Jump to content

Pinkiebee

Members
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pinkiebee

  1. You can. I'm good with all feedback loops positive or negative. a five word critique may have been more useful. But you are possibly in a hurry
  2. Well no. The " woke revolution" that everyone here seems to rally against is being conducted and controled by a small number of influencers on the internet. Mostly Twitter. It's the most powerful of tools. They are just better and smarter at using it
  3. People are being so judgemental of the bulk of the population for not ascribing to a world view similar to theirs. There not fools or sheeple or futile or any other pejorativeterm you want to throw at them. They are just rats in a maze like you. Only the dead go free
  4. I 5think people are clutching at straws In all of human history there has seldom been a revolution were the many have overthrown the few. Mostly as the many cant organise it. Sure they can organise a mob or a riot. They can kill people or burn things down. But when the anger goes so does the uprising and if they managed to kill the few another ruling class appears to take over. Revolutions that could be viewed as successful have always been lead by the intellectuals. Who can organise it. But then you get a new ruling class of intellectuals. Who generaly seem to be worse than what came before. Slow social change on the mantra of " educate, agitate organise seem to work best. That's why they want to shut the internet down.
  5. Apparently the radio waves from our own communication will just be a fog of noise. So they are not watching east enders with out a licence. It has by now manged to reach a distance of about a 100 light years. Strangely enough. But would almost certainly be recognised as not natural even if they have no idea what we are watching or where its comming from The actual attempts at communication are very directional. We pick a constellation and blast a message at it on a frequency that's a dip in the frequency of hydrogen. Again almost untranslatabe but the very fact it's on the frequency it is. Should tell them it's not natural . The idea that they blast back on the same frequency. Which hasnt happened as yet Of course if it's the wrong constellation. Or they are not monitoring an obscure frequency . Have already given up radio technology. They wont get it. Pulsed lasers seems to be the direction of travel
  6. That seems unlikely to be honest. I was speaking of being technically advanced rather that culturally or spiritually advanced. I'd guess that they had advanced for much the same reason we had and thus their morals and leadership were no better
  7. The problem with alien attack is we have no idea what the risk actually is. If there is an advanced and hostile civilisation with in travelling distance. Then the risk isnt low it would seem to have a probability of 1
  8. If I had to sum it up in a short phrase I'd say society fails to be tolerant of other peoples intolerances That then becomes an attack on free speech. Which has never actually existed in the UK anyway. But what speech is free has change generation by generation Which victims are lacking in received tolerance. Poor /working class white males for one
  9. Well yes/no / maybe Lives are generaly futile to be honest. Very few of us leave any lasting mark on society. Even less a good one. That accepted what's the point of existance other than to keep yourself fed warm and entertained and possibly a few kids to pass on the genies Our society is reasonably good at providing the first three. And not to bad at facilitating the last. If you want to rise to a higher level of existance no one is stopping you. It's unfair to require others to join you if they really only want a few beers watch the football and a chicken curry
  10. It's not " tolerance that's the issue. It's a variable and! sliding scale of tolerance with some getting far to much and others no where near enough
  11. I supose its largly how effective you think a relic would be against a missile. Not very it seems The way the russians are performing they possibly need more relics
  12. That's a really intresting and insightful quote Its is a fair point when people ask for evidence of evolution to point not to changes in man physical make up but to changes to our culture by technology which will themselves be a driver to our physical changes. Much as fire changed our physical make up so will computers etal
  13. Thats as close as your going to get from a politician to admitting to significant failures by the govenment. The govenment scientist and the media hype driving the responses. There a obscured admission that most if not all of the removal of freedoms was morally wrong and at best of no practical benifit He is rather glossing over the fact the govenment was largely responsible for that problem by pointing out other govenmentswere were worse. But hey. He is a member of that govenment. He is not going to throw them under the bus It's also the first official admission that I've seen that the vacines carry a risk. Something that has been strongly denied to this point During lockdown I was verbally attacked and called a mad conspiracy man for saying very much the same thing. So progress of some sort I suppose
  14. I havent. Can you link it or tell me when you posted it. So I can find it !
  15. I think your probably right. If they are capable of getting here in anything like a useful time frame they quite probebly already know we are here. Turning up tens of thousands of years from now with an invasion fleet seems a bit pointless
  16. Yea!!! that wouldnt have been my first conclusion of viewing the vid and I'd be slightly more concerned than the narrator of how they are having explosions that dont take the windows out
  17. That is possibly true to some extent. If the banking system takes against you as a leader or a govenment or a country then it wont end well But I highly doubt they are very concern about boris political career if he goes someone else who toes the line will take his place. To be clear we have a pretence of democracy. But in order to be convincing on the big stuff you have to let the small stuff run its course
  18. Here is professor dave exposing cassy as a fabricator, cheat and all round %%%%
  19. Yesterday 16 +(4) 2 (0) (20) = 18 3x6 I'm betting I can do that for a lot of different dates that are not connected to war at all or alternatively there are very few days were there is not a war somewhere
  20. I've absolutely no intrest in convincing you. Non at all,or anyone else really .by the time the worms have eaten in to their brains to the extent they call anything from the discovery institute science. Then it really is a lost cause If they were posting I'd debate with them. But they are not you are. Il point out major flaws. You wont know enough to respond and just say " I didnt write it . Ask them." Which I cant obviously. So a complete waste of your time and my expertise. I've been round the block. It's like giving a donkey strawberries If you want to throw up your under! Standing il go to the trouble of trying to help ,other than that. Your on your own
  21. You explain why they are right. Your the proposer after all. This time in your own words with out cutting and paisting and il see if I can obligate Its not an adhom attack to point out he is part of an organisation set up to exploit the gullible or surprising that you fell for it.
  22. I'm fascinated how you would question the differance between a convincing fake and the real thing. Let's say they death ray blast the white house to bits as an opening salvo, just to get out attention. How are you going to critically analyse that event armed with your fore sight ? Clearly the aliens are coming/ already here lot will fall for it hook line and sinker. The NASA is the devil lot will just say it's a false flag how will you steer a rational course through it ?
  23. I'm with you. The complete lack of intrest in local politics is to the deficient of our democracy
×
×
  • Create New...