Jump to content

webtrekker

Members
  • Posts

    3,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by webtrekker

  1. Oh well, that didn't last long! I reactivated a Twatter account I had set up years ago and never used and now, after a few short weeks, I'm BLOCKED! All I did was point out to @JeremyVineOn5 that Yasmin Alibhai-Brown was an 'uneducated old bag' for her comments regarding vaccination of 5-11 year olds. I guess the truth hurts! I certainly wont be supplying a phone number to reinstate my account.
  2. Link: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/new-israeli-weapon-causin-internal-human-combustion-on-defenceless-protestors-this-must-end_f5RJep8JKQnlGom.html?fbclid=IwAR2BAn2yjICIstTFCPAYYJeRoI6X77pYVoD60ZUQ1DD9rIQE59OomeBdgdc I then found this from a 2009 The Register article ... Link: https://www.theregister.com/2009/09/02/atl_first_flight_test_against_target/
  3. It's time we sent the warmongers (parliamentarians, elites, Royals, Blair etc) to the wars they are responsible for to defend the country and people they fucking SERVE!
  4. Yeah. I use FlightRadar24 quite a bit and each week there are many 7700 General Emergency squawks. Here's the one mentioned in the first link from Alicante to Edinburgh (diverted to Manchester) ... I have FR24 set to notify me every time a plane squawks 7700 anywhere in the world. Notifications seem to be on the increase.
  5. PROOF that Case Number 6029679/21 really is proceeding as a LIVE POLICE INVESTIGATION. MP refuses to answer Questions on Case 6029679/21 – “It would be inappropriate to comment on a Live Criminal Investigation” By Patricia Harrity on February 13, 2022 • ( 1 Comment ) In a response to a constituent who had contacted him regarding the Criminal Case number 6029679/21 a Member of Parliament replied, “Thank you for contacting me recently regarding a criminal complaint that was lodged with the Metropolitan Police in December, with allegations made against various Government ministers and officials, as well as members of the media.” The MP from Halesowen and Regis, James Morris continued, “As these allegations are now subject to a live criminal investigation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on them further.” What he is referring to is the complaint that was formally lodged on Monday 20 December 2021, with the Metropolitan Police (London and Greater London) at Hammersmith Police Station, London. The complaint was made by Philip Hyland, a lawyer from PJH law, Lois Bayliss, a lawyer from Broad Yorkshire Law, Dr Samuel White, a medical doctor, and Mark Sexton, a former police officer. by a team including retired police constable Mark Sexton and lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland to the Metropolitan Police in Hammersmith, London, UK, requesting the immediate halt of the experimental vaccine roll-out pending Police forensic examination. The team has brought the complaint of alleged offences of Corporate Manslaughter and Gross Criminal Manslaughter against defendants including: AstraZeneca Pfizer Moderna National Health Service (NHS) Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency (MHRA) Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) Her Majesty’s Government. The Background The UK government began the rollout of the “COVID vaccines” in early 2021, the said vaccines received a temporary Emergency Authorisation (EUA) under regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012). The vaccine trials are still ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022 or early 2023. The treatments have no long-term human safety data available, and only one year of short-term data. This has shown that the treatment does not prohibit infection of the virus which is termed “COVID-19” nor do they prohibit any transmission of any disease. In fact, there have been multiple reports of adverse effects and deaths attributed to the treatment. The criminal case, despite many individuals feeling disgruntled due to their local police force claiming they have no knowledge of it, is actually gaining traction. This week the police were in receipt of an interim forensic report showing analysis of the four most utilised vials of vaccine from Morena x2, Astra Zeneca, and Pfizer (source) The report concluded that there is now definitive proof of the inclusion of: Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol Graphene Composite Form 1. Graphene Composite Form 2. Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions. Graphene Nano Form with and without fluorescence Graphene nano objects Graphene nano scrolls. The summary of findings of the toxicology report: (source) The Police Submission States The first and foremost duty of the Police is the protection of life. It is therefore incumbent on the Police that they take action to halt the roll-out of these experimental treatments immediately and until their own forensic investigations have been completed. Again, there are reasonable grounds for doing this. The main potential defendants in this matter, as listed above, preclude them from conducting any investigation themselves. It is a matter for the Police only. The fact that Member of Parliament James Morris was not able to respond, is therefore further proof that the Criminal Case is in fact being treated in the manner it deserves and is being investigated.
  6. They're most likely all in underground bunkers. Seriously.
  7. Thanks for that, CC & Simon. David Martin is one of my all-time favourites and that last video you posted is right on the money. A great one to share, and I will be.
  8. Excellent interview with Jennifer Arcuri last night [Plays from set time] ... https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=249482
  9. Seriously, READ THIS and pass it on to the parents or anyone planning on taking these vaccines. Everyone who's had them is GOING TO DIE from them ... https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/12/covid-vaccinated-became-gmo-humans/ EVERYONE IN THIS FORUM SHOULD READ THIS AND PASS IT ON!
  10. Pfizer Adds Warnings to Their Financial Review That Safety Data “May Impact Business” By Patricia Harrity on February 11, 2022 • ( Leave a comment ) It would appear that Pfizer is anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2021 Earnings release on February 8, 2022. These changes seem to be centred around disclosures of unfavourable safety data. We could assume they are aware that the ordered release of their COVID vaccine Clinical trial data may cause them a few issues. According to Rubicon Capital’s Kelly Brown who in his own words, is an “accidental & unofficial COVID-19 data analyst, “Pfizer added new and peculiar items deep in its business risk disclosures re: clinical trial data” He notes on a Twitter post that “the changes centre around disclosures of unfavourable safety data.” For example, in the fourth quarter, Pfizer added: the line “or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection.” These changes that are referenced above, were found in Pfizer’s earnings releases. The links are below. Quarter 4: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file… Quarter 3: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file… To Recap A freedom of information act request (FOIA) resulted in Pfizer being ordered to produce data which amounted to over 329,000 documents. However, it would seem that there was an attempt for the information to be buried when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) challenged the FOIA in court. Justice Department Lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request. This would have meant that 500 pages a month would have been released, meaning that the safety of the Pfizer product kept under wraps until 2076. This request was refused and courts ordered the compliance with the FOIA. The FDA were to turn over the documents and as reported here at the Expose the first batch of data was released. Even within the first few pages it was clear that the vaccine approved for emergency use authorisation was not safe. In one document titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, it is evident that in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths (source) . Pfizer vaccines adverse events “confidential” document, showed thousands of conditions under a heading termed “Special Interest” these conditions may develop post-Pfizer vaccination meaning that every person who had taken the jab were not in possession of the facts or the risk involved by taking it. In other words, informed consent was never obtained. The Pfizer report concluded that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favourable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine. Pfizer’s Misleading Risk Reduction Report However, Pfizer reported that their vaccine showed a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that is not actually what that number means. The 95% figure refers to the relative risk reduction (RRR), but it does not tell you how much your overall risk is supposed to be reduced by the vaccine, that can be determined by the absolute risk reduction (ARR). In the Pfizer trial 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the jab were said to have developed that which was deemed to be COVID. In the unjabbed placebo group 162 individuals were said to have developed COVID-19. This means that even unjabbed the risk of contracting COVID was very low at 0.88% and the jab was said to have reduced this figure to .04%, which means that the absolute risk reduction that would be the main reason to have the Pfizer jab is 0.04%. The 95% refers to the relative difference between the 0.88 and 0.04% which is a 95% relative risk reduction and relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number which is why the FDA recommend using the absolute risk reduction instead (source) The 1% Overall Benefit That would not do though, as Pfizer would be sure that people would not be so keen to have a jab that offered less than 1% overall benefit. Nor would they have been so keen if they had known the actual potential risks of taking the jab. Possible Outcomes from the Pfizer cominarty Jab And more………….. (source) Pfizer appeared to have known that they needed to cover their financial bases from potential liability Pfizer asked for liability protection due to their, to put it in mildly, “misleading” promotion of their product. Pfizer received blanket immunity from liability through the EUA, however, this product is deadly yet it is others who are being financially burdened. Pfizer was even accused of “bullying” Latin American governments during negotiations to acquire its Covid-19 vaccine, and the company has asked some countries to put up sovereign assets, such as embassy buildings and military bases, as a guarantee against the cost of any future legal cases, according to an investigation by the U.K.-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism. However, if Pfizer are found to have been fraudulent it eviscerates all contracts which will mean that liability from vaccine damage will rest firmly with them (Source). They are still making plans for the babies to be jabbed. Pfizer have continued to shown reluctance to release the clinical trial documents, that really should have been made available prior to the vaccine rollout to enable true informed consent. With what we already know through their first batch of documents released, it really begs the question- What more are they trying to hide? What more could there possibly be? And importantly, why have the not been held to account already for the harm they have caused? It seems that even if Pfizer were now to say their vaccine was not safe and effective, the covid cult, would be calling them antivaxxers!! Lets hope the data release will quickly Impact the Pfizer business. Finally I though this was interesting and also hopeful.
  11. Posted on The Daily Sceptic (formerly Lockdown Sceptics). https://dailysceptic.org/2022/02/05/should-we-welcome-the-johnny-come-latelies-to-the-sceptical-fold/ I'd love to hear all of your opinions on this interesting question.
  12. BOMBSHELL Pfizer FOIA Proves Covid-Jab's a Bioweapon & Government Know They're Committing Genocide Rumble — "The Covid-Jab will make Thalidomide look like a joke." The preponderance of evidence that has come to light now proves, without a shadow of a doubt, that governments the world over are committing genocide against their own people. This Canadian FOIA request of Pfizer's own documents prove that the Covid-Jab is a bioweapon that has no medical benefit whatsoever. The only conclusion that can be made, in light of this bombshell information, is that governments are intentionally and knowingly committing Crimes Against Humanity against their own people. Pfizer's documents prove that the intent of the Covid-Jab is to maim and kill, and that this is no longer speculation, but proven established fact. https://rumble.com/vtqxdu-bombshell-pfizer-foia-proves-covid-jabs-a-bioweapon-and-government-know-the.html
×
×
  • Create New...