Truthblast

You mean "them fucked up wussies". I just saved you from being charged with a premeditated misgendering genocide violence offense!

Who is "they" and "them" anyway? The Illuminati?

The video: This looks strongly like a MADE-FOR-MAINSTREAM-MEDIA MK-Ultra to me. The kid does not hesitate at all, moves through the supermarket LIKE A KILLING MACHINE and coldly executes innocent people who've thrown themselves on the ground by shooting them in the head. The red flag is his EXTREMELY YOUNG AGE, the CLICHEED 4CHAN/ONLINE MANIFESTO BEHAVIOUR and the fact that HE CHOSE A TARGET SITE SEVERAL HOURS DRIVE FROM WHERE HE LIVES. I think this kid is a MIND-CONTROL DRONE. Who, aged just 18, is SO PASSIONATE ABOUT SOMETHING AS UNIMPORTANT AS SKIN COLOR that he TURNS INTO AN UNFEELING ANGEL OF DEATH?

18 year old livestreams himself shooting his way through predominantly black supermarket. At least 10 dead, 13 shot. 106 page online manifesto claimed to be by him conveniently talks about non-Whites replacing White people in the USA, that White birthrates have to be above 2.06 per woman, and apparently some Anti-Semitic stuff. Hmm. All the clichees in 1 event. https://bnonews.com/index.php/2022/05/mass-shooting-supermarket-buffalo-10-dead/

Does the Vatican have 2 billion users? Grin

1 - Set up a Social Media site with shit functionality... like SMS length message limit... 2 - Get clueless technorati reporters to promote it for no reason 3 - Profit

How do we know she wasn't killed by SWAMP GAS? If it can produce fake UFO sightings, maybe it can shoot journalists in Israel as well?

"Ukraine Syndrome" Its all so tiresome...

Hilarious how the presenter panics...

Elon Musk is a Viking?

Scary shit... https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-10/report-immigration-officials-spying-on-majority-of-americans https://americandragnet.org/ Formed in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, ICE was given sweeping powers to fight terrorism and enforce immigration law. Since then, the agency has collected data on hundreds of millions of Americans largely without much oversight or accountability, often crossing legal and ethical lines to amass people’s personal information to weave a vast surveillance system, according to the Georgetown report. Among other findings, the report documents that ICE has driver’s license data for 3 in 4 adults living in the U.S.; has scanned at least 1 in 3 of all adults’ driver’s licenses with face recognition technology; can track the movement of vehicles in cities that are home to nearly 3 in 4 adults; and can locate 3 in 4 adults through their utility records. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill in 2020 that promised to protect utility customer data from exposure to federal immigration officials. But ICE officials found a way around the law, purchasing access to hundreds of millions of Americans’ utility records provided by data brokers Thomson Reuters and Equifax. When state officials discovered that the agency was using a state system to view driver’s license information, legislators passed Assembly Bill 1747 in 2019, which prohibits ICE from gaining access to the system for civil immigration enforcement purposes. But ICE found a way around this too. The Georgetown report suggests that ICE may have accessed driver’s license data collected by California DMV through LexisNexis Risk Solutions, a data broker. Documents show that the California DMV directly sells its data to LexisNexis. Since March 2021, ICE has contracted with LexisNexis to access driver records.

Sorry, this really interesting article about Television being like Hypnosis from 1977 didn't paste properly in the last post... https://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/effects-of-watching-tv-zmaz79mazraw PARTIAL EXCERPT: How Television Dims the Mind When you are watching television and believe you are looking at pictures, you are actually looking at the phosphorescent glow of three hundred thousand tiny dots. There is no picture there. These dots seem to be lit constantly, but in fact they are not. All the dots go off thirty times per second, creating what is called the flicker effect of television, which is similar to strobe or ordinary fluorescent light. For many years conventional wisdom held that since this flickering happens at a rate beyond the so-called flicker-fusion rate of the human eye, we do not consciously note it, and we presumably are not affected by it. However, recent discoveries about the biological effects of very minor stimuli by W. Ross Adey and others, and the growing incidence of television epilepsy among those particularly sensitive to flicker, have shown that whether we consciously note the flicker or not, our bodies react to it. A second factor is that even when the dots go “on,” not all of them are lit simultaneously. Which dots are on determines the picture. In a sense, the television screen is like a newspaper photograph or the images on a film, which are also comprised of dots, except that the television dots are lighted one at a time according to a scanning system that starts behind the screen. Proceeding along a line from the upper-right-hand portion of your screen across the top to the left, the scan lights some dots and skips others, depending upon the image to be conveyed. Then the scan goes down another line, starts at the right again and goes across to the left and so on. What you perceive as a picture is actually an image that never exists in any given moment but rather is constructed over time. Your perception of it as an image depends upon your brain’s ability to gather in all the lit dots, collect the image they make on your retina in sequence, and form a picture. The picture itself, however, never existed. Unlike ordinary life, in which whatever you see actually exists outside you before you let it in through your eyes, a television image gains its existence only once you’ve put it together inside your head. As you watch television you do not “see” any of this fancy construction work happening. It is taking place at a rate faster than the nerve pathways between your retina and the portion of your brain that “sees” can process them. You can only see things that happen within a range of speeds. This is because four million years of human evolution developed our eyes to process only that data which were concretely useful. Until this generation, there was no need to see anything that moved at electronic speed. Everything that we humans can actually do anything about moves slowly enough for us to see. Even though you don’t see every dot go on and off in sequence, these events are happening. Your retina receives the light continuously and your brain cells record their reception. They only thing that doesn’t happen continuously is the translation of the energy into images inside your head. That happens only at about ten times per second. Television is sending its sequential images at thirty times per second. A few years ago there was a big fuss about advertisers exploiting the differential in these rates. A technique called subliminal advertising places images within the dot-scan sequence at a speed which is faster than sight. You get hit with the ad, but you can’t process this fast enough, so you don’t know the ad is registering. Your seeing processes are plodding along at nonelectronic speed while the advertisers have access to electronic speed. Your brain gets the message, but your conscious mind doesn’t. According to those who have used the technique, it communicates well enough to affect sales. For the entire four hours or more per day that the average person is watching television, the repetitive process of constructing images out of dots, following scans, and vibrating with the beats of the set and the exigencies of electronic rhythm goes on. It was this repetitive, nonstop requirement to reconstruct images that are consciously usable that caused McLuhan to call television “participatory,” another unfortunate choice of words. It suggests exactly the opposite of what is going on. I wish he had said “overpowering.” The word “participatory” has been passed around at thousands of cocktail parties, misleading people to assume that if only they could have managed to get through McLuhan’s books, they’d have discovered that their innate feeling (anecdotal evidence) that the experience is passive and that it “deadens my mind” was somehow wrong. In fact, watching television is participatory only in the way the assembly line or a hypnotist’s blinking flashlight is. Eventually, the conscious mind gives up noting the process and merges with the experience. The body vibrates with the beat and the mind gives itself over, opening up to whatever imagery is offered. Television Hypnotizes You As the largest category of terms that people use to describe their television viewing relates to its hypnotic effect, I asked three prominent psychologists, famous partly for their work with hypnotism, if they could define the TV experience as hypnotic and, if so, what that meant. I described to each the concrete details of what goes on between viewer and television set: dark room, eyes still, body quiet, looking at light that is flickering in various ways, sound contained to narrow ranges and so on. Dr. Freda Morris said, “It sounds like you’re giving a course outline in hypnotic trance induction.” Morris, who is a former professor of medical psychology at UCLA and author of several books on hypnosis, told me that inducing trances was really very easy. The main method is to keep the subject “quiet, still, cut down all diversions and outside focuses,” she said, and then to “create a new focus, keep their attention and at a certain point get them to follow your mind. “There are a great variety of trance states. However, common to all is that the subject becomes inattentive to the environment, and yet very focused on a particular thing, like a bird watching a snake.” “So you mean,” I said, “that the goal of the hypnotist is to create a totally clear channel, unencumbered by anything from the outside world, so that the patient can be sort of unified with the hypnotist?” She agreed with this way of putting it, adding that hypnotism has power implications which she loathes. As a result she uses her first session with patients to teach them how to self-hypnotize, reducing her power over them. “I don’t use tricky signals to set them off anymore, or get them to look into my eyes. That encourages their giving power to me; however, I’m sorry to say that most doctors don’t encourage self-hypnosis. I guess they want the power.” Dr. Ernest Hilgard, who directs Stanford University’s research program in hypnosis and is the author of the most widely used texts in the field, agreed that television could easily put people into a hypnotic state if they were ready for it. He said that, in his opinion, the condition of sitting still in a dark room, passively looking at light over a period of time, would be the prime component in the induction. “Sitting quietly, with no sensory inputs aside from the screen, no orienting outside the television set is itself capable of getting people to set aside ordinary reality, allowing the substitution of some other reality that the set may offer. You can get so imaginatively involved that alternatives temporarily fade away. “A hypnotist doesn’t have to be interesting. He can use an ordinary voice, and if the effect is to quiet the person, he can invite them into a situation where they can follow his words or actions and then release their imagination along the lines he suggests. Then they drift into hypnosis.” Dr. Charles Tart, professor of psychology at the University of California at Davis, author of several best-selling books on altered states of consciousness, told me, “Hypnosis is probably the closest metaphor as a state but I don’t know if I could equate it [with television watching]. Hypnosis is a state where you destabilize the ordinary state and then eventually get people into an altered state where they will follow a particular stimulus input much more strongly and with much less critical reflection than they would normally; there is certainly a lot of comparability there.” Tart explained that the way you induce any altered state of consciousness is by: disrupting the pattern of ordinary awareness, and then substituting a new patterning system to reassemble the disassembled pieces. He said this applied to any altered state of mind, from drug-induced alteration to Sufi dancing or repetitive mantras, and, he said, it could also apply to television. Morris said that since television images move more quickly than a viewer can react, one has to chase after them with the mind. This leaves no way of breaking the contact and therefore no way to comment upon the information as it passes in. It stops the critical mind. She told me about an induction technique called “confusion.” which was developed by a pioneer in hypnotism, Dr. Milton Erickson. “You give the person so much to deal with that you don’t give him a chance to do anything on his own. It’s fast, continuous, requiring that he try to deal with one thing after another, switching around from focus to focus. The hypnotist might call the patient’s attention to any particular thing, it hardly matters what. Eventually, something like overload is reached, the patient shows signs of breaking and then the hypnotist comes in with some clear relief, some simple instruction, and the patient goes immediately into trance.” The more I talked with these people, the more I realized how very obvious the process was. Every advertiser, for example, knows that before you can convince anyone of anything, you shatter their existing mental set and then restructure an awareness along lines which are useful to you. You do this with a few very simple techniques like fast-moving images, jumping among attention focuses, and switching moods. There’s nothing to it. Morris described a formula she learned in medical school in which the hypnotist builds “attention, involvement, emotion and expectation,” which are at last relieved when the hypnotist’s instruction comes through. I then told her about a formula I learned in the Wharton School of Business which reduced to the easily memorizable AIDS. Attention. Interest. Desire. Sell. The first two are disassembling, the third is reassembling. The “sell” is tantamount to the hypnotist’s instruction. Repetition over time reinforces the instruction, like the hypnotist’s posthypnotic suggestion. Jacques Ellul, in his classic book Propaganda, describes the process of influencing a large number of people at once by using virtually the same formula of dissociation and restructuring, especially through the media, which automatically confines reality to itself. Some version of this same method appears in all power relationships where one person attempts to dominate the awareness of others. A preacher shatters your ordinary reality and then, in the midst of dismay and confusion, substitutes another, previously organized system of perceptions. A political leader attempts to do the same. To the degree that the audience or congregation or patient is separated from prior connections or grounding, the task is made easier.

OSAMA BIN LADEN kidnapped little Maddie after attacking lower Manhattan. She is being held in a terror training camp in East Pakistan. The U.S. Navy's 55th Carrier Strike Group is en route to Pakistan to free Maddie right now. India has pledged to support the operation using highly trained multilingual call center staff who will coordinate the aerial bombardment that will be necessary to free Maddie. SEAL Team 33 will perform the extraction of Maddie using BlackHawk helicopters that have been given sophisticated Stealth capability by having strange black cardboard structures stuck to them in the Warner Brothers backlot.

He's the guy who started the Vietnam War and assassinated JFK using a chrome boomerang. He also tried to storm the European Parliament with the help of Sudanese suicide commandos posing as Euronews education reporters. Thank God the French Foreign Legion tracked him down in Tora Bora and America's SEAL Team Six killed him by stabbing him in the anus with a frying pan. There was a fierce firefight at the Burger King drivethrough Hitler was hiding at, but eventually Marines Special Forces Sniper Sergeant Mike "Squish" McMulloch was able to get close enough to deploy the frying pan. Hitler was given a burial at sea in accordance with Shintoist customs. There was much relief in the Knesset because Hitler was trying to start a Libertarian zero-income-tax party in Israel. The Mossad immediately changed their slogan to 'Wash Colored Garments At Low Temperatures, Otherwise The Colors Run'.

If you said this in America, it would take 5 seconds before an entire mob accused you of 'admiring Hitler'. Poor Israel! Nobody understands 'the only Democracy in the Middle East' and all the good it does in its region. Sniff...

In my opinion Musk does many things just to stay highly visible. He is an investor-magnet of sorts - anything he gets involved in immediately gets Billions thrown at it. Musk's role imho is to 'set the narrative' for what is HOT and what is NOT. Rich people in America all know each other quite well. Musk's job may simple be to ensure that the Market swings the way they want it to. There are many Elon Musk level 'smart guys' in America. He just plays the 'visible genius' for them.

America is governed by the large Wall Street firms in New York. That includes Silicon Valley on the other coast. Nobody in America becomes a hotshot Billionaire, let alone Multi-Billionaire,without the approval of Wall Street. Elon Musk would be a small to medium fry entrepreneur without their backing. There are tons of other smart techies in the U.S. who are just as capable as Musk.

Narcissists, Psychopaths and Sociopaths often seek out high positions which they believe will make them untouchable. They try to get to high positions in industry, commerce, banking, government, media, NGOs, charities, Churches because - this is their calculation - "nobody can touch you when you are a .............. ". And it does work for them, unfortunately. When questioned or held to account, they can often hide behind the "reputability" and "track record" of the organization they are in. Perhaps 90% of the most vile acts committed in any given time or era tends to be the direct consequence of people at the top behaving abominably. People at the bottom have a much harder time being a repeat offender of any significance.

A very, very severe security flaw/backdoor in the F5 network security technology used by 48 of the Fortune 50 companies and hundreds of other large organizations worldwide has left their entire computer networks wide open to intrusion by snooping hackers. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/252518097/Critical-F5-vulnerability-under-exploitation-in-the-wild%3famp=1 Hackers who use the exploit can penetrate deep into secured corporate/organization networks, take full control of the machines and software on those networks, jump over onto adjacent networks normally impossible to access over the Internet, and steal or wipe massive amounts of private data and also the system itself.

MKULTRA. Hypnosis. Psychic Heterodyning. Chemical Driving.

So there are no "influential ruling family dynasties", eh?

https://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/effects-of-watching-tv-zmaz79mazraw Sustainable Living/Nature And Environment Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television: The Effects of Watching TV By Jerry Mander EmailFacebookPinterestTwitter PHOTO: MOTHER EARTH NEWS STAFF Author Jerry Mander put considerable thought into understanding the effects of watching TV. The following is an excerpt from Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television by Jerry Mander, copyright © 1977. Reprinted with the permission of William Morrow and Company, Inc. This installment offers an examination of the neuro-physiological effects of watching TV: It produces confusion and submission to external imagery, and conditions the viewer for submission to autocratic control. How Television Dims the Mind

Americans are indoctrinated from a very early age into positively worshipping their rich and famous and their Fortune 500 companies. First it was Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. Then it was the Google founders, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. Now its Elon Musk. The average American thinks rich person = does good for our nation. I blame AYN RAND for this stupid trend.

If you read Robert Duncan's The Matrix Deciphered, its pretty clear that wireless brain-machine interfaces can already do all of this with no need for a 'Brain Chip' being implanted. I suspect something far WORSE. Elon Musk has been tasked with COVERING UP the fact that WIRELESS LONG-DISTANCE INTERFACING OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WITH REGULAR, UNMODIFIED BRAINS IS EVEN POSSIBLE. EVERYTHING MUSK CLAIMS HIS CHIP LETS YOU DO IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT ANY CHIP. BUT THAT FACT HAS TO STAY... OCCULTED FOR NOW.

Mother Klaus makes better pancakes in the morning than Mother Theresa ever did