Jump to content

Skotfreezy

Members
  • Posts

    213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Skotfreezy

  1. 5 hours ago, Filigree and Fire said:

    Well I was thinking DI books specifically but sure, I'm open to other sources :)

    you might want to start with "And the Truth Shall Set You Free"

     

    i might add that it seems you're looking for a guide on those subjects, remember David is exposing the elitesnot teaching Astral Projection or any kind of system. 

    • Like 2
  2. Being that you live in a world that presents the occult to you in such an aggressive manner, you must be fully girded in the truth and have a level of understanding that defeats the lie. Only if you were to never turn on your tv & use the internet, never leave your house, or never communicate with the world will you be able to stay away from this influence. Being that for most the latter is impossible, you must understand what it is you are looking at and the history of it.

     

    The mystery religion of Ancient Babylon is the beginning of the occult, after the great flood that destroyed man. There is more to the story before the flood, but as things started new after the flood, we will start from this point. The Mystery religion has been told in many different stories, through many millenniums. A lot of names of many different gods that are all actually the same god. Different cultures, different times, different languages, all the same story, figures, and structure.

     

    To clarify and explain in the simplest of terms, what the mystery religion of Babylon is; it is Polytheism and/or Paganism. The belief in many gods, with different purposes. In polytheism the masses believed in many gods. The true knowledge of the goal of these gods was only given to the few. They held the secret knowledge which gave them power over the ones who did not have the knowledge. If someone knew about the sun and when an eclipse would occur, they could seem as if they could control it, the people would then worship & follow that man.

    In polytheism, in most cultures you will see the same structure. One man who is God, one virgin woman who was the mother of a god, and a son of the mother who was impregnated from the main god. There’s father god, mother god, and the son of God. This only relates to Christianity through Roman Catholic doctrine.  The doctrine of Catholics.   They worship the Virgin Mary as mother God. But in true Christianity, there is only the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and while they’re 3, they’re still only One. There is no feminine nature of God. The mystery religion is polytheism that has deeply rooted secrets that have not been given to the masses.  In the end it all leads to Satan.

     

    From the line of Ham, Noah’s grandson son Cush did the complete opposite of what God commanded. God commanded them to flourish the earth and worship Him.  Cush gained followers and became a leader, bringing people all together to live under him. He promoted pure rebellion against God, leading to the creation and building of the Tower of Babel. They wanted to ascend into heaven and defeat God. They all spoke in one language and decided rather than move away from each other, they could build a kingdom for their own dominion.

     

     

    The Tower of Babel is a very important symbol in the occult world. It illustrates rebellion against God & masculinity. They all look the same. The bible does not explain in detail what was going on with Cush and his followers, all that he was rebellious and led people to be rebellious by building the Tower of Babel.

     

    When God came down and saw what it was they were doing, he was not happy. He decided to confuse their languages that no one could understand what either was saying. They were not able to communicate with each other. The building of the tower had stopped. God confused their language creating the name: Babel for babbling.

    Cush was disgraced, but still respected. Because the building of the tower had started, some went on to build the new site. It would be called Babylon.

     

    What you gain from this unedited truth is that after the flood, there were 3 lines, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. We know that from Shem’s line came the line of Israel, King David, and Jesus. We now know that from the line of Ham the rebellion against God began again.

     

    Now after Cush, there was Nimrod. Nimrod was a very powerful hunter. He was mighty. He was also very determined to finish the plan his father started. He conquered all animals and then men. He is the first to start the first empire following the flood. He became leader of the Assyrian/Babylonian empire.

     

    Nimrod is the beginning of all the stories  that have been passed down over time about the “gods” that everyone refers to when denouncing Christianity & Judaism.  His story has developed and transformed him into a god.  It all starts with him.  Following the occult will lead back to him but still goes further back to Cain.  Either way it is his story that must be understood to understand what the minds of pagans believe.

    It was said that Nimrod communicated with the spirit world which guided him to complete great accomplishments like the Tower of Babel. They obtained occult knowledge that gave them power over their people. Nimrod started the first world government, where they all practiced the same religion and were governed under him. They performed human sacrifices and were in control.

     

    Nimrod found rebellion only from his uncle Shem, Noah’s other son. Shem abhorred the abominations that Nimrod had done. Shem followed the commandment of God. He plotted with other conspirators and killed Nimrod. More than just kill Nimrod they cut him up in pieces and sent the pieces to all different cities that were under his rule. Shem did this to show that Nimrod was not a god, and for the people to stop what they were doing and start worshipping the One True God.

     

    His followers were nervous and frightened. It was obvious that Nimrod was not a god, and his father was already defeated. They did not know where to go from there. The next part of the story brings the real twist and connection. The answer came from a woman.

     

    The story of Nimrod is pretty simple to understand. A man in the beginning claiming power over other people. It’s a easy concept, the real twist starts with the woman. This woman who comes into this picture is Semiramis. Semiramis was first the wife of Cush. She was the mother of Nimrod.  She claimed to be divinely born. After Cush lost power, in order to stay in power she did the unthinkable, and married her son, Nimrod. After Nimrod was defeated, she found a way to stay in power.

     

    Shortly after Nimrod was killed, she became pregnant. She told the people it was the spirit of Nimrod that impregnated her. Her having a “virgin” birth from the spirit of Nimrod. Semiramis slept with no man and was impregnated by Nimrod’s “spirit”. Nimrod was now a father and Semiramis was the mother. This is the start and beginning of Father & Mother god worship. It is the primary driver of polytheism, but most people never make the actual connection.

     

    Semiramis was able to convince Nimrod’s followers, that her son was the fulfillment of God’s prophecy in Genesis 3:15 (KJV).

    And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.”

    The people believing that her son would be the savior to defeat the serpent. Reality being it was the actual serpent that they’d be worshipping. She managed to convince her follwers Nimrod did not die, but he ascended to the sun. She claimed it was the rays of the sun-god Nimrod that caused her to conceive. He was now to be worshipped now as “Baal”, the sun-god.

     

    She made her self a goddess claiming that she was divinely created. She was in fact the moon goddess. She had them believe she came down to the earth from the moon in a giant moon egg that fell into the Euphrates River. 
 The Queen of Babylon, Semiramis became known as the moon goddess, “Ishtar” which is pronounced “Easter”, and her moon egg became known as “Ishtar’s” egg.”

     

    The son’s name was Tammuz. When he was killed by a wild pig, Semiramis, now Ishtar said he ascended to the sun like his father and now are a union. They are now father, son, and spirit. This is satan’s unholy trinity. After Nimrod, Semiramis continued on with their worship & sacrifices, but because of Shem, and their constant defeat by God, they changed their approach. What was once done out in the open, would now be done in secret. All practices driven from Cush & Nimrod stemming from the channeling of spirits would now be done in the dark. It would now become a mystery. Only completely revealed to those worthy.

     

    These figures were now gods. The Sun and Moon God. This mystery religion spread through the many different cultures and was only challenged by the Israelites, who claimed they were in communication and chosen by the One True God. The battle of monotheism versus polytheism was fully in effect. Nimrod, Semiramis, and Tammuz were immortalized and worshipped. Their names being different, but underlying point of the story is clear.

     

    The ultimate goal is rebellion against God. To defeat Him and have the world worship “Baal” as the father, Mother God “Ishtar” will again have a virgin birth from Baal, birthing their savior, Baal reborn. To bring about their rule and dominion again on earth. It’s the same story over and over. Regardless of the name of the god, the story and prophecy is the same. This is the ultimate goal and main deception of Satan.

    Now you must understand there are plenty that worship satan as a god already, knowing completely in whom they serve. But there is a majority that worship these 3 gods, through other names. This needs to be understood that they are in actuality worshipping satan through deception. Many of today’s practices and traditions are centered around this deception. You now have a base foundation for stronger understanding and connections

     

    Based from the story of Nimrod, the mystery religion was created. This religion spread among the different ancient empires of Babylon, Egypt, Persia, Greece, & Rome. This is what paganism is. The purest definition of it. Paganism is the collection of all polytheistic beliefs centered around a central belief. The stories may change, but there are always 4 central figures. They are:

    • Father god
    • The Sun god
    • The Moon goddess (a.k.a Mother god)
    • The son of god

    Now we do not pretend to be luciferin experts. Nor do we contest to being scholars of greek/roman mythology and other religions, but in today’s Information Age, there is enough information available for anyone to gain a broader understanding.

    The chart below illustrates the god & goddess worship of the pagans of different cultures, empires, and religions. It’s impossible not to see the connection from all the stories of these gods & goddesses. The easiest distinction you will find when identifying pagan worshippers is if they worship both Father & Mother god. If there is a both masculine & feminine god in their belief system, then they are a pagan.

    Pagan god List

    Pagan god List

    Now with all of these sun god’s and moon goddesses, another similarity is that they are all birthed from the same father. This father is the ultimate god. He is the creator and bearer of light, of knowledge. He is Father god like referenced earlier. The main connection that most people do not make is that all of these names refer to actually one god. That is lucifer. It’s the same story just different names. Same purposes just different names.

    Names of Lucifer

    Satan is the master deceiver. This is how he will unite the world to worship him. They already are. They’ve been doing it in his name through silence and secrecy for thousands of years. He has created many gods & beliefs centered around him that people all around the world accept & worship. It doesn’t matter which god it is they choose because if it is not true belief in Jesus Christ, it will lead everyone to satan. This is part of the great deception.

     

    A lot of the prophecy matches God’s true prophecy of the messiah through Jesus Christ. Satan the deceiver has used God’s plan to deceive man. This is what an Anti-Christ is.

     

    The basis and understanding of this information will allow for greater understanding of the traditions the world keep. It will make you think about what god you actually might be serving without actualization.

     

    The key points to know are:

    • Lucifer is the sun-god
    • The birthday of the sun-god is December 25th, the Winter Solstice, the time when the sun is closest to the earth.
    • Pagans worship the moon, the moon goddess, Goddess Diana, Ishtar, and her many other names. She is the female, fertility deity. The virgin mother of god.
    •  She is worshipped on Easter, to celebrate her return each year
    • The son of god is always prophesied to return to be a savior of earth
    •  

    This is just a summary of the overall connection.

    --------------------------------------------------

     

    William Cooper - Mystery Babylon Complete series (edited)

    OIP.jpg

    • Thanks 2
  3. 18 hours ago, Captainlove said:

    Look at this little gem if true,image.jpeg.79c9a5afacf869797354a2e0103cf191.jpeg

    "the renowned particle accelerator located in Geneva, Switzerland, is gearing up for an exciting restart! After its annual winter shutdown, the LHC is emerging from hibernation, and progress can be tracked live on a CERN web page. Just last week, a proton beam briefly circled the LHC’s 27-kilometer circumference at its full energy of 6.8 TeV—a promising sign. The first collisions of proton beams are anticipated on April 8, once all tests and fine-tuning are complete. This marks the LHC’s final year in its current version before preparations begin for the next phase: the High Luminosity LHC, which will deliver ten times more intense proton beams." Accelerator Report: Protons or Easter eggs? Let’s hope for both | CERN (home.cern)

    • Like 2
  4. 4 hours ago, Saved said:

    There are fake lists all over the Internet already. People are desperate for views, not giving a shit about such concepts as truth and justice. 

     

    One such list doing the rounds on YouTube and Reddit is a list of famous people who had 'covid' - Gervais is on there but then so are many we would strongly suspect to be guilty as well as being the type to release misinformation in order to muddy the swamp further. 

     

    Meanwhile, TDS suffering msm are conflating Trump's former business connections to Epstein (before he cut ties) and alleged visitors to paedo island, as if they are the same thing. 

     

    the link i posted above are the real files. i seen a bunch of fake jimmy kimmel Q&As on X going around too. 

  5. 3 hours ago, Mr H said:


    I posted it under the Epstein Document thread. 
     

     

  6. Here are the newly released documents of the Epstein Files: 1324-epstein-documents-943-pages.pdf (documentcloud.org)

     

    Prince Andrew touching a young girls breast with a puppet that looks like him.

     

    "Q. Tell me what happened with the caricature.

     

    A. Ghislaine asked me to come to a closet. She just said, Come with me. We went to a closet and grabbed the puppet, the puppet of Prince Andrew. And I knew it was Prince Andrew because I had recognized him as a person. I didn't know who he was. And so when I saw the tag that said Prince Andrew, then it clicked. I'm like, that's who it is. And we went down -- back down to the living room, and she brought it in. It was just funny because -- he thought it was funny because it was him.

     

    Q. Tell me how it came to be that there was a picture taken 

     

    A.  I just remember someone suggesting a photo, and they told us to go get on the couch. And so Andrew and Virginia sat on the couch, and they put the puppet, the puppet on her lap. And so then I sat on Andrew's lap, and I believe on my own volition, and they took the puppet's hands and put it on Virginia's breast, and so Andrew put his on mine. 

     

    Q. To the best of your recollection, you went and sat on Andrew's lap, correct?

     

    A. Yes.

     

    Q. On his knee?

     

    A. Yes.

     

    Q. And Virginia was not sitting on his knee, correct?

     

    A. I don't recall. I just remember I was --  she might have been on his other knee, like Santa."

    • Like 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Mr H said:

    If you don't want people from other countries in then we have to start having more babies ourselves..... that's the other solution of course. But no one is up for doing that so we are where we are...

    I agree but with sperm counts going down because of vaccines, poisons, etc. and cost of living increasing and national debt due to the crap policies people cant afford to have kids, which is sad. so they migrate people from poor 3rd world countries to fill the void knowing they will conform to their NWO rules and be shoved into 15minute cities when those start getting built. Question though.. say an illegal got a job with the police force and came to you and started telling you what to do, what would you do?

    • Like 1
  8. On 12/31/2023 at 6:50 AM, Mr H said:

    Interesting. But demographic studies are the backbone of economic planning. So I do expect countries to do scenario planning for different situations.

     

    I didn't read anything nefarious in this, but I did quick read.....

    The invasion on the US boarder or other countries is the nefarious act to get the number like in Scenario V for the US: 

     

     "it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post 1995 immigrants or their descendants."

     

    775 million immigrants POST 95' is double the population of citizens in the US now. They cant achieve these numbers unless its done illegally. Just imo. Happy New Year!

  9. Ok well I was searching around the UN Digital Library and came across a PDF titled:  Replacement Migration (Replacement migration : (un.org)

    It goes into detail about how they want to flood countries with illegals and replace the current population and basically make them the minorities all on your dollar by 2050.

    This is straight from their website I added the link up above in green so you can check for yourself, but I've also pasted the UK and US here along with the graphs. I know it's a read, but it is worth it to me, and I wanted to share with the community here. If this is the wrong thread to post this to please move it to the proper place.

     

     

     

    UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

     

    Past trends Whereas the total fertility rate increased steadily from the 1950's level of 2.18 children per woman to 2.81 in 1960-1965, this trend reversed in the decades afterwards, and fertility fell continuously to 1.78 in 1990-1995. At the same time, life expectancy increased during the entire period of 1950-1995 from 69.2 to 76.2 years for both sexes. Hence, the proportion of the population aged 65 years or older increased over the same period of time from 10.7 per cent to 15.9 per cent. At the beginning of the 20th century, at a time when both fertility and mortality were higher, the potential support ratio was 13.3 persons aged 15-64 for each person aged 65 or older. The ratio had declined to 6.2 in 1950 and declined further to 4.1 in 1995.

     

    Scenario I

    Scenario I, which is the medium variant of the 1998 United Nations projections, assumes a total of 1.2 million net migrants between 1995 and 2050. From 1995 to 2025, 40,000 persons would enter Britain annually and none after 2025. The overall population of the United Kingdom would increase from 58.3 million in 1995 to 59.9 million in 2025 and thereafter decline to 56.6 million in 2050 (The results of the 1998 United Nations projections are shown in the annex tables). The population in working age, aged 15-64 years, would increase from 37.8 million in 1995 to 39.2 million in 2010; afterwards there would be a continuous decline to 33.4 million in 2050. By that date 1.9 per cent of the total population would be post-1995 migrants or their descendants. The population aged 65 or over, on the other hand, would increase from 9.2 million (15.9 per cent) to 14.1 million in 2050 (24.9 per cent) in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would drop from 4.09 in 1995 to 2.37 in 2050.

     

    Scenario II

    Scenario II, which is the medium variant with zero migration, is based on the fertility and mortality assumptions of the medium variant of the 1998 United Nations projections, but without any migration to the United Kingdom after 1995. The overall population would decrease to 55.6 million in 2050, one million less than in scenario I; the population aged 15-64 years would decrease to 32.7 million, 700,000 less than in scenario I. The elderly population (aged 65 or older) would increase to 13.9 million in 2050 and the potential support ratio would be at 2.36. In general, there are only slight differences between scenarios I and II regarding the population trends of the country. Scenario III Scenario III keeps the population in the United Kingdom constant at its maximum of 58.8 million people in 2020. In order to do so, the United Kingdom would have to receive 2.6 million migrants between 2020 and 2050. In 2050, 5.5 per cent of the total population would be post-1995 migrants or their descendants. This influx would result in a population of labour-force age of 35 million in 2050, and the population aged 65 or older would reach 14 million in 2050, 24 per cent of the total population. The potential support ratio would be 2.5. 68 United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration

     

    Scenario IV

    Scenario IV keeps the age group between 15-64 years constant at its maximum of 38.9 million from 2010 on. In order to do that a total of 6.2 million immigrants would be needed between 2010 and 2050, which would increase the overall population to 64.3 million in 2050. By that date 13.6 per cent of the total population would be post-1995 migrants or their descendants. The proportion of the elderly would be 22.9 per cent, and the potential support ratio 2.6 in 2050.

     

    Scenario V

    Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 level of 4.09. Keeping this ratio would require 59.8 million migrants between 1995 and 2050, slightly more than one million migrants a year on average. The overall population would reach 136 million in 2050, of which 80 million (59 per cent) would be post-1995 migrants or their descendants. Discussion Net migration in the United Kingdom amounted to 660,000 persons between 1990 and 1998, an average of 73,000 persons per year. In 1990, the proportion of the total population who were foreign-born was 6.5 per cent. This is comparable to the numbers needed to be keeping the total population constant, 88,000 migrants per year, and to the proportion of the total population in 2050 who would be post-1995 migrants or their descendants, 5.5 per cent. However, the numbers of migrants needed to keep the population in working-age constant are about twice the level of the past decade. Figure IV.16 shows, for scenarios I, II, III and IV, the population of the United Kingdom in 2050, indicating the shares that are post-1995 migrants and their descendants. Scenario V, keeping the potential support ratio constant, would demand more than one million immigrants annually. This would greatly exceed immigration rates that the country experienced in the past. In absence of migration, the figures show that it would be necessary to raise the upper limit of the working-age to about 72 years in order to obtain in 2050 the same potential support ratio observed in 1995 in the United Kingdom, i.e. 4.1 persons of working-age per each older person past working-age.

    image.png.3dbc845309bc86db9bde6f67f06b3a75.pngimage.png.a83070166f3eb43648531bcbd9383194.pngimage.png.63ce75627c65420870a67b13f7c82ce2.pngimage.png.d5ad46c37a96b0ca026640ef46606239.png

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     

    United States of America

     

    Past trends The total fertility rate in the United States dropped from 3.45 births per woman in 1950-1955 to 2.02 in 1970-1975. Except for a temporary period during the late 1970s and early 1980s (when it hovered around 1.8), the total fertility rate has continued to be around two children per woman. Life expectancy at birth, meanwhile, has risen from 69.0 years in 1950-1955 to 75.7 years in 1990-1995. As a consequence of these changes, the proportion of the population aged 65 or older has risen from 8.3 per cent in 1950 to 12.5 per cent in 1995. And the potential support ratio declined from 7.8 in 1950 to 5.2 in 1995. As a point of comparison, the potential support ratio was 15 in 1900, when 4 per cent of the population was aged 65 years or older.

     

    Scenario I

    Scenario I, the medium variant of the United Nations 1998 Revision, assumes an annual net intake of 760,000 migrants per year between 1995-2050, for a total of 41,800,000 net migrants during the period. Accordingly, the total population of the United States is projected to increase continuously from 267 million in 1995 to 349 million in 2050 (The results of the 1998 United Nations projections are shown in the annex tables). By 2050, out of this total population of 349 million, 59 million, or 16.8 per cent would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. The population aged 15-64 will increase slowly from 174 million in 1995 to 214 million in 2050, although not in a monotonic fashion. The population aged 65 or older will rapidly rise from 33 million in 1995 to nearly 76 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decrease from 5.2 in 1995 to 2.8 in 2050.

     

    Scenario II

    Scenario II, which is the medium variant with zero migration, uses the fertility and mortality assumptions of the medium variant of the 1998 Revision, but without any migration to the United States after 1995. The results in this scenario are quite different from those of scenario I. The total population would increase to 290 million in 2050, which is 50 million less than in scenario I. The population aged 15-64 would rise from 174 million in 1995 to 192 million in 2010 and 2015 and then decline, returning back to 174 million in 2050. The population aged 65 or older would double from 33 million in 1950 to 68 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decline to 2.6 in 2050, which is slightly below that presented in scenario I.

     

    Scenario III

    Scenario III keeps the size of the total United States population constant at its maximum of 298 million that it would reach in 2030 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the total population constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 6.4 million migrants between 2030 and 2050, which is an average of 319,000 migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 298 million, 7.3 million, or 2.5 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. 74 United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration

     

    Scenario IV

    Scenario IV keeps the size of the population aged 15 to 64 constant at its maximum of 192.5 million that it would reach in 2015 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the working age population constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 18.0 million migrants between 2015 and 2050, which is an average of 513 thousand migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 316 million, 25.0 million, or 7.9 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.

     

    Scenario V

    Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 value of 5.2 persons aged 15-64 for each person aged 65 or older. In order to keep the potential support ratio constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post 1995 immigrants or their descendants.

     

    Discussion

    The official United States estimate of (documented) migrants into the United States from 1990 to 1996 is about 1.1 million per year. Thus, the past regular inflow into the United States is well above the number of migrants needed to prevent a decline in the total population or in the working-age population. Also under both scenarios III and IV, the percentage of post-1995 immigrants, and their descendants, in the total population of 2050 (2.5 per cent and 7.9 per cent, respectively) would be below the percentage of foreign-born that exists currently (9.6 per cent). Figure IV.18 shows, for scenarios I, II, III and IV, the population of the United States in 2050, indicating the share that are post-1995 migrants and their descendants. In absence of migration, the figures show that it would be necessary to raise the upper limit of the working-age to about 74 years in order to obtain in 2050 the same potential support ratio observed in 1995 in the United States, i.e. 5.2 persons of working-age per each older person past working-age.

    image.png.d3db7132402d303df55a312af63acbb8.pngimage.png.b2ed4b5c9901d005e60db4127778ef07.pngimage.png.d6c8f51a2c1c5e0b357be4c4323e4af9.pngimage.png.2767d27420b08d2cf18e7957c4394780.png

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...