Jump to content

Mr. Nice

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mr. Nice

  1. Chelsea get kicked in the gonads: Roman Abramovich: Sanctions of Chelsea owner by UK government halt club's sale - BBC Sport The move is intended to stop Abramovich making money from Chelsea. The government has issued a special licence that will allow fixtures to be fulfilled, staff to be paid and existing ticket-holders to attend matches. Season-ticket holders can still attend games for which they have tickets but the club cannot now sell any more tickets. The club's merchandise shop will also be shut. The government is open to considering a further addition to the special licence which will allow the sale of the club. A condition for that to happen would be that Abramovich receives no funds. He has previously said that proceeds of the sale would be donated to victims of war.
  2. Apart from the endless broadcasts showing the visible signs of war that is.
  3. Apollo samples prove beyond any doubt that Man has been to the Moon. Over six missions, 842lbs of samples, including 3m cores were retrieved. Lunar samples that have been peer reviewed by thousands of the world's finest geologists and petrologists. The samples have substantial solar isotope impregnation, many contain large volumes of micro-meteorite impact craters. They collectively are devoid of any contamination from oxygen, water or nitrogen found on Earth, have no evidence of fragmentation or fusion crusts from entry through atmosphere. They show evidence of formation in a lower gravity environment. They are entirely dry as a bone, with the only hydroxyl/water type substances existing within low gravity formed volcanic beads or apatite crystals. They cannot by any possibility be meteorites. They cannot be from Earth. This leaves the only explanation as retrieval off world. meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm "Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in “the Government “ could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. " Summary: 1. Geologists have been examining Apollo samples for 50 years, there is complete agreement that they are authentic and from the Moon. 2. The samples are impregnated with billions of years of solar exposure causing isotopes impossible to produce on Earth. 3. It is impossible for a rock to reside on Earth without it interacting with the gasses or liquids it comes into contact with. 4. It is impossible for a rock to enter the Earth's atmosphere and still retain its outer layers. Apollo rocks have strong Helium 3 on their outer layers. 5. Lunar samples have in some cases been older than any known Earth rock. 6. The Apollo samples contain only water encased within volcanic beads showing formation in lower gravity. 7. The Apollo rocks contain tiny craters far smaller than any man made gun could produce! They also show redistribution effects called "gardening". 8. The Apollo samples have no terrestrial weathering they simply cannot be from Earth. 9. Apollo samples show evidence for a whole variety of meteorite impact damage. 10. They are bone dry with water-type material encased within volcanic beads formed in low gravity and apatite crystals. 11. It's been suggested that zap pits were created by guns that have limitations of 0.1mm projectiles when the zap pits are in the region of 50 microns (2/1000 inch) in diameter! 12. Apollo samples show evidence of formation with essentially no free oxygen. 13. Isotope ratios on Apollo rocks are different to anything found on Earth.
  4. The very definition of "Really? Not this shite again". You would never in a million years get the whole earth in a window from orbit. The deceptive movie ignores the middle TV transmission that shows the camera zooming out and the Earth disappears off to the side of the window! So many people suck up this crap without checking it. Here is a video I did oh just 10 years ago. Not one hoax believer has ever acknowledged the absurdity of this claim:
  5. How about a switch on or off option under profile preferences. Personally it doesn't do much for me...so lose it.
  6. Hello - echo chamber? Any takers? Anyone gonna answer any of these? Come on flat earthers, surely your model can explain the basic, basics of human observation?
  7. If you have a pre-conceived idea of the world, you edit information. When it leads you down a certain road, you don't challenge your own beliefs - David Icke.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. DaleP

      DaleP

      Pre-conceived idea.....like the ball earth you mean....

    3. Mr. Nice

      Mr. Nice

      No, bugger all like it. I don't have a pre-conceived idea about the planet being a planet, I have a 100% certainty based on the massive body of evidence, both observational and anecdotal. However, those crazy enough to fixate their views on the Earth being flat, are the ones that dismiss every single piece of evidence and ignore responses given to their fixed view. Try not to get sucked in to that, which ironically involves you doing the very thing you quoted.

    4. endfreemasonscum

      endfreemasonscum

      If you have a pre-conceived idea of the world, you edit information. When it leads you down a certain road, you don't challenge your own beliefs

      ------ David Icke.

       

      image.png.96290b9e0f273ad9b59f7885360c4482.png

       

      Yes, the irony is strong here, but 99.9% of the world carries that same preconceived idea of the world.

×
×
  • Create New...