Jump to content

Pinkiebee

Members
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pinkiebee

  1. Go for it then. That's the easy bit. The rest is quite a complex and possibly exspensive exercise of raising your profile enough that the small % of people who actualy vote and may very well be life long labour or tory voters have heard of you sufficiently they change their voting habits That's why opposing an unpopular bypass or some such is a good starting point
  2. I dont disagree. But that is not at all how the world ,at least this bit of it ,works. We know the whole institution is corrupt. How can you ever hope to change that with Democratic means with out first putting you nose in the trough
  3. Hard to get elected as an independent unless you have some buring local issue to exploite. It seems fine by me to use there time money and resouces to be a wooden horse candidate to then expose them. But I'm a cheap skate
  4. It's not particularly hard to get yourself as a candidate for one of the established parties. Just say all the right things. Then once elected they cant get rid of you for years. You can amuse yourself just messing things up and gobbling off whilst collecting your expenses. A sort of nigel Farage of the local council
  5. As the chance of a convincing fake and a real alien invasion seem to be of much the same magnitude it's hard to see how being prepared for one helps with the other or how you could tell the differance Let's face it you would feel a bit silly if you protested and were taken out with an alien death ray. I'm failing to see why something simpler wouldnt work just as well or quite why you or they wouldnt think they all ready had a compliant. Gullible population. So much so that there seems little to be gained from a deception on this scale It looks like the cold war is back on, that worked very well for 50 years. Everyone living with the acceptance they could be eviscerated at 4 minutes notice but for the care of their leaders. Not that the fabled 4 min warning wasnt a fable in its self
  6. I dont want to call her a fraud or delusional. I mean who knows being full of cancer treatment drugs may have made her german mentor delusional. But this is apparently a private conversation that there is no way of verifying . And even if an accurate account from a non delusional mentor. I'm not sure his undoubted skill at making rockets make him a good judge of American policy an unknown number of decades in the future. A fake alien invasion isnt impossible. But it does seem highly improbable. It seems less likely than an actual alien invasion to be honest Nether are at the top of my list of things I worry about It also seem a bit rich that someone who spent five years perfecting how to drop rockets loaded with explosive on the population of London, should suddenly get concerned about civilian populations
  7. What are you claiming Bs on. That it is indeed the true cross. I think that very unlikely. The the war ship had a relic in it ? That may but almost certainly wasnt the true cross ? thats a bit more likely but not by much
  8. What is keeping Johnson in power or the conservatives? The second is the complete 9inability of the labour party to come up with an electable leader or policies What keeping Johnson in power is his complete lack of shame and his grip on the Tory parliamentary party . Coupled with the chancellor throwing him self under the bus and the lack of any other viable candidates. All that considered if you want him out. Voting in the local elections is the only feasible way of convincing Tory MP to get rid of him. I'm not at all convinced that even land slide losses will get rid of him. But it is the only practical or legal way to do it
  9. I think that is extremely accurate. Boris despite appearance to the contrary is a very clever man who has plotted his rise up the greasy pole of power with cynicism and focus groups/ opinion surveys What will get his core vote back onside ? Tackling immigration particularly channel migrants. That's what the focus groups are telling him He really only needs this to run for another couple of weeks till the local elections. He has two years to hatch another plot for the elections The more controversy it creates the more good it does him. It will almost certainly be ruled illegal by the high court. Which doesnt matter as he will still get credit for trying.
  10. This is what I find most strange about the whole affair People who are of a conspiratorial mind and extremely sceptical of what they are told make by far the best scientist if they have the intellect to actualy go out and disprove established dogma. We would be nowhere as a species if they didnt exist. For the rest of us. Insisting that claims are explained is a very healthy state of mind. But you do need the concentration span to get to the end of the explination. Which does seem a bit lacking. But then some people doubt everything from one sub set of the population but lap up every word issued by another subset with no skepticism at all. This leaves them extremly vulnerable to being exploited. Yet they seem incapable of seeing their victimisation. In fact they seem to embrace it
  11. That's making a big deal out of the views of Casey luskins. Who somewhat deceptively calls him self a " scientist" he has allegedly got " scientiific" qualifications. Though given his track record for telling lies that may be questionable. He is not however working as a scientist by any reasonable use of the term And He is not however qualifed in any sort of biological area at all. Even by his own admission. He is very skilled at misinterpreting facts. Quote mining and just making things up in a way that sounds convincing to the layman. Possibly his qualification as a lawyer helps in this Luskins is paid by the discovery institute who's whole perpose is to take gullible people and exploit them for their own ends. Luskins and his ilk are genuinely evil. They earn a good living from the gullible just delibrately deceiving them
  12. Do you know I never had the slightest problem buying pasta or toilet paper in the lock down or any other household staple come to that. Bicycle inner tubes were hard to find.
  13. When was that filmed ? It must be decades old to make sense of the time line and her aparent age and the 1980s hair style. If the impending alien invasion hasnt happened in the last 30 odd years of be tempted to breath a sigh of relief Maybe there is grid lock near Polaris
  14. That might help the pharmaceutical companies or it might not. The govenment is just replacing one exspensive population with another The whole thing makes no financial or political sense. To anyone First find a motive then find a conspiracy to fit
  15. We have a pension time bomb because a) medical science has improved vastly and b) the govenment are prepared to pay for it. It's also some what counter inituative to implicate the drugs companies in a plot to kill old people when they are a key beneficiary of increased life expectancy And there are a lot simpler ways of reducing it than either releasing a vacine that ends up costing more than it saves or even just inventing a virus as a pretext for killing them another way
  16. Can you give a couple of examples of evolutionary biologists that have gone on the record about masks. I'm not doubting you. it's just not really their field of expertise The problem with damming them for that is. If you ask a " scientist " how to stop a killer virus. They will come up with more of less what we got. It's not out right wrong if the question is accurate If you ask a sociologist if it will work or the damage it will do to society or an economist if it's good idea or a logistics exspert if it can be organised. Youl get a different answer As it is. The virus wasnt that deadly so every thing was over the top ( in fact at times completly irrational . Not helped by the policemen enforcing laws that didnt exist)and ignored the people actually at risk nearly completly and no body considered the other issues at all it seems. Masks may have had at least some effect. If they had been surgery grade. What was commonly used were just placebos
  17. Well no I wouldnt like it nor its seems did anyone else out side of a looney fringe. But they seem to be evolving in their protests. Grid locking london did nothing for gaining support for their cause. If fact it was a Pr disaster . Manure bombing the daily mail on the other hand gets them both publicity and support. As are the police evolving. an arrest for breaking the highways act is a bit hard to justify under PACE A potential dangerous driving charge a lot more so
  18. I'm not concvince by the argument that you can switch over a lot of factories to war production at all let alone in the time frame. Unless they are making war bicycles etc. Or that China doesnt already have a munitions capability that will meet its needs. China invading Taiwan however or those contested islands etc is far from unlikely . They may even fancy a bit of Russia. With the Russians a) distracted and b) having demonstrated their army is rubbish
  19. Freaky. That the very last thing I saw on you tube before comming here.
  20. The gunners didnt know but the govenment did and kept doing it. Because...well that's an open question. They are estimated to have killed half the people who died in an average raid. So over a 100 a time whilst shooting down very nearly no planes at all. There were also no food shortages in Britain in WW2 . Less food perhaps of certain types bananas perhaps and sugar. But not by much. Yet rationing was introduced
  21. This is what I wish I'd wrote. I used 5 paragraphs to say the same thing half as well ". In general, evolution is a non-Euclidian energy density landscape in flattening motion."
  22. I think its long hand for a person
  23. Energy is really all there is. Quarks would be needed for any structure
  24. Well nothing. Energy is the building block of the universe. energy makes up every thing else Nb there isnt a law of entropy. It's a law of thermodynamics. Nnb a pile of stones is a wall
  25. It's just occurred to me. You havent misunderstood the second law of thermodynamics. You havent read it at all. Just picked something up off a web site and ran with it God I'm I'm slow today
×
×
  • Create New...