Jump to content

Mr. Nice

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mr. Nice

  1. 7 hours ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    I would not do that. It is absolutely from nasa. They call it the apollo 11 lunar module or Lunar Module Eagle.

     

    And you are not the first. Everyone I show that to who sees it for the first time have the exact same reaction. They are laughing their masonic asses off.

     

    It is NOT from NASA. It was built by Northrop Grumman and you are a repeater of other people's claims. You also appear to be ignoring where I am giving your posts a good kicking.

  2. 3 hours ago, alexa said:

    & 7:12 the moon looks like a close up of big lump of cheese 😂

     

    Thank you for your stunning and insightful argument. I have no answer to it. Well, if you ignore that the Moon looks exactly like that from every space mission in history that has photographed it, that is.

  3. 9 hours ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    That's not close to fair. But in all seriousness...

    800px-Apollo_11_Lunar_Lander_-_5927_NASA

     

    Just look at the state of that! If someone dry-walled your house like that you'd lose it.

     

     

    This engineering marvel was built by these guys:

     

    Grumman-LM4-Team.jpg&ehk=7lFb0vspW4S9Ew7

     

    Here it is without the cladding for micro-meteorites, and very expensive heat dispersion/ reflection foil!

     

    o8hnx.jpg

     

    Another whackamole, Apollo-conspiracy-by-numbers moment. Let's put it into perspective. NASA didn't even design this craft and if it was faked, the entire Grumman team built a machine not fit for purpose and there was an awful lot of them! Plus, why didn't NASA make their craft a work of visual art for the pictures.

  4. 1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    I don't care if they faked it we should keep trying.

     I do care that they murdered people to conceal the fakery, that part matters.

     

     

    We already went 6 times and nobody was murdered. There was no fakery and I can prove it. Try me with specifics.

    Oh btw - Bart Sibrel is a lying lowlife.

     

     

    1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    We will eventually figure out how to traverse the Van Allen belts.

     

    Either straight through the centre with a more protected craft or what Apollo did, they took a wide angled trajectory around the outer edges of the belts.

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    So the fakery needs to be exposed in order to accomplish that.

     

    Come on then, what have you got? Have you ever, ever bothered to look for the endless debunks for any of it?

     

    1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    I don't care about revenge or retribution. CIA needs to back away from worrying about it.

     

    No idea what that is about.

     

    1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    I don't care. We can do it if we stop pretending that we did it.

     

    We don't need to pretend. We already did it 6 times. Now are you going to debate this? 

  5. 44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    The main argument against a robust space program is this:

     

    We can't afford to feed everybody so we shouldn't waste money on a space program. 

    My counter-arguement:

    The MONEY doesn't leave Earth. When we send rockets out the money stays here.

     

    Nice strawman. The world has a robust space program, we just don't go the Moon as often and use a lot more far safer unmanned methods.

     

    44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    Sadly that's why they murdered people doing the fakes.

     

    Well that's a big load of bollocks. Nobody was murdered and there were no "fakes".

     

    44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    Because they grifted  a lot of the money.

    But we can afford to feed people and mount a space program.

    The money doesn't go anywhere but into the pockets of engineers and other people trying to solve these challenges.

     

    I spent ages crafting a good response about the expenditure and along you come and ignore it and make a provably wrong statement.

     

    44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    Then they spend it and it recycles throughout the economy.

     

     

    I agree with that 100% - That's where it went with Apollo.

     

    44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    We can solve hunger and space challenges at the same time.

     

     

    That's rather a largely inaccurate suggestion.

     

    44 minutes ago, Luvapottamus said:

    The MONEY stays here.

     

    Most of it.

  6. 1 hour ago, Luvapottamus said:

    Brighteon

     

    Mike Adams Interviewed Bart Sibrel today.(video at link)

     

    ^^^^^

     

    Very good interview worth watching.(brighteon link above)

     

    What convinced me it was faked was a series of articles by Dave McGowan:

    Wagging the moondoggie:

     

    Wagging the Moondoggie | The Center for an Informed America

     

     

     

     

    Oh, I did a blog for that as well. His entire dialogue is ignorance, incorrect statements and his perverse bare assertion. From page 1 below most of his beginning is a wall of rhetoric, it starts about half way down:

     

    WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE PART 1 - DEBUNKED (waggingthemoondoggiedebunked.blogspot.com)

    WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE PART 2 - DEBUNKED (waggingthemoondoggiedebunked.blogspot.com)

     

    I did two pages of his horseshit before I got totally bored. It was just the same thing over and over.

  7. 59 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

     

    How is this relevant to the OP? You've found some freemasons in NASA, does that mean they are scum then? It's like you have a preformed opinion of every one who has ever been in the organisation. Are we not doing debate then? In the other thread I await your rebuttal on fraud with finances and the post above .

     

    Tell me about that doctored Aldrin picture?

     

    5390_color-balanced.jpg&ehk=3XElDLmCTQT4

     

  8. 29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    It isn't about how long it should take. It is what is happening here on Earth during that time. Take a good look at the first video darian posted. Even if you want to claim that that is 100% real, that lift and thrust can be created in a [near] perfect vacuum, as nasa does to this day, how fast does that thing even go? Pretend the docking only took five minutes. It just doesn't matter!

     

    Bizarre and just odd. What is happening on Earth that makes any difference? Nothing. 

     

    Please tell me you aren't a rockets in space denier because it is a vacuum. Please tell me this. I took a look at the Apollo 11 ascent video. The ascent to close by the CSM was reasonably quick. The change in orbital planes is what took the time. It's a whole lot of messing about. How fast does that go? As fast as the rocket thrust detemines. To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Exhaust goes one way at thousands of miles per hour, the rocket goes in the other.

     

    P.s. there is no "lift" in a vacuum.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    And the masons don't get a mention just for good measure.

     

    Correct, why would they🙄

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Without going into too much detail, I’d like to share a little something. When I was first beginning to wake, these two articles which I had found on David’s old site simply fascinated me. I was such a believer and had never even heard of freemasons or the illuminati or any of it. I remember that evening like yesterday. The snow, high winds, it was a blizzard out there. But, I was heading out to meet some friends and for the rest of that night I asked everyone I saw the same thing. “Have you ever heard of the illuminati or freemasons?” About half of them had. I would get answers ranging from things like, “Oh, the guys that run the world,” to “Yeah, it’s some conspiracy theory…” and finally to “Bro, there’s a masonic lodge across the street!”

     

    Nobody really cares about you "waking up" if it then put you into a slumber about stuff you don't know much about.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    David Icke NASA Masonic Conspiracy Apollo Missions Masonic Symbols

    NASA Masonic Conspiracy
    Apollo Missions Masonic Symbols
    An excerpt from Wm Cooper's site http://www.williamcooper.com/majestyt.htm
    
    To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. WRONG 
    
    The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Which he did.
    Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret
    test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up
    of the moon. BULLSHIT bare assertion. There are thousands of hours of dialogue alone.
    
    All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echoed the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the
    Illuminati's secret religion. No they don't.
    
     The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at
     1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion),
     placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival, communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric
     knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem
     and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13).
     13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter),
    and the transition from the old to the new. AQUARIUS is the bringer of water.
    
    Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles,
     "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis ... and all Challengers shall be destroyed."  "Another" reveleation? 
    Where are the others including this one?
    
    Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being ultimately discovered. One of the most ridiculous claims possible.
    Apollo performed 6 landings ever increasing in duration and complexity.
    And of course they ran out of pre- filmed episodes. Bullshit. Just made up and provably wrong in so many ways.
    
    No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. Bullshit. Bare assertion.
     No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. Bullshit. Bare assertion.
    If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology…  Bullshit. Bare assertion.
    

     

    Well, with all due respect, David has posted quite a few things over the years from outside sources and makes no claim that they are the "truth". As he puts it, pass on information and make of it what you will. I made garbage of William Cooper's article which to me, in its entirety shows some real ignorance of the subject matter of space travel.

     

    Call signs:

    Apollo 13

    “Odyssey,” reminiscent of the long voyage of Odysseus

    of Greek mythology.

    “Aquarius,” after the Egyptian god Aquarius, the water carrier. Aquarius brought fertility and therefore life and knowledge to the Nile Valley, as the Apollo 13 crew

    hoped to bring knowledge from the Moon.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Apollo 13 spacecraft, name 'Aquarius' which occurred at 1:13 in the afternoon (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970.

     

    Hogwash. The accident happened at 55:54:53 mission time / 03:08 UTC on April 14, 10:08 PM EST, April 13.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Mars Pathfinder landing site (19.50 N by 33.30 W which = 33 x 11 = 333) - July 4th, 1997. which is 7/4/1997

     

    Hogwash again. The landing point is estimated to be at 19.33 N, 33.55 W.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Apollo 11 launched in the 7th month. Apollo is a pagan god, Roman Empire. Columbia module columbia route word in latin is columba, a pagan god Roman Empire. Saturn rocket booster Saturn is a pagan god, Roman Empire. Saturn in old latin is the same word as SATAN. Remember the metaphor in the Bible of the Tower of Babel. Where Satan was erecting a tower to try to climb out of hell to get into Heaven. Earth - Hell, Heaven, The heavens. Somebody was trying to leave this earth, and something was holding them back. 

     

    Baffling gibberish. How is it relevant to the OP?

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Now with Apollo 11 we have the Satan rocket booster lifting off from earth(hell) and the tower that disconnected form the Satan rocket booster had on one side a 6, the top of it a 6, and on the other side a 6 = 666.

     

    Prove that, but so what!

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    You can verify this by watching the documentary that is available on www.afunnythinghappenedonthewaytothemoon.com  

     

    A film made by a proven liar, showing about as many deceptive things as you can get. Pick any section and I'll tear it apart.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    Somebody was trying to leave this earth..........and something was holding them BACK! They never went to the moon with Apollo 11. It was a diversion tactic to divert your attention away from the civil rights movement and the Vietnam war protest. There was a lot of Anti-establishment activity at this time. They needed a ploy to get you to wrap yourselves around the flag.

     

    Bare assertion and provably wrong - the mountain of evidence proves we landed on the Moon.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    The Eagle Never landed  One small step for man...................One Giant FRAUD for Mankind!

     

     

    Nope, it is up there with mankind's greatest achievement. Let's get specific, because this post is just daft observations and incorrect facts.

     

    29 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said:

     NASA has one runway at Kennedy Space Center: Runway 33 and two platforms to lift off the space shuttle platform 39a, and platform .........39b.

     

    The runway is 15 or 33 depending on direction. Can you point out your skills of numbers with the other ones in this list🙄

     

    List of Space Shuttle landing sites - Wikipedia

     

  9. 3 hours ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    On page 21, Walsh writes...

    After liftoff from the lunar surface, the LM docked with the CM 3 1/2 hours later.

     

    This right here has always been one of the reasons that we know that the entire masonic story is nonsense. And that is the official narrative. Any moon landing fans should really think on that.

     

    Once again, you baffle with a claim that has not only no substance but doesn't make any sense.

  10. 2 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

    It's not green cheese, but it might as well be.

    The Dutch national museum has said that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.

    Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.

    "It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."

     

     

    wood.JPG

     

    Spam spam spam spam spam.....lovely spam! Dear me, someone who cowardly has me on ignore fails to read one of the dozen or so rebuttals just on this forum alone. I used to coin a phrase for this and it is still totally relevant.... WHACKAMOLE!

     

    Click grey arrow top right for those not sure how these other post links work.....

     

  11. 1 hour ago, alexa said:

    Yeah yeah right 🤣

     

    Your informed rebuttal is something to behold. You are most certainly a valuable member of this forum and not at all a troll who has no clue whatsoever about anything. Well done.

    • Haha 1
  12. On 9/30/2020 at 9:50 AM, Comedy Time said:

     

     

    The flat earther casually shoots himself in the foot. Notice how the Sun is now about a quarter the size and in terms of its proximity to the artificial horizon it's about halfway from when it started. Notice also all the garbage he left up because he knows full well it never goes lower than the worktop. It is impossible.

     

    1.jpg

     

    To really hammer this home, the sizes of the Sun projected onto his false horizon show the vanishing point on a flat Earth - looks to be on the small side. QED.

     

    1.jpg

     

    The angular velocity of the Sun anywhere on Earth is measurably the same - 15 degrees of arc per hour. This is impossible on a flat Earth with the variable distances claimed from observer to the Sun.

     

    Just that one post. We have the magic flat earth solar furnace heating and illuminating the planet. Its motion completely unexplained ...its speed unexplained....its disappearance and appearance unexplained....its impossible  illumination pattern completely unexplained.

     

    The flat earther shoots himself in the foot with an uzi as he proves the Sun should get smaller as it sets*

     

     

     

    *of course this ignores the crazy anti-physics, suggesting the atmosphere enlarges it.

  13. pla.jpg

     

    He doesn't need to point the nose down. The plane is under constant gravitational attraction of 9.8m s².

     

    The trim of the plane, its acceleration, drag, thrust, lift are all variable but in flight between second to second, that balance keeps the plane at a set altitude if not.... wthin the auto-pilot on every commercial airliner is a "Set altitude"! This adjusts trim accordingly.muttley-for-imbeciles.gif

     

     

     

     

      

  14. 26 minutes ago, ink said:

    lol .... There is nothing in this place except Potential

    Potential  ....... IS the first and ONLY reality

    There has never been and never could be any other reality

    Before time, before actually any creation of even the No Thing  ....... there was Potential

     

    Jolly good. But to every observer there is what we perceive. This matches with a planet it does not match with a flat earth. There isn't any magic explanation that works for both.

  15. 1 minute ago, ink said:

    Well you posting these words is part of it .... narrative

     

    This "realm" has all the above attributes of a planet and none of the attributes of a flat Earth. That's what the narrative shows. It can still be this mystical thing you allude to, but a realm with planets in. Just saying.

     

    E5nKXUnWYAM75Me.jpg

  16.  

    Here is a short and by no means concise list:

     

    • The Sun sets without any size change and that is impossible in itself. The vanishing point is named thus!
    • The Sun's motion through the sky is the same at every angle, location and time. It NEVER varies - 15 degrees of angular distance per hour.
    • On any map of the flat earth, the two tropic circles HAVE to be different circumferences - the Sun HAS to increase speed for the larger one!! It provably does not differ in speed anywhere, any time.
    • There has been not one iota of scientific measurement that corresponds to a flat earth, including sudden speed changes from the Sun.
    • The Moon is inverted in the Southern Hemisphere. 
    • At a range of distances starting with the unfeasible Everest height for the Sun - the horizon is a ridiculous distance away.
    • ANYONE can take an image through a quality telescope of Mars/Jupiter etc. and see them rotating.
    • ANYONE can take an image through a filter and see the Sun rotating.
    • Lunar eclipses occur where the Earth moves across the Sun's path to the Moon.
    • There are so many problems with long haul flight distances on the common flat earth map - it is quite absurd.
    • Australia on the regulation flat earth map is 5,000 miles across!!
    • Star fields rotate in opposite directions by hemisphere.
    • Gravity  - there is no offer of a workable counter explanation.
    • Sea tides.
    • There is no mechanism where the Sun is able to illuminate half a disc. It is an absurd magic spotlight needed to do this.
    • It is impossible for anything including the Sun and Moon to drop below eye level when they are always above it.
    • There are thousands of orbiting satellites. Including the ISS.
    • There are hundreds of thousands of images taken in space over the decades.
    • There is live footage from the ISS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY4UJceEaVg / https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/iss_ustream.html
    • Amongst the orbiting satellites are 24/7 weather satellites downloading realtime data.
    • Satellite TV dishes receiving data from a point out in space.

     

    This list could go on for pages and pages. Some of the answers given by flat earthers to these are amongst the most absurd things written on the internet.

     

     

     

    HELLOOOOOOO anyone here? @inkwould you care to explain to me how a realm incorporates a flat earth in view of the above? Just curious.

  17. 2 minutes ago, MarcusOmouse said:

    Couldn't you just tell me yourself? Its not a hard question for such an intellect.

     

    Yes I could. It is easy enough if you study the link I gave you for 3 year olds.

     

    2 minutes ago, MarcusOmouse said:

    Ok this might get complicated for you now

    Which is bigger?

    3.142, or 3.1425

     

    Nope, it's not complicated at all but I suddenly see where you are going with this and had to slap my palm to my forehead.

     

    You are hijacking the thread with this nonsense now.

     

     

     

     

  18. 1 minute ago, MarcusOmouse said:

    As someone who doubtlessly believes in definitive science, surely you can give me the absolutely confirmed number.

     

    Pi is a ratio that has no fixed division. It has an infinite number of decimal places.

     

    1 minute ago, MarcusOmouse said:

    I wont hold my breath.

     

    Please do. I'll give you the answer next week.

     

    1 minute ago, MarcusOmouse said:

    Dare I also suggest that this relates to this issue ?

     

    You suggest that an issue that I suggested relates to this issue, relates to this issue?

     

    Get off the bong.

  19. Just now, MarcusOmouse said:

    3.142, lol. You don't really know much at all do you ? Pi has not yet been defined.

     

    Pi has most certainly been defined and to various numbers of decimal places. Thank you for your useless "correction" which for the purposes of typing in two measurements of Earth won't be accurate to that level anyway.

     

    Just now, MarcusOmouse said:

    It grows exponentially bigger and at the same time smaller  daily.

     

     

    No really it doesn't. It is a constant where occasional somebody with too much time on their hands attempts to define it to more decimal places. It's still rounded up to 3.142 if using 3 decimal places🙄

     

    How Many Digits Of Pi Have Been Calculated? (popularmechanics.com)

     

    Just now, MarcusOmouse said:

    A smart guy like you should understand that.

     

    A smart guy like me knows you are talking bollocks, how about that?

  20. 2 hours ago, Basket Case said:


    As long as you scale up all the dimensions the same......why does it matter what scale ?

     

    Let me explain something here. The polar diameter and the circumference are tied together by pi. At best the ancients had figured out that a circle circumference is 3.142 times the size of the diameter.

     

    What are you seeing that I am missing?

×
×
  • Create New...