Jump to content

Deca

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,582

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Deca

    Another forum hacked - supporting Targeted individuals/Gangstalking

    in Censorship & Freedom Of Speech

    Posted

    8 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

     

    No im not the one who claims to be the authority on gangstalking round here. Or what is or isnt real..?

     

    Gangstalking is about disabling the victims but disability hate crime is playing into the nanny state bullshit.

     

    How can you talk about disability hate crime, then post a video attacking people who are claiming they are being harassed??

     

    See in your video your Greek weirdo friend @9:49 sticks his tongue out, classic subliminal gesture you see from these lower dimensional stalking fake freaks.

     

    Nobody claiming they are not being  harassed

    but is it because they are a victim of a "hate crime" or is it because people are paid to do i.e "gangstalking" them

     

    Another forum hacked - supporting Targeted individuals/Gangstalking

    in Censorship & Freedom Of Speech

    Posted · Edited by Deca

    9 minutes ago, Yasmina said:

    Is this relevant? I don't think Dawn has a disbability. @Dawn do you? 

    It's not whether she has or not ...... it whether other  people perceive her to having one ....saying your/or responding to being  "gangstalked" generally makes people think that so can be a Self-fulfilling prophecy   also the system do not recognize gangstalking and believes the people that claim it must be delusional  ...so really is not useful or helpful ....it's only a description and a belief ( there NO independent verifiable objective evidence to support the belief ) ...which generally as seen as a false one

     

     

    Technology Trends: 2020-2040

    in Technology, Transhumanism and AI

    Posted

    from the above link

    Quote

    An entirely new arsenal of weapons, based on devices designed to introduce subliminal messages or to alter the body's psychological and data-processing capabilities, might be used to incapacitate individuals. These weapons aim to control or alter the psyche, or to attack the various sensory and data-processing systems of the human organism. In both cases, the goal is to confuse or destroy the signals that normally keep the body in equilibrium. This article examines energy-based weapons, psychotronic weapons, and other developments designed to alter the ability of the human body to process stimuli. One consequence of this assessment is that the way we commonly use the term "information warfare" falls short when the individual soldier, not his equipment, becomes the target of attack.

     

    The real reason conspiracy theories work

    in General Chat

    Posted

    6 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    Deca!! What's your aim in posting that???  

     

    A video made by a couple of Know it all 23 year olds who know nothing about anything , discrediting the whole subject , lumping it in with FE and other non sense...

     

    People need to be more selective in their sources there are plenty of experts in this field who are now in their 60's and 70's ... springmier , jones , watt, icke , maxwell  where are their videos???  

    I posted it not to support them ....but to understand what the anti  "conspiracy theories"( again I thought many have moved on from this and call themselves truthers and  people that watch alternative media) debunkers are putting out .... thought you would have got that from my soy boy comment ...

    Technology Trends: 2020-2040

    in Technology, Transhumanism and AI

    Posted

    The report “Science & Technology Trends: 2020-2040” has been produced by the NATO Science and Technology Organization and draws upon insights of some 6000 scientists, engineers and analysts in NATO’s collaborative network. It provides an assessment of the emerging and disruptive technologies endorsed by NATO Heads of State and Government at their meeting in London last December, such as Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, robotics, space and bio technology and hypersonic weapons.  The report explains why these technologies are important to the Alliance and how they may develop over the next 20 years.

    ICNIRP Guidelines do not provide a restriction to specifically account for microwave hearing

    in Technology, Transhumanism and AI

    Posted

    Again I have more on this PDF ...but this is important "ICNIRP Guidelines do not provide a restriction to specifically account for microwave hearing" meaning the guideline levels would not restrict a microwave hearing effect taking place ....and goes back to this https://www.magdahavas.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_ELECTROMAGNETIC_RADIATION-RADIOWAVES_AND_MICROWAVES-EURASIAN_COMMUNIST_COUNTRIES.pdf

     

    high_standard-emf.PNG.9502396b174ae0706231570ebf952df2.PNG

    ICNIRP Guidelines do not provide a restriction to specifically account for microwave hearing

    in Technology, Transhumanism and AI

    Posted

    Hmm ... AUDITORY, VESTIBULAR, AND OCULAR FUNCTION

     

    A number of animal and some human studies have tested for potential effects of radio frequency EMFs on function and pathology of the auditory, vestibular, and ocular systems. Sub-millisecond pulses of radio frequency EMF can result in audible sound. Specifically, within the 200–3000 MHz EMF range, microwave hearing can result from brief(approximately 35–100ms) radio frequency pulses to the head, which cause thermoelastic expansion that is detected by sensory cells in the cochlea via the same processes involved in normal hearing. This phenomenon is perceived as a brief low-level noise, often described as a“click” or“buzzing.” For example, Röschmann (1991) applied 10-and 20-ms pulses at 2.45 GHz that caused a specific energy absorption (SA) of 4.5 mJ kg−1per pulse, and which was estimated to result in a temperature rise of approximately0.00001°C per pulse. These pulses were barely audible, suggesting that this corresponded to a sound at the hearing threshold. Although higher intensity SA pulses may result in more pronounced effects, there is no evidence that micro-wave hearing in any realistic exposure scenarios can affect health, and so the present Guidelines do not provide a restriction to specifically account for microwave hearing.


     

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...