legion

August 12, 2022

August 12, 2022

DELETE YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA - #SOLUTIONSWATCH

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/deletesocialmedia/

Even the Big Techers admit it: social media is ripping apart the fabric of our society. So the solution is simple, right? Delete your social media! Or is it not that simple? Join James on today's edition of #SolutionsWatch as he explores the solutions to the Media Matrix problem. Some silly cunts threaten it, but hang around like a bad smell.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4pa4yQnjq7f/

August 12, 2022

Canada geese also flock together..

Time and again I have heard international expert virologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, say that the more jabs people take the more it weakens their God-given immune systems. Even when the evidence of this wisdom solidifies into statistical graphics it seems all people, including doctors, choose to ignore it.

Let’s take Canada for example. It has started a fourth jab. Coincidentally following the launch of the fourth injection 6 doctors died within a fortnight.

This graphic is from the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. It gives, among other details, deaths from Covid-19 in the period 13 March to 9 April.

bc-centre-for-disease-control-vaccinatio

Although this is an official source let’s take it on face value, and not introduce factors such as the accuracy of the PCR and Lateral Flow Tests in diagnosis of Covid-19. From my own stance I tend to ignore the Covid-19 cases (2nd ring) because it is meaningless unless there have been medical events attached to the number and those not having had a jab are unlikely to test for any pathogen anyway, unless forced by an employer or government, for example. However, one thing to note is that triple “vaccinated” constitute 61% of total Covid-19 detections – a very large majority.

Ignore that because the important statistics are deaths, hospitalizations and critical care. In each of these categories it is noted that 78% of hospitalizations and deaths come from the “vaccinated”, while those in critical care (most likely to provide the bulk of the following month’s deaths) constitute 73%.

Statistics can be interpreted in different ways. There is not enough cumulative information in the above graphic alone to make a detailed study. One thing is clear – the more “vaccinations”, the greater the probability of death.

Canadian doctor deaths – and the cover-up

You can read about the doctors’ deaths in this report by Health Impact News so I will not repeat individual cases. In brief, as far as is known, these doctors had no known health problems before Covid-19 “vaccinations” began. Three of the doctors were from the same hospital – Trillium Health Partners-Mississauga Hospital in Toronto. According to a nurse, who blew the whistle, they had just taken their fourth injection.

Unexpected deaths do occur but this is disturbing.

Even more disturbing is the way the hospital – leaving out internal memos – tried to prevent the truth of the deaths from emerging. After learning of the deaths the Canadian Independent phoned Trillium Health Partners-Mississauga Hospital and in the case of Dr. Lorne Segall got this recorded message.

“Thank you for calling Dr. Segall’s office. Please note that Dr. Segall is away on medical leave until September 2022 and the office will be closed. If you have [indecipherable] scheduled for July or August [indecipherable] your registration, please follow up with your [indecipherable] doctor’s office. If you are an existing patient I will follow up with you in September. I will be able to update patients waiting for surgery in the following [indecipherable] . . .”

Internal memo regarding Dr. Segall’s death

Hospital spokesperson Amit Shilton states: ““The rumour circulating on social media is simply not true. Their passings were not related to the COVID-19 vaccine” and Dr. Segall’s obituary reads that he passed away following a “ridiculously unfair and hard fought year-long battle with advanced lung cancer”. However, it does not say that these doctors were not “vaccinated” with a fourth booster and it has long been suspected that the so-called “vaccines”, if not responsible for causing cancer, have been linked to reactivating and aiding cancer spread.

Dario Trapani and Guiseppe Curigliano writing in The Lancet were concerned that cancer patients had been excluded from clinical trials before the “vaccines” were inflicted on an unsuspecting world. Swiss Policy Research believes, at least in some cases, that “covid vaccines can induce a temporary immune suppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that may last about a week or possibly longer.”

Amit Shilton is therefore wrong to try to convince people that there are no “vaccine” links to the doctors’ deaths.

A second office, that of Dr McKenzie, left a recorded message that he was seriously ill. It is not possible to get more seriously ill than dead.

People are like geese

All these deaths are tragic, from whatever cause, and those grieving can find no solace in arguing whether the jabs were a contributory factor.

Near where I live there is a lake, Trittiford mill pond. On a daily basis a very large flock of Canada geese walk slowly across a busy road to the lake, having fed on the grass verges of a dual carriageway. Mostly drivers are patient but occasionally I have come across the corpse of a goose. They seem to know that crossing the road is dangerous, but do it anyway, one after another – peer-group mentality. They also follow one another in flight.

I suspect it is the same with people taking vaccinations. Even now there is clear evidence that the “vaccinated” are more likely to die from Covid-19 than those refusing to follow by example, they still go back for more. And the good doctors in Canada, like Charles Hoffe, who raise awareness of damage and potential damage from experimental injections, lose a source of income. Similarly, former associate professor, Dr. Michael Palmer, a medical doctor with some 80 papers to his name, has been sacked from the University of Waterloo for refusing to take the mandated death-shots.

Now all the evidence is emerging that these good doctors are right. And even if they were wrong, there was a time, not very long ago, when places of academic teaching and learning were open to alternative viewpoints. Today, sadly, those funding these establishments can enforce a single viewpoint – a viewpoint that is already proven to be wrong; and debate – like the Trillium Health Partnership doctors – is dead.

Getting more evidence is difficult because those who own mainstream and social media outlets have an agenda to prevent this. However, if you think the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control data might be an anomaly, think again.

Below are figures released by the New Zealand Ministry of Health for about the same period to that of the DC deaths. They show a similar percentage of Covid-19 deaths (81%) among “vaccinated” as opposed to non-vaccinated. And remember, health facilities get more money when they relate deaths to Covid-19, so there is an inducement for those writing the death certificates to take liberties with the truth.

Who can read this without concluding that Sucharit Bhakdi, also penalised for his moral and ethical stance, is right? You need to take care of your God-given immune system, because these “vaccines”, which are not vaccines at all, have now been shown to compromise it.

https://johnplatinumgoss.com/2022/08/06/canada-geese-also-flock-together/#more-8953

August 12, 2022

Pre-Emptive Murder

The lives of the latest fifteen Palestinian children to be murdered by Israel in Gaza, lives ripped from their small, terrified bodies with devastating violence, do not seem of much concern to the powerful in the West, or indeed anywhere.

The BBC repeated without question Israel’s claim that its latest launch of high explosive at the Gaza concentration camp was to prevent a terrorist attack on Israeli civilians – of which prospective attack no evidence has been produced. No western media has asked for any. Nor has it been explained why the attack would be stopped by Israel obliterating the alleged leader in Gaza of Islamic Jihad, and many innocents who chanced to be in his vicinity.

The scenarios in which the assassination of a leader prevent an attack which is in train are Hollywood.

The brave Daniel Hale sits in solitary confinement (euphemistically called a “Communications Management Unit) for blowing the whistle on the US drone assassination programme in Afghanistan. Hale, a drone operative, revealed that 90% of people killed by the drone assassination programme in Afghanistan were not the designated target, but that by default everybody killed by a drone strike was labeled an enemy combatant unless positive proof to the contrary were provided (which of course no effort was made to collect).

The extra-judicial execution of “Bad guys” with no legal process is not only carried out by Israel. The USA and the UK do it all the time, across the conflicts created by their own neo-imperial adventures and lust for hydrocarbons.

Nobody can tell you how many children have been killed by drone strikes or “targeted” missiles and bombings in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, Yemen or Libya.

The total across those countries is undoubtedly tens of thousands of dead children. We, however, are apparently the good guys. All those children have been killed in our self-defence, just like Israel killed those children in Gaza. I do hope that helps you sleep more soundly.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/08/pre-emptive-murder/

August 12, 2022

Freedom of Speech and Graham Phillips
(Ukraine War Reporting)

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/08/freedom-of-speech-and-graham-phillips/

The imposition of sanctions against British citizen and journalist Graham Phillips is an appalling violation of freedom of speech – which to have meaning must mean freedom to say things which disagree with the government, the media and/or majority public opinion.

Phillips has for almost a decade published and broadcast from Ukraine material which is openly supportive of the pro-Russian section of the Ukrainian population. He has operated from first Kyiv, then Odessa, then the Donbass. Phillips was sceptical of the Maidan protests and the popular revolution narrative. He subsequently for years covered much that the Western elites do not wish people to know – the shelling of civilian areas held by Russian separatists, the Nazi links of some Ukrainian military and politicians, the discrimination against Russian speakers and banning of Russian media and education.

All that is one side of the story in Ukraine, and the side that western governments and media are extremely keen you no longer can see. The information Phillips was providing was not in general untrue. The facts were selective and the interpretation partial, but that is also absolutely true of the western propaganda to which we are continually subjected.

In some incidents in the current war, it is impossible at a distance to be certain who was responsible for various acts. I see no reason in general to believe the BBC over Graham Phillips, or Graham Phillips over the BBC. It is good to have different sources.

Phillips has been criticised for broadcasting an interview with British prisoner Aiden Aslin, held by Russian separatist forces. The criticism is broadly correct. As I pointed out on twitter in the early days of this war, it is contrary to the Geneva Convention to make public display of prisoners.

This law was broken repeatedly by the Ukrainian side, with blanket footage of Russian soldiers phoning their mothers. Not one (except me) of those complaining about the Aslin interview complained about those. There are mitigating factors for Phillips – the interview was apparently Aslin’s initiative and he appeared pleased to give it. It was however still wrong. It is a good law – you never know what coercion or violence is applied to POW’s off-screen.

Personally there is much in Phillips’ line on Ukraine that I do not agree with. It is plain to me that broadly, the majority of the people of Ukraine genuinely wished in 2014 to move towards the EU rather than Russia, and dramatic efforts by Putin to reverse that process backfired.

But because I disagree does not mean Phillips should not be allowed to put across his view. It is also plain to me that Phillips was correct that the rights of the pro-Russian minority have indeed been trampled by ultra-nationalist Ukrainian forces, and Ukraine is a desperately corrupt and dysfunctional country.

The current proxy war is a disaster. It is not only killing tens of thousands in Ukraine, it is producing economic consequences that seriously damage the poor worldwide. The delight of politicians, the military and the arms industry is evident – and that is true of both Russia and the West. When wars happen, the bad people on all sides profit from them. The people suffer.

So I do not agree with Phillips’ cheerleading for the Russian “side” in this disastrous war. The answer to war is not to take a side but peace, and that is desperately needed.

The war will end with Ukraine ceding Crimea to Russia and perhaps more territory. Had Zelensky negotiated before the war started, Crimea plus the Minsk Agreements would have been enough. The Ukrainian negotiating position radically worsens daily. NATO is cheerfully sending Ukraine to disaster. The Russian invasion was illegal; the response now is immoral. The terms of the eventual settlement are obvious. Let it be reached now, without more pointless death.

But for Phillips, a British citizen, to be severely legally punished for publishing opinions about a war in which his own state is not a party – nor, it is important to state, in formal alliance with any party – is entirely without precedent. If we accept that Phillips supports the Russian side in the war, why should it be illegal to do that? How does this principle play out? Am I to be sanctioned for supporting the Palestinians? What about those who uphold the rights of the Houthis against the Saudi death grip?

What about american journalists who opposed the Vietnam War? Or the British journalists who stood up against the attack on Egypt in the Suez Crisis? What of campaigners against the Iraq War? When you think it through, the implications of this action against Phillips are simply appalling.

The sanctions against Phillips are serious. A British citizen has had his property seized by the state, his assets and bank accounts frozen, his ability to earn a living crashed by the blocking of funding mechanisms. All this for publishing opinions on a foreign war contrary to those of the British government.

This is a truly frightening attack on freedom of speech, whether or not you agree with Phillips’ views.

August 12, 2022