Mr. Nice

False. You appear to have been suckered by somebody's bogus claim and experiment. Things in shade have something assisting in blocking radiating energy. Remove that and the object cools faster.

Batshit. Not only do you have zero evidence for this epic facepalm of a claim it now places visible Sun and Moon angles into the realms of "pretend you can't see it" territory

Oh, you mean NASA should actually not do space exploration and should feed African kids instead? Rock solid proof of a hoax huh? Isn't this the job for the almighty?

No, really it isn't. That is not NASA's explanation although quite rightly they agree it. This has been known about for some considerable time. Going back to the original post you quoted about this, your reply is nothing to do with it. Why do stars rotate in opposite directions by pole? And why can't the North see southern constellation and vice-versa. Funny shaped "dome".

They do feed the world. The creation of jobs through any company enables people to work and support their families. The infrastructure to create the machinery and build things, deliver them etc. If you came into this thread to poke up your flag of virtue, gee, well done! Back up your claims about low Earth orbit, which to be honest is hysterical given that you think the bloody world is flat!

So if I explain it to you, then you will answer it will you? The flat earth map is an azimuthal equidistant projection. You yourself have frequently posted similar things to this. Point 1 : On this map, it is claimed that the Sun goes around in a big circle, kind of like this: I'm not even going to raise the first problem that it doesn't even come close to explaining the correct surface illumination. Now during the Summer in the Northern hemisphere that circle moves closer to the North pole and farther away during the winter - again just background information - not relevant but a major, major problem previously highlighted. Point 2: Above, for the sake of argument, assume the Moon is the grey circle above. Point 3: Now clearly that won't work, because the illumination from the Sun needs to vary to create the visible crescents etc. Point 4: The Moon goes around in a circle but at a different speed. At this point we have yet another enormous and impossible to work scenario. There is no speed that accounts for visibility of both at every location on the surface. But again not relevant to this point. Point 5 : Here is your problem! There is NO explanation whatsoever that can work with this - none - not even close. 1. The map cannot support the correct solar illumination for a sphere. 2. The map cannot support the correct motion of the Sun and Moon as viewed from the surface. 3. The map cannot support the illumination of the Moon from the Sun. Now what?

Spam - prove they have lied.

They spend their budget on things like The James Webb telescope or the Parker solar probe. It may have escaped your attention, but NASA subcontracts out nearly ALL its budget to other companies that develop and build the hardware. NASA in 2021 | NASA Solar System Exploration What should a space exploration agency spend their money on?

They can. They need newer versions of this equipment and developed for bigger crew, bigger payloads. Like this: https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/

Yes they can. Yes they could. Well, a stunningly stupid claim in the first place - they placed a rocket in Low Earth parking orbit at 17,500mph. The rocket was restarted and accelerated the craft to 25,000mph. This placed it in a very eccentric elliptical orbit. The outer portion of the orbit intersected the Moon's path, like this: That gif illustrates a free-return trajectory, so just as the craft arrives at the Moon it fires an orbital insertion and is captured in orbit by the Moon.

Before you post crap that you will evade answers to, explain to the forum why you can possibly defend this idiotic flat earth guff - are you really so afraid to be wrong? South America and South Africa see the same face of the Moon at the same time! Sydney and Cape Town can also view the Moon at the same time later on in the 24hrs and they are even further apart. Position Y will see a Moon with 2/3s illuminated face on the left. Position X will see a Moon with 50% illuminate face on the right. BOTH at the SAME time - Impossible! The whole situation dynamically alters in a matter of hours. Explain this Alexa or explain to the viewing forum why you cannot.

A few posts above is an observation that just on its own, just that one single thing proves without any possibility of error that the Earth cannot be flat. Impossible. The one with the flat earth map. Sun and Moon positions that MUST be wrong. There is no explanation certainly not from you. If it is "so obvious" why can't you explain hundreds of basics? You want to talk about moon landings go to the thread...post your parroted claim....watch me tear it to pieces.

Really? How do you figure they recreate a starfield without doing it? Use the real one? Laughing at all the flatties. You seem compelled to enter this thread without any attempt to explain a single major problem with your daft belief system. Two posts above is an observation that just on its own, just that one single thing proves without any possibility of error that the Earth cannot be flat. Impossible. The one with the flat earth map. Sun and Moon positions that MUST be wrong. There is no explanation certainly not from you. The flat Earth response on this thread is very telling:

I definitely answered this post. Equating occasional particles to dna damaging radiation is like equating a glass of salty water to the Atlantic ocean. Do you have anything more than your huff 'n' puff?

It's faked up to 26 seconds. Then it uses footage taken on the Moon. I think this was taken from an advert they did a while back. Oh and I could see the wires. It wasn't this one, but it's quite funny... Send him over to debate it then. Otherwise it's hearsay and bare assertion. My mate who works with this bloke at Tesco, said his dad knows a teacher who knows one of the engineers who worked on Apollo. He says it happened exactly as claimed and they brought back 842lbs of peer reviewed samples to prove it.

"Doh" he says whilst cowardly ignoring irrefutable evidence. There is no answer to my post that works on a flat earth. None. You know it which is why you ignored it all. You have way, way more important stuff on the table than your inability to understand physics. You still haven't identified where the selenelion was filmed from have you? Fail. Every time, every point. Now try to answer my post honestly for a change huh? POINT 1: 1. The Moon is a sphere, there is no doubt of this with visible shadows and libration. 2. To say it is like a 2d postcard is just ridiculous. A 2d shape distorts from oblique angles! 3. That same angle changes as the Moon lowers to the horizon anyway so it is wrong just on that alone. South America and South Africa see the same face of the Moon at the same time! Sydney and Cape Town can also view the Moon at the same time later on in the 24hrs and they are even further apart. Position Y will see a Moon with 2/3s illuminated face on the left. Position X will see a Moon with 50% illuminate face on the right. BOTH at the SAME time - Impossible! The whole situation dynamically alters in a matter of hours. Explain this. POINT 2: And that is just another problem with your nonsensical claims.

Oh, that's from....don't tell me.....it will come to me.....conspiracy for beginners. Yep. that's it. All hidden, but where every one can see, but ONLY the really smart conspiracy theorists can work it out. I'll have to look harder - you guys are just amazing.

You're raring are you

I love the way you take your claim and conflate it with other conspiracy claims. Good effort. The wing is a wing not a forked tongue. The name is NASA not with a silly made up T, or a silly made up anagram. I believe that every single symbol ever has some conspiracy nerd , somewhere, someplace making some "connection". Any symbol on a dollar bill would have the same crowd making the same claims.

Off topic noise.

Nope. You see part of the problem is that you have no clue about the subject so you aren't qualified to offer an opinion on what is obvious. I just wrote a reasonably detailed reply to you and of course you have nothing in response. That is correct, I have no proof that there are dead astronauts on the Moon. Faceplant time. Nope. You have no evidence for any of your claims (well none that I can't tear to pieces) and once again you aren't qualified to pronounce, with your clear ignorance of any of this, that you know "the truth". And I can see that you have no evidence or knowledge of any of the subject matter. Off topic shit, none of your business. Sars2 is not non-existent. The appeal to incredulity, a pathetic attempt at poisoning the well and off topic bare assertion. NASA is not a government - it is predominantly a large bunch of scientists and engineers. Here we are on page 2 and nobody has offered any tangible reason to mistrust NASA - just noise.

It's replicated before in the picture I posted in response, together with a reply to the straw-grasping line you just referred to.

Just what this thread needs, troll-buddies.

I don't claim to know it all, but I do know a lot on the subjects I mainly post on. And how dare you use my personal Muttley-gif