Leaderboard

As I see things, there are a few aspects to this question. First of all, we live in an age where most people are now accessing the internet through smartphones. Unfortunately this generation is now so 'hooked' on using apps - for social media etc - that they have simply forgotten that the rest of the internet exists, outside of Facebook, Instagram, X, etc. Secondly, major search engines such as Google and Bing, favour search results by big corporations and organisations that pay the most to 'sponsor' certain keywords. Which is why whenever you search for some subject, you'll always find the same usual 'mainstream' sources featuring prominently on the first page of results. Lesser known websites barely get a look in, and certain websites - such as this forum - find themselves 'blacklisted', and never appear. There are millions of people 'online', yet they've all been herded and corralled into only seeing and participating with a select few (controlled) websites on the internet. People are chatting in Facebook Groups, or Reddit threads. But they don't realise that these behemoth platforms are also home to thousands of 'agent bots', that set up fake accounts.

Not chemo, immunotherapy

COVID was a worldwide fear based psy-op. I know people who still rush to get the test every time they feel sick just so they have a label to stick on themselves "I've got covid" It still amazes me that folks will take a random jab that they have no idea what is in it, and don't even bother to find out prior to introducing it into their bodies.

The immigrant who got locked up in Epping has been accidentally released. man hunt underway. I do wonder how many times a day Tommy Robinson spits his tea out. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2d5rl36vgo

Joke of a story that should never see the light of day.

Fiona Rose Diamond was interviewed on Sky News on the day of the digital ID protest in London. Was this Sky just doing their job or was it a sign she's controlled opposition? https://www.facebook.com/reel/1955279888701875/?app=fbl https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1YELNPAsnc/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/study-vaccines-patients-academics-pfizer-b2850191.html this from independent

Other day on bbc online was an article suggesting that having a Covid jab after chemo for lung and another cancer, Can’t remember which, would extend survival times

GREEK MOMMY?

Drakeford was one of the biggest pushers of the con. He'd have had Wales under Aussie-like conditions if he could. Weasel.

https://davidicke.com/2025/10/23/digital-driving-licences-in-the-uk-greenlit-trending-ep203/

where the fk does it say on that tweet the victims were attracted to their abusers or is your "its the russians" imagination running away with itself again i'll tell you what its saying british blokes are pussies. if you think a british bloke will have your back think again, the first thing he will do is whip out his phone and film it

Listening to UK Column, I've noticed they will rail against the UK's Digital ID agenda at length, and then in another segment go on about how wonderful Russia and China is, and say things like "no one has done more to elevate humanity than China and Russia", and that is a direct quote from Brian Gerrish. Is it just me or does there seem to be something of a disconnect there? As far as I can see no one has done more to develop the Digital ID agenda than those countries, especially China. Maybe Mr Gerrish believes that the Russian and Chinese governments are totally transparent and uncorrupt and only do things for the benefit of their people and therefore sees their Digital ID measures as non-threatening and simply useful tools to increase convenience and standard of living? Or maybe he is so focused on what goes on in this country that he is simply unaware of what they do in China and Russia?

Sadly this is typical of many 'influencers' who gain a large following on Youtube and other social media - I'm reminded of when I used to follow the likes of Dave Cullen (Computing Forever, The Dave Cullen Show) and Hugo Talks. Dave Cullen started out on Youtube doing videos about 'computing stuff', tech and sci-fi, but when I started watching his videos he was already deep into political and conspiracy stuff. And then all of a sudden, he had some 'awakening' and started preaching about religious stuff, Christianity basically. And curiously, the same thing happened with Hugo Talks. This is why I warn people to 'beware the Pied Piper' - because they suck you in by 'producing content' that appeals to you, and then at some point they start going off and subtly promote some other ideology, which usually fits with what the 'establishment' agenda desires.

Thanks eve for that. I just want to understand who's to be trusted and not. But i guess we will never really know fully. As much as katie hopkins seems to say the right things, there is something about her im not quiet sure about,plus her army background is a possible flag.

Fiona first popped up at the anti-lockdown demonstration at Hyde Park on 16th May 2020 where she was arrested. She has since gone on to organise and lead many of the anti-lockdown / anti-vax demonstrations from 2020 to date whilst setting up campaign groups and websites. She says that her success as an activist is because she has worked as an events coordinator. There are a lot of people who have suspicions about her including, for example, Mark Windows and Michael Chaves (Mad Mix). Mark Windows, after his prior experience with the Occupy Movement, came out early in questioning the figureheads behind the Covid protests in his "Covid "Protest" Social Engineers" article. It's not specific to Fiona but does draw attention to how movements become infiltrated and steered into dead ends and he has since expressed misgivings about her specifically. Michael Chaves (Mick) was heavily involved in the Covid "resistance" and openly questions how Fiona has been able to set up stages and big screens in central London, apparently without permission, whilst rubbing shoulders with Andrew Bridgen and speaking at the EU Parliament. Meanwhile, a recent anti-vax sing song at a park in Croydon which Mick went to was almost immediately shut down by police. I think Mick is a good egg and I'm pretty sure he was a member of the old forum commenting on the London Bridge so-called "terror attack" in his capacity as former paramedic. Fiona has had a meteoric rise to prominence within the "freedom movement" which many feel is inorganic especially as her story involves heroically becoming sober whilst now studying law. In the earlier lockdown days, Fiona was involved in many spats alongside Kate Shemirani. At a key juncture in September 2020, Fiona and Kate were, in my opinion, sowing division which split the movement. We discussed some of the goings on in the thread below. Fiona also associates with others who some consider to be dubious such as Katie Hopkins, Mark Steele and Andrew Bridgen. Members of the forum have expressed doubt about Fiona and I have witnessed countless such discussions on Telegram among those very active within the movement. I have never met her personally (although I have seen her at demonstrations) so I cannot speak from any personal feeling about her. However, I am wary.

The Daily Mail have reported that "thousands" attended yesterday's demonstration in London against Digital ID. The video below provides a snapshot and includes interviews with David Icke, Fiona Rose-Diamond, Katy-Jo Murfin (Hope Sussex), Sean Finch (Delivering Liberty) and Piers Corbyn. To help jog your memory, Fiona Rose-Diamond - aka Fiona Hine - appears from about 1 minute 30 seconds.

Can Britain avert a civil war? https://davidicke.com/2025/10/19/can-britain-avert-a-civil-war/ Back in May, I created some upset with a piece entitled “Why mass deportations are a non-starter”. I wrote: One of the reasons mass deportations is a non-option is because the state will face major pushback on three fronts. You will recall a while back when a deportation operation in Glasgow was halted by a mob of leftists. I think we would see far larger coordinated efforts to frustrate any concentrated government action. Just from an optics and economics perspective, you can’t deploy full riot squads every time you detect an illegal immigrant. Then we should recall the Harehills riots last year when the entire community turned out to prevent the authorities taking a child into care. Deportations are a non-starter in majority ethnic areas. The third front is the media. If we set about a campaign of mass deportations, we will likely see a number of blunders the media will exploit, and the news will be wall to wall sob stories. The effect of this in mobilising popular opposition should not be underestimated. Images of families being dragged from their homes by uniformed men is too rich for the blood of the average normie. They might want something done about immigration, but the urge to virtue signal will soon assert itself and mass deportations will lose popular support. It’s just not the way to go about it. Dawn raids should mostly be reserved for terror suspects and criminals who are an imminent danger to the public. Six month on, and I stand by what I wrote. Britain is not ready for such a policy and it looks like Trump is reaching the limits of what is possible. As it happens, we’re able to see in realtime what such an approach looks like. America has stepped up its ICE raids in which have seen protests escalate into violent disorder. Anti-ICE radicals are using social media apps to dox, threaten, and terrorise ICE agents and their families. Just a couple of week ago, mobs were blockading ICE compounds and sabotaging vehicles. ICE is now deploying teargas against protestors and calling for National Guard back up. As yet, the National Guard can’t be deployed, as an appeals court ruled on Saturday. The decision to prevent the troops from protecting federal property or going on patrol comes after federal judge April Perry ruled on Thursday to temporarily block the national guard deployment for at least two weeks, finding no substantial evidence that a “danger of rebellion” is brewing in Illinois. This spectacle has not made for good headlines or good optics. It looks like the National guard will have to hold off for now. The left wing narrative is exactly what you’d expect. Some are comparing Trump to Hitler while others take the line that deploying the military for a civilian enforcement operation is a bridge too far. Of course, it’s not unprecedented for US troops to be deployed in times of unrest. During the Los Angeles riots in 1992, George H.W. Bush invoked the Insurrection Act, deploying about 4,000 Army and Marine Corps troops, alongside federalised National Guard units, to support local law enforcement. More recently, Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act during the George Floyd protests, but did not formally do so. Active-duty troops (including the 82nd Airborne) were staged near Washington DC, and National Guard units were deployed in multiple states (over 40,000 Guard members across 34 states). In DC, Guard troops and federal law enforcement cleared protesters from Lafayette Square for a presidential photo-op. For Britain, though, it would be unprecedented. The only time in living memory the British Army was deployed in a civilian setting was during the Troubles. It’s not how we do things. To my mind, any attempt to mount ICE style deportation raids at scale would immediately blow up into widespread unrest, especially following operations in Molem areas. The police are simply not equipped for such a challenge to their authority. I take the view that if ever we were going to start a programme of mass forced removals then we’d be starting a low level civil war, and there’s be no way to bring it under control without deploying overwhelming force, likely calling on civilian reserves we lack the capacity to mobilise. As such, any suggestion that we should implement such a programme is for the birds, especially given how wet the media is and, how indoctrinated the average MP is. It does not become a realistic prospect without the situation becoming a magnitude worse than it is presently. I think, though, the time will eventually come. I think soft remigration measures are inevitable, but the culmination of decades of misrule will eventually come to a head, and unless something changes significantly, civil war seems unavoidable. We’re missing all the off-ramps to avoid one. As a bare minimum, a functioning country needs a common civic identity which is impossible when there are no controls on immigration and no demands placed on foreigners to integrate. Ultimately, when you leave sectarianism to fester for long enough, you reach a point where the choice is either remigration or civil war, and since the establishment would rather not have a contentious debate about remigration, we will sleepwalk to civil war. The second element is the absence of consent for what’s been done to us. Nobody asked the English if we consented to our ethnic replacement. Now that’s increasingly likely we’ll become a minority in our own homeland, more people than ever are deciding they will not passively accept it. People are beginning to recognise that racial collectivisation is their only guarantee of survival as Britain disintegrates. We should not forget that immigration is not the only pressure on Britain. We’re also seeing rapid deindustrialisation and there’s been no significant developments in energy to take the strain off the grid. Blackouts are still looming. Meanwhile, living conditions can only worsen, and the public mood sours year on year. I ever don’t recall seeing as many protests as we’ve seen in recent years, and I don’t see them remaining peaceful while Starmer is in charge. What seals our fate in my estimations, is the trajectory of British politics. The polls all suggest a thumping Reform victory in 2029. While we can take polls with a pinch of salt, it seems highly unlikely that Reform is capable of forming a functioning, viable government and will not be able to deliver the kind of change they promise. As much as anything, their “policies” often fall far short of what is necessary. We’ve already been through the mill of a popular Tory government that promised much and delivered nothing, and a repeat performance might well be enough to convince the public (once and for all) that voting is a sham. Once that sinks in, all bets are off. https://www.northernvariant.co.uk/p/can-britain-avert-a-civil-war?publication_id=2416978&r=popli

Let's take our country back': Robert Jenrick says Brits are 'fighting' decline saying Tories must get behind 'collapse of the old order' Robert Jenrick urged Tories to 'take our country' back today as he warned the 'old order' is collapsing - and took a brutal shot at 'activist' judges. In his keynote speech to party conference, the shadow justice secretary said Brits were sick of decline and wanted to 'fight'. Snip He said: 'The collapse of the old order is in sight. A new one is coming because the British people are fighting back and, conference, there's absolutely nothing that Labour can do to stop them. 'The only choice, the only choice we have is whether we have the spirit to fight with them.' Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15169915/Lets-country-Robert-Jenrick-says-Brits-fighting-decline-saying-Tories-collapse-old-order.html