Campion

My theory is that humans being a social species, are tribal by nature and over time we coalesce into blood-related tribal groups, as a kind of extension of the extended family, because we can't survive very well as individuals or in small family groups. After some kind of social upheaval which disrupts the existing tribal networks, such as invasion it takes hundreds of years to reform and stabilise the ethnic situation (after the dust settles from the disruption). So after our last invasion by the Normans, out of our previous tribes, we eventually ended up with the white nations of the UK, led by a unionist government. Which might have worked out if that government was tribal and looked after its own. Instead, after gaining control in these islands the elite kept going with creating a foreign empire. Not even content with that, it's now gone global. Agreed, and power has changed our leaders who now don't care what tribes they rule over, as long as they rule and get rich. It's the same with all the big powers, including the Russians. And we've become the pawns in this power play, even if it means creating more disruptions with multiculturalism and replacement. Yep, and I reckon we're probably not the intended audience for this guff about genetic weapons, more likely it's aimed at regular Russians to keep them onside with the regime.

Thanks, but I don't understand what it means, can you interpret it into simple terms please?

Cheers EW, I've been doing a bit of reading around Angles and Saxons history for another reason, and I've found it hard to track where they came from originally, ie where their unique DNA can be traced to apart from the general mix of earlier Germanic tribes. Presumably dating back to earlier Indo-European tribes. There's also some debate around how much assimilation of the Celtic and Romano-British peoples occurred, vs replacement and displacement when they came to Britain. It all means that few people are 100% pure blood Anglo-Saxons now, most of us are a mix with other backgrounds, and there's a lot of similarities with other Europeans. Although ethnically we equate the English with Anglo-Saxons (mostly). For sure I don't know much about genetics, perhaps it's much more advanced than I realise, but the thought of creating weapons which can target us without spilling over to other tribes (potentially including the European Russians) seems incredible. If nothing else it shows how the Duma feel about us. Or how they want us to think they feel about us. Is it fact or propaganda?

I don't buy the profit motive explanation, this looks like a deliberate deconstruction of the western economy and intellectual base because someone doesn't want us (well America) to be no 1 any longer.

I think it's just following the alphabet starting with gen X, then gen Y is the millennials, then gen Z, followed by gen alpha. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation Is it just me or are generations getting shorter?

Because of the differences between the indigenous Japanese and foreign residents. I'd like to see how our national fertility rate breaks down into the different ethnic groups ok.

I've had a couple of OBEs, not intentionally, so the idea of NDEs fits with that and I'm really interested in them. I didn't meet anyone else in my experiences and can't say in detail what's true or not about other people's experiences. An important area of research I think.

Or to put it another way, what's the difference between a god and an entity who's just more powerful and technologically advanced than us? Perhaps aliens did visit the earth in ancient times and got written into the human cultures as gods. So when I claim that gods are creations of the mind, I can expand that to say that the whole category and definition of the word "god" is a human creation of thought which is then projected as a label onto what we perceive. So if we stick with what we can actually see, and drop all the unnecessary assumptions, what is left?

Sure, it's good to question everything, especially me cos I'm no expert on this. But as a thought experiment, just imagine for a moment that you're having a spiritual experience and meet some beings which look like literal gods (or you die and go to another dimension to meet them). How do you know they are what they appear to be? What if the reptilian elite are also shape shifters who can appear in whatever other forms that we might believe in and hand over our power to them. If they can appear as the British royal family for example, what's to stop them dressing up as gods if that's what it takes to control us.

Isn't there another theory that feathered birds evolved from dinosaurs - birds of prey are called raptors aren't they? In which case the dinos weren't all wiped out but some must have survived and evolved into other animals, not just new species but families from reptiles to birds.

I thought it was 65 million years ago, but perhaps there's room for error there. However I always found it strange that a single asteroid could wipe out the entire dinosaur population of the whole planet but not the other non-dinosaur life forms which would go on to evolve into what we have now (including reptiles). How could it discriminate like that? The occult symbolism hadn't occurred to me so thanks for the idea.

I think deities are a creation of the mind, so their power is a function of the belief someone has in them. If you want to end their power, simply stop believing in them and move on in your life. No need to make a big deal out of it. There's no objective evidence that they exist, but there's plenty of subjective evidence of the power of religion, for good and bad.

No need to do anything drastic, just don't read about it and focus on something else instead.

It's a war on our institutions and traditional way of life to soften us up for the reset and replacement by the new global order. The Christian churches (which were the new world order of their day ) have obviously served their purpose and need to make way for their new incarnation.

I'm currently reading The Illuminatus Trilogy which he co-authored. I didn't know anything about him before this, clearly he's travelled a long way from Catholicism to Illuminatus!

Yes, I should add that this is my spiritual philosophy, in other areas we do need help sometimes like from good health professionals and teachers. We need armies and police to protect us, politically too things need to change so I'm not some kind of pacifist who believes we should let others walk over us, or just accept the evil in the world. Sorry to hear about your childhood, but it sounds like you've moved on and made your own life now. I heard that's the best revenge for bullies and abusers is to make yourself an awesome life and be happy now.

This is more or less where I've reached in my spiritual search (from other places not freemasonry) that we don't need to change ourselves to become enlightened, just become more aware of what we already are, of the here and now. But the world is full of seekers asking and bowing down to gurus and mystery cults to save them, enlighten them, remove their sadness and make them happy, free and powerful. Most people aren't satisfied with the here and now. Therefore lots of gurus and cults like the freemasons appear and say they've got the answers if you follow, obey and pay them. “All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” ― Blaise Pascal, Pensées

This is already implemented in China. A few months ago I remember a news story about people's covid app (necessary for permission to travel) mysteriously changing status from green to red, even though they were jabbed, meaning they couldn't get tickets. By a strange coincidence it was the same time as mass protests were being organised against things like the covid policy and various ponzi schemes going bankrupt.

Diesel engines emit particles into the atmosphere, and it's being phased out as an alleged health risk, as well as the CO2 issue. And now the oligarchs want to put particles into the atmosphere? This doesn't add up, at the very least there's another agenda we're not being told. Maybe it's the climate agenda linking up with the 15 minute city agenda - we won't have personal car ownership, but they still want to terraform the atmosphere.

' “In countries known for their colonial past, cultural racism has turned into institutional racism,” he said on television after chairing a weekly cabinet meeting. ' Says Erdogan in the above article, the president of the country whose past included the Ottoman empire, as he continues his own ethnic civil war against the Kurds.

The provision they made was to increase the state pension age - more so for women than for men so we now have equality at what, 67? Also most regular workers had their final salary pensions replaced with inferior versions. But we've had a lot of economic growth over the last 50 years so we should be richer than ever? Yet it doesn't always feel like that maybe because it's not shared out fairly, if it was there'd be less blaming the ordinary working boomers and following where the money actually went. I agree we don't have enough forward planning, in many ways not just financial. Another way we don't forward plan is by not having enough children as we become materially richer. When the baby boom finished, that gave the ptb the new excuse they needed for mass immigration to continue (after the post-war rebuilding was over). Traditional cultures know the value in having large families to provide for the future; we rely on what, debt and giving away our culture?

Thanks - I notice that Russia's FSB comes last in the list which is a bit surprising.

Yes, "wokeness" is for the masses, for divide and rule purposes, not for the few. If the royals were properly woke they wouldn't agree with all the inequality hard wired into the aristocracy.

Although state & public sector pensions are expensive, and not saved up for in advance, I'm not aware they are contributing to the national debt. Are you suggesting they default on pensions - putting millions of people onto benefits instead - or on the general national debt which was increased mainly due to the credit crunch (bailing out the banks), and the covid spending. Tho you could say that the national deficit is just due to the overall spending being more than income. As for the generational issue, boomers are mostly retired now and the current crop of leaders are mostly gen x who seem to be more tolerant of debt than their parents. It's also a chronic short termism, spend today and get the political credit today. If we did start saving up into a long term sovereign fund like the oil-rich nations do, what's to stop the next govt from frittering it away for their own benefit? Perhaps short termism is the price we pay for our voting system.

There goes Greta's net zero