.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
jjjamson
-
Posts
64 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by jjjamson
-
-
1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:
LOL Truth hurts eh.
Ignore button for you. First time I've ever used it
Still not answering the question: do you even hold yourself to 1/10th or 1/100th of the standard you hold others to? Since all booksellers are corporations and therefore tainted by association, what do you suggest? Should he sell books out of the trunk of his car?
Delivery companies are financed by evil bankers. That means David and his family must start their own shipping company as well.David utilizes the internet which was intended as a mass surveillance device by US and other foreign intelligence. Should he then communicate by carrier pigeon? Why are you on the internet if your "purity" is of such concern?
Seems you are just as guilty as anyone but somehow hold yourself unaccountable.Easier to hit the 'ignore' function rather than have a civil, thoughtful, logical discussion where you examine your own behavior in light or your own lofty standards. FAIL.
-
2 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:
Wow I rattled your cage
Nice deflection
David Icke consistently highlights the Beast which is Amazon, but has sold his books through
them for years. He could boycott them completely, but chooses not to. I call that hypocracy
A whistle-blower who was tortured in a Chinese prison for exposing Amazon’s horrific slave labour operations asks for an apology
https://davidicke.com/?s=amazon
LOL, never seen a grown person so desperate for attention. Talk about bitter, obsessing over where someone far more successful sells his books.
But nice try ducking the questions, troll. Holding others to standards you are so far below you refuse to even discuss it.
-
38 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:
You may see it as my comments as a smear, I see it as speaking the Truth
His latest book is 15.00 pounds on this website, but 12.59 pounds on Amazon, the beast he hates.
So much fake outrage. Let's see you've NEVER purchased ANYTHING EVER from a big box store, ever in your life. You've NEVER done anything wrong, illegal, immoral or ever made a mistake in your life, right? Yeah, we know where this is going....
I certainly don't agree with everything he says or does, same as any other person. But, the reality is, you're harping on every perceived (mainly yours) negative you can conjure up, which is the hallmark of a troll.
Nice try though. :-)
-
It's just the nature of the beast. Just about any public figure is going to get attacked. Whether it's due to jealousy of their fame or notoriety, and/or the anonymity of the internet, there's simply no way of avoiding it.
Many find personal attacks to be a convenient method of smearing someone when they don't have the facts to back up their criticisms. Or they just hope no one calls them on their speculation.
No big deal as all of this gets sorted in the face of reality sooner rather than later.
-
I don't know if that's the case. Again, pure speculation mainly to defame him. It could be waterstones, amazon, ickonic, or in the past his live shows.
Do you have the figures to back up any of your claims? No.
Also, it's very naive to think in such black and white terms. Life is never that clear cut. The disinfo agents I speak of, or the independent operators who make major, fundamental errors, still get a lot right.
I've met hardcore pathological liars who say common sensical, factually correct things from time to time as well.
-
The difference is, David doesn't necessarily rely on amazon for a living. He sells on other platforms, including his own website, and has other revenue streams aside from book sales.
-
In order to save yourself time, simply assume EVERYONE is either an overt shill, financially, legally and/or personally compromised, or simply not knowledgeable to be considered a credible source.
Now, you've eliminated at least 99% of all public figures. This is not to say that that 99% is spouting lies 24/7. Anything but. What it DOES mean is that some or many of their fundamental premises and assumptions are completely wrong therefore rendering anything they discuss on or related to that/those particular topic/s pointless.
Let's take an American example: ted and austin broer. I believe they genuinely believe what they 'preach.' The problem is, a lot of is just completely wrong. They believe, without merit or basis in fact that:
a. covid is real
b. that it is deadly
c. and that vitamins help you to recover from covid
All of these premises are false for obvious reasons. No transmissible virus has ever been isolated, therefore it goes without saying that non existent objects cannot possibly kill, and therefore taking supplements cannot possibly protect you from something that does not exist.
Sadly, even though the broers especially ted, cites a lot of david's work (almost always without citation), they profit from the same problem reaction solution model they claim the elites exploit.
Even public figures I have a lot of respect for, including David Icke, make lots and lots of mistakes or pass off (or at least attempt to) conjecture as fact. For example, David Icke regularly cites out of body experiences as if they were factual, but the reality is, researchers, some quite sympathetic to the claim, have never been able to verify even a single instance of such.
I could cite dozens of such examples from david's work where there is simply no direct evidence to support his claims. Nonetheless, I still respect those facts that he DOES get right, and in this particular case, he's spot on with regards to the corona hoax.
The difference is, david is not as compromised by his sponsors and/or family ties like Tucker or Alex Jones are. The point is, his intent is different. Tucker, Alex, Jordan Peterson etc are all ultimately dependent upon their masters for a paycheck and a platform, whereas david is not.
I don't think ted and austin are compromised in this way either, they just happen to get the facts wrong on their own without any prodding. Multiple paths to the same disinfo I suppose.
-
1
-
-
One can easily identify less than noble personality traits not only in professional athletes but in people you may have met casually, or even in those who are or have been subjects of extensive credible research (increasingly rare these days).
I'm hard pressed to recall a time where I wished injury or illness on an athlete, for any reason, whether it was because of their political view or for any other reason.
At worst, their traits or behavior might generate some mild sense of annoyance, but usually I just find it amusing or don't think much of it.
Sports figures tend to elicit highly polarized responses which always struck me as strange. Typically, they're not very eloquent, and can't really articulate a political or philosophical position. They're just there as a curio or laughingstock or in rare cases, a coaching model for those rare athletes who could benefit from such (almost never).
Djokovic is likely the best to have played the game of tennis, but running around in shorts and hitting a yellow ball on a lawn, well, that doesn't form any basis for a position of esteem in any culture, or at least it shouldn't.
-
1
-
-
I've been on a bit of a spiritual roller coaster ride the past few months. I feel like I'm living life a little more fully, a little more courageously, and have felt a stronger sense of peace for a variety of reasons.
I attend a church on a semi-regular basis and have mixed feelings about it. I do feel like my attending church has contributed to some of the positive changes in my life, along with my own determination to make some positive changes.
The church pastor does occasionally contradict himself (the longer you attend a church the more often this will occur) and I am well versed in all of the criticisms of the historicity or lack thereof of christian origins.However, since I feel better and am better in discernible ways, I follow my intuition and incorporate some church attendance into my routine.
What's interesting is that David Icke has developed a much more sympathetic approach to christianity in recent years. In one recent interview he says his world view and that of christianity are basically one and the same, although of course couched in different terminology. David did not elaborate on how this was so, but alluded to the claim that both christians and himself both act fundamentally from a position of love, the foundation of which is pursuing truth and not being afraid to speak it and apply it, or something like that.
I also sometimes stumble upon a christian author and their writings can sometimes make a lot of sense, again, from a primarily christian world view. David however is quick to point out that he is not a christian, but for whatever reasons, I am not as quick.
Anyway, I just wrote this up to express some ambivalence about how faith seems to be powerful even if logic dictates that it should not be.
-
Respect for Bryce Mitchell vs respect for the UFC are not one and the same.
Dana's been pretty open about his disdain for the corona scam, but nonetheless, he's imposed every fake measure upon all of his athletes: fake tests, masks, quarantines, social distancing, etc. I've never seen him wear a mask, but obviously he flies and therefore wears a mask when it's "required."
He did want to continue holding events during the fake news flatten the curve nonsense early on. Nonetheless, of course he bowed to his masters at ESPN and canceled events and eventually held events without spectators and continues to do so. He doesn't need gate revenue for the smaller events because of ESPN/Disney's unlimited banker backed dollars.
He did push to hold events in "open" states such as TX and FL as early as possible which is to his credit.
He's definitely done some things right, but by and large he's a fucking douchebag. He's a cokehead, whoremonger, gambling degenerate and fucks his players out of as much dough as possible. Dana even threatened to kill one of his fighters when he wanted to leave the promotion (BJ Penn). He's petty as fuck, refusing to put the belt on Ngannou personally because Ngannou wanted to make real money in a boxing ring.
He's up to his eyeballs in any and every vice imaginable. It's even obvious he's a steroid abuser and makes no attempt to hide it.
Back to fighter pay: it's up to the fighters themselves to organize and eventually enter collective bargaining. But fighting is an individual game, and by it's nature makes labor organizing difficult to impossible. Even members of the same gym have a tough time getting along, hence Colby vs. Jorge.
Fighter pay is approximately 20% of UFC revenue, compared to I believe 52% in the NBA. He spread fake rumors about Cyborg not wanting to take certain fights, so much so that Cyborg was forced to confront Dana face to face on camera, politely calling him a liar. Of course Dana lied to her face, on camera, just as he did behind her back. Dana then fired Cyborg and she went on to become a champion in another promotion.
Dana passed the human feces/scumbag test with flying colors. I just can't imagine anyone actually respecting Dana as a human being. As a piece of shit fight promoter who will do anything in his power to disempower fighters and fuck them out of market value paydays? Yeah, he is that, but do I respect him for it? Absolutely not.
As far as being fan friendly? This fucker is charging $80 for a PPV! And that's only AFTER paying for an ESPN+ subscription! A double fuck to fight fans!
FUCK DANA WHITE. -
NFL suspends all fake corona protocols:
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33413223/nfl-suspends-covid-19-protocols-cites-decreasing-spread
-
That rascaly cunt rense is at it again. Now he's resorted to making fun of Andrew Kaufman's hairline. How desperate the disinfo agents are.
How long has this douchebag been running his allison c scam? We're separating the wheat from the chaffe very quickly these days.
-
Far Left Hawaii ditches all "covid" travel "requirements"
https://www.yahoo.com/news/no-more-covid-tests-vaccine-005930007.html
-
On 2/23/2022 at 4:22 PM, tommydrifter said:
i can point out other sources of good information that i consider to be reliable (but not the final word) -- i only follow a handful of people because, frankly, most people are talking nonsense. i share the frustrations of the o.p., but to be fair, because so much is unknown, a lot of speculation is required in the analysis. it is not an easy job.
have a great dayI wish I were as optimistic as you. It's just too easy to figure out that coronavirus doesn't exist and that germ theory is bogus. Not much research is required here. Just the initial hunch that a wildly exaggerated response to a "virus" likely has nefarious motives behind it.
Dig a little further and it's basically inevitable that you'll discover within a very, very short period of time that viruses don't exist. This is not something that requires exhaustive research, you'll come across this information over and over again.
Sure the masses are too lazy to do any research beyond watching the evening news, but supposedly, "professional" researchers and journalists, or even just news aggregators should be able to piece things together since they claim to be engaged in acquiring knowledge on a full time basis.
After 2 years of researching full time or even a lifetime, they're all out of excuses. Take Alex Jones for example, he'll humor david pretending to agree with him, then in the very next segment he's right back to spreading fear porn about chicomms manufacturing a new bioweapon, yada yada yada.
-
More of what I predicted documented below.
Even the bluest of the blue states are rolling back almost all fake requirements. The off world controllers under-estimated the enormity of what they were attempting to undertake and are reassessing after severe backlash and some calculated realization that they were about to destroy the body they have been parasiting on so successfully since time immemorial.
Its impossible for such a tiny few to successfully police 8 billion people.
Fake vaxx passports, endless fake vaxx "requirements," are all off the table, so it's unlikely they are pivoting in the direction of endless vaxxing.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/california-lifts-indoor-mask-mandate-190836224.html
-
But it's an inaccurate and misleading "message." In other words, disinfo.
Please continue with the name calling, as it is an ongoing testament to your dishonesty and lack of integrity. It is the MO of the brainwashed minion.
-
The controlled op shills are out in full force. Notice they can never address any items of substance. They go straight for ad hominem attacks. So easily exposed, it requires literally no effort on our part to be spotted.
-
Joe Rogan is part of the class of pseudo-intellectuals installed into media by the banker class (how else could his funders secure $100 and $200 million contracts?); along with the likes of Alex Jones, Jordan Peterson, Neil degrasse Tyson, Tucker Carlson, etc.
They'll tell you a portion of the truth, but divert you from who the true manipulators and controllers are, after all they are funded by them. I'm sorry that you have fallen for their trap and become a fanboy. This is their plan and you are prime evidence of it. The goal of the bankers is to create a celebrity pseudo-intellectual class facilitating podcasts, book publishing and immediate access to audiences of millions.
Rogan in turn shies away from the truth: critique of germ theory in this case, and leaks a tiny bit of pertinent information which is actually quite deceptive. His guest makes it sound like WEF has only recently been installing it's puppets when in fact, this process has been going on since the creation of the species.
But I do like your post since it shows you how easily people can be manipulated to worship false idols once you back them with a large media contract and millions of dollars.
-
Rogan is controlled opposition much like Jordan Peterson. Also, he's not a researcher.
If Rogan wanted to get to the heart of the matter he'd bring on David or Andrew Kaufman instead.
Say what you will about Brian Rose; at least he had the temerity to interview David Icke not once but six times!
-
The 2010's were a golden era of conspiracy research: the emergence of social media such as youtube allowed for creation and dissemination of alternative research like never before. Forums were active with discussions on any and every possible topic. Reddit was soon to emerge as a major platform.
Just as importantly, alternative researchers could travel and report more or less freely throughout the entirety of the decade. The combination of freedom of movement and immediate dissemination of self published journalism was a first in world history and it all collapsed almost immediately in the spring of 2020.
The ARC is now in shambles. The Alt Right has collapsed as their fat orange frontman was shown to be nothing more than a vainglorious, ineffectual and ultimately traitorous shabbos goy who openly pushed vaccines and led his supporters into a trap on January 6. All after accomplishing nothing more than repairing a few feet of fencing along the southern border during his single term.
Alex Jones has been openly conning his followers with his ridiculous, clownish chicomms are creating bioweapons and taking over hollywood narrative to great effect.
The Alt Lite: Jeff Rense, Red Ice, the Broers cannot wrap their heads around the fact that there is no coronavirus. Ignoring this one basic fact renders all of their other research moot.
The Alt Right narrative has collapsed since their white genocide narrative has been negated by the fact that depopulation generally speaking is clearly the globalist agenda.
The offshoot is that I now have a lot more free time as all of these "researchers" and "journalist's" narratives have gone off the rails since none of them saw the fake virus agenda coming and once it did, they couldn't process the simple fact that it is all a fraud and hoax from beginning to end.
The state of the ARC is laughably bad and almost completely irrelevant at this point.
Our saving grace is the revolt of the truckers, the bible belt right and a growing sense of malaise and impatience even among the far left. No thanks to alternative research!
-
On 2/20/2022 at 12:13 PM, tommydrifter said:
hello everybody
so far i have been disobeying the mask mandate. i find the blindly obedient normies to be contemptible going about in their nosebags -- they look so stupid. as david icke would point out, if you comply with the dehumanisation agenda, then you have no self-respect.however, is there a situation where practicalities trump principles? in other words, is compliance in order to keep a low-profile, stay out of trouble, and do what needs to be done a legitimate war strategy? or, is compliance with idiotic impositions being pathetic and inviting further victimisation?
what does everybody think?
please speak up and share your feelings and thoughts about mask mandates. your input is required.
have a great day everybody
This is a very important question obviously and forgive me for saying so, but find some of the responses surprisingly flippant and dismissive.
In my case, I'm as hardcore an opponent of the fake corona scam as anyone in my county. I've encountered a lot of people who are supportive of my actions but will not risk walking into stores unmasked. I have heard of a few people who will in fact shop unmasked but I don't know of any who are speaking out publicly in my area. Not a single person.
With that as background, I have found it extremely stressful shopping without a mask. So much so that after less than a year I resorted largely to having groceries delivered. Of course, I shopped at outdoor farmer's markets where they were available, but eventually stopped shopping indoors during periods of mask "mandates."
I find it difficult to believe that others experience little to no stress shopping without masks in areas with mask mandates. Even in states in the US which prohibit mask mandates, most people still wear masks in big box stores.
Some of the podcasters I listen to in states without mask mandates report constant conflicts in banks, restaurants, grocery stores when they refuse to wear a mask. I am not in one of those states. I live in a far left blue state in the US. The situation is almost certainly far worse than in red states where anti-mask folk still face serious harassment from the majority of businesses they patronize.
I have been in many, many, many verbal altercations with customers, staff and store management, and police. So I understand your question and sympathize. The only answer I can give you is that you must exercise your own judgement given your more or less specific circumstances.
But if you choose the route I've chosen, expect an enormous amount of pushback. It's unavoidable even if you are polite to a fault but insist on exercising your sovereign rights.
That's why I'm very skeptical of some of the responses far: yes you are exempt, but you don't report if you are shopping regularly without a mask indoors or what responses you've received. I have and I can tell you the more often you do so, the more of a risk you take. You WILL encounter conflict, harassment, be kicked out of stores, have the police called, and have police attempt to intimidate you. This is the reality of the situation and anyone who has shopped regularly without a mask will encounter the same.-
1
-
-
I've actually attended church consistently for years, but could never quite get past the ahem, historicity question.
The last straw so to speak was the gross and overwhelming display of cowardice by literally every single church in my local area and then some in response to the fake corona virus.
Obviously one could write an entire book, multiple volumes about the fundamental problems with American churches, but as a brief overview:
1. as stated, the complete and utter capitulation to fake virus theatre under the guise of abiding by "governing authorities." Who ironically are not governing authorities and do not follow any laws of government themselves.
2. the egomaniacal tendencies of most of the pastors I've encountered
3. their predatory and sociopathic exploitation of their elderly followers who are fearful (hopeful?) for obvious doctrinal reasons
4. the churches' constant groveling to the masses and appalling willingness to abandon any unpopular doctrine for donations and butts in seats
One of the most bizarre aspects of christianity in the west however, is the bizarre cucking to middle easterners, especially jews. It's utterly ridiculous and embarrassing to witness.
It's also strange to see so many very high IQ people drawn magnetically to the church. Anyone with even a well below average IQ could quickly figure out that christianity is a bizarre hodge podge of paganism, sun worship/astrotheology, common sense classical roman and greek moral truisms, and evinces endless internal plagiarism of the old testament within the new.
Clearly there are many noteworthy positive aspects of the institution of christianity, as evidenced by it's extraordinary generosity. This is undeniable. I've also enjoyed attending churches as at least a partial oasis of sorts from the typical savagery, and proudly subhuman behavior at any other point in the week in any location.
Given all of the severe and obvious problems within the church as an institution and amongst it's practitioners, we can all still learn a lesson from the more principled of churches and practitioners. Just attend even a few services at a few of the more positively regarded churches and you'll immediately figure out that despite it all, they are doing a lot right.
Nonetheless, overall my verdict is this: CUCKS!!!!
-
As I predicted a few weeks ago, there has been huge pushback, protests everywhere, and restrictions are all being rolled back. Plans for "vaxx passports" are being shelved, as are "requirements" for any fake vaxxes.
People have had enough. Expect even more opposition as we enter into spring and summer and fall. There may very well be a boot stomping on a face: the question is on whose?
-
You haven't attempted to seek medical attention in the past 10 years? Is there a naturopath in your area? Short of that, what does your own research suggest as to a solution?
Your title says it's rheumatoid but no diagnosis now, much less 10 years ago? I don't see how anyone here can help without your being slightly more pro-active first.
Shill, idiot, or genuine
in General Chat
Posted
I'm curious about the motivations behind zeitgeist. I enjoyed the first edition quite a bit. Yes, the arguments were rather over-simplified (part 1), extremely derivative of previous work (part 2) but then really finds it's groove in part 3 on banking.
It seems like the 2nd and 3rd? editions were rather lackluster and uninspired: maybe they were just bad instead of coopted?