Jump to content

RobSS

Members
  • Posts

    3,430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RobSS

  1. 5 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    i'm just helping you to understand that in time i will be proven right and you will be proven wrong

     

    You sound like a lot of Jehovah Witnesses - everyone is bad except themselves because only they see the truth, and so they constantly tell people how bad the world is to prove their own terrible personal reality.

     

  2. 1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

     

    not true. the whole point about what the tavistock institute does, just like the governments covid behavioural science unit is that you don't realise that you are being steered

     

    You're pointing the finger of blame again. But this thread is about questioning the Everyman character and what wisdom can be learned from this aspect of human nature.

     

    If you only want to focus on material reality and the red bricks, why don't you do your own thread on the subject? I might even be able to contribute my own knowledge to your red bricks.

     

     

  3. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    understanding more about what's going on IS wisdom

     

    its you that is trying to say that nothing really matters except what an individual WANTS to believe

     

    But once you've pointed the finger of blame, what then? The guillotine, and then what?

     

    The hand of Vengeance found the Bed
    To which the Purple Tyrant fled
    The iron hand crushd the Tyrants head
    And became a Tyrant in his stead


    William Blake

     

  4. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    this reminds me of debates that were had on the old forum

     

    the pirate council told people that the rainbow flag of the LGBT movement was freemasonic and this caused people to attack. They didn't like that at all and yet now here we are seeing the freemasons using the rainbow again in their covid scam

     

    There was another debate in which the pirate council said bowie was a kabbalist and that he and the kabbalist rock group led zepplin had been shagging young teenagers and once again this caused people to attack

     

    This was because they weren't looking at what is objectively true. They were only concerned with what they WANTED reality to be and they did not take kindly to someone rocking that boat

     

    You're giving irrelevant examples. Everyman FOOL characters are not in the LGBT movement or in Led Zepplin.

     

  5. 4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    the only difference here is that a jab is injected into your bloodstream whilst a movie is injected into your psyche

     

     

    But you don't have to accept everything into your psyche that you see in film or book. You can chose and take responsibility for those choices. It's a waste of time just blaming books or films. You don't have to accept everything. You can sort the wheat from the chaff. Then the bay isn't thrown our with the weeds or the bathwater.

     

  6. 6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    who gives a crap what frodo does....frodo isn't real

     

    What is real. Everything in reality is an idea.

     

    6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    I'm talking about what is being done alchemically to society through their exposure to popular culture created by occultists pushing certain agendas

     

    is society becoming more free right now or less free? is it becoming more degenerate or less degenerate?

     

    why do we see this explosion of occultic popular culture coming out of the same cliques around about the same time?

     

    Why are you worried about being a therapist to everyone? That's an impossible task!

     

    It's far more productive to learn wisdom that in turn will inspire other people to learn wisdom.

     

  7. 10 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    no i go even deeper than you and ask: 'what is the author trying to get me to think and perceive through this process that they have crafted?'

     

    That's what I am doing but it is that what you're really though? All I see is you looking at the personality and digging the dirt. I don't see you questioning much about the story and the characters hardly at all.

     

  8. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    no i go even deeper than you and ask: 'what is the author trying to get me to think and perceive through this process that they have crafted?'

     

    Which leads to the culture of blame and complaining. Complaining about what people do and what they were involved in, etc., has nothing to do with learning the deeper and more valuable insights that can be learned from characters who interact with life in a way that teaches lessons and raises question about morality and the human condition. What is the matrix? What is the significance of the Grail? Why did Klingsor turn to evil? Who is Kundry really? Who does the Grail serve? Answers to these questions, and many more, will never come in the all the time spent digging the dirt on people and finding blame.

     

  9. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    by using the template given you ie kiplings story and kordas interpretation of it you are trusting yourself to their process but what if the process itself is inherently flawed?

     

    I'm not trusting them at all. Like I said, I'm not so much interested in the cult of personality. I'm more interested in the realms of human experiences.

     

  10. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    but according to the christians you shouldn't be using magic at all!

     

    the theosophists forbade their members to engage with practical magic and a schism opened up within the hermetic order of the golden dawn over the same point

     

    I agree, and Frodo renounces magic. Harry Potter though can't get enough of it.

     

  11. 4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    no!

     

    That is moral reletavism

     

    you don't get to choose your own reality. You get to choose how you engage with this reality and that is not the same thing. one leads to truth and the other leads to delusion and mental illness

     

    How you engage with this reality determines what kind of reality you have, so you're really just playing with words. What leads to mental illness is not learning wisdom and only focusing on material reality and the culture of blame.

     

  12. 2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    no i don't think you are doing that

     

    i think you are simply looking to see what you WANT to see in it, instead of standing back and seeing if their is a purpose behind its design

     

    I want to see what's in the blue bricks. What do characters such as Mowgli, Frodo and Parsifal learn in their adventures. That's the kind of questions I ask. You only want to look at the outer red bricks.

     

  13. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    but i AM taking responsiblity for my own reality by asking deeper questions

     

    it is you who is entreating us to blindly trust in this process that these freemasons have created

     

    Where have i said you should blindly trust any process? I've never said any such thing! I actually said in the post you replied to that do actually need to take responsibility for your own reality, so I'm really puzzled by your comprehension here.

     

     

  14. 2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

    you have another thread on shelob from the lord of the rings which you asked me to leave so i have but i feel the argument i'm trying to make there is easier than the argument in jungle book because i have less familiarity with the jungle book.

     

    But with the lord of the rings there is a different conception of reality being offered which is not the orthodox christian one. If we consider works like harry potter and the lord of the rings they normalise the occult and encourage the young to view the occult favourably. Arguably therefore the elites who control the airwaves would want to create and push those kind of stories because it is helping them to remake the world in their own image

     

    It depends what you mean by "orthodox Christian". I believe that LotR is Christian and nothing conflicts with the Bible, but of course, the bible is the ultimate authority and not the commentary of man, which is where things like the Talmud are in gross error, for inverting truths and wisdom.

     

    Regarding 'Harry Potter' there are two main schools of thought. Harry Potter uses magic as a means to get through life. The latter renounced magic and the occult, and in so doing had to rely on his skills that could only originate from within. This gave him the ability to overcome his lower self and defeat evil. Frodo does not rely on the occult. Gandalf did, but it meant he wasn't able to go as far as Frodo.

     

  15. 5 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    but i'm not being dismissive rob. I am engaging with the subject of discussion

     

    I just don't share your perception of what is going on

     

    so your perception is that the elite are secretly telling us what they are doing through childrens programmes to circumvent some sort of law of karma

     

    But my perception is that the 'art' is itself crafted by magicians to have a particular psychic impact on the viewer that feeds into their agenda of control. I might not necessarily have a grasp on the full nuts and bolts of how that works on that level but i believe that the dark occultists do as they have a grasp of human psychology that far surpases what is currently within the scientific textbooks. I believe they are manipulating people on a subconscious level through mass media

     

    I addressed these things here:

     

    https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/25220-the-jungle-book-as-an-allegory-for-political-society-the-conflicts-between-man-nature/&do=findComment&comment=380946

     

    In particular, the quote by C.S. Lewis, through Aslan (Jesus Christ):

     

    "They have chosen cunning instead of belief. Their prison is only in their minds, yet they are in that prison; and so afraid of being taken in that they cannot be taken out."

     

  16. 6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    so you look at the trees while i step back and see how the trees are actually part of a big forest

     

    No, in the context of the metaphor, "Not being able to see the wood for the trees", I look at the wood.

     

    There is spirit and then there's material reality. I think of spirit as being the 'blue bricks' and 'material reality' as being the 'red bricks'. You like to focus on the 'red bricks'.

     

  17. 13 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    we can ask what exactly is the impact going to be on the human psyche of these images being beamed in through peoples eyeballs?

     

    The impact they have is entirely up to you as you're responsible for creating your own reality. Personal reality cannot be created by blaming other people. So it's not the stories that are evil or bad, it's how they are viewed. Most people just dismiss them and in so doing they throw the baby out of the bathwater. That's why the illuminati place put the truth where conceited minds won't look.

     

    13 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    the reason i ask is because i don't trust the people who make these movies and when we consider the role of sabbatean jews like freud in dream analysis we can wonder just what kind of impact these things are going to have on our inner world

     

    You have to take responsibility for your own reality instead of looking for blame and walling in distrust. For example, at the end of C.S. Lewis's Narnia tale, "The Last Battle", Aslan (Jesus Christ), says: 


    "They have chosen cunning instead of belief. Their prison is only in their minds, yet they are in that prison; and so afraid of being taken in that they cannot be taken out."

     

    The astral is merely the matrix. You can't leave the matrix unless you understand what the matrix is and take responsibility for your own reality.

     

  18. 9 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    but why are the illuminati so concerned with creating things that will be consumed by the youth whether its childrens cartoons or the pop music industry?

     

    what are they trying to do to people on the psychic level?

     

    The illuminati have a duty to reveal their agenda in advance but they conceal truths in places where most people are less likely to look, and I explained the reasoning for that already, in the post you replied to:

     

    It's the last place a conceited person with the wrong attitude would look. In order to find inner revelation, the heart needs to be open, and the intellect needs to be at the service of the spirit. Proud people who value their intellects and academic knowledge, above anything else, are too busy concerning themselves with how to impress others with their cleverness and status. "That's all part of the dream world, only suitable for children, and dreamers", they say, and so they look down on such things from a position of superiority, as they believe their brain's intellect is far superior to the spirit that comes from the heart.

     

  19. 1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

     

    ok but sorry to go off on a conspiracy tangent again but korda sounds like he may have had some dodgy connections himself

     

    now you might ask but what harm could there possibly be in a cartoon of jungle book but i guess we could ask the same question of tv itself or of the internet as for most of the 200,000 years of modern humans we have not had these things. They have come very suddenly, in the flash of an eye and we really don't know what the psychic impact of these things will be. Society is the testtube of the tavistock institute. This piece discusses the kordas:

     

    How British intelligence shaped the
    u. S. 'entertainment industry'
    by Michael J. Minnicino

    https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n41-19821026/eirv09n41-19821026_060-how_british_intelligence_shaped.pdf

     

    You seem to be falling back on your default position of throwing the baby out with the bathwater all the time. By not focusing on the kernel of the truths, there's the risk of not seeing the wood for the trees. Personalities are interesting but they should not occult the truths, so therefore, I'm more interested in Mowgli than I am of Rudyard Kipling, I'm more interested in Milo than I am of Norton Juster, I'm more interested in Pinocchio than I am of Carlo Collodi, I'm more interested in Gulliver than I am in Jonathan Swift, I'm more interested in Parsifal than I am in Richard Wagner, etc. I'm not interested in the cult of personality.

     

  20. A lot of movies reveal the cabal's hidden agenda, and the true nature of our make-believe world, but relatively few do so in a way that's beneficial to the viewer... in a way that's spiritually uplifting, inspiring and confidence building.

     

    For uplifting films I'd recommend films made for children, but ones that are also made with adult satisfaction in mind. Fairy tales contain a lot of positive information. Books are the ideal medium, but every so often, a director comes along who adds insights to a classic tale that are unique and full of value. Of course, there are also many stories and films that come somewhere in the middle.

     

    Fairy tales were originally much darker than the ones most people have come to know through writers such as Hans Christian Anderson, and the Brothers Grimm. A lot of artists over the past century and a half have taken very old ideas and reworked the essence of these stories in such a way so as to create an almost original appearing story, and in some cases they no longer even appear to be simple fairy tales, but they still have a lot of the essential information embedded in them that are seeds for growth, and new ideas.

     

    Why are stories made for children that also satisfy adults, the best places to find information? It's the last place a conceited person with the wrong attitude would look. In order to find inner revelation, the heart needs to be open, and the intellect needs to be at the service of the spirit. Proud people who value their intellects and academic knowledge, above anything else, are too busy concerning themselves with how to impress others with their cleverness and status. "That's all part of the dream world, only suitable for children, and dreamers", they say, and so they look down on such things from a position of superiority, as they believe their brain's intellect is far superior to the spirit that comes from the heart.

     

  21. I strongly identify with Mowgli. He was brought up by wolves and animals who taught him the ropes and the secrets of the jungle clan. I grew up close to the street with wild skinheads and subsequently had many encounters along the way, similar to Mowgli with his encounter with Shere Khan. I also identify with Milo, Frodo, Pinocchio, Gulliver, Jack, and Aladdin, who was also a street urchin, but I'm going to start a new thread on this in order to explore the topic more fully and see if other people feel the same about these Everyperson stories. I say 'person' because there are also Alice and Dorothy, two tourists of the astral realm who shouldn't be neglected or forgotten, and sometimes they come as a pair, like Hansel and Gretel, who had an encounter with a witch.

     

  22. 3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    do you not find it interesting though how boris is suddenly being demonised now in the media?

     

    Are we supposed to believe that all those journalists who regularly dine with the politicians didn't know about these parties until now?

     

    so i think they are just moving a chess piece around. Boris is tainted by the lockdowns so they want a fresh reputation to carry us into a deeper level of the clownworld shitshow

     

    Humans are very resourceful at keeping above it all, but it is quite a show. The critical thing is not having attachments and to leave the Titanic.

     

×
×
  • Create New...