Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by webtrekker

  1. Apologies @MarcusOmouse I had to delete that post as I hadn't realised it was from 2021. Don't know why it hasn't been mentioned before though.
  2. Comment from TCW Defending Freedom site, and I couldn't agree more ...
  3. I found this very short 4sec video showing LF tests under a UV torchlight ... https://www.bitchute.com/video/SuBseAqfDdAY/
  4. If this proves to be true, and it's certainly worth looking into, then it alone will blow the lid off the whole game.
  5. Nice piece by Jon Rappoport ... COVID vaccines were designed to fail; that’s HOW they won authorization For the past two years, I’ve been demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a fake. It doesn’t exist. Now let’s enter the bubble where people assume the virus is real, and examine a few of the major crimes and contradictions that exist inside that lunatic bubble. by Jon Rappoport January 21, 2022 I wrote and posted this piece while the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were doomed to fail. They did fail. Since then, nothing has changed. The vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials that, even on their own terms (“the virus is real, fear the virus”) were destined to be a complete flop. PART ONE: Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials. They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials. September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know” [1]: “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?” “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.” “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.” “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.” “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.” This means these clinical trials are dead in the water. They are only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES. The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive. Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments. “The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…” Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups— those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial. Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID. The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.” The outcomes for 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.” That’s staggering. But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer: “In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.” But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article [2] stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive. It registers “positive for COVID” when it shouldn’t. So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that “150 people developed COVID-19” is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical. On the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On the other hand, a cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is designed to prevent. “So the magic number is 150? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?” “Of course.” “And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.” “Correct.” “And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.” “Yes, that’s right.” “But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.” “Indeed.” “Why?” “I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.” “Thank you, sir. And that’s tonight’s news. Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone. It’s vital. This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South. The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects. Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.” PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK: Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how… The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to… Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine. Stick with me. This is big. Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success. Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers. Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars. Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops. Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water? Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.” BUT suppose 75 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 75 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective. Now comes the “reshaping of the data.” HERE WE GO. The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. There were 110 in the placebo group. The vaccine IS effective. We’re good. We’re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.” Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick. Why leave things to chance? Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials? The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail. They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.” However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur. That might never happen. If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases… They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that. FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…” The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine. These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race. And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely. EPILOGUE: The punchline. Every “expert,” in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is definitely protecting people against severe illness and hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world. “Yes, even if you’re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus, you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people, BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely ill.” As you can see from what I’ve written above, this is a straight-out lie. It was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine development, because the design of the clinical trials had nothing to do with preventing serious illness. SOURCES: [1] nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opinion/covid-vaccine-coronavirus.html [2] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
  6. Those fans must have been on some real good shit before they went backstage!
  7. Of course it is. You can see where they've made a piss-poor job of removing the Shutterstock logo!
  8. I've had shills on Twitter disputing this data but here's the link to the actual data presented on the ONS site ... https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021 Dispute THAT, motherfuckers!
  9. Oops! Apologies BC, I completely missed your post.
  10. I make that 3,362 MALE + 2,821 FEMALE = 6,183 people that have actually died FROM Covid-19 between Feb 2020 and the end of Dec 2021! Hardly a PANDEMIC!
  11. In a word, PHOTOSHOP! In fact, nowadays, he probably uses AI to insert his ugly mush into thousands of images while he sits around doing fuck-all.
  12. Don't know about satire, but I believe the original was aired in Oct '21 so yes, it is a bit suspect! Saying that though, the agreements made by Pfizer are real and I wouldn't be at all surprised at any future grab of land and assets.
  13. WTAF?!!! ... Pfizer seizes HMAS Stirling Naval Base after Morrison fails to meet vaccination targets Mon 10:46 am +00:00, 17 Jan 2022 posted by Weaver Pfizer has taken control of HMAS Stirling Naval Base in Western Australia, after EZFKA Prime Minister Scott Morrison failed to meet vaccination targets for the third month in a row. Pfizer stated that the deal, signed under the terms of the Trans Pacific Partnership, allowed the pharmaceutical corporation to claim the military base similar to deals signed around the world, including with many South American nations. “It’s specifically stated in the contract that Morrison signed with us that he put up Garden Island and Kapooka as two assets we can seize as collateral,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said. “We wanted the Port of Darwin but that’s already been taken.” PLAN ships are due to arrive in Rockingham next week to complete the seizure. https://www.ezfka.com/2021/09/13/pfizer-seizes-hmas-stirling-naval-base-after-morrison-fails-to-meet-vaccination-targets/?fbclid=IwAR1yfGdj1q6nmluS0WlT_Y2f4lTa_TmQhmdNcOdpx8k4bRiGbeQk7UpV3r I know what was in these agreements, signed by all governments, but never thought they would actually sign over military bases to fucking Pfizer! We're DOOMED! (... if the article is true!).
  14. Great comment from TCW's 'Letters to the Editor' section ... 150,000 dead? I’m not impressed! Dear Editor Don’t get me wrong, every death is a tragedy for someone. But having passed the ‘magic’ figure of 150,000 dead since the ‘pandemic’ surfaced, it has featured once more as a bludgeon in the government’s scare canon. At risk of playing the same old fiddle, ‘impressive’ figures quoted deliberately out of context remains a key government strategy, and needs to be countered with a more realistic context. There are some 10,000 council wards in Great Britain. These are the drawn boundaries for local elections, and are as good as any definition of ‘your local neighbourhood’, certainly for the purpose of this analysis. Divided into a population of around 65million, a council ward averages 6,500 inhabitants. On average, 15 people have died from Covid in each council ward (your neighbourhood) over the past two years. Fewer than eight people per year. Not even one per month. Shock! Horror! Plague! And let us not forget that ‘150,000 dead’ is based on dodgy testing and includes the cancers and the road accidents ‘who died within 28 days of testing positive for Covid’. These figures are so tiny one wonders whether anybody has died from Covid as opposed to with Covid. John Drewry Beckenham
  15. Germ Theory versus Terrain Theory ... Here's something worth remembering ...
  16. Not only Johnson, but Dowden and ALL of these fuckers must GO! ...
  • Create New...