.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Janet W
-
Posts
887 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Janet W
-
-
What ever happened to "weapons expert" Mark Steele? A couple of years ago he was busy showing street-lights with high-voltage capacitors in standard switched-mode power supplies and pointing to quarter-wave vertical UHF monopole antennas tuned to about 880 MHz and claiming his electronics expertise indicated it's all part of a microwave phased energy weapon. Anyone with even a bit of electronics knowledge knew that he was talking bollox. All SMPS contain high voltage capacitors, and quarter-wave vertical antennas cut for about 800MHz are neither part of a phased array nor designed for microwaves.
So why does a street light need an antenna anyway? It's just used for sensing tiny amounts of telemetry data and fault reporting. Pretty scary ehh...?
If he was right all along he must have amassed huge quantities of evidence by now. I wonder where it is...? -
Fantastic! A reply!
-
So, did anyone spot it?
-
Hi there. More HAARP testing in a few days. Since nothing spectacular happened last time it was operated (or did I miss it?) earlier in the year, maybe this time...?
For those with a short wave radio living in the reception zone, below is the transmission schedule complete with frequencies so anyone can check the suspicious activity.
It's so powerful that anyone with a basic SW radio can receive the signal themselves, so it's not as if it can be operated clandestinely.
https://ghostsintheairglow.space/transmission/october-2022 -
9 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:
if anyone wants to find out what the sun is up to
there was some fear porn about 2 coronal mass ejections one after the other reaching earth today
and knocking stuff out
Yes, that's a good site with real data aimed at radio amateurs and other users of the HF spectrum. The nonsense about the CME/flare knocking stuff out is as you say fear porn written by non-technical hack who just want a catchy/scary story - sound familiar? It does knock out HF communication and some HF radar, but unless you have any dealing with that branch of the RF spectrum it'll pass by without 99% of people noticing - although you might get a good auroral display...
-
1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:
What's your informed opinion then?
I'm not a meteorologist either, but I do have a science background and know how to assess data. My partner is a statistician and he can assess cumulative data that the 40C in the UK (and Europe) is in statistical terms 'a super deviation'. Meaning it is very unusual and not likely caused by random variation. But it's the recent cumulative data that is also somewhat worrying.
Many of these threads are full of posts by well-meaning people who read some non-scientific sites and just repeat stuff without understanding the evidence; but it fits with their world view, so must be true and anyone contradicting them is obviously part of the conspiracy.
You know, it would really be refreshing if we had some amateur experts (cos all the professionals are obviously part of the cover-up) who understand the data, the accuracy (or not) of the observations, and who can cut through the conspiratorial bull sh!t. Yes, 'experts' do get quoted here sometimes, but by people who are not really equipped to know if they really are 'experts' or just self publicists.Unfortunately true experts rarely join these forums because they know they'd be wasting their time presenting information to those whose minds are made up, and so have probably got better things to do. That's a shame because alternative views and evidence-based discussion is good for everyone.
-
1
-
-
Are there any amateur meteorologists on the forum who can give some informed input regarding the recent UK weather?
-
1
-
-
Blimey. It's been a few hours since this tragedy. Has no one here yet repeated the this-is-to-promote-gun-control, false-flag, crisis actors memes yet?
-
1
-
-
Just now, Macnamara said:
you've already been provided with a clip of an ex FBI agent telling you two airbases they are taking off from and also an ex military woman who was in charge of handling the manifest for what came onto military bases telling you that there were vast quantities of certain substances coming onto the bases unaccounted for. Why have you ignored these?
Not ignored. The ex-military woman isn't saying anything new, nor presenting any evidence. I can stand up and just claim that sort of stuff - though not as young or glam! Ted Gunderson is interesting. Doing a bit of research reveals he made numerous extraordinary claims, like 4,000 ritual sacrifices in NYC annually...
-
2 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:
Why would it be done in secret if its for humanitarian reasons?
Big pharma? and again why would it need to be done in secret if everyone within the loop believes it is a large humanitarian project?
OK. Let's just find someone who is involved in this massive industrial process. Look at the skies some days. Seemingly thick with the stuff. If it's as pervasive as many think - given the evidence in the skies - it must be a massive industrial process. Where are the raw materials coming from, how are they being transported, where are they being processed and which planes are specifically responsible?
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, sock muppet said:
You seem to be knowledgeable about the construction and workings of jet engines including the fuel used, so you must also be aware that part of the testing phase for an engines approval involves throwing chickens into the intake at full thrust that the engine has to survive, not only this but also have water pumped into the intake until it extinguishes the combustion process, so that's quite some punishment an engine can sustain, even ash from volcanic eruptions are survivable by a jet engine.
Indeed. But those are only relatively short interruptions of the operation of jet engines which they are (mostly) designed to survive. Continuous use of a fuel additive for which the engine is not designed will eventual cause a noticeable decline in performance and damage.
(The story about some intern being asked to get chickens for this test and coming back with frozen ones, I believe is apocryphal!)-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Morpheus said:
You've provided zero evidence that geo engineering is not happening. Let's start there first shall we. What's your evidence other than your opinion?
Oh dear! I didn't say it wasn't happening (although I think small scale weather modification is). I just gave my reasons why I don't think chemicals are 'smuggled' into aviation fuel on commercial jets or involves the connivance of personnel working in those fields.
But I'm still waiting for the evidence of special aircraft doing this. The skies are full of 'chemtrails' some days so there must be thousands of them. Where are they taking off and landing from? Who is maintaining them? And most of all where are all the thousands and thousands of tons of the stuff being manufactured, and distributed without anyone knowing anyone who is involved in this massive operation?-
1
-
-
55 minutes ago, sock muppet said:
On commercial aircraft the cabin crew have very little to do with the maintenance of the craft, please correct me if i am wrong, the cabin crew are also isolated from the rest of the plane while in flight, please correct me if i am wrong, a jet engine is nothing more than a tube with a fan in it that compresses the air and fuel is added to the compressed air and ignited, the sustained explosion then turns the fan faster forcing more air and more fuel to the mix to achieve thrust, please correct me if i am wrong.
The cabin crew have no idea of the fuel being used, the cabin crew could be told anything about the unusual characteristics of the fuel, perhaps told that it enhances fuel economy, why doubt what you are being told, what evidence would they have to suspect anything unusual.
The only parts that would be compromised would be the injectors for the fuel and the fan blades after the ignition point and of course the housing these things are encapsulated within, the ignition of the fuel may not produce anything of a solid nature until the exhaust hits the low pressure low temperature of the atmosphere where it then can readily condense to what we term
contrailsCHEMTRAILS.The maintenance crew are tasked with specific areas of the aircraft so not all crew would be dealing with the fuel system or indeed the engines, only those crew would be able to tell of modifications in those areas of concern, and again perhaps told that the unusual systems adapted to the engines could be for testing new fuels for efficiency, why not it's all about saving the Planet and climate change and nobody would be lying either because that is the mantra employed, but perhaps deception is in play where normal people think of good things associated with this terminology, the evil bastards actually mean the opposite, please correct my glaring errors?
You are correct. The cabin crew have nothing to do with the maintenance of the aircraft - short of pointing out things like bad air-con, galley equipment faults or other generally minor problems. But the engineers tasked with maintaining the engines know what they're doing and what to look for. Not only that, routine engine swapping between aircraft is done to spread operating hours and closely check for wear, etc. which would show up if fuel that varied from the very specific formula for which the engines were designed was ever used.
Before anyone suggests the chemicals are kept in special tanks completely separate from the fuel, each aircraft has a known laden weight. Not only that but airport load control know what that is, so airport staff and the pilots would certainly be aware of anything that caused their maximum cargo weight (even on passenger jets) or handling to be incorrect.
I find following a conspiracy is great fun. Unfortunately knowing what would be involved to make it happen can be deeply disappointing... :(-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, sock muppet said:
Most are not even aware that this is a thing yet, so how could there be any whistle blowers, a whistle blower acts on conscience, if this has not registered past the, 'naah, they wouldn't do that, would they?' filter, then why would anyone bother to risk a nicely paying job, evil is insidious, more insidious than you can imagine, because it knows how to blind you.
Perhaps you haven't worked in a test environment where results are matched across lots of teams - sometimes internationally - against base-line measurements. And I'll repeat; jet engines are designed to run on specifically formulated fuel. Any additive will not only show up in performance tests, but will leave evidence in the combustion chambers, or might even cause engine damage that would require expensive investigation and repair.
-
1
-
-
On 4/28/2022 at 2:47 PM, eddy64 said:
well if i was working for the gov id put the chemicals in the fuel at the refinery, if you had government operatives working there you could send any altered aviation fuel batches where you wanted them. much harder for peeps to prove anything if only a few people working at the refinery know what's up.
Except that would damage the precision engineered jet engines, alerting all the international maintenance engineers. Not to mention the aviation fuel test labs all over the world who asses the chemical balance and quality of the fuel prior to fuelling.
So I can't see it being 'smuggled' into aviation fuel past a whole chain of a people and tests. Unless you believe thousands are involved in this conspiracy. We need a fuel-test or engine mechanic whistle-blower. Surely from all those involved there must be dozens by now...?
-
7 hours ago, SimonTV said:
What do you make of the gap in the trail?
Does anyone here know anything at all about atmospheric physics, or even a basic understanding of meteorology? What you can see is just local humidity or temperature changes occurring at the plane's altitude.
-
On 4/22/2022 at 5:25 PM, sock muppet said:
Doing a search on the serial number associated with that switch takes you to this web site and it is an aviation site but you have to join to view the item.
And as soon as you land on the page chat bubbles fire up immediately, curious.
https://www.avspares.com/mros/search?parts=BAC27DCC3265
I removed the hyper link for privacy reasons.
Surely no one actually thought the chemtrails switch photo was a genuine control? It's a joke, a parody. Search 'Chemtrails switch' in Google Images and you can find plenty more, including before-and-after pictures doctored by Photoshop. (Though good research and lateral thinking by Sock Muppet!)
-
1
-
-
@ Macnamara
She's just repeating the usual chemtrail talking points. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see any evidence or test results.
Yup. And here's evidence of a chemtrail switch in a chem-trailing aircraft. -
On 2/4/2022 at 10:40 PM, Beena said:
Well my conclusions are singular. It's water vapour and thanks for the advice on re-reading the thread, but no, I saw no evidence first time around. Just speculation and pictures. Pedigree.
You're flogging a dead horse. Those who 'know' about chemtrails, (and HAARP, 5G, Sandy Hook, crisis actors, etc.) probably mean well, and feel they are part of a group which has a deeper understanding of how the world really works than the rest of us. Unfortunately vanishingly few of those who inhabit this conspirasphere could describe the difference between an electron and a moron; i.e. they have no scientific training, critical thinking skills or can differentiate between facts, evidence, belief or opinion, so find it hard to separate genuine data from cool-sounding BS.
Asking logical questions like "does anyone know anyone who is involved in chemtrail manufacture, testing, transportation, delivery, use and aircraft piloting" doesn't generate any meaningful replies, and can even attract accusations that the questioner is a paid shill.
I know this is a forum where unusual beliefs and observations can be freely discussed, but it's (presumably) also a space where alternative, evidence-based ideas can be aired.
Janet -
Any chance we can have a distillation of what remote viewers and prophets have seen as the outcome of the Ukraine war? (Maybe we don't need to include those who missed the Covid Pandemic or got the last US election wrong.)
Thanks.JW
-
Someone here will like this:
-
8 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
It was just a coincidence of course.
Anyway, how did the testing go? What did they learn from this experiment?
Yes, coincidence, though the conspirasphere (once they put the two events together) will likely come to a different conclusion.
Too early to tell what the results were. Sometimes they do this stuff just so amateurs can listen, develop their equipment, and in this case go: "gee-wizz - I can hear HAARP's signal reflected from the moon". Which is of little practical use, but pretty cool when you hear it and to know your radio gear is working well to detect other weird stuff. -
Come come people. Has no one noticed the volcano and tsunami in Tonga on 15 January? Obviously this minor pacific island has been made the demonstration target of the sinister HAARP super weapon.
-
11 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
2) nothing happens of note
- "see, HAARP isn't this deadly weapon you conspiracy theorists make it out to be"
That one!
Anyone might think earthquakes and weird weather never happened before HAARP. And we must remember, correlation is not the same as causation...
HAARP testing 13, 14 January 2022
in Environment & Climate
Posted · Edited by Janet W
More HAARP operation on 27 December. Did the HAARP followers detect it?
[/quote] The HAARP Program Office just now issued the attached Notice of Transmission for the Asteroid Bounce Experiment on 27 December 2022.
The transmission frequency is 9.6 MHz with 30 kHz Linear Frequency Modulation (LFM) and waveform repetition frequency (WRF) of 0.5 Hz. This means the Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) at HAARP will repetitively sweep from 9.585 to 9.615 MHz in 2 seconds.
The transmitted signals may be receivable at various locations around the world but the received echos will be extremely weak. Large arrays in New Mexico and California will be listening.
The associated campaign media image also is attached, and the press release can be viewed here: HAARP to bounce signal off asteroid in NASA experiment
[quote/]