Looks like they're on to Russell Brand now. in Today's News Posted yesterday at 05:03 AM 5 hours ago, northern star said: Has to be said, Russell is very very late to the conspiracy party. But he spotted an opportunity and caught up, and is very popular because of it, which is why theyre onto making this a trophy case. They only take notice when these things become popular, as with MLK, John Lennon, Avicii etc etc. Maybe he does genuinely care about these issues and wouldnt stick his neck out otherwise. Agree Fluke - do these women accusers even exist, or are they a media creation? If this is going to be a serious case there will have to be some proof or its he said, she said. In other words, a nothing burger. Its also interesting the cases are ten years old or so, so the Demonic Cabal might make anything we've said online in the last ten years a hate crime. I expect that's what this is all about and Brand is being used as a catalyst. Yes, like many he is an opportunist of sorts. As I was washing up last night I was mulling over the many possibilities of what this is about after reading the forum, and one of the many thoughts I had was "if THEY are going after him, then that must mean he is a good guy/on the right side', and then I thought voila, is that what this is about? Are the 'Cabal' going after him to add credibility to Brand (in the truth community that is)? On any thread I have ever come across regarding Brand, going back to the early days, he has always divided opinion. Much like Trump, is it possible that they are attempting to 'prove' that Brand is on the side of 'truth'; because like me doing the washing up, I have seen it many times where people in the 'truth community' take these things as 'proof' that that said person must be 'one of us'; as in 'they would not go after him/her, if they weren't on the side of good'. It is just a thought, and as I have said earlier, these things tend to be multi-faceted, but there is no doubt that the attacks on Trump, Tate and now Brand, are adding some credibility to these people because as we know, all three have divided opinions in the 'truth community'. So maybe this is for US, and these people really are being moved into position of the organisers of 'the revolution'; maybe these types of people, are their contingency?