Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Campion

  1. 10 hours ago, Mr H said:

    I can write this in a very simple and provable manner for those who think we control our thoughts or destiny....



    If you can control your thoughts and are free to think what you wish. Then you would know what your thoughts would be before you thought them.


    So let's experiment.


    Please tell me what thought you will think at 6pm tomorrow?


    ( We can do the same with feelings)


    Thoughts and feelings create actions create destiny.


    We are at the mercy of the thought Gods!


    The thoughts control us, we do not control thoughts!


    Even decisions are just more thoughts. Whos to say when a deciding thought will pop up? 


    It's quite a bitter pill to swallow........


    There's a lot of pronouns to describe all this; I, you, we etc. Is that just a use of grammar, or do you think there is a self which has these thoughts, feelings, God's mercy etc? 

    If there isn't a separate self, there can still be responsibility and freedom but which belongs to an impersonal mind-body-environment rather than a self. 

  2. 8 hours ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

    He originally had more policies, but probably decided to simplify his message after feedback from the public, I assume.


    I don't think he's a fraud - there's not much evidence of that, as far as I can tell. And he's still preferable to the current Mayor. 


    Ha ha ha, when did politicians ever tell us their whole agenda during election campaigns! No doubt he is playing to his target audience, but what can the mayor of the West Mids do about UK foreign policy in the middle east?  Sending a message of protest as a kind of rehearsal for the general election maybe. 

  3. Don't worry I'm not laughing, it sounds like it could be a type of night hag (imo supernatural creatures and aliens are basically the same thing).  At the time when you could see them, were you able to move then?  The night hag is often associated with being immobilised - I've had that experience of sleep paralysis many times although I've not seen aliens with it. 

    • Like 1
  4. 11 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:


    Agreed, I just want us to be neutral internationally and concentrate on looking after our own kith and kin.  No chance of that while we're governed by globalists. 

    • Like 3
  5. Best examples I can think of for either one or two wrongs making a right, is with spying. Espionage and counter-espionage. Spying involves lying, stealing and deceiving which are wrong. Now, countries (and corporations for that matter) don't allow others to spy on them but they do it to others so it breaks the golden rule, but they want the intelligence so justify it with the old idea of 'the ends justify the means'. Do what I say not what I do etc.   Counter-espionage is when you spy on the spies so it's two wrongs making a right of catching the other guys doing to us what we're also doing to them 🤔

    • Like 1
  6. But wasn't India the victim of Islamic colonialism before the Dutch and British got there (Mughal empire) ?   Does their colonialist narrative become two faced when describing them? At least the British empire didn't result in such a large demographic religious upheaval that divided the Indian people. 


  7. On 4/12/2024 at 10:42 PM, pi3141 said:

    The Dying God and the Resurrected God: What is Religion, Really?


    Stepping back a bit from all the various stories of Gods being born, dying, resurrected etc I want to know how this all works in a metaphysical sense. What do death and resurrection really mean? 


    The standard theory most people believe is that we are a combination of matter and spirit. Matter, the physical body is clearly mortal; it's born, grows up and lives, then dies. But the spirit is immortal and passes through all the stages and realms intact.


    So to say a God can die and be resurrected implies (s)he had a material body which went through a life, died and came back to life, but the divine spirit is unaffected, just like our human spirits. There's also stories of humans dying and resurrecting, so Gods doing that isn't really such a big deal to me. But are these stories saying something else, that spirit can also die and either be reborn or not come back at all? 


  8. 3 hours ago, shabbirss said:

    ... the people in power in the govt of israel dont even look jewish,


    ... so are they truly representing the Jewish faith and Jewish people?


    I still believe that the Jewish people are being played by the Zionist regime for its expansionist goals in the region ...


    What do you think of the idea that there's a hidden hand behind the most powerful governments (not just Israel of course) linked to the secret society network?  

    • Like 2
  9. 4 hours ago, pi3141 said:

    Israel says the heavy restrictions on trade and movement are needed to keep Hamas from enhancing its military capability, while critics view it as a form of collective punishment. Israel and Hamas have fought four wars since 2008, the most recent in May.


    Israel closely supervises aid to try to ensure it bypasses Hamas. But the Hamas-run government benefits from foreign countries footing the bill for schools, hospitals and infrastructure, allowing it to conserve its own resources, including the taxes and customs it collects.


    We talk about Israel and Palestine as if they're two separate countries, but even before the current war Israel was exerting all this control and supervision of Gaza as if the relationship is more one of empire or satrapy. Even if the Palestinians do have elections and their own governors, they only have limited control of their own country anyway. 


    I'm not saying I have an easy alternative to all this, but wouldn't it be better if a more neutral and independent group could do the supervising and control of Gaza until they're ready to do it themselves, such as UN peacekeepers and observers. It might help de-escalate things a bit. 

    • Like 1
  10. 8 hours ago, Mr H said:

    Thoughts and feelings decide actions, particularly thoughts, which I will stick with for example.


    Do I choose my thoughts?


    "Thoughts and feelings decide actions"   Yes there does seem to be a close link here, but what's the process?  I have thoughts about doing something, then after a short delay there's a physical action such as moving my arm and hand to do something. Are all steps in this process observable? Not for me, there's a part of this process where it goes underground (into what we could call the subconscious) before re-emerging into the light of consciousness as observation of the action. 


    "Do I choose my thoughts?"  Depends what you mean by 'I'. From the pov of the conscious mind, thoughts just seem to appear out of nowhere, yet that does seem unlikely in practice. We have accumulated a huge vocabulary and knowledge of language over our lives that resides somewhere, the dictionary in my mind is invisible until words are drawn out one at a time by some invisible process. 


    I don't know enough neuro-science to prove the existence of the subconscious, just that it's a theory to explain the deficiencies of what we experience in consciousness which in itself can't explain where thoughts and feelings come from. Unless we believe in magic, something else must be going on which we can't see. 


    So if in include my subconscious as part of 'I', then in this theory the thought-choosing process is something that occurs behind the veil in the dark side. Although I can't say what that process is yet, until science can detect it. It's a bit like when theoretical physicists postulate the existence of a particle to explain some anomaly in the evidencial data but don't have the equipment to detect it directly yet. 


    5 hours ago, Mr H said:

    From the separate entity perspective, there is no personal responsibility. 


    In the subconscious theory, there is personal responsibility but it's at least partially in the subconscious. We can see the end results of the process, but not the whole process itself. That means things like self control and impulse control are likewise only partly visible.  I appreciate this isn't terribly helpful in terms of holding people to account for their actions, which we still need to do for practical purposes of having a civilised society. 

    • Like 3
  11. 5 hours ago, The OC said:

    What is "the mind"?


    Lol, I can't think of an answer which is relevant to Israel 🤔  and I've already gone on a side-track. Is there another thread we could take this question? 

  12. 3 hours ago, Screamingeagle said:

    Political top in Russia supports all great reset foundations - jabs,digital everything,15 min city ect


    just as are all governments around the world ,so no surprises there! 


    they are spinning this as the elites work in the west and not in Russia.


    Yes it's no surprise here that all these agendas appear round the world at the same time, it's no coincidence, they are working together behind the scenes. 

    • Like 1
  13. 9 hours ago, DannyUK said:

    Madonna as the Whore of Babylon


    I just noticed that he symbol IXXI can also be seen as M on top of W (or vice-versa W over M) and I was wondering what the WM / MW could stand for. Madonna Whore would fit and it could also be a sexual motif for Man over Woman (patriarchy) vs Woman over Man (feminism).






    Or the Freemasons symbol is also like a man and woman in missionary position. 



    • Like 2
  14. 10 hours ago, Maggotman said:

    Have you ever tasted a Red or Blue lolly practically the same taste once you bit into the core the difference is the outer flavour is different but the core follow the same path to the lolly stick.


    Nice analogy. I gave up watching the party conferences years ago when it became obvious they were just a show, and the ordinary members have no influence in setting the policies. 

    • Like 2
  15. 8 hours ago, The OC said:

    When you look at your reflection what do you see?


    I see a reflection of my body. Especially my face which I can't see except in reflection or image.  An eye can't see itself, the teeth can't bite themselves. Can the mind be aware of itself? 

    • Like 1
  16. 2 hours ago, The OC said:
    Why on earth would anyone risk their lives to support a group which the Elitists themselves most likely started, so that some privileged little shit in their family avoids the torments of hell, because his or her ancestors chose to follow satan.
    So, if the devil is real, then so is our God, The Holy Trinity.
    And unless we make an effort to educate others, history will repeat itself.


    I get that you are presenting fascism and communism as a dialectic pair of apparent opposites both controlled by a single hidden hand. But can't we say the same for your Jesus 'n' Satan pairing as a good cop & bad cop routine to test us and see which way we turn. Who's the hidden hand behind those two? 

  17. 3 hours ago, Bombadil said:

    And every other race, religion or group with any sense. Logically anyone would support whatever suits their beliefs. In fact the only ones who don't tend to be white. Asides from nutjob groups that is.


    It's even worse that, mainstream white society actively suppresses its own members who do have an in-group preference with labels like racist and far-right. 


    There's something very alienating and incongruent about belonging to an ethnic group which has been taught to hate itself.

    Our society encourages everyone to have some sort of identify, but to belong to a group and have a taboo on promoting it or desiring its growth and prospering is downright weird. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  18. 1 hour ago, pi3141 said:

    But the Jews are like the Freemasons, they help each other, they give business contacts to each other, promote their own family as much as they can, and in this way the Jews, like the Masons, exceed in life.


    And yes, when others see people effortlessly winning in life they do get jealous.


    But they are only winning because they belong to a club or culture or religion that strongly promotes helping others in that club or religion, and that is a form of cooperation we Westerners don't have - except of course the aristocracy, they help each other, if you've been to Eton and Oxford you will be sought out for the top jobs by other graduates.


    Religion is one of the "protected characteristics" these days but things like membership of a secret society, being an aristocrat, going to public school etc aren't . So it isn't illegal for those groups to discriminate in favour of their people. Funny that. 

  19. 1 hour ago, Screamingeagle said:

    i dont see a problem,exempt black people from taxes,and double the taxes for Caucasians 

    it is called free,democratic society 😇


    It would need your race put on your government identity like they did in Apartheid South Africa, look how well that worked out. 


    What about mixed race people, do you pay 50% or 25% tax depending on your parents/grandparents? 


    Besides, anyone can identify with whichever race they want, it's a social construct not a biological fact according to the left's current ideology, so what's to stop everyone identifying as black and defunding the whole government 😀  


    If they want race to be determined by physical characteristics instead, then these leftists will need to stop their opposition to scientific_racism and they'll be in league with the Nazis. 


    The whole idea is hilarious let them keep this stuff coming, they're keeping up America's reputation as losing the plot. Which is perhaps the point of it, it's the kind of thing which is pushed by America's enemies abroad. 


    • Like 1
  20. 4 hours ago, jack121 said:

    I wonder how many sons and daughters of politicians will be on the front lines ?

    I wonder how many sons and daughters of royals will be on the front lines ?

    I wonder how many sons and daughters of bank executives will be on the front lines ?

    I wonder how many sons and daughters of the WEF and UN will be on the front lines

    The answer is ....


    In round figures ... very round ... 

    • Like 1
  21. 2 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

    Erm not quite, it’s showing that the tuning fork on the right only resonates and moves the ball if it’s stimulated by another tuning fork of the same frequency (440htz). Sound can move mountains if it is tuned to that mountain.

    If they have a clone of you and they flick it’s ear, you will feel your ear being flicked….. maybe.


    I think distance affects sound induction, so if this dude struck the 440htz fork standing 20 metres away, the ball wouldn’t move 



    Agreed, it's what we called resonant_frequency at school. If you use the same frequency as the natural oscillation of the object, or a simple multiple like 2x or 4x you can transmit the energy more efficiently. Like when an opera singer smashes a glass when they hit the right note. Or if the wind speed is resonant, and the damping insufficient it can blow down a bridge like the Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_1940   



    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  22. 16 hours ago, novymir said:

    I can assure you there would be no co-existence between Bolshevism and National Socialist Germany. Any kind of 'agreements" with or by the "USSR" is not to be taken seriously, the USSR was founded by and run by satanic pathological liars and murderers, period, who would believe or trust them or imagine any legitimacy of them?  except that it was an international criminal enterprise that butchered and looted Russia and Russians.

    Hitler and educated Germany knew that. 


    Apparently the drunk Freemason Churchill and Freemason stooge Roosevelt(virtual-jew if not actual) believed the USSR was a benefit to mankind and of more value to the world than a free Europe or America.


    None of those clowns represented "the people", they represented Judaic Freemasonry and Satanism. 


    Totally agree about the genocidal nature of USSR which killed many of its own people, I don't know how it compares with deaths in WW2 but definitely a very bad regime. 

    In my terminology, globalist westerners like Churchill and Roosevelt represent the illuminati axis; but if it's a choice between illuminati, communists or fascists then god help us. We do need a political system which advocates for our people and can defend us against these threats but not under occupation by an empire. 

  23. 8 minutes ago, novymir said:

    Germany wasn't and couldn't be self sufficient, it depended on imports. And everyone knew that.


    They didn't go "on an invasion spree", they went a a LIBERATION SPREE! 


    But that is BLASPHEMY!


    You all just gotta do your own digging, do it before they scrub the internet. I've dropped all sorts of stuff on this website, stuff to check into for yourself and come to your own conclusions. 


    Well I heard the idea that Hitler invaded the USSR, breaking the non-aggression pact, because he needed oil due to the allies' blockade.  What I've just learned is that there was a secret protocol in the pact which divided up eastern Europe between Germany and USSR. So, if true and Germany was going on a liberation spree, they were willing to throw half of eastern Europe to the communist wolves. Why ally themselves with Russia like that, were they unconfident of their chances of success and simply being realistic, or in some kind of real pact? 


    I just want freedom and sovereignty for my own people. Occupation by illuminati, nazis, communists or whoever else isn't an acceptable option in my book. Happy to be allies with my brother tribes but I don't trust empires of any stripe. But yeah, I'm doing my some digging. 

  • Create New...