Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Campion

  1. 9 hours ago, numnuts said:



    'Climate change food calculator: What's your diet's carbon footprint?'


    Oh dear, you mean all those metropolitans will need to stop eating all that imported food to save on transport emissions? Oh no I forgot it's the BBC they're telling us over-rich westerners to eat less meat & dairy and have more vegan food. 


    For a moment there I thought they would suggest more self-sufficiency but that doesn't fit the global agenda does it. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. 8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    all those israeli 'tech start-ups'.....just extensions of the israeli military-intelligence apparatus. They're playing to win


    As they say, everything is connected, it's all one extended system. 


    8 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    meanwhile in the UK we are flooding the third world into the country whilst 'transitioning' our young so that they can't reproduce....


    Low birth rate is one of the western features which Israel doesn't copy.   We in the west have been programmed to think that we can't afford to have more children, but when you look at the birth_rate figures, it's the poorest countries which have the highest birth rates. Which is where many of those migrants are coming from. 

    • Like 1
  3. 16 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

    "Billions more spent in UK will count as foreign aid"


    That makes sense if the money is being spent on foreigners coming into the country... 🙄


    We give them aid abroad and at home, they must think we've got money to burn and we become a magnet. What do other countries really think about us, our immigration policy and general demographic decline I wonder. 

  4. I can't decide whether to get cremated or buried when I die, being a traditionalist I prefer the idea of burial which preserves any evidence as Mac says, though it's more expensive.  Reading up about Baal I've learned that the word is more of a title than a name of a particular god, and I've found this sacrifice reference in wiki to Ba'al Hammon: 


    "Rather than the bull, Baʿal Hammon was associated with the ram and depicted with his horns. The archaeological record seems to bear out accusations in Roman sources that the Carthaginians burned their children as human sacrifices to him." 


    Ba'al Hammon was possibly known as the Lord of the Brazier which is another fire connection, and also identified with Saturn. I don't know of a connection with modern cremation but I suppose our recent acceptance of it has occurred alongside the decline in Christianity which mostly opposed it. 

    • Like 1
  5. On 11/6/2022 at 1:37 PM, sock muppet said:

    I agree with this, this is what i would imagine the new Republics to be, the major countries of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and of course England all would be autonomous regions and boundaries respected but would come under the banner of free republics united in our common cause that both respects the culture and customs of each region, our laws are not so different and we all enjoy our freedoms as individuals, and in fact we are not so far from this realisation with respect to the common wealth that exists already, essentially we just need to retire the Monarchy system say thanks very much and there's a cheque in the post for your efforts and turn it into a museum, to remind ourselves of what unbridled tyranny has given us throughout history, any thoughts?


    It's a great vision but I think there's a lot more to it than just retiring the monarchy.  At the moment the UK and especially England is completely controlled by the globalist cryptocracy who will fight tooth and nail to stop us having independence and freedom. We were after all the first victim of the British Empire and the monarchy is just the tip of the iceberg in the scale of the challenge we're facing.  I'm not sure which commonwealth you're referring to - what goes by that name is basically the remnant of the British Empire which doesn't affect us ordinary people very much. 

    • Like 1
  6. On 11/4/2022 at 7:48 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

    Over the course of the last 25 years, you can equally ask the same question of the Labour party.


    After the untimely 'demise' of John Smith in 1994 which saw Tony Blair become Labour leader, it can be argued that this was the point where Labour stopped being the party of the 'working class'.


    The Labour government from 1997 to 2010 were equally a bunch of "self-serving wankers". And if they 'win' the next General Election, which is what will happen, don't expect anything to change.


    Your question is very 'loaded', and presumes that 'one evil is better than the other'. Which is exactly the problem that the USA has, where they argue amongst themselves about the 'choice' between Republicans and Democrats.


    In my opinion, both the Labour and Conservative parties are bad for this country, and both are following the same globalist agenda, so it is pointless trying to argue for/against the merits of either, as all you do is 'reinforce the narrative' that there is no other choice.


    The voting systems (and funding of parties) we have results in space for only two effective political parties in each nation, meaning that  Labour and Tories both go for the middle ground which is largely made up of those middle-class, middle-income, educated liberal voters, who are the swing voters. The traditional working class have nowhere else to go apart from Labour, and the upper class high-earners likewise have nowhere else to go apart from Tory. Therefore there's less motivation for either party to worry about their traditional base. The middle ground is more amenable to globalism, multiculturalism and corporatism because they haven't seen the straws in the wind of the encroaching cryptocracy. 


    So the Tories become more socialist and Labour becomes more capitalist. This was upset a little in the 2019 election when the Red Wall was persuaded to vote Tory because of one-off factors like Labour's stance on Brexit and the populism of Boris, but this may well be overturned next time. However you only need to persuade people to vote for you, not actually do the policies because we've got such short attention spans.  We've been trapped in this political hamster wheel since the beginning of democracy. 

    • Like 1
  7. 25 minutes ago, legion said:

    Yes. They could, but they don't. 

    Don't want to lose the 2 BILLION. 

    Don't want to start a shit storm in the Middle East about who can and can't have WMDs and why.. 


    The most charitable explanation I have is that the powers are being pragmatic and applying the maxim of 'the end justifies the means'. Instead of consistent moral principles we have contradictions and double standards.


    In which case we have to ask ourselves what are the real ends they are working towards. Of course by their own actions they have created a precedent that lying is acceptable ("Israel doesn't have nukes" justifies the ends) so we have to take everything else with a pinch of salt. 

     I'm not only referring to the US-Israel relationship here of course, many other countries use this so-called "diplomacy". 

  8. @Ethel well I've no great preference between constitutional monarchy and a republic so I'm not offended but at least it's good to see your passion for this stuff and I hope you decide to stay in the forum. 


    I don't know enough about anarchy to give a good reply apart from the usual what-if scenarios. Whether we keep the monarchy or go for a republic, I'd advocate sovereignty for the British nations and either dissolving the union or relegating it to a subordinate status. Then let the nations decide their destiny themselves. We need more decentralisation and local powers at least, even if I'm not ready for full-on anarchism yet .

    • Like 1
  9. 52 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

    And during talk of rising mortgage rates, I've already heard the 'experts' on the radio saying that more assistance will need to be made available by the government. So if anyone can see the logic of having exorbitant costs for everything and 'demanding' hand outs from the government, the only explanation is the implementation of  UBI. What a fucking panto! 


    If you follow the money, this way of doing it channels money from govt borrowing, to the govt, back to the taxpayers in the form of handouts, and then on to the banks, energy companies and other corporations. And we still have to repay the debt to the banks plus interest. 


    They could just use price caps, tax cuts or minimum wage increases to help us out, but then we aren't the main beneficiaries of this whole money vortex. 

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
  10. The more I think about it, the more that things like the non-proliferation treaty and international aid ( civil and military) looks like a scheme to keep small countries dependent on the superpowers and compromise their independence. Preventing places like Ukraine and Taiwan having them makes them rely on the US and effectively become part of the empire. 
    We were told that MAD, mutually assured destruction, from nukes has kept the peace in Europe since WW2 so we need them. But there's a different rule for others. 
    And now they're trying to bring in "international law", which implies international courts and international government. Ie a single authority merging together the superpowers. No wonder the left like it to deal with the middle east: problem/reaction/solution again. 

  11. @legion  ah yes I remember the Mordecai Vanunu story. Not good, but I don't see the answer as unilateral disarmament. It looks like Israel only has nukes for themselves, they're not proliferating to other countries are they? Israel could simply admit to their nuclear arsenal. The US policy, as a nuclear power itself, doesn't make sense to me. To be consistent they'd have to stop funding themselves or do unilateral disarmament first, before they stopped funding anyone else.  


    This is also why I don't get the campaign against Iran having nukes too, when it's mostly nuclear powers trying to stop them. 

  12. 4 hours ago, alexa said:


    If space goes on & on & on, what's at the end ? I've always asked this question ever since I was a kid.


    Wiki says that the size of the observable universe is 93 bn light years, and the total size is unknown. So, maybe there is 'dark space-time' beyond the end of the visible universe, rather like there's dark matter and energy. 


    I find it strange that the size of the universe is 93 bn light years when it's only 13.8 bn years old, so it's expanded faster than the speed of light. Due to inflation in the first fraction of a second after the big bang. 

  13. 10 hours ago, legion said:

    UN Votes 152 to 5 Telling Israel to Get Rid of Its Nuclear Weapons


    I think I'm with Israel on this one. Why should the globalist UN pick them out individually when there's plenty of other countries with nukes too? I could understand it if they had a resolution on multilateral disarmament for every nuclear power, but unilateral disarmament? Wind your neck in. We should leave the UN.  

  14. "What is the Purpose of Religion?" 

    There's so many different types of religion and the question appears to be trying to generalise. I'd say both purpose and religion are human creations, therefore are we wishing to create something monolithic;  something which expresses our individuality; or perhaps a mixture? 

    For myself I realised some time ago, after trying and failing to belong to various traditions, that I'm better off being religiously self-employed.  I've found meaning and purpose in searching for a reconciliation between unity and diversity. Wholeness and fragmentation. 

    Earlier in the thread @shabbirss said 'everything is connected'. Well, that's true if you've got a belief that there are multiple 'things' which need connecting up. How about if reality is only one 'thing' which just appears fragmented because that's how our minds work? What if the distinctions between things are relative to our thoughts? 

    Are the waves in the ocean connected together, or is it just all one ocean? It could be both depending on your perspective. If you want to divide it up into waves, what's connecting them is the rest of the deep ocean, which is far larger. In broader terms, the relationship between things is the rest of the universe. It's not so much divide and rule, but divide and relate. 

    • Thanks 1
  15. On 11/1/2022 at 8:37 AM, RidgyDidgy said:

    What could be considered 'good' paganism?


    Originally the word pagan was used by urban people as a term of abuse about the uncivilised rustic country folk, rather as we have terms like bumpkin and redneck. In other words, pagans were people who lived away from the centre of authority and control, their religion more local and home-grown such as the spirits inhabiting their local area. 


    So I'd say the good paganism, like other good religion is based on the sovereignty of the ordinary believers, with self-responsibility and not giving away their spiritual authority (ie authorship) to a centralised hierarchy, usually based in the city. 

    • Like 1
  16. There's a war against masculinity, and fertility in general in the western world. Masculinity is  demonised as 'toxic masculinity'. As long as trt is kept on a small scale and not challenging the infertility effects of all the artificial chemicals and LGBT agenda it'll probably be tolerated and kept under medical control. 

    • Like 1
  17. 23 hours ago, pi3141 said:

    Mithras was a Persian warrior god who, according to legend, entered a cave and killed a bull that had been created at the dawn of time. 

     Which ties into the legend of Theseus killing the Minotaur, and that legend echoing the Minoan religion of Bull worship and domination of the Greeks at that time. 


    1 hour ago, pi3141 said:

    Pagan superstitious horseshit this belief in a 'Royal' family - a 'special seed' whose descendants created Nations they were so fertile and blessed by God - it says so in the Bible. Fertility worship plain and simple.

     But on the other hand, the Royal obsession with bloodlines and fertility is arguably just a supersized version of regular people's desire for children and family as a way to get continuity and overcome the destruction and decay of death. Projected onto the whole tribe or society, as it were.

  18. 1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

    They are all really now just expressions of the same GLOBALIST parties wearing different ties to create a delusion in the minds of the public that they are actually beiyng offered a viable choice by the system


    I agree but they also hoodwink the ordinary members of the parties, and even many MPs, as well as the public, into thinking there is a genuine political democracy. 

  19. 43 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

    and you think those corporations don't know these sort of ingredients are harmful when they put them into their products? If so i have some prime swamp land to sell you..


    I just looked at the ingredients in my cheap brand of moisturiser and realised I've no idea what many of those chemicals are. So from now on I'm going to try using simple olive oil instead. 

  20. 8 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

    no they are not after the minority vote. They are globalists looking to completely change the demographics of britain which is why they are flooding migrants into this country


    The whole system is designed to absorb minorities into the mainstream and neutralise them as much as possible. When you look at the main political parties they are made up of a coalition of different factions held together by mutual desire for survival and power in the first-past-the-post electoral system. 


    This is also the globalist agenda for us, as our local identities are subordinated to the global hive mind out of a belief that's what we need for our survival. Anyone who tries to keep hold of their culture and identity separate from the global hegemony is labelled extremist, far-right or far-left, and a threat to peaceful society. Even as that very society crumbles and is replaced. 

    • Like 1
  21. 2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

    That's exactly it. There was the 'pretence' of an election, whereby the 'elite' Tory MPs in the Commons presented a 'choice' of candidates to the wider party membership.


    Yes. But in the second round, the same people make the rules for the election, and are the voters in that election, for who will be Prime Minister of the whole union of nations. I'm trying to get my head round the reality that a political party is a private organisation making its own rules like your local golf club; but can be elected to parliament and run our countries like a public sector service. 


    2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

    However, what still does bother me is that the media seemed to 'know' that Liz Truss was the 'next Prime Minister' before the votes had even been counted.


    Unfortunately we're being tractor-beamed into a condition where media is reality, because we are so disconnected from the traditional realities of community and nature etc. 

    • Like 2
  22. On 10/25/2022 at 6:49 PM, Macnamara said:

    Now Sunak is Prime Minister – though he received the support of only half of Conservative MPs, he was not the favoured candidate of the Conservative Party members and he was not elected to the position by the British electorate. How the hell did that happen? Do you think I’m being paranoid to suspect that it was all fixed for the Goldman Sachs/WEF candidate to win?


    I was a little surprised to discover, but should have already known, that the 1922 Committee has free rein to make up whatever leadership election process they like, "apparently" even on the spur of the moment and in a state of panic like this time (if you believe the narrative that this wasn't premeditated). They seemed determined to keep out the party membership and keep the election to the parliamentary party who would deliver their preferred candidate. 

    • Like 1
  23. 3 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

    They really don't have a clue about how they are being manipulated, in one breath they'll say that its a "good thing" to blow up gas pipelines, then in the next they'll be complaining about their energy prices rising.


    Yes, it's how we're paying for both sides of the Ukraine war. 


    On 10/16/2022 at 7:17 AM, masonfreeparty2 said:

    he seemed adamant that there would be civil unrest around february 2023 as if he knew it was going to happen so wondered if he was 77th brigade or somekind of op?


    I hear so many predictions in this game that I honestly think it's part of the manipulation to keep us coming back for more. But how often do people review their previous predictions to see how good they were? I've got an idea for a project to create a database of all these predictions so I can analyse how accurate it all is. 

  • Create New...