Jump to content

Truthblast

Members
  • Posts

    870
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Truthblast

  1. 51 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

     

    As far as I understand, the core kernel of Windows is written in the C language, with many other components written in C++.

     

    The source code is 'compiled' into binaries which run as 'machine language'.

     

    Being proprietary commercial software, the source code of Windows is not available to the public, so unless you are able to somehow 'reverse engineer' the Windows binaries code, yes it will be difficult to understand exactly what the software is doing.

     

    The funny thing is that the Windows core kernel is still mostly the same as that used in much earlier versions, and even the likes of Windows 11 retain many dynamic link libraries (DLLs) from older versions, hence why each new release just becomes ever more 'bloated', as new code adding new functionality just gets 'bolted' on.

     

    I remember the days when Windows came on one CD (650mb) now it barely fits onto one DVD (4.3GB).

     

    To be honest, I think this says more about 'modern' Computing Science Graduates who don't know any of this stuff.

     

    These guys had actually taken other software apart before using sophisticated software tools used for things like analyzing viruses and malware, or looking into software drivers, which is also machine language binaries.

     

    They said:

     

    - The tools worked to some degree only

    - What they saw was really really strange, and DEFINITELY not written in C or C++ or similar

    - They eventually concluded that it was machine instructions written in an obscure programming language which has never been made public

     

     

  2. I've just been told this:

     

    - A bunch of guys who are Computing Science graduates got together and tried to poke their heads into the Windows Operating System

    - They wanted to know what it is doing - is it spying, is it listening, is it sending documents or files your create to the U.S.? Is it always watching?

    - They tried and tried and found that it is PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to analyze how ANY ASPECT of Windows actually works

     

    Windows appears to be written in a VERY STRANGE, HEAVILY ENCRYPTED AND STRONGLY OBFUSCATED PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE WHICH OFFICIALLY DOESN'T EVEN EXIST AND WHICH MAKES UNDERSTANDING HOW WINDOWS DOES ANYTHING PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE

     

     

    IT APPEARS THAT MS WERE SO OBSESSED WITH NOBODY EVER SEEING INTO WINDOWS THAT THEY WROTE IT IN A STRANGE LANGUAGE NOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT AND NOBODY CAN EASILY DECIPHER

     

     

    THERE IS NO WAY TO SEE WHAT WINDOWS IS DOING AT ANY GIVEN TIME

  3. 3 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

    Some people seem convinced her freak-outs like this one in which she ended up crashing and burning, were her attempts to break free of Ultra programming. I've seen the clip of her being carried on a trolley from the crash scene to a waiting ambulance, in which she pops up from under the sheet (which completely covered her making it look like a corpse was being moved) and appear to try to escape. The next thing I read, she was in a coma - then she had been found to have narcotics in her system and was brain dead, so they were going to harvest her organs for transplant donations.

     

    I know too little about her story to have an opinion, but I was surprised to hear that organs from an alledged addict would be OK to transplant. 

     

     

    Killed out of fear she would reveal things about Ellen perhaps?

     

  4. 1 minute ago, JCP said:

    I would be cautious about giving too much credibility to old, leaked UFO pictures from the government after this Covid-19 hoax. Another hoax is just around the corner ....... Project Blue Beam.

     

    https://allthatsinteresting.com/project-blue-beam-serge-monast

     

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/qp9Qc5ZVCNIT/

     

    I have read a lot about Blue Beam.

     

    I am 100% certain that they have the technology to pull it off.

     

    But it would be a DARING thing to do.

     

    If Blue Beam had been done in the 1990s, EVERYBODY would have fallen for it.

     

    After 9/11, Iraq, Covid, Blue Beam would be A BIT OBVIOUS.

     

    Millions have read about it and would warn others.

     

    In the 1990s, everybody would have fallen for it.

    • Like 1
  5. 53 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    If the fatwa was 33 yrs ago, he would have been 42 at the time.

     

    Oh these numbers.....

     

    Christ's age when he was crucified.

     

    These dumbasses think that when they kill with the 33, Christ gets crucified all over again, and it rains in Heaven.

     

    That's about as logical as making your kitchen toaster face North in the belief that bread will toast better that way.

     

    But that is what the Freemasons believe.

     

    It must be terrible to have an IQ lower than your food blender.

     

    Wanna know why Masonic lodges have checkerboard floors?

     

    It helps these dimwits cross to the other side of the room without accidentally walking in the wrong direction. 🤣🤣🤣

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  6. - Psychopaths often believe that they "incredibly special" and "above everybody else in everything"

    - They NEED to think of themselves as being the smartest, most capable, best looking, wealthiest, best dressed, most successful, most worldly, most elite, most influential person anywhere

    - When REALITY THREATENS to SHATTER this ILLUSION in any small way, they get ABNORMALLY ANXIOUS

    - What? What? That man is smarter than me? No! No! Not possible! Not true!

    - Because they need to be the BEST in 50 DIFFERENT WAYS ALWAYS the THREATS ARE MANY and the THREATS ARE EVERYWHERE

    - ANXIETY! ANXIETY! I MUST BE NUMBER 1 ALWAYS!

    - The anxiety becomes EVERPRESENT and UNBEARABLE

    - It is the CHAOS OF THE FREE LIVES OF OTHERS that are the ROOT OF THIS

     

    - Only througy REGIMENTING EVERY ASPECT OF THE WORLD INTO SOMETHING TOTALLY PRESCRIBED AND CONTROLLED can the Psychopath finally RELAX and BASK in FEELINGS OF TOTAL AND ASSURED SUPERIORITY OVER OTHERS

     

    - Most Psychopaths are actually PITIFULLY FEEBLE INTELLECTS who LIE, CHEAT, MANIPULATE, THREATEN AND KILL THEIR WAY TO THE TOP

     

    - SMART PEOPLE can HANDLE DISORDER

     

    - It is the DUMB ONES who CANNOT

  7. 7 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

    Apparently, Anne Heche had a lot of mental trauma from her childhood, which can't have helped.

     

    Always these damaged types go into films and TV, I guess. Maybe to escape themselves, live out different lives, avoid being who and what they are.

     

    Remember a few of her films from the 90s, she seemed quite smart.

     

    Smart, cute... and suddenly in Hollywood's most famous lesbian relationship.

     

    But did Anne want this... or was it MK-ULTRA?

    • Like 1
  8. - Actress Anne Heche and Ellen De Generes dated from 1997 to 2000

    - Heche's mental state reportedly "deteriorated" during the relationship, while ELLEN's career and wealth soared to greater and greater hights

    - In a 2021 interview, now mother of 2 Heche said that she "has tried and tried to reach out to Ellen every day since, but nothing would sattisfy Ellen's soul"

    - A few days ago Heche's Mini Cooper car smashed into a house at high speed and burst into flames causing fatal burn and brain injuries to Heche

    - A preliminary police report appears to indicate drugs in her blood

    - De Generes's popular ELLEN show was suddenly cancelled today

     

    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/anne-heche-said-nothing-could-27726065?int_source=nba

    Screenshot_20220812-232836_Chrome.jpg

  9. Facebook is using "voyeur technology" which does this:

    1) When you browse away from Facebook to another site, Facebook sneakily injects its own code into the page you visit

    2) You are not on Facebook anymore but Facebook can still watch you like on Facebook

    3) When you move away from that site to yet another site, Facebook can still track you

    4) Zuckerface's people claim they are doing this to benefit their users

     

    https://m.slashdot.org/story/403348

     

     

    The two apps have been taking advantage of the fact that users who click on links are taken to webpages in an "in-app browser," controlled by Facebook or Instagram, rather than sent to the user's web browser of choice, such as Safari or Firefox. "The Instagram app injects their tracking code into every website shown, including when clicking on ads, enabling them [to] monitor all user interactions, like every button and link tapped, text selections, screenshots, as well as any form inputs, like passwords, addresses and credit card numbers," says Felix Krause, a privacy researcher who founded an app development tool acquired by Google in 2017.

    Krause discovered the code injection by building a tool that could list all the extra commands added to a website by the browser. For normal browsers, and most apps, the tool detects no changes, but for Facebook and Instagram it finds up to 18 lines of code added by the app. Those lines of code appear to scan for a particular cross-platform tracking kit and, if not installed, instead call the Meta Pixel, a tracking tool that allows the company to follow a user around the web and build an accurate profile of their interests. The company does not disclose to the user that it is rewriting webpages in this way. No such code is added to the in-app browser of WhatsApp, according to Krause's research. [...] It is unclear when Facebook began injecting code to track users after clicking links.
    "We intentionally developed this code to honor people's [Ask to track] choices on our platforms," a Meta spokesperson told The Guardian in a statement. "The code allows us to aggregate user data before using it for targeted advertising or measurement purposes. We do not add any pixels. Code is injected so that we can aggregate conversion events from pixels."

    They added: "For purchases made through the in-app browser, we seek user consent to save payment information for the purposes of autofill."

  10. 6 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    I happen to think punk and rap were psyops! 🤣

     

    Rap absolutely.

     

    In "The Committee Of 300" Coleman writes that the planners wanted Americans in large cities to feel unsafe.

     

    For that, street gangs had to start appearing everywhere.

     

    And rap music was used to get young inner city Blacks and Hispanics to want to live "thug life" in an armed gang.

     

    They also mandated constant news coverage of gang violence.

     

    Apparently poor youths who were nobodies who saw that TV coverage wanted to join a gang, because you could end up on TV and appear dangerous.

     

    According to Coleman, the planners let this go on for years, then sent out an order not to cover gang violence on TV anymore when the project was over.

     

    The gangs started losing members, got smaller and smaller, and eventually disbanded.

     

    Rap was softened and Gangster Rap stopped completely.

    • Like 1
  11. My thoughts on the issue:

     

    - A heterosexual man would likely make a BETTER designer, because a heterosexual man is ATTRACTED to women, to their BEAUTY and FEMININITY and WOMANHOOD, and knows INTUITIVELY whether a piece of clothing makes a woman look ATTRACTIVE and BEAUTIFUL or not

     

    - A gay man on the other hand feels NO ATTRACTION whatsoever to women, and should actually have SERIOUS PROBLEMS judging whether a woman looks ATTRACTIVE or not.

     

    - In exactly the same way, a heterosexual woman should make a GOOD designer of mens' clothing, because she can make a male model put on a jacket and say with certainty "The shoulders look broad. The neck looks strong. The chest muscles look like a mountain face. Yes, this design makes a man look powerfully masculine."

     

     

    If this is the case, why this ARMY of gay men being star fashion designers?

     

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  12. 1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

    who are the 'big names'? The big names are people on the Tv aren't they? That would be Tv and movie stars, pop stars, politicians, sports stars and commentators and various assorted celebrities and why would we assume that any of them are smarter than us and have grasped what we have managed to grasp?

     

    if you look at their behaviours it becomes pretty clear than most of them are not focussing their time and attention on pursuing truth as one of their core values

     

    In fact pursuing truth as one of your core values would ensure that you would never be allowed on to the television and could not then become a 'big name'

     

    A 'big name' is more likely to be someone pursuing any one of the myriad distractions that the elites want to use to divert your time, attention and energy away from the pursuit of the truth. The system will also reward them handsomely for this which would likely disincentivise them from saying anything that might see their perks dry up

     

    Now either that big name thinks their particular form of distraction is actually something important in which case they are also distracting themself from the path of truth or they are someone who is in the secret society network and is pursuing occult knowledge in private whilst in public encouraging you to distract yourself, in which case they are an active conspirator which would explain their silence on the big issues

     

    To be a 'big name' that is pursuing the truth and also speaking it out publically you would need to accept that you are going to meet resistance from the system so you would need to be someone with strength, integrity and grit....and it would also help to be financially self-reliant and it might just be the case that there are not many people on the television who fit that description.

     

    There are journalists who have been criticizing big business and government corruption and opportunistic geopoliticking and warmongering for decades.

     

    Edward Said - now dead - was a good one.

    Amin Maalouf's book "Disordered World" is excellent.

    Some of John Pilger's work I liked in the past.

    Zmag - where Chomsky and quite a few others write, really tore into the Bush Cabal and Washington hard.

    There was another veteran British journalist at the time who wrote excellently, but I can't remember his name.

    Julian Assange was quite active for a few years.

     

    Unknowns outside the West - TV channels and newspapers in countries East of Europe featured some excellent commentary and discussions by many courageous journalists and writers who are not known in the West.

     

    Today's landscape is far more HUSHED  and CENSORED compared to back then.

     

    Back then many would have asked questions like "what the fuck is the exact chemical formula in these MRNA shots" and "why precisely do children under 6 suddenly need them".

     

     

    • Like 1
  13. During the whole Iraq War debacle, there were many well known names who spoke out against the establishment.

     

    Quite a few spoke TRUTH to POWER, wrote articles challenging the Status Quo, went on TV to protest. All around the world.

     

    But they are largely SILENT now.

     

    I personally do not think they have been BOUGHT with money. A handful maybe.

     

     

    I think the STRONGEST of them may have been VICIOUSLY HARRASSED into total silence with ELF technology and gangstalking techniques.

     

    They cannot talk about it because:

    a) The public would say its "Crazy Talk"

    b) The harrassment may come back, and this time in a LETHAL form

     

     

    They wouldn't have to do it to 1,000 people.

     

    Severly traumatizing the 30 strongest and loudest would be enough.

     

    They would quietly warn the others to keep their heads down and stay silent. "They have a technology so powerful that it cannot be fought or resisted. Don't say anything."

     

     

    I'm trying to find another explanation but nothing else really sticks.

     

     

    There should be HUNDREDS of well known names SLAMMING Schwab, questioning the MRNA vaccines, speaking out against SURVEILLANCE.

     

    How is it that NOT 1 WELL KNOWN NAME HAS PUBLICLY SPOKEN OUT ABOUT GANGSTALKING?

     

    Its so COMMON that they MUST HAVE AT LEAST HEARD ABOUT IT BY NOW.

     

    IMO there is only one explanation.

     

    S I L E N C E   C A U S E D   B Y   G R E A T   F E A R   A N D   T H R E A T   O F   D E A T H

     

     

    Some of them have been ASSAULTED SO CRUELLY AND VICIOUSLY WITH ELECTRICAL WEAPONS IN THEIR OWN HOMES, OR CARS OR OFFICES that the rest is ALSO SCARED...

     

     

    Make sense to anyone? Am I seeing this right?

    • Like 1
  14. - Hitler rises to power

    - He does awful things

    - Thank God the virtuous Allies stop him

    - They then also stop the USSR and Red Threat

    - You can trust the Allies/NATO with your life

    - Your saviours would never ever become your OPPRESSORS...

    - Unless of course all of this was PUPPET THEATRE designed to HIDE "THE GREAT WORK"?

    - While you were preoccupied with OFFICIAL HISTORY AND CURRENT EVENTS...

    - ...SOMETHING MUCH MUCH BIGGER WAS QUIETLY IN THE WORKS

    - THERE NEVER WERE 2 WARRING SIDES. EVERYBODY WAS ON THE SAME PAGE FROM THE BEGINNING. BUT THE BLOOD OF TENS OF MILLIONS BEING SHED MADE THE VERY IDEA OF HISTORIC EVENTS NOT BEING "REAL" APPEAR PATENTLY ABSURD

    - WHO in their right mind would SACRIFICE 100+ MILLION LIVES TO CONTROL THE WORLD?

    - MEN and WOMEN whose LOYALTY IS NOT TO HUMANITY, BUT SOMETHING ELSE...

     

    • Like 5
  15. On 8/4/2022 at 4:56 PM, Mazthehobo said:

    The way I see it is that people like Alex Jones and David Icke and others will always be mocked and ridiculed no matter what they say.

    it doesn’t matter if 90% of what they have said is groundbreaking hot news that smashes the official narrative.

    the media will concentrate on the 10% that they got wrong.

     

    Here is the way power fucks up the CONSPIRACY SPACE:

     

    - All HARD EVIDENCE which could VALIDATE a conspiracy theory is THOROUGHLY DESTROYED

     

    - Even the smartest, sharpest conspiracy researcher now has to GUESS much of what MAY have happened based on WHO the perpetrators MAY have been and what MEANS they MAY have had

     

    - Some researchers will guess RIGHT and some researchers will guess WRONG or PARTIALLY WRONG

     

    - Nobody can PROVE anything because the EVIDENCE HAS BEEN DESTROYED OR REMOVED

     

    - The conspiracy is often so VICIOUSLY OVER THE TOP that EVEN A 100% CORRECT GUESS sounds like CRAZY TALK to regular people

     

    - Mainstream Media NEVER investigates. It SMEARS the good samaritans trying to unearth the truth

     

    EXAMPLE:

     

    - The World Trade Center Complex must have had DOZENS of CCTV cameras recording the persons, tools, equipment and vehicles entering and exiting the buildings through various ground floor entrances. 50, 60, 70 or 80 cameras at ground level alone.

     

    - There is not 1 VIDEO FRAME that was ever made public from that CCTV footage. And some footage from the non-collapsed buildings should in fact be available.

     

    - There isn't even information where the cameras were, what they were pointing at, or how many there were in total

     

    - If someone filed a lawsuit demanding to see the footage, the court would be told that the SECURITY ROOM WHERE ALL THE FOOTAGE WAS BEING STORED WAS CRUSHED BY THE HUGE TOWER FALLING ON IT

     

    - The harddisks and magnetic tape storing the footage were so heavily damaged that even the best efforts to extract imagery proved FUTILE

     

    - There is no surviving record whatsoever of who are what entered the building in the weeks and months before the collapse

     

     

     

    Now I could say "My spidey sense tells me that a group of maybe 2 dozen men disguised as maintenance workers entered the buildings repeatedly to do something illicit in there".

     

    But it is a GUESS until such time that CCTV footage emerges of VANS entering the WTC garages at night, and men visibly unloading equipment that could be used to damage the buildings.

     

     

    There is NO WAY there is such a record. And they would have ensured that ANY BUILDING SECURITY WATCHING THE CCTV MONITORS DIE IN THE COLLAPSE.

     

     

    What MAY have survived is CCTV footage from other neighborhoods showing, say, a number of WHITE VANS driving to the WTC every day. And they MAY have contained the equipment that brought the towers down. But WHITE VANS driving through a city like New York is nothing unusual. If you said "Look! That's them! That's them!" people will respond "That could be anyone in those vans. That could be roof insulation in those vans, or Chinese food or furniture being delivered."

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  16. Suppose that I am on a Social Media Site.

     

    - I write "such and such mining company is heavily polluting the environment where I live and endangering the health of everyone living here"

    - 10 minutes later, Social Media Site has deleted this post and others and suspended my account

    - Bla bla Terms Violation bla bla Community Guidelines bla bla

    - Nobody can see or share what I wrote anymore

     

     

     

    Should I be able to claim that:

     

    a) A very serious crime has been committed against my person by this Social Media Site - free speech is a fundamental human right protected by both local laws and international treaties around the world

     

    b) That the people who committed the crime should not just be fined, but punished with 2 to 3 years in jail because of the severity of the crime and the level of malevolence involved?

     

     

     

    I personally think that by the 10th jail sentence handed down to a Silicon Valley "Censorfiend", all of the censorship would quickly go away.

  17. People ask questions about various things on Quora.com, and other people supposedly answer them "truthfully"... except that most of the time they DON'T.

     

    Check out THIS BULLSHIT:

     

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-be-a-CIA-agent/answers/9425924?ch=10&oid=9425924&share=2d6472d3&srid=5T5Gp&target_type=answer

     

    What is it like to be a CIA Agent?

     

    As an ex-CIA officer, I can actually answer this one with a fair amount of authority. We used to joke that if there someone made a TV show or movie about what CIA officers actually do, it'd be more like The Office than Homeland or 24. There'd be a lot of shots of people waiting in line at Starbucks and complaining about how their computer just crashed for the 3rd time today. :)

     

    In reality, shows like Homeland get some very small parts of the job right, but those are the boring details and not why anyone watches those shows. For example, the CIA isn't a police force (it doesn't arrest people) and most of the things you see on TV wouldn't happen because the lawyers would say we couldn't do it. There's all the politics, bureaucracy, IT problems, etc. of any large organization, public or private. I was a manager in the National Clandestine Service and most of my time was honestly spent worrying about my employees' schedules, editing reports, coordinating with other offices, etc. The same stuff that every manager in every company in the entire world does.

     

    Obviously, though, there are some major differences. Secrecy and security are paramount. We can't talk about what we do or even let most people know who we work for, which is really stressful both on officers and their families. The seriousness and stress of the job itself exceeds most jobs in the private sector. To give a sense of it, the general feeling in my office was that anything less than absolute focus and 100% commitment could result in you missing the key piece of info that could stop a terrorist attack. The common sentiment was "how would you live with yourself if an attack happened, but you didn't do X, Y, or Z because you went home at 6pm/didn't want to call someone in at 10PM on Thanksgiving/etc." There's also definitely a "Holy Sh!t" moment everyone has early in their career where something happens and it hits you that you're actually working at the CIA. It's a pretty cool feeling and I had plenty of those moments, but if I told you about them I'd have to kill you :)

     

    Admittedly, I got tired of that type of life and left. But I loved the job itself and have massive respect for the people who do it every day for their entire careers. CIA officers tend to get a bad rap in the media and public debate, but I really think most people would be impressed and proud of the work CIA officers do in some of the most difficult and dangerous places in the world.

     

     

     

  18. 10 hours ago, alexa said:

    In the Daily fail today...........:classic_rolleyes:

     

    Will America's conspiracy king finally be silenced? Deranged radio host Alex Jones made millions peddling far-fetched fantasies to the gullible. But after his sickening lies about the Sandy Hook massacre, he's finally been made to pay,

     

    • Jones is deranged now  :classic_rolleyes:
    • We are the gullible          :classic_rolleyes:
    • Sickening lies                  😂

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11089899/TOM-LEONARD-Americas-conspiracy-king-finally-silenced.html

     

    There is not ONE country in the world which produces anywhere near the number of "courtroom dramas" for film and television that America does.

     

    The American Justice System is ALWAYS being waved in people's faces, and most dramas are about HEROIC LAWYERS trying to save their clients.

     

    Here is what I think:

     

    - Whatever the DEEP STATE wants happens in a  U.S. courtroom.

     

    - No force on earth can currently hold the DEEP STATE accountable.

     

     

    Assange was a healthy, goodlooking idealist with real popular appeal.

     

    Today he is broken down figure who is probably lying on a bunkbed right now, and cursing the fact that nobody.is coming to his rescue.

     

     

     

     

     

  19. I talked to 2 people recently who each said "There is a real slide towards dishonesty, selfishness, cheating and corruption in our country. Every year it gets a bit worse, and many people who do it now think its normal and brush it away as 'Its just a way to make money. Nothing more. I do it for my family and children. Everybody else would do exactly the same.'"

     

     

    What is everybody's thoughts on this?

     

     

    Are we entering a "post-ethics" phase of human civilization where it is "every man for himself"?

     

     

    Is the world giving up on honesty, decency, empathy and morality?

×
×
  • Create New...