Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Campion

  1. We talk about Israel and Palestine as if they're two separate countries, but even before the current war Israel was exerting all this control and supervision of Gaza as if the relationship is more one of empire or satrapy. Even if the Palestinians do have elections and their own governors, they only have limited control of their own country anyway. I'm not saying I have an easy alternative to all this, but wouldn't it be better if a more neutral and independent group could do the supervising and control of Gaza until they're ready to do it themselves, such as UN peacekeepers and observers. It might help de-escalate things a bit.
  2. "Thoughts and feelings decide actions" Yes there does seem to be a close link here, but what's the process? I have thoughts about doing something, then after a short delay there's a physical action such as moving my arm and hand to do something. Are all steps in this process observable? Not for me, there's a part of this process where it goes underground (into what we could call the subconscious) before re-emerging into the light of consciousness as observation of the action. "Do I choose my thoughts?" Depends what you mean by 'I'. From the pov of the conscious mind, thoughts just seem to appear out of nowhere, yet that does seem unlikely in practice. We have accumulated a huge vocabulary and knowledge of language over our lives that resides somewhere, the dictionary in my mind is invisible until words are drawn out one at a time by some invisible process. I don't know enough neuro-science to prove the existence of the subconscious, just that it's a theory to explain the deficiencies of what we experience in consciousness which in itself can't explain where thoughts and feelings come from. Unless we believe in magic, something else must be going on which we can't see. So if in include my subconscious as part of 'I', then in this theory the thought-choosing process is something that occurs behind the veil in the dark side. Although I can't say what that process is yet, until science can detect it. It's a bit like when theoretical physicists postulate the existence of a particle to explain some anomaly in the evidencial data but don't have the equipment to detect it directly yet. In the subconscious theory, there is personal responsibility but it's at least partially in the subconscious. We can see the end results of the process, but not the whole process itself. That means things like self control and impulse control are likewise only partly visible. I appreciate this isn't terribly helpful in terms of holding people to account for their actions, which we still need to do for practical purposes of having a civilised society.
  3. It's not a climate crisis, it's climate clickbait. Reminds me of those qofficial posts we had a few months ago.
  4. Lol, I can't think of an answer which is relevant to Israel and I've already gone on a side-track. Is there another thread we could take this question?
  5. Yes it's no surprise here that all these agendas appear round the world at the same time, it's no coincidence, they are working together behind the scenes.
  6. I just noticed that he symbol IXXI can also be seen as M on top of W (or vice-versa W over M) and I was wondering what the WM / MW could stand for. Madonna Whore would fit and it could also be a sexual motif for Man over Woman (patriarchy) vs Woman over Man (feminism). Or the Freemasons symbol is also like a man and woman in missionary position.
  7. Nice analogy. I gave up watching the party conferences years ago when it became obvious they were just a show, and the ordinary members have no influence in setting the policies.
  8. I see a reflection of my body. Especially my face which I can't see except in reflection or image. An eye can't see itself, the teeth can't bite themselves. Can the mind be aware of itself?
  9. I get that you are presenting fascism and communism as a dialectic pair of apparent opposites both controlled by a single hidden hand. But can't we say the same for your Jesus 'n' Satan pairing as a good cop & bad cop routine to test us and see which way we turn. Who's the hidden hand behind those two?
  10. It's even worse that, mainstream white society actively suppresses its own members who do have an in-group preference with labels like racist and far-right. There's something very alienating and incongruent about belonging to an ethnic group which has been taught to hate itself. Our society encourages everyone to have some sort of identify, but to belong to a group and have a taboo on promoting it or desiring its growth and prospering is downright weird.
  11. Religion is one of the "protected characteristics" these days but things like membership of a secret society, being an aristocrat, going to public school etc aren't . So it isn't illegal for those groups to discriminate in favour of their people. Funny that.
  12. It would need your race put on your government identity like they did in Apartheid South Africa, look how well that worked out. What about mixed race people, do you pay 50% or 25% tax depending on your parents/grandparents? Besides, anyone can identify with whichever race they want, it's a social construct not a biological fact according to the left's current ideology, so what's to stop everyone identifying as black and defunding the whole government If they want race to be determined by physical characteristics instead, then these leftists will need to stop their opposition to scientific_racism and they'll be in league with the Nazis. The whole idea is hilarious let them keep this stuff coming, they're keeping up America's reputation as losing the plot. Which is perhaps the point of it, it's the kind of thing which is pushed by America's enemies abroad.
  13. Agreed, it's what we called resonant_frequency at school. If you use the same frequency as the natural oscillation of the object, or a simple multiple like 2x or 4x you can transmit the energy more efficiently. Like when an opera singer smashes a glass when they hit the right note. Or if the wind speed is resonant, and the damping insufficient it can blow down a bridge like the Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_1940
  14. Totally agree about the genocidal nature of USSR which killed many of its own people, I don't know how it compares with deaths in WW2 but definitely a very bad regime. In my terminology, globalist westerners like Churchill and Roosevelt represent the illuminati axis; but if it's a choice between illuminati, communists or fascists then god help us. We do need a political system which advocates for our people and can defend us against these threats but not under occupation by an empire.
  15. Well I heard the idea that Hitler invaded the USSR, breaking the non-aggression pact, because he needed oil due to the allies' blockade. What I've just learned is that there was a secret protocol in the pact which divided up eastern Europe between Germany and USSR. So, if true and Germany was going on a liberation spree, they were willing to throw half of eastern Europe to the communist wolves. Why ally themselves with Russia like that, were they unconfident of their chances of success and simply being realistic, or in some kind of real pact? I just want freedom and sovereignty for my own people. Occupation by illuminati, nazis, communists or whoever else isn't an acceptable option in my book. Happy to be allies with my brother tribes but I don't trust empires of any stripe. But yeah, I'm doing my some digging.
  16. Thanks, and no but I'll have a watch. Always glad to see alternative histories.
  17. I am precisely wondering why they didn't focus on defending themselves. Germany was strong enough to defeat Poland, France, the low countries, Norway etc, hold off Britain and get as far as Stalingrad and most of north Africa before getting overstretched. I know I'm not a military expert but surely that's taking a massive risk if all they needed was a defensive position for their own country? When one country starts doing that it forces the others to fight back, but with a defensive line there's a better chance they'll hold onto the territories they've taken over without a full-scale war. A bit like with the Ukraine war perhaps? The brothers you refer to in your earlier post with the German soldier saying "Bruder you killed me". Us ordinary folk the indigenous Europeans. Yes a lot of us were and are mind controlled by what I call the illuminati cult, but I'm looking at it to see if the Nazis fell into a trap when they went on their invasion spree, and made their downfall more likely.
  18. I don't know enough about them to give a good answer, like which ethnicity or nationality they call themselves. And I doubt if there's free speech or unbiased surveys to find out. From what little I do know, the Crimea has changed hands a lot over history, was given to Ukraine by Khrushchev in 1954 and taken back by force in 2014 (though will little resistance by the Ukrainians). Why do you think the Kiev regime is neo-nazi?
  19. It is getting dangerous to be open-minded about history, but thanks for the reply. I'm doing a kind of thought experiment, what if ... what if Germany had: stopped paying the WW1 reparations; demanded a refund on what they'd already paid; taken back the German lands taken from them and reasonably considered part of Germany [1]; built strong defensive positions on their new borders; voluntary repatriation of other ethnic groups and left it at that, concentrating on building themselves up inside their new borders. ( [1] It's debatable what to include here but we could include territory taken off Germany after WW1. I would say no to Austria (a separate country) and I don't know enough about Sudetenland to comment. I think it's good to have long-term historical borders which are accepted by all sides and if an ethnic group spreads beyond it's native borders that doesn't mean the newly occupied lands should be annexed. ) Would that have been a sustainable position, preventing a world war and the takeover of eastern Europe by the Russians? You're implying not because they were provoked? Well I don't know enough to give a good answer yet. But the choice which Germany took, meant they over-extended themselves as far as North Africa and Russia, as well as having the Americans drawn in, so they couldn't hold the line. It makes me wonder whether they were free of illuminati influence or if their choice of a brotherhood war in Europe and beyond was not in their interests from the start. If all of Europe is dominated by illuminati overlords then this history makes more sense to me. I'm trying to look at this long-term and blaming particular groups like Bolsheviks, Hitler's Nazis, the Cold War etc omits the big picture because those are milestones along the waypath of the ancient cult agenda.
  20. I didn't use the word but I'd say it means something like one country invading another territory and incorporating it into their own country. Rather than including it in an empire and allowing it to keep a separate identity. In this context we could talk about the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine, Sudetenland, Austria. And some disputed territory on the German/Polish borders.
  21. I'm willing to look at history with an open mind (or as much as I'm able with how I've been brought up). But I can't reconcile someone being a nationalist and invading other countries to take them over. That looks like imperialism. If the third reich had been confined to securing the borders and prosperity of the Germanic peoples without killing and invading other ethnic groups it'd have a bit more integrity. Yes there were some disputed territories that were taken off Germany after WW1 but they went way beyond that.
  22. I'm probably well behind on all this but I just noticed the numerology here IX XI = 911.
  23. β€œThe problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.” ― Charles Bukowski Though imo this isn't really a problem, it's a feature of the world that truth doesn't come easy and lots of people are lazy - including me sometimes lol .
  • Create New...