Jump to content

Pinkiebee

Members
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pinkiebee

  1. Just now, Morpheus said:

    Hmmm, I don't agree. Many people who have arrived here have woken up as a result of the information they've received. You're making it sound like everyone is too dumb to comprehend the information and whilst that may be the case for some for others it is not. We also have cognitive dissonance in play as well as the brainwashing undertaken by TPTB, there are just so many factors at play it's a little too simplistic to just say people are too dumb to do anything with the information. 

    People are dumbed down and compliant.  That's what ink said and I agree.. that's clearly not all people just most of them. If they understood history and some of the dreadful things done to people in the past they may be able to see through it, but they dont and cant and a govenment propaganda machine spreading fear and fear and hate of dissenters is hard to over come unless your already of the mind that they are a complete bunch of @@@@s with no morals at all. Ie like minds

  2. 2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Us, the people. The exchange of information. Sorry, I thought I was quite clear who I was referring to. 

    The problem is your only ever going to find like minds to receive the information.

     

    I was 5thrown of three forums I was a long time member of, a martial arts, a cycling and a motoring forum for throwing shade at the lock down requirments. Not you understand to any degree compared to on here and all that happened is people got very very angry at me for going off script. And even more angry as they couldnt win the debate

     

    The exchange of information is no use if people arnt receptive to it and the powers that be had already put in place a plan to demonize decenting voices 

  3. 25 minutes ago, ink said:

     

    Not really!

     

    Just look at the fertility rates across the world and consider the tech world they are creating which along with the utter dumbing down of the population will leave only a 'slave' race of 'humans'.

     

    But it is not just killing the mass of people .... if that was what had been wanted then to poison the water supply (in first and second world countries) would have done it (even I know of a substance which added to the piped supply would have killed most very quickly) .... It is enslavement of that which people may have become!

    The subservience .... getting the mass to line up to be injected and getting them to lose any essence of individuality .... to enslave them!

    Making them 'murder' themselves!

     

    They already 'kill' their own children in the mothers womb and now that will become the false legal even to birth (and maybe beyond). 

    They have already destroyed most of what 'Mankind' could/should have been .... now they inflect servitude on the 'Spirit' in order to stop 'people' becoming truly 'Born'!

     

    And still some refuse to comply ....... Some will never comply.

    Well that's very different to a depopulation agenda

     

    And I dont necessarily disagree with your sentiments . 

     

    But these things came to pass generations ago. People were forming orderly queue to be sent off to be butched in the first world war.  The vacine roll out was nothing by comparison to that level of population control .Sugesting this is anything more than business as usual is in my view an error.

     

    There were three occasions were they nearly lost control of the population and there for the country in the last century . The 1910s the 1930s and the 1970s. 

     

    Each of these was followed by a war, which in the first two killed vast numbers of young men who might have rebelled and in all three caused a wave of patriotism and a collective pulling together 

     

    At the moment we have boris strutting about being a ' war leader" and we're not even in a war, at least not yet.

     

    But it serves much the same purpose of distracting the population from the " home front" 

     

    A dumbed down compliment population distracted by alcohol or TV or war is very much the norm not a new initiative. Hell they managed to control us with the cold war for 50 years and that wasnt a war at all

    • Like 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Wow, I think you're in the wrong place, maybe netmums or something would be better suited. 

     

    In answer to your two questions it's clearly option 2 or is it? If you're trying to wipe out 2/3 of the population, not spooking people you're trying to murder helps. 

    So when do you project we will see the fruits of their labour and a notable decrease in the earth's population or even a fall in the average life expectancy which also continues to increase. 

     

    Between these two figures both increasing it must be the most inefficient mass murder in history

    • Like 1
  5. 43 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Is there yeah? 🙄

    Well yea, just a bit. I have no doubts that if it suited the agenda they would happily see us die by the millions as they have before.

     

    Where it falls down is people have to my certain knowledge been claiming there is a de population/ mass murder agenda for the last 20 years and probebly some time before that. And in all that time the earth's population has kept increasing. 

     

    This only leaves two reasonable conclusions

    1) these people were wrong

    2) the elite are making a really bad job of de populating the earth

    • Like 1
  6. 31 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

     

    Indifference or not, once the ramp up the propaganda again and introduce a new and improved variant, the masks will be back on. This is a truce and nothing more.

    I'm not so sure  not that they wont ramp it up again or that people wont wear masks if forced to . But I doubt there is any appetite in the population for more " lock down" bollocks. There a limit to how long people can live in fear before they say stuff it. If my numbers up !

     

    That was very much what happened in december. Mask mandates and it was near universally ignored. even the shop girls on the tills wernt bothering . Hell the police wernt bothering.

     

    I think they could get reluctant compliance.  Most people arnt going to be anything other than resistant 

    • Like 1
  7. Just now, Given To Fly said:

     

    The most credible and legitimate is your own experience and research, rather than confirmation bias. And my own numerous sober experiences confirms the existence of God and the supernatural. No scientist or expert on the planet is going to be able to refute or tell me otherwise what I know to be true which wasn't by blind faith.

    Richard Dawkins asides very few scientist are remotely intrested in telling you god or the supernatural doesnt exist.  You cant prove a negative. They are to the most part concerned with proving rather than disproving things. 

     

    I too consider myself a believer.  In the supernatural not at all the bible.  As there isnt any evidence that would pass scientific rigour I have to accept that it's almost certainly superstitious wishfull thinking. Still it helps and that's all that matters 

    • Like 1
  8. 21 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Not being funny, but the very same people who seek to destroy 80% of the world's population, through various methods, are the very people's schools you have passed through. Those same people, who seek to destroy you and your family wrote/allowed that history to be passed to you. The same history books your so vehemently defending. Just think about that for a second before you make a condescending comment to me. 

     

    As for the comment I've highlighted, oh the irony. 

    There a touch of paranoia there. 

     

    School history is, well, child like by design very simplistic with a strong element of goodies and baddies in it. The History I took had a big element of the british empire was great. Modern school history has a big eliment of the british empire was evil. Nether is accurate and we didnt even have an empire if you want to be especially accurate

     

    ""Hollywood"" ( film.tv adventure/ romance books etc) history which is where most people get their history from isnt much better. The story takes precedence over accuracy thats if it isnt blatantly misrepresenting it . Which it commonly is for commercial or national interest reasons

     

    Then there are ACTUAL history books. Writen by people who have committed much of there lives to researching the battle of agincourt.  They have sources.  They have reasoned comparisons between sources. They have reasoned interpretations and they discuss the case against those interpretations 

     

    Then they still might mislead you. Read 6 by different authors then you are in a postion of having enough information to make a reasonable judgement on what is true or not.

     

    There are any number of these books which greatly contradict what could be considered the official narrative.  So its clear they are not being censored. Plus only a few 1000s people read them anyway so they wouldnt really care.  They will never gain traction against the propaganda machine

    • Confused 1
  9. 19 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Could that not be said about most history? I mean, none of us were there, it's all hypothetical is it not? If this is dangerous, then so is all history, not all of it can be verified at all, but the norm is to accept everything you here from them as fact. 🤔

     

    Its reasonable to say if you have at least some logic that the battle of agincourt didnt play out like the movie  ( which it didnt)  it's reasonable if you have some evidence to say the battle of agincourt didnt happen at all (which it did) 

     

    It's not reasonable to totally invent a battle ( or a mud flood) for which you have nether logic or evidence just because you dont trust who ever.. the NWO the govenment the historians 

     

    And that's largly where the stolen history lot are at

     

    By all means challenge history. Dont start inventing it

  10. 18 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    I suppose if you only watched a small segment you're not going to know the rest of the argument are you. 

    It's easy to just dismiss this as harmless nonsence.  But I feel it does do harm.

     

    There no doubt that popular history, history as its understood by most of the population has been modified and edited or just forgotten entirely to fit a later narrative. 

     

    The world would be a more informed and possibly better place if this was understood . This becomes almost impossible if people invent events that have not happened at all and for which there is no logical reason to believe at all as this is just noise that drowns out the truth and people confuse people who are genuinely challenging the narrative with complete fantasist 

  11. Just now, Morpheus said:

    I suppose if you only watched a small segment you're not going to know the rest of the argument are you. 

    I watched up to the point they started making ridiculas claims. Which to be fair was quite early in the run time. Did it improve with reasoned and logical points later? 

     

    Give me a time stamp and I will pop back  for the reasoned argument 

  12. 10 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    It doesn't suggest every house with a basement does it. 

    It's the black swan effect.  If you can find even one non mud flood basement window or even one earlier non basement window house. (There are many thousands of similar era houses round here that have no cellar at all).  It throws doubt on the whole theory of world wide mud floods 

     

    I suppose you could modify its be a world wide cataclysm that managed to miss Manchester entirely 

     

    Or you could look at less grand houses of the same era as those illustrated and also find non basement windows.

     

    They not usually put the date on the building wall to assist

  13. 1 hour ago, Given To Fly said:

     

    Bud, c'mon, these 'scientists' are trained/indoctrinated in Chinese communist philosophy where they have to deny God for the benefit of the state, and their livliehood !!

     

    I used to believe in this sort of horse manure. I blindly believed that because Engels called Marxism 'scientific socialism' and not utopian, that it was indeed scientific. The same with the cow dung of covid science ... it should all be taken with a grain of salt.

    Very few of them make a habit of debunking god. It doesnt come up very often.

     

    Its reasonably clear that a lot of scientific understanding seems to contradict the old testament in particular. That throws shade on the bible rather than there not being one or more supernatural entities ruling our lives

     

    Admittedly evidence for supernatural entities is a bit lacking if you discount the bible and other ancient text. But they could still be out there keeping a low profile

    • Like 1
  14. 8 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    I've watched this, it's very good. 👍

    I got as far as the basement window fitment means catastrophic world wide mud flood thing. Apart from the obvious question of where exactly did all this mud come from. It's a nonsence argument.  The house I grew up built in the 1885 had such a basement window. The houses over the road built in the 1875 did not. They were slightly less grand so got a cellar with out.

     

    The height of the water pipe was also a clue. It would have been 8 foot in the air if the cellar was the ground floor

  15. 17 minutes ago, jack121 said:

     

    Sheep in my area wearing triple masks, while they are sleeping ! ! !

    Heard them boasting about it as the flock trotted and baa'd past me the other day, through the town centre:

    "A'int no covid gonna get me, i got me dem dere masks in."

    "Well, i got three masks."

    " Well, that's nothing, I buy 'em by the box."

    And all the rest of that pointless inane drivel as i stare at the blue faces and hastily sidestep out of the way of their breath

     

     

     

    There are very few people wearing masks round here. Maybe one in a 100 from casual observation . And they are nearly always designer masks. It's like they paid the money and are now going to make sure they get their money's worth.

     

    The bulk of the population seem to have developed complete indifference to covid. 

     

    I suspect most of them were always mainly indifferent. 

    • Like 1
  16. On 12/29/2021 at 8:44 PM, allymisfit said:

    Well, I'm not sure where to put this thread really, but I figured here would make most sense, unless it's a medical thing...

     

    It's a rather peculiar phenomenon that I've experienced throughout life at very random times.

    For example, I'll be going about my day and all of a sudden a flash from a dream appears, but not from last night's sleep, from a long time ago. 

    The flash feels like it's lasting less than a second and when I'm trying to figure out what it is, I can't..then it will appear about 15 times throughout the day and I still can't figure it out.

     

    Has anyone else experienced this? I wonder what it could mean.

     

     

    Happens to me quite often. A long ago flash of a dream. Its takes me a while sometimes to make out it if it's a memory of a dream or an actual memory . Then it's gone again and I cant remember what I remembered 

  17. On 4/11/2022 at 7:13 PM, rwkt said:


    The Space Camel's nose under the tent flap...

    Keep looking up.

     

    clif high

    Apr 11

     

     

     

     

    I follow Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying, two famous evolutionary biologists. Yes, they can define ‘woman’ for you.

     

    What they can’t do is to tell you when in planet Earth’s history there was a time of several millions of years wherein the climate conditions would have allowed for human evolution. Bear in mind we don’t have fur, at least most of us don’t. This means that we modern humans will die of exposure over repeated nighttime temperatures of lowering to only 60 degrees F with only a 2 % increase in relative humidity.

     

    So my question to the evolutionists, is when existed a period where humans could have ‘lost’ our fur (presuming we evolved from apes), and not died of hypothermia? It does not appear to exist from a climatologists understanding of the geological record.

     

    There is also, IMO, the issue of our digestion. We cannot digest plants effectively as most of the plant nutrients are not bio-available to our stomach/intestinal processes. Even, and especially for plant based foods, humans need to cook. So fire is an essential survival tool for us. Again, did conditions ever exist that would have allowed humans to evolve wherein we can’t digest the items in our diet without the technology of fire? When was that?

     

    Then there is the whole thing of how did we hunt without technology? Without language to coordinate the taking of big game?

    And, IF, really big damn IF, humans with fur and with the ability to eat without fire existed, what was the impetus to change them into us naked guys who need clothes & grills to live? If, as Evolutionary THEORY does, we postulate that humans evolved really slowly, then where in the historical record did these millions of years exist? And what did those humans eat? Why did they lose their fur? How rapid did that occur such that they would invent clothing/shelters to survive.

     

    Human history did not happen that way.

    Humans did not evolve from apes on this planet.

    Humans are THE product of technology.

     

    This is my conclusion, as the science about humans is SO fucked up.

    Anthropology is the study of humans. It is divided into 4 large areas,

    ·

    · archaeology, the study of humans in the fossil records;

    ·

    ·

    · linguistics, the study of human communications via words (phonemes) and other biological processes that we call ‘language’;

    ·

    ·

    · culture, the study of tradition, and the collective human life;

    ·

    ·

    · genetics, pertaining to DNA, evolutionary theory as applied to humans.

    ·

    Linguistics are my area of intense study, and that is a real giant stew of conflicting claims and evidence that end up only partially supporting any theory of human origins or advancement (evolution). There are many theories & none are cohesive. None work to satisfy analysis & to proceed further. They all end up being a dead end.

     

    It is this way with all aspects of Anthropology. There is NO clear record in any of our studies that will answer THE questions that face us constantly.

     

    Where did humans originate? Who are we? And where did we come from?

     

    All the theories from religion to science are bogus. They answer nothing conclusively and are filled with gaping holes of exclusion. As an instance, evolutionists such as Bret & Heather, do not, and will not, acknowledge nor discuss such things as Giant hominids. And even worse, that some of these Giants may have been contemporaneous with modern peoples. Agghh! That don’t work with the academic view of “Humans out of Africa”. This, by the way, in my opinion, is another one of the Khazarian Mafia ‘history distortions’. Our collective story is riddled with their fuckery. We don’t know shit for sure because of their organized and consistent goal to remove our history from us with each passing generation.

     

    We are a quasi intelligent species with amnesia stumbling around in a dark cave tripping over clues continuously as we attempt to devise a science, a ‘knowing’, that will shed some light on our past.

     

    Constantly in science, and academia, one runs into the barriers that the Khazarian Mafia puts around knowledge. You can’t discuss giants, or strange critters in the oceans, nor glaring huge events in history, if any of it chips away at the narrative that the KM is trying to construct.

    THE one thing that is most forbidden is to examine Anthropology with a perspective that includes UFOs & Space Aliens. Extra forbidden with a beating on top, just to get your attention.

     

    BUT this one element, the mere idea that Space Aliens with a bent towards biology, and genetics came here & created humans INSTANTLY fills in all those pesky holes.

     

    Humans did not evolve, we were created in labs. Thus, of course, we would not be able to find a period of millions of years of specific stable environmental conditions where no night dropped to lower than 65 degrees, and no day rose higher than 78 degrees.

     

    When we were genetically engineered in the labs, we were given the digestion system we have, and thus, of course we don’t find any fossil records of humans who were vegetarians, nor any without fire sign nearby. Aha! So simple, they made us to eat this way!

    And, need we even go to the issue of our ‘fur’ supposedly in our ancestral past? Nope.

     

    All one has to do, really, it is not difficult at all, at least initially, is to let the idea of Space Aliens creep into your thinking. It alters everything, this idea, and explains so much.

     

    Of course the human fossil record is bizarre with no clarity in any part of the examination that is not created by very very sketchy, very very loosely supported ‘evidence’. Of course the human fossil record is scattered, confusing, diverse, and totally out of whack with any projected clade ‘evolution’. Of course the human fossil record is exactly as mixed up as those of dogs and cats. We messed up dog and cat ‘evolutionary fossil record’ with a plethora of clade members with all our breeding experiments with these animals.

     

    Exactly the same thing was done to us humans. The plethora of clade members, and the absence of clarity of lineage by evidence, not assertion, looks to be a replica in the abstract of what we have done to the ‘lesser animals’.

     

    It is when we apply the idea of Space Aliens interfering with human and earth history to Cultural Anthropology, that we reap the most progress in our science. There are millions of instances, constantly found in our historic cultural records, of Space Aliens.

    These millions of items of cultural evidence are all dismissed by academics as though it was evidence of vote fraud in the 2020 election, and for exactly the same reason; that the Khazarian Mafia can’t have you understanding reality as they do.

    In their reality, Biden won. They made it happen. In their reality, you believe in the Theory of Evolution. They made that happen too. They have been fictionalizing reality for centuries.

     

    To the top dogs in the Khazarian Mafia, humans being the creation of Space Aliens is a established fact. This can be ascertained by just how much energy they put into hiding the Space Aliens as originators of humans idea.

     

    Understand also, that the Space Aliens did not create us to be physical slaves. That is we are not created to mine gold for them, or do their laundry. There is another agenda involved that is way deep into biology and genetics.

     

    Understand also that any species that can cross the vast distances of space, by whatever means, will by that very technology, be capable of creating either elements/compounds, or machinery to harvest them from nature. An intelligent species does not need the problems associated with slaves to do simple labor tasks.

     

    Humans are THE product of a technology. Perhaps biology is the ultimate ‘technology’ in Universe. It is certainly the ultimate prize for the Space Aliens that the Khazarian Mafia knows created/altered their genetic makeup.

     

    These creatures, Those Who Came from the Sky, or the “Elohim”, these Space Aliens, are described in the hidden language of the Khazarian Mafia, as being basically gaga over genetics.

     

    Biology is the true gold of universe. Metals, the Elohim could create in industrial processes. They can make gold if they wanted it.

    Biology they had to locate. To the Elohim earth was a treasure house of biologic diversity. They reveled in it for centuries, mucking about with this and that line of creatures, thus producing our crazy fossil record.

     

    The Elohim found planet Earth teaming with Life that they intended to, and did, exploit and alter. They did not create us. They altered what they found here. They, and the Khazarian Mafia, are also hiding that fact. The Elohim, in spite of all their power, and claims, cannot create Life, they have to find it.

     

    The Khazarian Mafia understanding is that the Elohim achieved their goal, that is, creating an extra little bit of DNA and adding it to some compatible human DNA which created, as they claim, the Khazarians.

     

    Some of the Khazarian Mafia understands that the Elohim left. It is their way. The Elohim are not the only Space Aliens out there. The Elohim are the Coneheads. Not quite like in the movies, but you see the imagery filtering through the obscuring of the culture to some degree. Space Aliens are all around us in Culture and our History. These signs and images are still there despite the best efforts of the Khazarian Mafia to obscure the subject right out of your awareness by their control of academia, and the press.

     

    The Elohim, according to the Khazarian Mafia, track another species of Space Aliens through the Galaxy, and over Time. These are the Nummo. These guys look like really ugly fish beings, but are exceptionally smart, and, unlike the Elohim, are kind and not self-absorbed. The Nummo are what we humans would call ‘moral’, unlike the Elohim, and their minions, the Khazarian Mafia.

     

    The Elohim seem to be angry at, and jealous of, the Nummo, and are, according to the Khazarian view, in a kind of a strange War against them.

    But that is another investigation for another time. Right at this moment, it is the Khazarian Mafia that concerns us as they think that the Elohim left them in charge. In fact, many of the Khazarian Mafia at the top believe themselves to be the new Elohim.

     

    This is not a good thing for humans. It will need to be rectified.

     

    Your pre supposing  that the loss of fur happened before either we had mastered fire or the use of animal skins for optional warmth and they all happened at much the same time and to varying degrees. Ie fur didnt disapear over night it reduced gradually over time as it was selected for and other things came along to help keep us warm

     

    Circa a million years ago give or take a few 100,000. 

     

    It started with homo erectus in africa.  Who could, as the first homid in history actualy, run rather than scurry. 

     

    This brought about the practice of persistent hunting.  Ie you chase the much faster antelope for 5 hours till it keeled over with exhaustion.  This was however a bit of a problem on hot days with a big coat of fur.

     

    Hence the natral selection for the less hairy and a ready supply of animal skins to keep us warm at night .

     

    This is also about the time we got so many sweat glands, for much the same reason

     

    That also sort of answers your hunting question

  18. On 4/11/2022 at 10:02 PM, Anti Facts Sir said:

    I know what you mean mate. Within seconds of me saying to my old man that I wasn't convinced about either the vaccines or the Ukraine stuff, he flew into a rage. I was insulting his intelligence, apparently. Because obviously everyone involved is being 100% honest and the people running the media and the people in power are not trying to screw us over at all.

     

    You need to cut them some slack. There near 24 hour propaganda going on both of those. It's very rare people who dont buy into it.

     

    My sister, who wouldnt trust Boris to tell her the time, got very cross with me over my refusal to buy into vacinate or die. Family are very important I avoid topics that will make her cross. It's pointless I cant counter the combined might of the Govenment, its agencies and the media.

     

    Truth will out. In time

×
×
  • Create New...