Jump to content

spideysensei

Members
  • Posts

    494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by spideysensei

  1. 2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

     

    if you think that a hermit can live a life of ignorant bliss then you are assuming that they will be left alone by events

     

    and what i'm saying is that no one is going to be left alone by events.

     

    There will be no blissfullness through ignorance. All that will be achieved by people burying their heads in the sand is that they will bring catastrophe down on themselves even faster

     

    so truth is the horse not the cart because it is ONLY through engaging with the truth that we would be able to avert the catastrophic events that are coming down the pipeline.

     

    So as far as i'm concerned a chart of where someones shallow level of emotions are at from one moment to the next is not so significant as to what extent they are trying to build a relationship with the truth because ultimately only that process is going to bring them any sort of lasting, deeper connection to anything

     

     

    I've taken your initial post to be more philosophical than was intended. You've come at it from an intentional angle and are busy creating strawmen out of my words just to make a point. That's fine but it's not really a discussion.

  2. 23 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

     

    You assume that the ignorant are somehow going to be left alone by the 'great reset' and the turbulence ahead.

     

    I've never said anything of the sort. You came at this from a broad angle with your 'truth scale' but have now zeroed in on a specific 'truth' that adds new context to the dialogue. You can't very well accuse me of assumptions i've made because i haven't followed your train of thought, which is impossible unless you're more explicit to begin with.

     

    Even so, i don't know what you're contesting in what i've actually said, which is essentially that, a person living in a lower state may be more susceptible to a comfortable lie, than someone who is already functioning higher.

     

  3. 13 hours ago, Macnamara said:

     

    i think you are putting the cart before the horse

     

    I was thinking the same of you.

     

    13 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    your emotional state will depend on how well you are able to engage with the truth

     

    But now i wonder whether we're even in disagreement. There's probably some cyclical nature to it. Can one be in a good state without knowing a truth? I don't see why not, a hermit might not know much but they may be in a pretty good state of emotional health. If truth is rejected then there's probably some fall back to a lower level.

  4. 12 hours ago, Macnamara said:

    doesn't your engagement with the truth then affect where you end up on the scale above?

     

    Possibly one's level affects how one responds to a truth? Otherwise i would think it's independent. Someone living in fear/anger may reject a truth. Someone already 'empowered' may be less inclined because their state doesn't depend on externalities. Of course that's a hard state to reach.

  5. Very similar structure here with the enneagram's levels of health/development scale. https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/levels-of-development

     

    Only difference is it's type based, so it hones in on the particular strengths/difficulties. You can easily cross reference the two. A enneagram type 8 at levels 19-22 is probably sociopathic and violent towards others, a type 4 at that point is often equally destructive towards themselves. The Abraham-Hicks categories have broad enough appeal to suit the general psyche of everyone to some degree, so on that basis i like it.

     

    I'd guess i'm at 6-7 on your scale today. Day off work, couple of wake&bake spliffs and i'm gonna go out for a run in the nice weather in a bit. Might be enough to push me up to 4-5 later!

  6. 31 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

     

    I've had a look at some, i don't understand them all, but some are easy enough, like the very first one. Some need a better res photo.

    Regards the first, it is pretty interesting i'll give you that. It's evidence of a connection between the two parties (although not tippy top proof). It's not proof to me that "Q"/Trump is on the side of the people, because this may have been engineered this way to fit the overall Q narrative.

     

  7. 2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    plus the optics need to appear to be tptb are still the ones driving this. 

     

    This appears to be in contradiction with a subsequent comment i'll get to...

     

    2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    Right off the bat, are you informed on election fraud? seen the documentaries (2000 mules and Lindells multi hour multi part doc) and seen the evidence of manipulation? then read the posts about covid and mail in voting/fraud and who owns or runs voting machines/companies. Realise the world went on lockdown for USA to steal an election. I believe we weren't supposed to come back out of lockdown until a vaccine was developed which would ordinarily take many years.

     

    Might this be a case of present the worst scenario to the public (the public in this instance being Trump/Q supporters), but ease them into what they were after all the time? "It could've been much worse if not for us" they'll tell you. But did it have to happen at all? Why did anyone have to be injected for a fraudulent pandemic?

     

    Yes i believe the election was also fraudulent, embarrassingly so, to the extent that i wonder whether it was intentional to stoke the ire of Trump supporters.

     

    2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    as for why isnt this ending right now, the people involved in the cult have infiltrated pretty much every bastion of power, influence and control worldwide.

     

    Here's where i see the contradiction. You claim that Trump/white hats are in charge, yet at the same time they've been infiltrated and so are not actually calling the shots?

  8. 14 hours ago, sock muppet said:

    I went back in the thread to find some posts that might help in your 'awakening'

     

    I think our standards of evidence are a little different. For me this is such a far out idea it needs to have extremely convincing evidence. Same reason i don't believe in ghosts... never seen one, never seen evidence that can't be explained some other way/fakery. It's possible you'll never meet my standards but it could also be true, not ruling that out either.

     

    14 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    I think that is more in regards to allowing the deep state to believe they are in power still so their plans continue and expand, more people see it pick up pace, more people wake up in time. The important aspect appears to be deep state believing they are in Presidency

     

    Meanwhile the 'deep state' are allowed to run roughshod over the general public, by poisoning them, shutting down their businesses, and making all the other changes they want for the reset. So, if the deep state aren't really in charge, why are 'white hats' allowing this to happen? They could stop all of this carnage right now, but they won't, for some reason?

    • Like 1
  9. 26 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

    As I say, happy to be wrong.

     

    I'm not, because you being right essentially solves everything going on in the world right now. It just sounds too good to be true. It's an extremely convoluted plan, and as i gather, it has to be this way to ease the shock of having everything revealed to the people? (correct me if wrong).

    There's always the chance that things such as Biden not flying on AF1 have been purposefully engineered to gel with the Q psyop (assuming it is).

    To be honest, i don't know. It'd be cool as hell if you were right, and if you are, there doesn't seem to be any downside to maintaining scepticism.

    Thanks for the info.

  10. 2 minutes ago, Captainlove said:

    Can't wait for the first transgender football team coming soon.

     

    Yes, but it won't be for a while. It'll trickle in over the next 10 years, and by that time the under 12s who've had gender reassignment surgery will be coming through the ranks. They'll probably get special privileges to do so.

     

    I know some of the feminism is a bit laughable, but better that than castrated males taking over their sport. So from that pov, count me in as an ardent feminist. Continue to take your tops off if you like ladies, it won't get any complaints from me.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  11. 7 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

    Trump comments regarding wall and who will build the wall if Pelosi and Schumer do not allow budget for the wall?

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-threatens-to-have-military-build-border-wall-if-pelosi-schumer-wont-budge - at the time they were after a spending bill of around 12 billion, 0 of which was designated for a wall. Looked in to the details of their covid relief bill spending breakdown?

     

    I'm finding it difficult to parse the meaning in your post. What are you actually suggesting is happening regarding the wall?

  12. Agree with all points made. The problem i have with the likes of the BBC isn't the extra coverage the women have been getting, it's the fact they would love to see the women's game infiltrated with men, which it will be in 10 years give or take. They're just sad it's not going to happen sooner. So fuck the BBC, women are just another vehicle to suit whatever agenda they have going.

     

    I've been watching the Euro's anyway and i'm really impressed with the quality and how far they've come. Of course they're not going to beat the men, but i wouldn't refuse to watch a women's boxing match because they'd get pummelled by Tyson Fury. That said i think some of the play is a very high standard, especially the goalkeeping nowadays (used to be infamously terrible). Pound for pound i think they could take on Championship level teams maybe higher. 

     

    What actual level of the men's pyramid could they play at though? I'm sure they would be beating junior/schoolkids, these women are fit and muscular *drool*. Amateur leagues? Well, as long as it wasn't amateur refereeing, and they were playing on a good pitch. Maybe amateur teams can route 1 them off the pitch just with height/strength, but if they had their game together with favourable conditions they could do it. Pro level is probably where they'd really struggle.

  13. What if the real purpose isn't to stop human trafficking?

     

    After all, Hillary and Obama have both called for a border wall in the past.

     

    It's only racist when our controlled opposition is fronting it!

     

     

    • Like 1
  14. 40 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Coming from a biased position.... Non-Q believer! 🤣

     

    I completely agree, but saying one side has it down more than other makes you sound biased.

     

    Indeed i am probably biased, my point is that scepticism is a more favourable position than belief. If Q is right none of us have to do anything anyway. Oh well the sceptics get egg on our faces. I can take that if we are rid of the evil. If Q is wrong there may end up being consequences for believing as opposed to not.

     

    40 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

    Now it's going to end one way or another with a lot of angry and upset people, or a load of non-Q believers (myself included) owing people big apologies.

     

    Apologies not needed imo. Every Q supporter should understand the value of scepticism towards beliefs and narratives, or they are no better than their opposition.

    • Like 1
  15. @Grumpy Owl

    @Anti Facts Sir

     

    Thanks guys, i see your point. For me it would just be minor corrections or adding info. It's not important, sometimes not even on topic. Just times where i've realised later i may have said something factually incorrect.  Perhaps if there were allowances based on the rep system. One can edit for example if they have a ok ratio of rep points, minimum 100-200 posts or summat. Could call it, The DI social credit score. Or DISCS for short. "Sorry mate you can't edit that, your DISCS have slipped".

    • Like 1
  16. One general difference between Q believers and Q sceptics is that the believers want to be right, and the sceptics want to be wrong.

     

    How fortunate it would be for a group of elites to not only be on the side of good, but to guarantee they will eventually prevail without anyone else lifting a finger ('extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence').

    Q sceptics are practising better science; demonstrating how it is not true, because the consequences of a wrong assumption are even more dire.

     

    Q believers spend their energy demonstrating how it is true. Decoding, pattern recognition, gematria, etc. As such they are more prone to confirmation bias, and in some cases could qualify for an Olympic team with their gymnastic ability.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...