octoplex

You, and others here, have clearly not listened to the the survivors' testimony. Russell Brand's victims include a schoolgirl who was delivered, via BBC chauffeur, from her school lessons to Russell Brand's house. Here, she described how Brand pushed his phallus down her throat until she was unable to breathe. Then to prevent herself from being choked to death by Brand, she had to punch Russell Brand in the stomach as hard as she could. Later, Brand ordered the schoolgirl to sit in a bathtub of water. Leaving the house, Brand demanded that the schoolgirl remain in the cold water until he returned. Being only a CHILD, and already having been nearly choked to death by Brand's phallus, the child shivered until his return. From this you got, "he was their Casanova." and she was " looking for parties, sex, money". A CHILD. Jesus. Welcome to society.

This is Jimmy Savile all over again. With zero lessons learned. If Savile had been exposed in his lifetime, and had social-media existed at the time, we would be witnessing precisely the same scenario as now. Savile's 6.6 million Youtube followers would flood internet forums. Savile's followers would claim that 'The Matrix' was attacking Savile because his brilliant work at Stoke Mandeville Hospital was exposing shortcomings in the government. Savile was being targeted by the 'elite' because he was so outspoken against the legacy-pharmaceutical / medical industry etc. If anyone on this forum is curious about whether they would have spotted Savile in his lifetime: Well, if you're uncertain about Russell Brand, then now you know the answer: You would have been totally oblivious to Savile. He would have completely fooled you. The reason why people like Russell Brand and Savile abused children on such a widespread scale is because society cannot accept this reality. At the same time that Savile was roaming about the UK sticking himself into anything that smelt like child, is it implausible that the BBC was sending taxi cabs to relay a supply of children to Russell Brand? The Times and the Mail and Channel 4 appear to have bet the house on it. This is not a small bet. Why did the BBC supply Russell Brand with school children? Did we forget the reason why presenters are allowed on the BBC? They are almost all compromised. The BBC is the broadcasting arm of the Freemasons. Sure, we can debate it all day; in idiot land. But those who learned from Savile have left Idiot Land. We see BBC television presenters for what they are: pedophiles and trainee pedophiles. Society is unable to entertain the simple realization that a person who is deeply evil, and abuses children, is successful in doing so precisely because their public-persona disguises them. Is Brand charismatic? Of course. Was Savile? Yes. This is the reason they were chosen for these roles. They are actors. They are split. They were likely groomed from childhood; their psyches split and fractured intentionally. They are bipolar. This is even the name of Brand's tour. Don't forget: unconsciously these people are human. They seek an escape from the Freemasonic hellpit of their puppet-lives. Was Russell Brand the mainstream media in disguise? Finally, the idea that Russell Brand was 'alternative' media was absurd to begin with. Anyone who watched his broadcasts on Rumble etc over the last two years has seen that Brand takes whatever CNN broadcasts and disputes it. While this is certainly better than parroting it, all Brand does is splash about in the cess-pool of nonsense spewed from the pipes of the Associated Press. Truly independent media frames its own stories. Brand has not been attacked by 'The Matrix', he is The Matrix. Was Brand trained for this role? There is a reason Brand refuses to take psychedelics: They would heal the split in his psyche; and force him to face the horror of his split-aspect. There is a reason that Brand NEVER talks on the topic of Epstein's Island. There is a reason why Brand has never been de-platformed from YouTube. He is YouTube. He is CNN. He is the Royal Family. Welcome to Savile Part Two Did you learn anything from Part One? Or are you going to make all the same mistakes? Incidentally, there's a reason why these survivors didn't go to the police. Russell Brand and the British police are members of the same club. So are the courts. Welcome to Britain: Freemason Hive. Trial by media? Let's hope so. It's not like there's some other kind of trial in the UK that members of the neo-Savile-caste, like Brand, will ever face. When the police have failed; and the courts have failed, for multiple-generations, to prosecute their Freemasonic-brothers, all that survivors have left is the media.

Agreed. Russell Brand even wrote an illustrated book, packed with Freemasonic iconography, in which a powerful Freemason kidnaps "gorgeous" children and plays on the "shaft" of his pipe. Sadly, most of British society is so scared of the reality of who governs them, that their emissaries, like Brand, can literally (in literature) tell people who he is, and there is zero reaction. It reminds me of how everyone knows Joe Biden is a pedophile, and his own daughter (Ashley Biden) says so in her verified diaries, but society just shrugs and carries on. How long will the general public tolerate the rule of the pedos? It's become almost comical to watch the contortions that must be gone through by people to deny it.

Russell Brand can be heard, on tape, offering Jimmy Savile direct sexual-access to his staff. But to you this "Doesn't sound like particularly friendly terms". Wow. The damage-control on this is extraordinary. “I’ve got a personal assistant, and part of her job description is that anyone I demand she greet, meet, massages, she has to do it. She’s very attractive, Jimmy.” — Russell Brand, 2007, BBC. Listen again:

The basic psychology of projection now suggests that dirtydog's hard drive should be examined. He's already re-framed Brand's oral-rape of a child as "having sex", then, as a finale, he told us that those who think that sexual contact with children is wrong are a "problem". Personally, I'm glad to be a problem. I think we got ourselves a live one here in the forum. Wow. This is the social context in which survivors make their reports. You can see the problem, no? British society is decades from making progress in this arena.

Save it for the courts, Russell. Or are you Prince Andrew?

The mainstream news reports are incidental. Many of us have been collecting evidence on Brand for years. The media reporting on it now is just of minor interest.

This is fascinating. If I think having sex with children is wrong; I am the problem? This is what we're dealing with. Welcome to British society. Incidentally, Brand raped the child, according to her account. Even if a person is sick enough to regard British consent-laws as morally justified. Also: Guys, I think we've finally located Russell Brand's account here!

Agreed. Let's just implement the jury-system for government. It's used in every significant trial in the land. And limit the government-jury's reach to the roads, sewage, water and power-grid. End this madness already.

The current zeitgeist is to pursue men who have had sexual relations with CHILDREN in the past... Corrected that for you. We know that Russell Brand raped at least one child, by her own account in The Times newspaper. Don't think that users on this forum won't notice the way you are re-framing this.

You're absolutely correct. A lot of legitimate anti-msm mouthpieces are being silenced. In the case of Russell Brand, however, we were dealing with a fraud. He was being positioned to cause substantial damage later down the line. The most pertinent question about all of this is: Why are Channel 4 and The Times finally reporting on this after all these years? Brand has, in the past, been seen as untouchable because of his ties to the Freemasons and The Crown etc. Are some of these legacy-media groups going rogue? Or, is the Freemasonic-elite intentionally placing brand in a 'Whicker Man' that the British 'villagers' can 'burn' so that they don't burn those who pull Brand's strings? Did Brand displease his higher-ranking Freemasons? Remember that the way these networks function is that 'kompromat' on a Freemason is released if that Freemason 'betrays' the group. Are we witnessing the release of this kompromat? In short: Does the British Crown know we are coming for them? Is Brand's excommunication by the Freemasons a kind of 'chaff' countermeasure to slow our march towards Buckingham Palace? Or, did Brand upset the Freemasons? Or, did part of the legacy media suddenly grow a soul?

This would not be a win for the elites. The only reason Brand was positioned as an "anti vaccine" mouthpiece is so that he can later be used by the pedo-elite to mislead his 'followers'. The elites position people like Brand as controlled-opposition, to function as a fail-safe in the event of failure. Brand was one such fail-safe. The Covid hoax was, ultimately, a failure. As a failsafe-measure-"guru-of-the-people" devised by the establishment, Brand has the trust of millions and will lead his "followers" astray in the next major 'event'. Unless, of course, his 'followers' realize why Brand is positioned where he is. Brand has abused the trust of millions. Denial in his followers is a natural response. Then anger. Then acceptance. Call it 'rehab', if you like.

Many of us knew this was coming for a long time. David Icke himself issued multiple warnings about Russell Brand. This is just the tip of the iceberg. What comes next is truly disgusting. I have more evidence to share in this post. Incidentally, Brand is probably never going to end up in a court; for the same reasons Savile was never going there either: 1. The British Court system is infested with Freemasons; of which Brand is one. 2. Brand has direct ties to pedophiles in the British Monarchy. I feel we must also be honest with ourselves here: British society tolerates a known pedophile holding the highest-office in the land. What hope do any of Brand's survivors have in a British court? Near zero. Additional Evidence I offer the following evidence for consideration. I have presented this evidence in the form of some questions: Why did Russell Brand write a book full of Freemasonic iconography in which "gorgeous" children are led away by a 'pied piper'? In this book, there is a contest for "The Most Gorgeous Child in Hamelin". The narrator (Brand) gushes over the kids in Hamelin, and "adored" one child for the "blooming circle of blood around his right nipple". "Bob is so delicious," a character remarks of a child, "his hair smells as sweet". Here are some images from the book written by Russell Brand. This forum's right to reproduce these images for critique is legally protected under the terms of 'Fair Use' enshrined in United States law (17 U.S.C. § 107) and fair dealing, in the UK. Copyright, therefore, does not apply. First, we enter through a Freemasonic Archway. Note the black and white motif, and sculpture at the top of the door: The "Pied Piper", curiously resembling Brand himself, arrives dressed from head-to-foot in Freemasonic iconography: The "Piper" leads the "gorgeous" children away by playing a "pipe". Note the perspective on this drawing. Eyes rolled back: Then compare this passage in Russell Brand's book: To these accounts, published in The Times newspaper, by a woman he sexually assaulted: Again, take another look at the image above and square it with this account from a child that Russell Brand raped. Also, as reported by The Times. You can also see, from Russell Brand's book, that Brand is aware how the Freemasonic power-systems work. What is the pattern on the mayor's tie in this illustration? Note, also, the crown: And why is that same pattern in Russell Brand / The Pied Piper's eyes later in the book? I think we get the picture now, no? Why did Russell Brand tell Tucker Carlson, in reference to the behavior of drug-addicts around children "the [children] who are five or six, they won't ever have really seen it... or remember it"? What is Brand referring to as the "it" the child will not remember? No modern trauma-therapist still realistically believes this nonsense that children do not remember abuse. At this point in the interview Brand loses his composure and immediately then begins to fidget excessively with his clothes and microphone. Then takes his cardigan off and sips water. He has said too much, and knows it. You can watch this in the video, here, at 18mins 15seconds in. Even Tucker seems a bit lost for words in response, but does not call Brand out on the statement. Society struggles to challenge these abusers. How did Russell Brand make his trip to the USA for the Tucker interview without being 'vaccinated'? The US government was coercing all plane passengers to have an experimental injection before being allowed into the USA at the time. Why was Russell Brand on such friendly terms with Jimmy Savile? Let's revisit a recording of their phone call here: Summary Why was Russell Brand positioned as a guru and alternative-voice? What is a pied-piper? Why did Jimmy Savile do charity work? What is controlled-opposition? What is ingratiation? Was Jimmy Savile the British crown's only supplier of children?

Many of you are probably wondering why the Cabal is now re-playing their Covid narrative. After all, if the hoax failed to deliver the 'Cabal' Total-World-Domination last time, why would it work this time? Especially now that even more people are self-educated on the fraud. Plainly, it won't work now if it didn't work then. What we are witnessing therefore is a 'Failure Tantrum'. This is the point in psychotherapy where the 'patient' is confronted with the inescapable futility of their deluded-behavior, and begins to kick the furniture over and smash the windows. In other words, the 'patient' (The Cabal / Deep State) now feels an unconscious sense of futility. Their behavior-pattern (serial-homicide) has been exposed. The 'patient' can no longer conceal their pathology behind a veneer of surface-level confidence-trickery. We then get a rapid-repetition of the pathological behavior, regardless of its usefulness to the 'patient'. At this stage in our hypothetical 'therapy' session with The Cabal, we might observe that The Cabal's basic inability to understand boundaries is no longer covert; it is now overt. The 'patient' (The Cabal) understands on some level that the previous-strategy has failed disastrously. However, this previous strategy was the only way the 'patient' has ever known as a means to relate to the world around them. The patient inherently lacks imagination. The Cabal's hostility and violence is innate to their personality. It was forged through torture and abuse in their childhoods. It does not respond to conscious de-escalation. This pathology cannot be up-rooted in 'therapy'. Currently, then, the 'patient' (The Cabal) is trapped in a 'Failure Tantrum'. Their mechanism of abuse is exposed and well-known, but The Cabal has no other strategy. In the absence of an alternative means of relating, the 'patient' (the Cabal) can only repeat previous behavior (mass-homicide), but now in the full-view of the 'therapist' and others. In this final-phase, the 'patient' is, on some level, learning that society has placed boundaries on them. These were precisely the boundaries that should have been established in childhood. There is a reason why most major-politicians are known pedophiles (Biden; Trudeau; Macron) who have been testified against. These figures come from families where there were no boundaries and multi-generational abuse. These 'patients' (The Cabal) will repeat their abusive strategies until a boundary is established. We are therefore currently in the final stage of the Covid Hoax. This is the phase in which the 'patient' (The Cabal) acts out a final-time. However, Earth's communities are now sufficiently awake to the strategies of The Cabal and the Pedo-Elite will soon be expelled from society. This does not require any organized-effort precisely; society will do it innately. It just takes some time. It is in our nature. The human immune system works in much the same way; it can take a while to identify the pathogen. Fevers can repeat, and an illness can potentially last many years. Our worldwide-bio-psycho-social immune system has reached a critical point where the 'pathogen' of centralized pedo-governments has been identified. We are now in the last fever of this illness. First we will see collapses of regional-governments; then centralized; then the monarchies. It will be surprising to many how fast this happens. Just as a fever can break overnight, and health return, so too can a global Cabal fall overnight. After all, it is just a large-pathogen that has invaded our planetary system. Hold on tight; brighter skies ahead :)

Rather than introduce new material into the 'official narrative' of the sinking of the Titanic, I'm interested (for the sake of simplifying the debate) in accepting the 'facts' of the official narrative, but questioning its internal-contradictions. Here are some new questions: 1. Given that it is not disputed that the ship-builder himself, Joseph Bruce Ismay, was on board the Titanic, why did Ismay not object to the attempt to turn "hard to starboard" to avoid the alleged iceberg? As the architect of the Titanic, Ismay would have known that, at such a late stage, the Titanic would be more likely to stay afloat in a head-on collision with an object, rather than a side-on swipe. Colliding with the side of an 'iceberg' was allegedly what sunk the ship because multiple compartments were breached along a large stretch of the hull. Is there evidence of any decision making process in this regard? 2. The official narrative proposes that last-minute passenger-cancellations (not by least ship-owner JP Morgan) were entirely normal. Is there data available for other major ships on their maiden-voyage at the time to determine if the last-minute cancellation volume (and by passengers of such 'prestige') was normal? 3. Was Titanic the first ocean liner that was billed as "unsinkable"? Who made this marketing decision? Had such a promotional campaign been run previously with another ship? For consideration: If someone, loudly and publicly, tried to sell me an 'un-crashable car' I would think them either deeply naive. Unless, of course, they were contriving a plot-arc that will cause impressive newspaper-headlines when the inevitable happens to the car. I'm interested in all (non-hostile) thoughts and feelings on this topic. Incidentally, the internet is flooded with 'straw man' theories on the topic of the Titanic. These 'straw man' theories are likely contrived by the same groups who were involved in the sinking. In other words: there's a lot of nonsense out there designed to give the impression that there is weak evidence that the sinking of the Titanic was intentional. In fact, the evidence is extremely strong. That said, I'm not going to outline all the strongest evidence here, yet. First, I need answers to various questions, and then I intend to present a very robust case soon.

Absolutely. The cycle begins in these schools and universities. It's fascinating to learn precisely how these 'top' universities systematically groom students to become puppets of The Empire as adults To dig deeper: It's clear that the notion of university per-se is deeply entwined with freemasonic systems. Students achieve 'degrees'. The mortar-board hats also have links to freemasonry; both in an obvious way — traditional 'masons' use mortar boards to mix mortar, to bind stone — but the hats are also a metaphorical symbol — the student's mind is effectively boxed-in by the freemasonic 'learning' system they are put through. Finally, the square / diamond is arguably a simplified glyph for the masonic logo itself; the dividers and square. Obviously, context is important — not all squares / diamonds depicted in our world are obfuscated freemasonic-logos. However, a constellation of items suggests, in this case, it is a glyph. Consider: - Degrees - Mortar-board hat - Diamond / squaring of the head - Long cloaks. Together these items strongly suggest that, in deconstructing the notion of a 'University', we are looking at an initiatory freemasonic-system; A kind of Hitler-youth club for the Crown. Sometimes it is hard to perceive those establishments of the Crown / freemasons (pedophiles) which are so culturally pervasive. The familiar becomes invisible. We have learned to accept universities despite their horrors. As the article made plain. It will be interesting to see how long this fraud can sustain itself now that whistleblowers are coming forwards. The entire root-network of this cult is being dragged up through the soil; and into the light. Exciting times!

Having explored Germany extensively, both in print and physical reality, I can conclusively say that it is the most evil place in the world. I don't say this out of xenophobic-impulse; it is provably true. I even speak the language. I had German friends who used psychedelics to heal from childhood trauma and so many of them had been ritually-abused as children. The woods of Germany are full of occult groups who ritually abuse the children of the villages. It's literally like walking into Mordor. Of course, it is possible for the naive-traveler to experience the superficial beer-and-brätwurst-Disney-version of Germany if you pass through on a summer holiday. However, spend any time in Germany and (with your eyes open) you'll discover that the country runs on occult ritual-abuse. Germany never confronted what happened there in WWII. The Germans claim to have transcended their 'difficult past' of concentration-camps and occultist-politics. The reality is that they all still drive Vokswagens (the car company which built concentration camps inside its own factories); wear Hugo Boss (Nazi uniforms) suits; and muzzle their children with glee. National Socialism was, at its heart, an occult movement, not a political one. The big secret in modern-day Germany is that most of them are still Nazis. Yet, they prize themselves on their capacity for deep 'self-reflection after the war'. This combination of evil and self-delusion makes Germany the most hostile and dangerous place I have ever traveled. Never again. Nie wieder.

Texas might be a good option to emigrate to soon as they are now establishing their own gold-backed currency. If you're looking for a place that is actively fighting back against the pedo-elite at a high intellectual level, Texas is (unexpectedly) a global high-point of resistance. As we know, the monetary system must no longer be 'fake' if a society is to have a strong foundation. Anywhere that is still central-bank controlled is still at the mercy of the pedos who print worthless-fiat and dish it out to the zombies and 'smart'phone palm-staring masses. The only problem is that you'll have to get through the border to the US to get to Texas. Most of us on this forum are likely on some kind of CIA-watch-list because we threaten the ongoing existence of their pedophile ring. We also threaten the Lord of All Pedos (Joe Biden). His daughter, Ashley Biden, wrote in her diaries that he molested her. His son, Hunter, listed Joe as "Pedo Peter" in his cellphone... As for entering Texas: The answer is not to fly in. Instead, walk or swim across from the Southern border, which no longer exists in any meaningful sense. Happy travels ! See you in Austin :)

Looks like the establishment is crumbling fast: Exeter University is now reported to have been a kind of trauma-based training-camp for upcoming journalists and political figures. There's also a British knight named who led the operations there. The article linked below shows how specific journalists at papers like the NME, regulators like Ofcom, and political parties like the Green Party, were, as students at Exeter, groomed through abuse to occupy these positions. Now, covertly, they enact the will of the British Crown. It's a shocking story, and includes the rape of two students; the manslaughter of a professor; and ultimately the corruption of the British media establishment — by design. If you've ever wondered how those 'famous journalists' are groomed and abused for these positions, this will blow your optics. Link: https://dakotaskyhawk.com/Degrees-of-Deception-1.html

Great question. On a sub-orbital level, the 'spider' is likely to have been the (now dead) Queen. There are numerous reports of her having an identical appetite to Philip for certain types of 'food', let's say. Savile often 'cooked' for them both. There's a general suspicion that the 'spider' is someone behind the scenes. But, as we know from these people's modus-operandi, the 'elite' like to be seen. They do not take pleasure in their work if they cannot be 'adored' by the public. The 'elite' must be publicly adored as it is part of their sickness; they need external validation. They have no ability to self-assure. For this reason, the Spider is often the 'richest' most publicized human-form on earth at any given moment. This public position of 'power' is their reward for decades of serving extra-orbital interests. There are always several spiders in-the-making. For no reason in particular, I am thinking of Bill Gates and Joe Biden. And, for no reason in particular, although he is now the 'richest' person in the world, I am thinking of 'King' Charles. Clearly the extra-orbital influence that created the so-called 'elite' has been dismantled. Because, what we appear to be left with is a bunch of confused-Freemason-types trying to hold their global crime syndicate together. Only now they have no external support off-planet. This is the reason why this pantomime is unfolding. We are slowly discovering that the 'elite' did not gain their positions through intelligence. Now that intelligence is required, they keep making mistake after mistake. I mean: Is it really a good idea to hold a public 'coronation' for a 'king' just months after his associates in government tried to genocide us all in a 'pandemic' (hyped-up seaonal-flu). Where are the Crown going to run the parade route? Won't the streets be lined with citizens who the 'king' and his friends very recently tried to 'vaccinate'. How are the crowds now going to respond to a man in a gold hat mincing about their neighborhoods? Especially when aunt Jane and uncle Jack recently blood-clotted themselves to death-by-excessive-television-watching. You have to give the current 'spider' one thing: He's SERIOUSLY brave if he's actually going to hold his jamboree in public. Wow. Really, wow :)

Me too. Another survivor went as far as to run a sting-operation on the British Crown itself, and exposed the entire thing, in writing.This video shows how he reported the murder of a little girl at a Crown-run camp. The police correspond with him for over a year and don't even ask for the murdered girl's name. Instead, they try to entrap the whistleblower:

Her video is available on YouTube in most countries. But not the UK. VPN into another country and you can see, on YouTube what the British Authorities do not want you to know about. The British Crown controls the 'crown' courts; so obviously the video was censored by the Crown / Freemasons in the UK. Outside the UK, however, there are more Constitutions and 'freedom of speech'. So you can still watch the video there. Without a VPN. Here's a link to a mirror of the video on another platform: https://rumble.com/v2d869q-the-testament-an-investigative-report-into-british-childhood.html I recommend others here make their own mirrors of the video. It completely decimates the Freemasons. A very brave, intelligent, little-girl outwits an adult Freemason. On video. Inspiring!

Correct. At a certain level of depravity, the system converges. In other words, MI5; MI6; the CIA etc are all branches of the same organization. These three-letter agencies operate at the behest of the Anglo-German monarchies. They are not separate entities. The Freemasons are the occult-ritual-abuse arm of the Anglo-German Aristocracy. Some of these Freemason are useful idiots (they think they've joined the adult Boy Scouts, and aren't told the truth); many others are predatory pedophiles. Here's a glimpse into the Freemasonic order that 'King' Charles will be King of. In this video, one very-clever child of a 'high'-ranking Freemason made sure a video was shot that exposed it all:

It's definitely interesting that, in Charles' case, we have a precise historical record of his trauma-based mind-control upbringing. Aside from known-pedophile Mountbatten clearly shaping Charles, there's his father, Prince Phillip. Phillip was (in my experience) a worse pedophile than Savile. I have been able to compare notes with other survivors of this Phillip-Saville 'team' in childhood. Savile also supplied Prince Philip with children. Savile confirms this in an interview, which is here: Then we have Prince Charles trauma-conditioning at Gordonstoun school, where he was (as just one example) "caged, naked in a basket, under showers" https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/12/child-abuse-at-prince-charles-former-school-scotland The school was a famous rape-camp for elite children to have their childhood's destroyed in. There is much more to say, but to keep it short regarding 'King' Charles circumstances: 1. Groomed by Mountbatten; epic pedo. 2. Raised partially by Prince Phillip; epic pedo. 3. Attended Gordonstoun child-rape camp. 4. Nurtured by Jimmy Savile; epic pedo. What hope did Prince Charles ever have? He was groomed his whole life to be 'King' (a word which is a euphemism for "someone who you should never let babysit your children"). Obviously, I have sympathy for the children Charles' effects, but Prince Charles is like a mindless half-human monster, roaming lovelessly in the prison-cell of his own mind. No amount of money, jewels, crowns or brass bands is going to heal the abuse he suffered as a child. The guy is trapped in hell. It's sick to watch society applaud this man. It's like celebrating a person who embodies every mental-health symptom ever. Wouldn't it be kinder if we all agreed, as a society, to abolish the monarchy? Then our children will be safe again. The alternative is to bear witness to this depraved festival of a 'coronation'. One in which Charles, a trauma-survivor of childhood sexual-torture, is trotted about the place like a rancid corpse. It's ugly for him; disgusting for us. How are people tolerating this level of insanity? It's become PURE COMEDY.

Thanks Truthblast. I'll have to check out the documentary you've linked to. Tim Cook is clearly the latest in a long-line of troubled tech-figureheads. It seems like -- as with politics -- once a company is successful enough, corrupt-forces oust the legitimate CEO and install one of their kompromat-drenched puppets in his/her place. Watching Tim Cook in interviews (don't, by the way, it's unsettling) he can't actually speak a coherent sentence without 'umm'-ing and 'err'-ing through it. Just as with Gates, and Zuckerberg, it looks like Tim Cook's human-suit is restricting the movement of his scales, and he's aching to rip his human-flesh-balloon-skin off; burst out; and emit a reptilian howl into the starry night sky. Who works for these companies anymore? Imagine taking instructions from CEOs who claim to be captains of industry, but can't even speak whole sentences in their mother-tongue. A lot of these CEOs don't know how to move like a human, and struggle with 'adult' relationships... The movie Pirates of Silicon Valley (2000) is also very revealing on the topic. Watching that movie closely, the filmmakers are giving us come very strong indications about Bill Gates' sexuality that clearly led him later to certain dinners and investments later... The scene in the club is particularly obvious. For years, it seems like it's been an open secret in Silicon Valley that many of these tech CEOs are not into 'adult' relationships... Cook is just the latest revelation in a historical trend.