Jump to content

Mr. Nice

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mr. Nice

  1. 22 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    You are not even sure either anyway....

     

    Yes I am. 100% positive. I provided a video taken in space showing weightlessness. There are so, so many things that team hoax have not a scooby-doo about.

     

    24 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    They may have, could have, probably have been to space, a half way may be but that doesn't prove they landed on the Moon.

     

    No, the presence of 842lbs of peer reviewed rocks and soil and 3m core samples does that. Visible motion that can only occur in low gravity proves it. Images showing Apollo hardware on the Moon proves it. Quite a bit more also proves it.

     

    27 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    People have said that there are already aliens on the dark side of the Moon that if anybody went near it they get attacked. If so, they would have done the U-turn.

     

    "People" said that did they? Alienz huh? Do you think "people" have evidence for that or do you think maybe they mysteriously plucked it from their bottoms to try and sell books and stuff?

  2. 15 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    ^ It just sounds like a made up reason to cover it up.

     

    Your opinion means nothing. Perhaps you are confusing it with proof. The flag was completely stationary as soon as they left it alone.

     

    Click the timeline at 6:00 then any other place afterwards, pick a half dozen points. The flag is completely still.

     

     

     

    Now apply logic. It moves about when they are putting it up. Then stops completely when they finish. What do your observational skills tell you about this!

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, DaleP said:

     

    Astra+not is a person who do/did not go to the space.

     

    If you have to copy all the Apollo-hoax-sheeple, at least spell it right. Astronot. They provably went to space. If you want to start off from a position of fail before I've even begun to dissect this crap, at least do some basic research huh?

     

     

     

  4. 4 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    This is the danger of indoctrination.

     

    They cannot even see a simple thing such as the difference of angle the image has been captured. 🤦‍♂️

     

    No. This is the danger of not getting your eyes tested. We haven't even got out of the starting gate and already we have the kind of response I would expect from Stevie Wonder.

  5. 2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    The difference.

     

     

    There is no difference.

     

    2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Your video shows astranot's back, you can't see his face.

     

    It's astronaut. The clip on DarianF's video takes a clip from the full EVA I posted.

     

    2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Darian's video, the astranot can be seen from his profile angle. Different angle. You say, there was only one camera...... I doubt it.

     

    I don't care what you "doubt". You need to go to the opticians. It's the same camera and the same EVA.

     

  6. Just now, DaleP said:

    OK @DarianF

    According to Mr Nice, the video you have posted is fake. Hence cannot be used to debunk Fake Moon. 😌

     

    BULLSHIT! The video is authentic, you are the one who thinks it is different to the one I posted showing where that clip comes from!

  7. 59 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Mr Nice, no, you look at the video Darian has posted which is from another angle. 🤨

     

    No, really it isn't. There was only the one camera  - how can you not know this.

     

    59 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Your video is in very poor quality. At 3 mins 3 second, you will see the flag waving when he is not moving the pole.

     

    Your time stamp is wrong. I "will see", when he has let go of it, that the damn thing doesn't move in any way whatsoever. If you say it does, this is going to be one of those "debates" where things go nowhere because you need to visit Specsavers. All you need to do is go to 52 minutes, then drag the cursor along the time-line and watch the small screen showing the flag is the same for the entire time after he lets go. Don't make me fart around and make a gif just to prove this! 

     

  8. Just now, DaleP said:

    If you look again, he's still and not moving the pole but flag is waving. 🤦‍♂️

     

    Dude, I've seen this clip a thousand times. YOU look again! Facepalm? Really? This crap has been debunked 20 years ago. You stumble upon it and like every other hoax believer fail to check a single thing. It stops when he lets go of it - it moves more because a) less gravity b) no atmosphere to slow it. At 47 mins:

     

     

    • Haha 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

     

    Not convinced with these. Look at the flag waving at 3 mins 10 second.

     

    I am going to assume that you have zero physics knowledge. In a vacuum there is still the same inertia. He moves the pole, the flag moves. he stops moving the pole, the flag stops. If it was atmosphere making the flag move, it would carry on when he let go. 

    • Haha 1
  10. 6 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    I've heard about the Moon ringing like a bell but if the crater depth is anywhere between 2-4km....did they drop a JCB digger for it to penetrate the surface?

     

    To what are you referring? A random crater or the Apollo seismology device recording the spent Apollo craft impacting the Moon?

     

    Meteorites hit the Moon at crazy speeds. Some are tiny and make small craters, some are huge and ........

    • Haha 1
  11. 15 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Someone has always started from the scratch. 😁

    But I still think it was a fake, non-landing on the moon.

     

    I'm not concerned about your opinion on the matter. If you care to present your evidence I will show you why it is bollocks.

    • Haha 1
  12. 5 hours ago, DaleP said:

    You see, the key words are "half way to the Moon" and that's just a half story.

    They didn't tell you the rest that they didn't actually go to the Moon for whatever reason in the end. 😆

     

    It's really difficult to debate somebody who doesn't know the subject and doesn't provide any material to debate. You failed to acknowledge the point made in the video. Namely that the "hoax" film was made by a dishonest person who deliberately falsified his result and made a provably absurd claim.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  13. 16 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Before you jumped to artificial objects or legitimacy of surveyor...... we need to first establish if we can land on the Moon. 😊

     

    Nope. You need to substantiate the ramblings of your source.

     

    It has craters. Meteors "land" on the Moon. The owner of this forum cites a seismic experiment on the Moon as proof that the Moon rang like a bell. 

     

     

  14. 5 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    I think you missed the point. This is a Moon thread!!

    And the scientist says Moon is plasma so you can't land on it.

     

    Uhuh. No, I didn't miss any point. Show me where his theory was proven. Clue: it never was.  

     

    Surveyor landed 1 year later - his interview is absolutely absurd.

  15. 16 minutes ago, DaleP said:

    Well done @alexa

    This is huge. I reckon, he is sincere...true scientist, not like the modern counter part of fake scientists.

     

    Everybody download this video before it gets removed.

     

    It's been around for 60 odd years, it's quite safe. This is huge? In what way? 

    He basically contradicted everything she claims - the Earth is a sphere.Guffaw-Twat.gif

  16. 1 hour ago, endfreemasonscum said:

    https://image.scoopwhoop.com/w620/s3.scoopwhoop.com/aka/starvingcountries/10.jpg.webp

     

    Oh, you mean NASA should actually not do space exploration and should feed African kids instead? Rock solid proof of a hoax huh? Isn't this the job for the almighty?

     

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT_sAu5t2La8PLbYK0G6I7

  17. 4 hours ago, alexa said:

    Feeding the world.

     

    They do feed the world. The creation of jobs through any company enables people to work and support their families. The infrastructure to create the machinery and build things, deliver them etc. If you came into this thread to poke up your flag of virtue, gee, well done! 

     

     Back up your claims about low Earth orbit, which to be honest is hysterical given that you think the bloody world is flat!

     

     

    • Haha 1
  18. 4 minutes ago, alexa said:

    Don't they get enough money ? Doesn't NASA get something like 22 billion a year ?

     

    They spend their budget on things like The James Webb telescope or the Parker solar probe. It may have escaped your attention, but NASA subcontracts out nearly ALL its budget to other companies that develop and build the hardware. 

     

    NASA in 2021 | NASA Solar System Exploration

     

    What should a space exploration  agency spend their money on?

  19. 6 minutes ago, alexa said:

    They can't go higher than low earth orbit which is 1,200 miles,

     

    Yes they can.  Yes they could. 

     

    6 minutes ago, alexa said:

    so how the hell did they go to moon if it's supposed distant is 238,855 miles away? 

     

    Well, a stunningly stupid claim in the first place - they placed a rocket in Low Earth parking orbit at 17,500mph. The rocket was restarted and accelerated the craft to 25,000mph. This placed it in a very eccentric elliptical orbit. The outer portion of the orbit intersected the Moon's path, like this:

     

    freereturn.gif 

     

    That gif illustrates a free-return trajectory, so just as the craft arrives at the Moon it fires an orbital insertion and is captured in orbit by the Moon. 

  20. On 3/19/2022 at 10:50 PM, sock muppet said:

    Radiation, the body can only sustain so much because it destroys the DNA.

     

    I definitely answered this post. Equating occasional particles to dna damaging radiation is like equating a glass of salty water to the Atlantic ocean.

     

    Do you have anything more than your huff 'n' puff?

  21. 2 hours ago, rebornsteve said:

    No idea whether the below video is faked or not.

     

    It's faked up to 26 seconds. Then it uses footage taken on the Moon. I think this was taken from an advert they did a while back. Oh and I could see the wires. It wasn't this one, but it's quite funny...

     

     

    2 hours ago, rebornsteve said:

    I sent it to my brother and asked his opinion on moon landings. To clarify, my brother lives in California with his Russian wife. I knew his wife’s parents were scientists of some kind. So, her parents worked at Russian space complex in khazakstan for 15 years - where she was born. Wife’s father doesn’t believe they landed.

     

    Send him over to debate it then. Otherwise it's hearsay and bare assertion. My mate who works with this bloke at Tesco, said his dad knows a teacher who knows one of the engineers who worked on Apollo. He says it happened exactly as claimed and they brought back 842lbs of peer reviewed samples to prove it.

  22. 15 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

    Always in hidden in plain sight, until you start questioning🤔

     

    Oh, that's from....don't tell me.....it will come to me.....conspiracy for beginners. Yep. that's it.

     

    All hidden, but where every one can see, but ONLY the really smart conspiracy theorists can work it out. I'll have to look harder - you guys are just amazing.

     

    200w.gif?cid=82a1493byya18ie3o9uiml2i3e1

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...