Jump to content

webtrekker

Members
  • Posts

    653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by webtrekker

  1. 13 minutes ago, zarkov said:

     

     

    Press release29 June 2021Brussels

    COVID-19 Therapeutics Strategy: Commission identifies five promising candidate therapeutics *

     

    “Vaccination against COVID-19 offers the best way to end the pandemic and get back to a normal life. In parallel, we are working to have the best treatments available for those who are infected.” *

     

    The EU Strategy on COVID-19 Therapeutics delivers today its first outcome, with the announcement of the first portfolio of five therapeutics that could soon be available to treat patients across the EU. Four of these therapeutics are monoclonal antibodies under rolling review by the European Medicines Agency. Another one is an immunosuppressant, which has a marketing authorisation that could be extended to include the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

    Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, Stella Kyriakides, said: “Today we are taking the first step towards a broad portfolio of therapeutics to treat COVID-19. Whilst vaccination is progressing at increasing speed, the virus will not disappear and patients will need safe and effective treatments to reduce the burden of COVID-19. Our goal is clear, we aim to identify more front-runner candidates under development and authorise at least three new therapeutics by the end of the year. This is the European Health Union in action.”

    The five products are in an advanced stage of development and have a high potential to be among the three new COVID-19 therapeutics to receive authorisation by October 2021, the target set under the Strategy, provided the final data demonstrate their safety, quality and efficacy. The products are:

    A new COVID-19 indication for existing medicines:

    • baricitinib immunosuppresant (a medicine that reduces the activity of the immune system) from Eli Lilly: an application for extension of marketing authorisation for COVID-19 indication is under assessment

    Newly developed monoclonal antibodies under rolling review - a regulatory tool to speed up the assessment of a promising medicine during a public health emergency:

    • combination of bamlanivimab and etesevimab from Eli Lilly: under rolling review
    • combination of casirivimab and imdevimab from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd: under rolling review
    • regdanvimab from Celltrion: under rolling review
    • sotrovimab from GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, Inc.: under rolling review

    Next Steps

    The Commission will draw up a portfolio of at least 10 potential COVID-19 therapeutics by October, building on the work of the newly established expert group on COVID-19 variants.  The selection process will be objective and science based, with selection criteria agreed with the Member States. Since different types of products are needed for different patient populations and different stages and severity of the disease, the expert group will identify product categories and select the most promising therapeutics candidates for each category based on science based criteria. 

    The portfolio will contribute to the objective of having at least three new therapeutics authorised by October and possibly two more by the end of the year. The European Medicines Agency will start more rolling reviews of promising therapeutics by end-2021, subject to research and development outcomes.

    The Commission recently concluded a joint procurement of monoclonal antibodies (casirivimab and imdevimab) and could launch more by the end of the year.

    The first industry matchmaking event on therapeutics will be organised on the 12-13 July to ensure that once authorised therapeutics are produced in sufficient quantity as soon as possible.

    Background

    The EU Strategy on COVID-19 Therapeutics aims to build a broad portfolio of COVID-19 therapeutics with the goal of having three new therapeutics available by October 2021 and possibly two more by the end of the year. It covers the full lifecycle of medicines from research, development, selection of promising candidates, fast regulatory approval, manufacturing and deployment to final use.

    The Strategy forms part of a strong European Health Union, using a coordinated EU approach to better protect the health of our citizens, equip the EU and its Member States to better prevent and address future pandemics, and improve resilience of Europe's health systems.

    The Strategy, which focuses on the treatment of patients with COVID-19, works alongside the successful EU Vaccines Strategy, through which safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 have been authorised for use in the EU to prevent and reduce transmission of cases, as well as hospitalisation rates and deaths caused by the disease.

     

     

     

  2. 13 minutes ago, zarkov said:

     

     

    Press release29 June 2021Brussels

    COVID-19 Therapeutics Strategy: Commission identifies five promising candidate therapeutics *

     

    “Vaccination against COVID-19 offers the best way to end the pandemic and get back to a normal life. In parallel, we are working to have the best treatments available for those who are infected.” *

     

    The EU Strategy on COVID-19 Therapeutics delivers today its first outcome, with the announcement of the first portfolio of five therapeutics that could soon be available to treat patients across the EU. Four of these therapeutics are monoclonal antibodies under rolling review by the European Medicines Agency. Another one is an immunosuppressant, which has a marketing authorisation that could be extended to include the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

    Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, Stella Kyriakides, said: “Today we are taking the first step towards a broad portfolio of therapeutics to treat COVID-19. Whilst vaccination is progressing at increasing speed, the virus will not disappear and patients will need safe and effective treatments to reduce the burden of COVID-19. Our goal is clear, we aim to identify more front-runner candidates under development and authorise at least three new therapeutics by the end of the year. This is the European Health Union in action.”

    The five products are in an advanced stage of development and have a high potential to be among the three new COVID-19 therapeutics to receive authorisation by October 2021, the target set under the Strategy, provided the final data demonstrate their safety, quality and efficacy. The products are:

    A new COVID-19 indication for existing medicines:

    • baricitinib immunosuppresant (a medicine that reduces the activity of the immune system) from Eli Lilly: an application for extension of marketing authorisation for COVID-19 indication is under assessment

    Newly developed monoclonal antibodies under rolling review - a regulatory tool to speed up the assessment of a promising medicine during a public health emergency:

    • combination of bamlanivimab and etesevimab from Eli Lilly: under rolling review
    • combination of casirivimab and imdevimab from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd: under rolling review
    • regdanvimab from Celltrion: under rolling review
    • sotrovimab from GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, Inc.: under rolling review

    Next Steps

    The Commission will draw up a portfolio of at least 10 potential COVID-19 therapeutics by October, building on the work of the newly established expert group on COVID-19 variants.  The selection process will be objective and science based, with selection criteria agreed with the Member States. Since different types of products are needed for different patient populations and different stages and severity of the disease, the expert group will identify product categories and select the most promising therapeutics candidates for each category based on science based criteria. 

    The portfolio will contribute to the objective of having at least three new therapeutics authorised by October and possibly two more by the end of the year. The European Medicines Agency will start more rolling reviews of promising therapeutics by end-2021, subject to research and development outcomes.

    The Commission recently concluded a joint procurement of monoclonal antibodies (casirivimab and imdevimab) and could launch more by the end of the year.

    The first industry matchmaking event on therapeutics will be organised on the 12-13 July to ensure that once authorised therapeutics are produced in sufficient quantity as soon as possible.

    Background

    The EU Strategy on COVID-19 Therapeutics aims to build a broad portfolio of COVID-19 therapeutics with the goal of having three new therapeutics available by October 2021 and possibly two more by the end of the year. It covers the full lifecycle of medicines from research, development, selection of promising candidates, fast regulatory approval, manufacturing and deployment to final use.

    The Strategy forms part of a strong European Health Union, using a coordinated EU approach to better protect the health of our citizens, equip the EU and its Member States to better prevent and address future pandemics, and improve resilience of Europe's health systems.

    The Strategy, which focuses on the treatment of patients with COVID-19, works alongside the successful EU Vaccines Strategy, through which safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 have been authorised for use in the EU to prevent and reduce transmission of cases, as well as hospitalisation rates and deaths caused by the disease.

     

     

     

  3. Pro-Jab Professor’s ‘Quick Death’ After COVID ‘Booster’ Shot

    Published on September 28, 2021

    Written by John O'Sullivan

     

    nnnn.jpg?resize=450%2C155&ssl=1

    Zealous COVID vaccine promoting professor who attacked anti-vaxxers as “selfish” dies after getting her third jab. In what is fast becoming a pattern of quick deaths after the so-called “booster” shots, Mrs Karen Croake Heisler was notorious for using her Twitter account to attack anti-vaxxers.

    The former Notre Dame scholar had been a passionate campaigner for endless mask wearing and social distancing. She insisted those who refuse to take the experimental COVID19 gene therapy should be locked in their homes “till they see sense.”

    Her demise caught the attention of social media followers who suffered her ire. As Jim Crenshaw writes:

    “This bitch needed to go. Her middle name was “Croake”…she did. Some things just work out. Blamed the unvaccinated for her illness. As I have said, it is not about intelligence level. It is about environment. A college professor. Really. This is what is killing doctors and health care professionals. They are so deeply sold on their own abilities and bullshit they cannot see the truth no matter what. She killed herself and does not know it. Her family I am sure blames the unvaccinated for her death. There is a war brewing with these people.”

    Video source: www.bitchute.com

     

     

  4. 2 hours ago, epsom said:

    I HAVE NO INFORMATION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THIS ----ANYONE HAVE ANY INFORMATION?

     

     

    242808281_908915013163302_7867491408293850289_n.jpg

     

    If they were going to do this don't you think it would have already started by now? It's just more scare-mongering.

     

     

     

  5. 1 hour ago, TwopackShugar said:

     

    have fun with tap water i guess... that does seem like a direct hit piece on RO systems, i mean if it requires professional maintenance then so does every other water filter system. We can go back and fourth but im guna say if you trust the government saying chlorine is safe in drinking water you are a little screwy. alkaline water is a interesting, but who the heck knows what that will do and if we should ingest alkaline water.

     

    Well, all I can say is that anyone gullible enough to pay for expensive water filtration is as crazy as someone paying Big Pharma for worthless medical treatments.

     

     

     

  6. Excerpt from Tapewswire article:

     

    To sum up: Fluoride in the water could potentially make future generations of people compliant, gullible and stupid.

     

    Or, in other words, it’s the perfect thing to start pumping into the water when you’ve just tried to launch a global coup, and not enough people are falling for it.

     

    https://tapnewswire.com/2021/09/uk-to-begin-nation-wide-fluoridation-of-tap-water/

     

     

     

  7. 23 minutes ago, TwopackShugar said:

    Yeah he needs stopping, but people also need to understand that they need a R.O. water system they are like 300$ and the best drinking water around

     

    What are the disadvantages (cons) of RO filtration?

    • Wastes as much as 6x the amount of clean water produced
    • Requires professional maintenance to ensure effectiveness and safety
    • Removes healthy minerals including calcium, magnesium, potassium and bicarbonates
    • Relatively expensive starting from $300 + maintenance and replacements
    • Risk of bacteria growing in the water after the filter since the chlorine has been removed

    Also, the WHO says (if you believe anything they say!): 'Low mineral (TDS) drinking water produced by reverse osmosis or distillation is not suitable for long term human consumption and in fact, can create negative health effects to those consuming it. This lack of minerals may also impact the taste negatively for many people.'

     

     

     

  8. Quote

    Excessive fluoride consumption is toxic to human beings in a variety of ways. But despite this, over 5 million people in England have drinking water that is intentionally polluted with fluoride, and now Professor Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, has advised the UK Government to intentionally add the toxic substance to the entire nations water supply.

     

     

    This MURDEROUS FUCKER needs stopping, NOW!

     

     

     

  9. `Today, children, instead of writing an essay about what you did in your summer holidays, I want you to write a paper on how the nasal flu spray may interact with the experimental mRNA jab, with particular reference to those individuals with compromised immune systems. And then, children, explain how the Government will blame the extra deaths on covid-19. You have twenty minutes to complete your essay.’

     

    https://tapnewswire.com/2021/09/shocking-urgent-news-share-widely/

     

     

     

  10. 24 minutes ago, whatthefoxhat said:

    Why not indeed i'm sure they'd be given a warm welcome and her madge is looking for a new husband,I just wish we had those 2500  US marines you've got,maybe they could keep the flotilla in check,all we get are US fighter planes

     

    Yeah, the Taliban got a better deal than us from the US! 🤣

     

     

     

    • Haha 1
  11. 14 hours ago, Macnamara said:

      

     

    I fully expect them to try and control food production which is why they created codex alimentarius

     

    The point i'm trying to make is that marching in the street is not enough to stop them. People have to both refuse to do everything that they tell us to do as well as doing everything that they don't want us to do

     

    I'm not advocating that people just march, i'm advocating that people turn their lives into a living protest

     

    We aren't just pushing back on some small faction that has managed to encamp at the top of our system, we are dealing with an entire corporatocracy where elite bloodline families who have been organised in secret societies for centuries have created CORPORATIONS to act as legal vehicles for their business dealings and they have gained control of governments through assassination, threats, bribery, central banks, taxation systems and all the rest

     

    We were in deep shit BEFORE covid its just that many people didn't realise it which is why i was advocating back then BEFORE covid that people do all the things i'm saying now like rejecting all smart tech, growing your own food, working to become self-reliant, boycotting the corporations and buycotting the alternatives

     

    I'm advocating the creation of an entirely separate and parallel system because think about it....even if by some miracle one of the protests somehow changed the direction of the government (will never happen) you still have the problem of the fact that we are all living in the cabals corporate system

     

    The covid jabs are just the latest toxic product the corporations are pushing on us. Why would you selectively reject the covid jabs whilst still drinking the corporations fizzy drinks with neurotoxin aspertame in it? Why would you eat food sprayed by roundup (with glyphosate in it)? Why would you drink water that's been fluoridated (destroys IQ)? Why would you eat meat pumped full of sodium nitrate and sodium nitrate (carcinogens)? Why would you have a smart phone in your pocket irradiating your balls whilst it spies on everything you do?

     

    I could go on and on....

     

    They are waging a full spectrum war against us and that requires a full spectrum response

     

    Smashing your smart phone and moving your money out of their banks and stopping eating their junk food is a far more powerful action then any march will ever be and if you grow your own food you are not only avoiding the toxins they put into their products but importantly you are taking away market share from their businesses

     

    If enough people did that their system would fail. Its that simple but people just don't want to hear it. They want to think that marching or rioting will change everything and then everything will simply go back to normal and everything will be tickety-boo. They are not living in the real world

     

    end_pandemic.jpg.a99f112e3096c7bd8276647a2a977903.jpg

     

     

     

     

    • Like 4
  12. 2 hours ago, jack121 said:

     

    Looking at the angle of the syringe it is not even lined up with ugly whore arden's shoulder.

    No one injects one handed.

    The needle seems to be going behind the ugly whore cocksucking-bitch's back, not into her satan worshipping body at all. No wonder she is grinning, thinking about all the millions of soon to be dead sheep

     

    Fake!

     

    I've been told the proper procedure is to always use BOTH hands, One to inject, the other to line up the target, commonly known as 'landscaping,' I believe.

     

     

     

  13. 11 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

    Is this realy where we at with public health? Adding poison the water supply to help teeth? Why stop at that? why not add mRNA in to the water supply to boost the anti-bodies of the population? This is why nothing should ever be added to the water supply for any justification. Water should only be filtered and supplied as from source. 

     

    It is quite obvious that adding anything to the water supply is not done for people's health but to harm it. 

     

    When asked how he lived so healthily in the swamp-infested jungle Tarzan beat his chest and replied ...

     

    'Ha! Me no daft, me no silly, me get water from my willy!'  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...