Jump to content

RobSS

Members
  • Posts

    3,430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by RobSS

  1. If you have nothing to say, why post? I'm still waiting to hear why you associate brown people with bigamists. Shameful.
  2. I have not misrepresented Hitler. I quoted exactly what he wrote, and any person who is truly awake can see that he believed Aryans were inherently a superior race. It's you who is woke. You're not woke in the left political sense, but your the opposite side of the same coin.
  3. Yes, I agree with that but I've never stated otherwise. Do you acknowledge that or are you tilting at windmills? Again, this is nothing to do with what I've claimed. Of course, any kind of genocide is abhorrent, but you're now just shifting the goal post. Originally, we were discussing Hitler and in particular my comment that it's not woke to say Hitler believed Aryans were inherently supreme as a race. You're not even addressing that now.
  4. Thanks for the clarification which I have no qualms with. So there's a difference between a nation as political state and a nation as an ethnic entity. Nationalism is usually understood to be an identification, not just with the nation as an ethnic group but also an identification with the political structure, which is why Nationalists wave flags (all occult symbols from the Pagan Ancient Mystery Religion) and often sing praises to the leader, whether it be the monarch or the political ruler. That is the kind of nationalism that is under the control of the Devil in Christian beliefs.
  5. Good, we're getting back on topic by mentioning woke, however, I don't think it is woke to state that Hitler believed Aryans were superior to other races. I agree with you completely that's what Hitler believed in the at the time, but in his writings it's very clear that Hitler did not believe Aryans were superior just temporarily. He believed Aryans were supreme for as long as they were in the world.
  6. The following is from a speech by Alex Thompson. He explains very well what went wrong with present ideas about what a nation is. Here's a link to the video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BR1bWOyft7gi/ The original law, God’s law, was thundered from a mountaintop in the wilderness. Its purpose was to call a nation out of slavery — slavery to human masters and slavery to sin. In those days, that nation, called Israel, was governed by the law of God, administered by judges. They had no other form of government. No king, no parliament, no bureaucrats, no police. They needed none. They were governed by the word of God. But our ancestors were not happy: they looked at other nations, governed by kings and tyrants and said, “We want to be like them. We want a king to judge us.” The Lord said: “They have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.” But, nevertheless, the Lord respected their choice. Yet he did warn them what sort of king they would have: one that would take their sons and daughters into his own service. One that would regulate and regiment the people. One that would steal from the people and hand the proceeds to his own servants. One that would take a proportion of everything they earned and hand it to another. Does any of this sound familiar? But our ancestors did not listen; they said: “Nay; but we will have a king over us; that we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.” They rejected rule by God and by God's law, not because this made them free, but because they could not shoulder the responsibility that it places on every man and woman: to made make judgements, decisions and commitments; to stand — alone, if necessary — for the truth and for justice. They rejected God because being ruled by a man, and being told what to do, was easier. They did not want the law of God, a law that they would need to place in their hearts and to defend. Instead, they wanted a ruler to think for them and to fight their battles. Slaves they had been, and slaves they still were in their hearts. Of course, we no longer have a king, as our ancestors wanted. We have gone a stage further. We have politicians. Our Queen Elizabeth sits on her ancient throne, but does not reign. She might hear and see the travails of the people, but she does not speak on our behalf. She keeps the throne in being, nothing else. She refuses to fight our battles. She will not lead. No, we have politicians now. Do you think that is better or worse? A king or queen is born into their position; they might turn out to be capable or incapable, dilettante or accomplished, harsh or gentle, merciful or vindictive. A politician, on the other hand, is selected. Chosen from a vast range of wannabes, based on their abilities. Their ability to lie convincingly and not get caught. Their willingness to steal from the people and to use the proceeds to buy loyalty from those they need. Their ability to prey on people’s fears. Their skills in the manipulation of public opinion. And their ruthlessness with former friends who stand in their way. To these people, selected from the worst, to be the worst, we have handed over power to rule us. And worse still, we call their pronouncements and statutes “laws”. They are not laws, they are the opposite of laws. They are rules for slaves. The law is for free men and women who want to live free and be free in their hearts.
  7. It was never my intention to trash this thread. I'm now actually doing my best to keep this thread on topic...
  8. Yes, but we were discussing what Hitler believed and he did believe in Aryan supremacy, but please let's not take this thread off topic.
  9. Hitler clearly thought Arians were superior. but we're going off topic. Even though it's strictly not related, I don't mind this being discussed in this thread:
  10. When I read Mein Kampf, it was clear to me that Hitler believed the Aryan race was the supreme race in the world.
  11. Okay, this is interesting but in order to clarify things, we need more specifics. When you say a nation is "a group of people", how would you define that in more detail? For example, would it include their political system? Would it include their political leader or king or Queen? "Tribes"... let's first clarify what we mean by "tribes" and "nations". Don't forget that God never wanted the Israelites to be ruled by a king.
  12. When I read the article, it said, "Ayran supremacy in the world". If it said otherwise, please quote where, thanks...
  13. It was a straw man because I didn't make the claim that you said I made. I disagree. I was having a debate with a Christian. That was the context, so it was only fair that Jesus Christ was part of the conversation. Which is why I've never had anything to do with what I call Churchianity!
  14. In the light of the above post, how any one calling themselves a Christian can believe in Nationalism is beyond me, when Nations owe their allegiance to the Devil.
  15. I didn't say Hitler wanted to take over the world! You're tilting at windmills. I said Hitler believed in Aryan Supremacy which is a load of Lucifarian nonsense. Your above comment is a straw man - I've never advocated anyone should be forced to live under any man-made political or religious institution. BLM are puppets, just like Hitler, pushing Satan's system of things on Earth. My world view is that the only solution is Jesus Christ. Other than that, I don't follow any man-man label or ideology, so I'm happy not have the same world view as you, which is very limited from a spiritual perspective.
  16. Please don't put words into my mouth. I didn't write that Hitler said "European man was a light of the world akin to Christ". You're building up straw man arguments, and there nothing woke about what I wrote. But Hitler went on to say that, ""He is the Prometheus of mankind from whose bright forehead the divine spark of genius has sprung at all times". All I'm pointing out is that what he's stating is NOT based on the Bible. It's based on his own occult belief system, which was witchcraft and the occult, no different to where the Synagogue of Satan got their beliefs from. Yes, the Ancient Pagan Mystery School tradition, which is the same source as Freemasonry and the aforementioned Synagogue of Satan. It's not from Jesus Christ.
  17. So where did Hitler's racial ideology come from? Was it inspired by Jesus Christ or occult spiritual psychobabble? Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf: "All the human culture, all the results of art, science, and technology that we see before us today, are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan. This very fact admits of the not unfounded inference that he alone was the founder of all higher humanity, therefore representing the prototype of all that we understand by the word "man." He is the Prometheus of mankind from whose bright forehead the divine spark of genius has sprung at all times.... Exclude him- -and perhaps after a few thousand years darkness will again descend on the earth, human culture will pass, and the world turn to a desert." According to Hitler, the light of this world is not Jesus Christ, but the Aryan race. Satan must've been rubbing his hands with this puppet of his!
  18. All following an ideology conjured up by black magicians in the Nazi party, like Heinrich Himmler! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3498908/Heinrich-Himmler-s-stash-books-witchcraft-discovered-Czech-library-hidden-50-years.html Heinrich Himmler's stash of books on witchcraft is discovered in Czech library after being hidden for 50 years Excerpt: A rare library of books on witches and the occult that was assembled by Nazi SS chief Heinrich Himmler in the war has been discovered in the Czech Republic. Himmler was obsessed with the occult and mysticism, believing the hocus-pocus books held the key to Ayran supremacy in the world. The books - part of a 13,000-strong collection - were found in a depot of the National Library of Czech Republic near Prague which has not been accessed since the 1950s. Norwegian Masonic researcher Bjørn Helge Horrisland told the Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang that some of the books come from the library of the Norwegian order of Freemasons in Oslo, seized during the Nazi occupation of the country. In 1935 Himmler founded the 'H Sonderkommando' - H standing for Hexe, the German word for witch - to collate as much material as possible on sorcery, the occult and the supernatural. The bulk of the collection was called the 'Witches Library' and concentrated on witches and their persecution in medieval Germany.
  19. I agree life was great but they were living in a false paradigm, the architect of which were Zionist bankers and the Eastern American bankers! The Nazi "utopia" was doomed to failure.
  20. Sounds like you just want to have an argument to me..,
  21. Of course it's about global supremacy. It's Satan's plan to usher in a counterfeit global kingdom on Earth as a substitute for the one ordained by God. Naturally, their plan will fail.
×
×
  • Create New...