Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Campion

  1. 1 hour ago, Jason57 said:

    I tried meditation, but i wasn't sure I was doing it right.


    If we approach this with an intention of getting something out of it for ourselves, even spiritual wisdom, it's still an ego desire, but that's ok, we are where we are. The only meditation not done right is one that's not done at all. Here's a resource which I'm finding helpful at the moment. 



  2. 12 minutes ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

    The origin of the name ISRAEL is disputed but seems to be on the lines of 'someone who battled with God and survived'. If this refers to an adversary, then it could be a cryptic reference to Satan/Lucifer and - by extension - Judas/Judah. 


    The God referred to here is El, originally a polytheistic pagan name for God, usually a chief God. So the name Israel (which was given to Jacob in Genesis 32.28), probably predates monotheistic Judaism. Otherwise wouldn't their country be called Isr-Yahweh. Oh, but that name shouldn't be spoken out loud, maybe that's why they settled on Israel. 

  3. 19 minutes ago, Campion said:

     I try to avoid using the word myself, am I being pedantic or just clear and logical?


    I actually go further than just this example, there are other distorted words in the "equality and diversity" space. When you look up the meanings of the suffixes -ism and -ist it becomes clear that words like racism, racist, sexism, sexist have been twisted to mean something negative. 


    Compare with a word like Buddhism, which simply means the movement following the teachings of the Buddha, not discrimination against the Buddhists. Imo this is an example of how academia has been taken over by ideologues who are confusing us with cognitive dissonance. It's part of the Illuminati spell to cloud our thinking. 


    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  4. 15 minutes ago, shabbirss said:

    in fact, all the people over there are semitic - they all speak the semitic languages and are of semitic bloodlines.
    how did anti-semite become so limited to jews and israel


    Good question, there's history to this which dates back to Germany in 1860 and a debate between Moritz Steinschneider and Ernest Renan. Steinschneider was the one who first used the term anti-semitism to refer to Jews only, later on in the 1870s Wilhelm Marr carried on the trend. 


    It could have remained as a local oddity in 19th C Germany but spread out to other European countries. I try to avoid using the word myself, am I being pedantic or just clear and logical? After all, the logical fallacy works both ways: not all Semites are Jews, and not all Jews are Semites (ie speak a Semitic language as their native tongue). 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  5. 2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    here they go speaking about 'the anglo saxons' again: we are being set up here to take the fall for the crimes of the sabbatean-jews

    6 Nov, 09:53Updated at: 09:57

    Lavrov blames Anglo-Saxons for pushing Middle East towards big war


    Accuse your enemies of what you yourself are doing, it's an old tactic. I guess we're not the intended audience for this, and I found another quote from him which takes it to the next stage of threatening retaliation. Now of course Tass is a Russian news agency and the quote below is from a Chinese website so perhaps this is more about cementing the bond between those two countries. 


    "6th November 2023 – (Moscow) In a recent address at the International RUSSIA EXPO’s Znanie (Knowledge) marathon, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed the necessity for Russia to introduce reciprocal measures against diplomatic missions of Western countries. Lavrov highlighted that European countries, along with the United States and Canada, have severed ties with Russia, leaving discussions solely focused on the functioning of diplomatic missions, such as embassies and consulate generals. These missions have encountered significant obstacles, ranging from conducting financial transactions to ensuring their own security.


    Lavrov emphasised that Russia’s response, which involves creating technical difficulties for the operations of Western embassies, is not intended to cause harm but is instead based on the diplomatic principle of reciprocity. He explained that these measures are a direct consequence of Western countries refusing to engage in dialogue through any other means. Lavrov asserted that Western nations only comprehend the language of force, leaving Russia with no alternative but to respond in kind."




    Mind you I find it refreshing to see the name Anglo-Saxon used, our own overlords don't use our indigenous tribal names any more but prefer us to call ourselves white British or something similar. Lavrov has a poor grasp of ancestry if he thinks Joe Biden or Rishi Sunak are Anglo-Saxon or that the Anglos have been in charge here for the past 957 years! 

    • Like 2
  6. 3 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

    Many decades ago, there was a TV programme called The Stone Tape which explored this (fiction). Don't know if you can still get it. Quite scary when you are a teenager.


    The stone tape theory gets regularly mentioned in ghost hunting programmes, it helps explain why sightings are often very repetitive and the ghosts don't move very far away. It's just a theory though. 

    • Like 1
  7. 3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:



    Those diversity fans love the EU too with its open borders. So never mind a one nation solution just for IsraelPalestine, how about they apply their own logic and start supporting a Middle East Union with open borders and economic union for the whole region. 

    • Like 2
  8. 13 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

    I know the oy vey folks like you won't care, but Russians have boasted that the Middle East happenings have taken attention off Ukraine.


    I've heard the idea that the US can only fight two wars at once, but surely the msm can report more than one at a time if they want to? They're deliberately shifting attention to where they want our thoughts to be. 


    And another curious thing is why should Zelensky even care what the mass of us ordinary westerners get to see about the war over there as long as he gets the cash and weapons from our governments. What difference does it make to the progress of the war? It's not like we get a say in it or even know the full truth of what's happening. It's almost as if media coverage exists for another purpose, to control what we think and when. 

    • Like 1
  9. 2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

    They want you on the streets with all the Marxian filth ranting about the West and NATO.


    Yes they want us to hate ourselves, and this poison has spread into the "conspiracy theory community" too. Just look at how many conspiracies and wikileaks relate to westerners behaving badly compared to natives from other continents. 

    • Like 1
  10. 1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

    I don't believe they're truly Christian either. Those that we're not allowed to criticize don't want Britian or the US coming out on top though. I know that, because I actually listen to what these scoundrels say when they think we're not listening.


    There was that "defender of faith" speech in the 90s and when Charles started expressing admiration for Islam I remember some muslims were saying that he might convert, or was already a crypto muslim. I didn't believe it at the time, I thought he was more of a dreamer, but with the progress of new age syncretism I'm not so sure. 

    • Like 3
  11. 43 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:






    "Leftists admit mass immigration is equivalent to colonisation. They see it as payback for Britain’s history…" 


    Even by their own flaky logic how would they explain that some ex-imperial countries are more colonised than others? Some like the Turks are still proud of their past and others like ours are ashamed, so there must be cultural differences in how people get educated about these issues. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  12. 4 hours ago, Mr H said:

    Revisiting this topic ...


    I think if humans were mature and loving then you just get rid of borders and folks just live where they like 


    But the way we act today. I mean people with two different opinions can't even get along nowadays let alone multiple cultures . ..


    I've actually heard socialists and hardcore liberals suggest borderless living, all of them westerners. But I'm inclined to think that we're hard wired in our DNA to thrive best in moderate sized communities and when too many of us get together we fragment, start competing and create new borders between neighbourhoods etc. This is how we evolved for the majority of our pre-history but since the advent of city-states and countries we need to club together in larger numbers for safety and trade, so we've expanded in size and complexity. 


    Do borders exist in nature? Well we're a social species and need to live in communities; try doing a search on pictures of wolf pack territories and what happens is that the territories are roughly similar sizes and the wolves tend to respect the borders without creating empires. Of course we're a different species to wolves but I think we should take anthropological knowledge into account for our politics. 


    www.reddit.com   Satellite mapping of 6 different wolf packs in Voyageurs national park. 




    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. 3 hours ago, Mr H said:

    Survey today reported apparently Brits ok about immigration. Anyone get the survey?




    Most British people hold positive view of immigration, survey reveals

    Although Tories claim curbing net inflow of migrants is critical issue for voters, poll shows attitudes have evolved significantly


    Hi, I had a quick look at it and wanted to check the methodology, eg where they did it, was there a breakdown of who replied to the poll etc, but don't have time today to find the details. Also to do some background research into the National Centre for Social Research. I'm sceptical because of the size of the claimed increase in "very positive" since the previous surveys. 


    If the data is accurate it shows how far gone the natives are in our decline. I'm thinking that we shouldn't even call it immigration any more but colonisation. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  14. Good idea for a thread. I've listened to some modern nondual (neo-advaita) teachers like Rupert Spira, Jim Newman and Tony Parsons. Ramana Maharshi crops up in discussions, was he a common link to the modern movement? Also I can see pockets of nonduality in many other traditions, but using different vocabulary. 

  15. 5 hours ago, legion said:

    Yes. A ceasefire is needed. 


    Who is "us"...? 


    I added release of the hostages too, and how about also stopping the use of civilian human shields? Those would make a ceasefire more meaningful imo. 


    "Us" is a bit ambiguous, but in the context of your earlier post which I was replying to, let's say the UK. Should we get involved monitoring it, or perhaps the UN? I dunno, perhaps a ceasefire doesn't need a military to police it if there's enough journalists around to watch what's going on. 


    4 hours ago, legion said:

    Who exactly is your 'ethnic people'..? 


    White English / Anglo-Saxon. 


    4 hours ago, legion said:

    I disagree. This isn't an anti white / white guilt thing. 


    Then what's "European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project" all about? I appreciate it's not your words. 


    4 hours ago, legion said:

    But I do feel responsible enough as an Earthling to speak out against the mass slaughter of innocents in Gaza .. Which is not only totally immoral and abhorrent but also against International Law. 


    Agreed and commendable to call it out and try to stop it. But do you think this conflict gets disproportionately more attention than others which cost just as many lives? 

    • Like 1
  16. 2 hours ago, legion said:

    I'm shocked at your short sightedness. The members that liked your comment too.. 


    Many aspects to this atrocity. 


    1) 'Wars' abroad increase the likelihood of our criminal government shipping more immigrants into the UK all the the fake name of helping the greater good. 


    2) Our government are giving Israel the green light to massacre civilians against International Law, in plain sight. This sets a very dangerous precedent. Where and when is the next one greenlit..? How long until it gets uncomfortably closer to the UK..?


    3) If this situation in Gaza escalates into the surrounding countries then we have the very strong likely hood of a real physical WW3. Do you really think that the UK will be able to duck and miss the worldwide destruction and massive death count..? 


    This situation in Gaza has to stop and stop right now. Cease fire. Now. 


    Everyone around the world has to make their voices heard and send a message to the monsters in control that we the people will not tolerate this. 


    The UK govt has been involved in middle eastern politics since the demise of the Ottoman empire over a hundred years ago and this is where we are. Vicious ethnic wars (the Syrian war is still ongoing too), and mass immigration to the west. Would it have been any worse if the Europeans, Americans and Russians had withdrawn after WW1 and let the locals set up their own nations with borders which worked for them? 


    A ceasefire and release of all hostages would be very good but who should police it? 

  17. 56 minutes ago, legion said:




    "A Textbook Case of Genocide”

    Craig Murray 1 Nov 2023 


    The resignation letter of Craig Mokhiber, Director of the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, has gone viral on social media but most posts only show page one. Here is the full four page letter. 














    I got as far as "The European, ethno-nationalist, settler colonial project in Palestine ..." before realising this is just another anti-white spell. Yes what's going on there is terrible but my ethnic people is not responsible. 

    • Like 1
  18. 1 hour ago, Mr H said:

    So I was watching David Icke on the latest vid, the one on YouTube.


    He mentioned one of his theories was that we're all walking around with VR headsets on and it only comes off when we die.


    I had a similar experiences when I did Ayahuasca which I wanted to share.


    I also had the experience that we are wearing some kind of headset. And when I was "done" playing the game of life

     I died. Then Instantly appeared behind a stage. And everyone started applauding me. I was like wtf is going on? I just died.


    They were like well played, you did really well. Then all the characters from my life were there behind the stage and congratulating me for my performance. And even the people I hated and caused me harm. Really weird. Seemed so real. 


    Interesting, thanks for sharing. By a coincidence I had a thought this morning (before I read this), how do we know that the afterlife isn't another simulation? Just because there appears to be people there congratulating or judging us, it could be just another roll of film in the projector. 

    • Like 1
  • Create New...