Jump to content

Campion

Members
  • Posts

    1,720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Campion

  1. The way I heard it, Jews/Hebrews were a breakaway group of Canaanites who worshipped Jehovah and then took on some other religious myths from Babylon during their time there.
  2. Quite easily, if the short interviews are anything to go by. I guess if there's enough whites willing to pay $30 to have pseudo-intellectual mud thrown at them and take it, then someone's going to do it. It's hard to say how representative of Canadians they are though.
  3. What do you think were the motives behind the historical expulsions? Was it an actual hatred or powerful people protecting their own position? And back in the middle ages and early modern period, lots of other religious groups were hated, expelled, burned at the stake by whoever was the church in charge at the time. Not only Jews. Christians have hated other Christians, Pagans and Atheists in the past too, but the left wing academics don't call them "far right" for that do they?
  4. Do you just study (ie read about it) or practice it too?
  5. That's the crux of it! Am I: * An eternal soul who lives through many incarnations with free will, responsibility and ownership of them. * A psychological construct which thinks it's in charge. * Infinite love having a human experience and temporarily forgetting who it really is. * Nothing much, just a recurring thought pattern learned in early childhood. * Something else? There's a meditation practice based on "who am I" which is based on finding out through direct observation.
  6. That facial recognition is eerily similar to Nazis using phrenology to classify people into races. Fascism takes many forms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_policy_of_Nazi_Germany https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
  7. If all of us regular folks are pawns (which sounds right to me) then why support Israel in particular? Why not support all victims of the 'Satanists'.
  8. This reads like a textbook stawman piece by a couple of university sociologists. Putting the focus of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim ideology onto the far-right (ie whites), when most hatred of Jews and Muslims comes from, Muslims and Jews. Many also have the west. With all the fighting in the middle east stirred up by the puppet masters it's not hard to see why.
  9. Where does Iran fit into the picture? They're supposed to be financing and arming groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, so are they the quartermasters of the Islamic side of the dialectic, with the US likewise for Israel?
  10. Some random thoughts, make of it what you will. I first thought the vertical eyes reminded me of reptile eyes. Snakes can look like they're smiling. Then I remembered that cats also have vertical eyes, and a smile. Maybe a connection with the Cheshire Cat and Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland. Also disembodied heads have symbolic meanings, going back to John the Baptist and the Templars.
  11. And they said that chemtrails is a conspiracy theory!
  12. Reminds me of Pussy Riot tho I don't think they left graffiti behind. The commies always seem to take aim at the Christian churches, as the Muslims are useful at undermining the white cultures too. Even though Islam is no friend of LGBT, who are being used.
  13. Anglos working together is prevented by calling it white supremacy and far right. It's not just one maniac involved, I've got you and numerous other folks to thank for showing me that over the years.
  14. Indeed. And he's on thin ice because he's forgotten to tell us that Russia was founded on the roots of the Slavic Kievan Rus (where the name Russia comes from), who descended from some Vikings called Varangians. Vikings being those well known invaders and pillagers. I wonder if Putin has done his ancestry DNA test, to see where his roots are? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia#Kievan_Rus' ... "The Varangians settled in the territories of present-day Belarus, Russia and Ukraine from the 8th and 9th centuries, and established the state of Kievan Rus' as well as the principalities of Polotsk and Turov. They also formed the Byzantine Varangian Guard, which later also included Anglo-Saxons. " So Russian ancestors were allied with us Anglos back in Byzantine times. And since the Varangians formed the Russian empire, he now wants us to take blame for Britain and the US? He's just taking advantage of our ignorance of history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varangians
  15. It's the US taxpayers paying for it, who also pay the people promoting it.
  16. I think the quotes need further inspection, just because they are so transparently wrong at first glance. Ie at the level which most people will see. 'Nothing is true, everything is permitted' is such an obvious nonsense coming from an evidently intelligent man, that imo it's either the delirious ramblings of someone on their deathbed (or after too much hashish), or there's a hidden message intended only for his initiates. 'Nothing is true' is a self-contradicting statement, as for it to be true it must also be false. If 'everything is permitted' then there is no authority able to give permission or withhold it. The esoteric meanings I can see are: Nothing is true means the ultimate truth is nothingness, emptiness or the void. This ties in with certain mystical teachings in Buddhism, Advaita and nondualism. Everything is permitted is the flip side. The ultimate truth is everything undivided, wholeness, infinity. And free will means you can do what you want, but so can everyone else. The universe (or God) doesn't stop criminals stealing or whatever, neither does it stop the rest of us clubbing together and creating a justice system to catch them and punish them. I'm allowed to defend myself against someone who wants to attack me. Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law. I see this one as a little test. Who does 'thou' refer to? Most people interpret it as the individual, so it means a lawless anarchy. Christians could read it as God's will, as the statement is similar to "Thy will be done". Thou (you) can also be plural so it can mean the will of the people. The ambiguity suggests it's throwing a question back at you: who are you? What is the self? That's also a well known approach in the eastern religions I mentioned. I'll add a caveat that I'm taking these quotes out of any context which the original authors may have had to explain them, so this is all my interpretation.
  17. Thanks Mac, it's good to have some more fleshing out the details of these groups like the sabbatean-frankists with names and dates etc. It makes it into a proper historical theory rather than just a vague 'conspiracy theory'.
  18. As far as I can tell, moral relativism and 'everything is permitted' are like fancy names for the Law_of_the_jungle and wiki has this to say about it: "The phrase was introduced in Rudyard Kipling's 1894 work The Jungle Book, where it described the behaviour of wolves in a pack." Which is interesting because we know that some species are social and live in groups like wolves and ants but some are solitary like spiders. In nature, morality seems to be no more than the survival instinct of each species whether social or solitary. Humans however have the faculty of abstract thought so we can conjecture beyond our instincts to things like absolute or objective morality. And act out of pure pleasure. According to standard science we evolved from apes who lived in social groups with their own social order and hierarchy, and throughout history most people lived in social groups with tightly knit rules, but recently we've seen a big increase in people believing in more individualistic ideas like 'do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law' and 'everything is permitted'. The full quote comes from the the last words of Hassan i Sabbah (the leader of the order of Assassins "Nothing is true, everything is permitted". This feeds into the breakdown of the old social order and its replacement with a new order. (As an aside, the Assassins were an Islamic order and secret society which existed at approximately the same time as the Knights Templar and I need to research them more, especially in regard to what happened after their official demise by the Mongols 37 years before the Templars were closed down.)
  19. There's a whole other thread about mass immigration, and another one on endocrine disrupting chemicals, so I won't labour the point here. But some of us are joining the dots between a system which is defertilising the native population at the same time as opening the gates to very different peoples with no intention of integration. Governments in many other countries have no problem controlling immigration; in the middle east, places like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have guest workers on temporary contracts to fill skill shortages as they don't want to change their whole civilisation, and they seem to recruit enough. "we're all mixed anyway" We did have plenty of diversity within the English indigenous population, eg northerners, southerners, west country folk etc but there was a sense of ethnic unity that has been lost now we have so many citizens who identify with other continents. Even if we end all immigration today imo it'll take hundreds of years and much communal conflict to regain the social cohesion that we've lost.
  20. I get why out govt would close down RT. What do you think about Aljazeera, whenever I look at them it's wall to wall Gaza. Afaik it's owned by the Qatar govt, and the middle east is divided up into goodies and baddies by our side. Divide and rule?
  21. They even make ordinary food toxic with their processing, so lord knows what this will do to us.
  22. We need something to at least ensure a minimum level of law and order. To avoid threats like gangsters, foreign invaders, military coup, revolutionaries, police state and dictatorship etc. Lots of countries have those when the civilian government becomes too weak and corrupt. Someone else is always waiting in the wings to bring out their weapons and take over. Yes I'm well aware that governments and political parties are controlled by the illuminati but I'm just talking about a baseline of stability for us to build a life and community. I'm meaning I don't want online voting which needs verification of identity and therefore it's not a secret ballot. My voting could be linked to the rest of my digital 'footprint' in the cloud and stored in a GCHQ database. No thanks. I've no problem with using computers to crunch the numbers after they've been counted and totalled up anonymously. That's already been going on for decades. Where I live we have paper ballot papers which you manually mark with a cross and they get put in sealed boxes and go to a counting room for your constituency to get counted manually in full public view. I did it once, I counted them into batches of 50 and there was a returning officer to check, flicking through the piles, and representatives of the parties closely watching. The ballot papers do have reference numbers on them though, so in theory they could be linked back to your record in the electoral register. But that would be more difficult for the authorities to do secretly, compared with a totally digital system. Yes there's risks of fraud, especially with postal voting which has had some attention, but computer systems can be manipulated too.
  23. This suggests that God is divided up into parts. I'm not judging your beliefs, many others also talk about having a divine spark within us etc. Hindus do namaste to the divine within each person, which is perhaps where the saying comes from that they have 300 million Gods (back when that was the population of India). Others believe that the separation into parts is just appearances and everything is really One. For me spirituality is all about investigating the oneness vs multiplicity, wholeness vs fragmentation, spirit vs ego, duality/nonduality, God/world. However we want to to express it.
  24. Indeed. We can see the condition of their existing satellite states like Belarus and Mongolia, why would we want to go that way?
  25. There's two different angles going on within the same discussion here. There's a colourblind economic argument about how to deal with what's called the population_pyramid so there's enough wealth to support the elderly. There's also an argument about ethnic replacement and whether we should be concerned about being converted from a mostly homogeneous population into a melting pot. Clearly the government has no interest in preserving the indigenous tribes. Money is colourblind. It is precisely because we expect the government to solve all our problems rather than taking responsibility for our own interests that we've got into this state. We have left our own institutions like the home-grown churches, fragmented our extended families and chosen a nanny state whose solution to the problem is to keep us in an infantile condition asking them for solutions. They don't care about us as members of the native culture, they treat everyone the same whether first generation immigrants or indigenous peoples. As long as we all march towards their authoritarian nanny technocracy.
×
×
  • Create New...