-
Posts
2,352 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Truthblast
-
NASA Artemis (same Goddess of the hunt as Diana) mission, Zohar made by German Space Agency: https://gizmodo.com/nasa-is-sending-artificial-female-bodies-to-the-moon-to-1848861579 The Zohar (Hebrew: זֹהַר, Zōhar, lit. "Splendor" or "Radiance") is a foundational work in the literature of Jewish mystical thought known as Kabbalah.[1] It is a group of books including commentary on the mystical aspects of the Torah (the five books of Moses) and scriptural interpretations as well as material on mysticism, mythical cosmogony, and mystical psychology. The Zohar contains discussions of the nature of God, the origin and structure of the universe, the nature of souls, redemption, the relationship of Ego to Darkness and "true self" to "The Light of God". Its scriptural exegesis can be considered an esoteric form of the rabbinic literature known as Midrash, which elaborates on the Torah. In Greek mythology and religion, Artemis (/ˈɑːrtɛmɪs/; Greek: Ἄρτεμις) is the goddess of the hunt, the wilderness, wild animals, nature, vegetation, childbirth, the Moon, and chastity.[1][2] She would often roam the forests of Greece, attended by her large entourage, mostly made up by nymphs, some mortals and hunters. The countryside goddess Diana is her Roman equivalent.
-
Steric effects arise from the spatial arrangement of atoms. When atoms come close together there is a rise in the energy of the molecule. Steric effects are nonbonding interactions that influence the shape (conformation) and reactivity of ions and molecules. Steric effects complement electronic effects, which dictate the shape and reactivity of molecules. Steric repulsive forces between overlapping electron clouds result in structured groupings of molecules stabilized by the way that opposites attract and like charges repel. https://www.bethanien.de/en/exhibitions/karl-hans-janke/ “Manic inventing”? Karl Hans Janke’s life was a struggle against the consequences of this medical diagnosis. More than 2500 drawings document his inventions of atomic propulsion models, domestic lamps that collect steric energy, and spaceships that fly without the need for energy at all. Janke did not want to be an artist, and he plagued every institution he could find, from the Academy of Sciences to the Ministry of Trade and Supplies, with requests to promote and to realise his world-changing innovations. His sketches were so authoritative in their precision that people hesitated to reject his work. And so Janke collected statements from the scientific world besides his own “engineer’s” papers. What could not adequately console Janke is now the object of a large-scale retrospective at Künstlerhaus Bethanien: the artistic quality of an oeuvre that was not intended as fiction and yet, without doubt, represents a fascinating narrative.
-
Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six." Revelation 13:18 states that if one is wise and has an understanding to count the number of the beast, which is also the number of a man, the number comes to 666.
-
KARL HANS JANKE, born in 1909, designed supersonic aircraft, modern liquid propellant rocket engines and rocket thrusters, space travel vehicles, new energy devices, motorized land transportation vehicles and much more that didn't exist yet at the time. He was incarcerated in an East German Psychiatric facility all his life for being a 'pathological inventor' and left behind THOUSANDS of SCHEMATICS and DRAWINGS. He died incarcerated, and begged before his death that his drawings be 'preserved for the sake of humanity and its future'. (Read with Google translate) https://1e9.community/t/karl-hans-janke-der-weltmenschheit-groesster-erfinder/3834
-
(HUGE PREMIERE) LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON 1: EXPOSING HUNTER BIDEN
Truthblast replied to totaldisclosure's topic in General Chat
Very interesting. Thanks. -
All countries at war talk up their miiighty weapons to raise support for their war. What he's talking about is nuclear torpedo. A torpedo can be stopped quite effectively by another torpedo unless it is so silent that nobody knows it is there.
-
The current list of countries that have endorsed this Declaration for the Future of the Internet includes Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, the European Commission, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, North Macedonia, Palau, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Ukraine, and Uruguay.
-
-
WE HAVE DARK SECRETS AND DON'T LIKE THEM DISCUSSED ON THE INTERNET: https://reclaimthenet.org/60-countries-sign-declaration-misinformation/ The daft declaration as PDF: https://docs.reclaimthenet.org/declaration-for-the-future-for-the-internet.pdf The United States (US) and 60 partner countries, including the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, Australia, and members of the European Union (EU), have signed a sweeping “Declaration for the Future of the Internet” which commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation” and somehow upholding free speech rights while also censoring “harmful” content. The White House framed the declaration as something that supports freedom and privacy by focusing on its commitments to protect human rights, the free flow of information, and privacy. The EU put out similar talking points and claimed that those who signed the declaration support a future internet that’s open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure. However, the commitments in the declaration are vague and often conflicting. For example, the declaration makes multiple commitments to upholding freedom of expression yet also commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation.” It also contains the seemingly contradictory commitment of ensuring “the right to freedom of expression” is protected when governments and platforms censor content that they deem to be harmful. Furthermore, many of the governments that signed this declaration are currently pushing sweeping online censorship laws or openly supporting online censorship. For example, just a few days ago, the Biden administration called for private companies to censor online “misinformation” – the latest of many similar calls. The EU also recently passed its Digital Services Act (DSA) which contains requirements to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation.” Some government officials, including Canadian Minister of Innovation, Science, and Industry François-Philippe Champagne and UK Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) Secretary of State Nadine Dorries, even mentioned their country’s online censorship laws during the live launch of this Declaration for the Future of the Internet. “The vision outlined in this declaration aligns very well with the many initiatives we are working on here in Canada, including our Digital Charter,” Champagne said. Canada’s Digital Charter was launched in 2019 and threatens platforms with “meaningful financial consequences” if they fail to fight online “hate” and “disinformation.” “I am enormously encouraged to see online safety is a key principle of that declaration,” Dorries said. “As the UK’s Digital Secretary, doing more to protect people online is one of my main priorities – and last month, I was proud to introduce a groundbreaking Online Safety Bill to the UK Parliament that will make the internet safer for everyone.” The UK’s Online Safety Bill will give the government sweeping censorship powers, censor some “legal but harmful” content, and criminalize “harmful” and “false” communications. Like the commitments to freedom of expression, the declaration’s commitments to privacy are also being made by governments that engage in or allow mass surveillance. For example, the EU is allowing the linking of face recognition databases to create a mega surveillance system. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) recently boosted its social media surveillance technology. And the outgoing London Metropolitan police commissioner recently congratulated herself on extending the surveillance state. While the current signatories of this declaration are governments, the White House plans to work with “the private sector, international organizations, the technical community, academia and civil society, and other relevant stakeholders worldwide to promote, foster, and achieve” the “shared vision” of this Declaration for the Future of the Internet. Big Tech companies such as Facebook and Google have already welcomed this declaration. “It’s great to see countries coming together today to launch the Declaration for the Future of the Internet (DFI),” Google’s Vice President, Government Affairs & Public Policy, Karan Bhatia, wrote in a blog post. “We are committed to partnering with governments and civil society through the Declaration to disrupt disinformation campaigns and foreign malign activity, while ensuring people around the world are able to access trustworthy information.” Google and its video-sharing platform YouTube have used the term misinformation to justify the mass censorship of content. Additionally, Bhatia’s commitment to ensuring access to “trustworthy information” echoes YouTube’s commitment to boosting “authoritative sources” – a practice that creates a huge disparity between mainstream media outlets and independent creators and results in mainstream media outlets being artificially boosted by as much as 20x. “This Declaration is an important signal from some of the world’s leading democracies,” Nick Clegg, the President of Global Affairs at Facebook’s parent company Meta, tweeted. “The only way to preserve and enhance the best of the open internet, prevent it from fragmenting further and protect human rights in the digital space is by working together.” While Clegg’s statement focuses on the open internet and protecting human rights, Meta also mass censors content on its platforms and plans to continue this censorship in its metaverse. And despite the declaration’s commitment to privacy, both Google and Meta’s businesses rely heavily on surveilling users to serve targeted ads. The current list of countries that have endorsed this Declaration for the Future of the Internet includes Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, the European Commission, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, North Macedonia, Palau, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Ukraine, and Uruguay. The declaration isn’t legally binding but is intended to be used as a “reference for public policy makers, as well as citizens, businesses, and civil society organizations.” The signatories also intend to translate its principles into “concrete policies and actions; and, work together to promote this vision globally.”
-
That is actually in the 'The Fall Of The Cabal' documentary series that was popular some time ago. Hitler's mother works as a maid for the Rothschild's in Vienna. One of the Rothschild sons impregnates her. She is sent away. Some years later she inherits a small fortune. The family takes the name Hiedler. AdolfnHitler later has Austrian chancellor Dolfuss murdered when he tries to investigate Hitler's family history.
-
Are the Russians hinting at the Hitler - Rothschild blood relation?
