home school if you can! It's quite a long article, and be warned: the illustrations of the "teaching materials" are very graphic. Makes Cosmopolitan magazine look like The Beano. I'm starting this thread so parents and grandparents (or even foster parents/guardians) can be forewarned and on their guard. If anyone has any direct experience of evidence of these disgusting "sex education" lessons, do feel free to comment. And just as an aside, I once had a copy of Cosmopolitan magazine on my coffee table about 15 years ago, and my Mum (born 1943) started to leaf through it as we waited for the kettle to boil. She saw one of the sex advice articles and her eyes widened. "What have I just seen!" she exclaimed. Uh, that was my reaction to this DM article.
×
×
  • Create New...