.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Fluke
-
Posts
4,733 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Recent Profile Visitors
Fluke's Achievements
3.6k
Reputation
Single Status Update
-
2 other fit youngish memebers of my family have "Signed up" for the jab next. They were also against the lockdowns. I am not going to stand in the way, perhaps morally i should but i wont especially after one was smug with me and got snarky. I just don't see the logic or why any sane person would even bother? Do they really think they are going to let us have freedom because you have taken the vaccine haha. How naive can you be. Cowards. Still, they are still invested in political parties by invested i mean following. If you have not realised the political scam of parties and 'teams' by your mid 50s i guess you never will, and will be getting scammed until you die. Sad really.
- Show previous comments 7 more
-
-
-
Astra (TGA) [ https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2021-PI-01194-1&d=202103201016933 ]...
Do you know anyone who is 'anti-GMO'? There's plenty of people out there who are supposedly anti-GMO foods, etc. But how many of them know that the Astra vaccine "contains genetically modified organisms" [p. 1]? This quote is a good test of their convictions. If you're anti-GMO, then how can you accept injecting GMO's into your body via vaccine. Doesn't make any sense.
What about someone who is pregnant or is breastfeeding? Do they actually know that, "as a precautionary measure, vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is not recommended during pregnancy"? [p. 4] Or that for breastfeeding women, "a risk to breastfed newborns/infants cannot be excluded"? [p. 4]. That might make them think twice, because they won't hear it in the media.
What about people trying to get pregnant, or who are in general worried about fertility issues? The government has a special note for them too: "It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca may impact fertility. No data are available." [p. 4]. Are they willing to risk their future ability to produce offspring?
What about people you know who think the vaccine will protect them from Covid for the long term? Are they actually aware that the Government has no idea how long the assumed protection lasts? Here's what they say: "The duration of protection has not yet been established. Studies are ongoing." [p. 3]. So okay, you're willing to take a vaccine that risks your health, your baby's health, and your future fertility, for a duration of protection that is completely unknown. Sure, that makes fkn sense. Yeah.
What if your immune system is compromised? Surely the vaccine is safe for you, yeah? Actually, fuck no. No safety data available, sorry: "The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has not been assessed in immunocompromised individuals, including those receiving immunosuppressive therapy." [p. 3].
But surely, surely there is plenty of safety data on people over 65, because they are claimed to be at the highest covid risk? No, sorry again: "There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals over 65 years of age." [p. 3].
So @Fluke, if you've got some friends or family who fit into those categories, if this doesn't wake them up, I'm not sure what will. Each vaccine is basically the same, and the documents for each say basically the same things. If you want more let me know. But that's a few highlights for me at least.
- Show next comments 3 more
